PERHAPS nowhere is the influence of the different climatic factors on the rapidity of growth so well illustrated as on the plains of Russia. Therefore W. Kowaleuski's careful researches into this subject, summarised in the Memoirs of the St. Petersburgh Society of Naturalists (xv. 1), are especially worthy of attention. The author has gathered all necessary information for showing the periods of growth of various cereals on the soil of Russia, from the far north of Arkhangelsk, to the southern province of Kherson, and he has arrived at most interesting results, of which the following is a summary. If the periods of growth of the same cereal be taken throughout Russia, it appears that, altogether, it is in the higher latitudes that it ripens fastest. Oats and spring wheat take 123 days and barley no days to ripen about Kherson, and only 98, 88, and 98 days at Arkhangelsk, the difference in favour of the north being respectively thus: 25, 35, and 12 days. The intermediate regions show also intermediate differences, while for each latitude the growth of cereals proceeds faster in the eastern parts of Russia than in the western. It is obvious that if the rapidity of growth were due to temperature, the phenomena would be the reverse of what they are. Moreover, the want of moisture in the southern steppes is also a condition in favour of the rapidity of growth: so that it is in the insolation that we must seek for the cause of the above-stated difference. In fact, oats being usually sown about May 17 at Arkhangelsk, and the harvest usually occurring about Sept. I, the insolation continues there for 2000 hours in 98 days, not to speak of the 240 hours of bright nights; while at Kherson, during 123 days (from April 1 to Aug. 1) the insolation lasts only for 1850 hours. The difference in favour of Arkhangelsk is thus equal to 150 hours (to 400 hours, if the bright nights be added), and it compensates for the influence of temperature. It is useless to add, moreover, that the cereals cultivated in the north have already undergone a certain accommodation to their conditions. As to the intensity of light, Prof. Famintzin's work on the subject, corroborated by ulterior researches, shows that the great intensity of light in Southern Russia, combined with the great transparency of the atmosphere, is rather a condition against the rapidity of growth, the intensity of light exceeding the limits of the maximum of decomposition of carbonic acid. Winter rye shows the same differences as the spring cereals. It appears from M. Kowalewski's tables that in the Arkhangelsk district winter rye takes 375 days to arrive at ripeness, of which there are 202 days of winter rest, 68 days of autumn growth, and 105 days of spring and summer growth, making thus a total of 173 days of growth. At Kherson the total growth lasts for 290 days, of which only 101 days of winter rest and 189 days of productive growth (63 during the autumn and 126 during the summer). The difference reaches thus 16 days in favour of the north, and it would rise to 20 or 25 days if only spring and summer be taken into account. The graphical representation of all these data is most interesting. Thus the lines of simultaneous sowing of winter rye from north-west to south-east correspond to the isochirnenes, while the lines of simultaneous ripening of the spring cereals—oats, barley, sarrazin, wheat—run from south-west to north-east, corresponding to the lines of equal summer temperatures. The retarding influence of rain comes out also pretty well.
Read full abstract