Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation Research Articles

Comparing Leadership Skills of Senior Emergency Medicine Residents in 3-Year Versus 4-Year Programs During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Pilot Study.

The majority of pediatric patients in the United States (US) are evaluated and treated at general emergency departments. It is possible that discrepancies in length of emergency medicine (EM) residency training may allow for variable exposure to pediatric patients, critical resuscitations, and didactic events. The goal of this pilot study was to compare leadership skills of graduating EM residents from 3- to 4-year programs during simulated pediatric resuscitations using a previously validated leadership assessment tool, the Concise Assessment of Leader Management (CALM). This was a prospective, multicenter, simulation-based cohort pilot study that included graduating 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM resident physicians from 6 EM residency programs. We measured leadership performance across 3 simulated pediatric resuscitations (sepsis, seizure, cardiac arrest) using the CALM tool and compared leadership scores between the 3 rd - and 4 th -year resident cohorts. We also correlated leadership to self-efficacy scores. Data was analyzed for 47 participating residents (24 3 rd -year residents and 23 4 th -year residents). Out of a total possible CALM score of 66, residents from 3-year programs scored 45.2 [SD ± 5.2], 46.8 [SD ± 5.0], and 46.6 [SD ± 4.7], whereas residents from 4-year programs scored 45.5 [SD ± 5.2], 46.4 [SD ± 5.0], and 48.2 [SD ± 4.3] during the sepsis, seizure, and cardiac arrest cases, respectively. The mean leadership score across all 3 cases for the 3-year cohort was 46.2 [SD ± 4.8] versus 46.7 [SD ± 4.5] ( P = 0.715) for the 4-year cohort. These data show feasibility for a larger cohort project and, while not statistically significant, suggest no difference in leadership skills between 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM residents in our study cohort. This pilot study provides the basis of future work that will assess a larger multicenter cohort with the hope to obtain a more generalizable dataset.

Rapid cycle deliberate practice versus postsimulation debriefing in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized controlled study.

Simulation plays an important role in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Comparing postsimulation debriefing with rapid cycle deliberate practice could help determine the best simulation strategy for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training among pediatric residents. This is a single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled study. First- and second year pediatric residents were enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1 ratio): rapid cycle deliberate practice group (intervention) or postsimulation debriefing group (control). They participated in two rounds of simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest to assess the simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance gain (round 1) and retention after a 5-6 week washout period (round 2). Scenarios were video-recorded and analyzed by blinded evaluators. The main outcome was the time to initiation of chest compressions. Secondary outcomes included time to recognize a cardiopulmonary arrest, time to recognize a shockable rhythm, time to defibrillation, time to initiation of chest compressions after defibrillation, and chest compression fraction. Sixteen groups participated in the first round and fifteen groups in the second one. Time to intiation of chest compressions decreased from preintervention scenario to the round 1 testing scenario and increased from round 1 to round 2 testing scenario. However, no interaction effects nor group effects were observed (p=0.885 and p=0.329, respectively). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the secondary outcomes. Despite an overall improvement in simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, we did not observe significant differences between the two groups regarding the analyzed variables. The decline in simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance after 5 weeks suggests the need for shorter time intervals between training sessions.

Trauma-informed and family-centered paediatric resuscitation: Defining domains and practices

AimFor paediatric patients and families, resuscitation can be an extremely stressful experience with significant medical and psychological consequences. Psychological sequelae may be reduced when healthcare teams apply patient- and family-centered care and trauma-informed care, yet there are few specific instructions for effective family-centered or trauma-informed behaviours that are observable and teachable. We aimed to develop a framework and tools to address this gap. MethodsWe reviewed relevant policy statements, guidelines, and research to define core domains of family-centered and trauma-informed care, and identified observable evidence-based practices in each domain. We refined this list of practices via review of provider/team behaviours in simulated paediatric resuscitation scenarios, then developed and piloted an observational checklist. ResultsSix domains were identified: (1) Sharing information with patient and family; (2) Promoting family involvement in care and decisions; (3) Addressing family needs and distress; (4) Addressing child distress; (5) Promoting effective emotional support for child; (6) Practicing developmental and cultural competence. A 71-item observational checklist assessing these domains was feasible for use during video review of paediatric resuscitation. ConclusionThis framework can guide future research and provide tools for training and implementation efforts to improve patient outcomes through patient- and family-centered and trauma-informed care.

PRE-scripted debriefing for Paediatric simulation Associated with Resuscitation EDucation (PREPARED): A multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial

AimScripted debriefing tools may improve the performance of novices debriefing in resuscitation courses, but this has not previously been measured. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a script on the quality of debriefs in a statewide paediatric resuscitation course. MethodsThis cluster-randomised controlled trial compared scripted debriefing (intervention) versus non-scripted debriefing (control) for participants in a paediatric resuscitation course. The trial was conducted across participating sites in Queensland, Australia, from November 2017 to February 2020. Debriefing quality was measured using the Observational Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) tool. The OSAD tool rates 8 domains that comprise the elements of an ideal debrief. OSAD scores between scripted and non-scripted groups were compared, overall and after stratification by debriefer experience and site size. ResultsSeventy debriefings occurred across 19 sites (intervention, n = 34, control n = 36). There was a statistically significant increase in total OSAD scores in the scripted group, compared to non-scripted (mean difference (MD) = 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–6.2, p = 0.01). The categories of ‘reflection’ and ‘analysis’ had the greatest difference in OSAD scores in the scripted group (MD = 0.8, 95%CI 0.2–1.3, p = 0.005; MD = 0.6, 95%CI 0.2–1.0, p = 0.007). After stratification, overall OSAD scores improved for novices (MD = 4.1, 95%CI 0.5–7.7, p = 0.03) and large centres (MD = 5.2, 95%CI 1.1–9.2, p = 0.01). ConclusionProviding debriefing scripts to faculty facilitating simulated paediatric resuscitation scenarios improved the quality of debriefing, especially for novices and those at large sites. The development and provision of debriefing scripts for large-scale paediatric resuscitation courses should be considered.

Comparing the Psychological Effects of Manikin-Based and Augmented Reality-Based Simulation Training: Within-Subjects Crossover Study.

BackgroundPatient simulators are an increasingly important part of medical training. They have been shown to be effective in teaching procedural skills, medical knowledge, and clinical decision-making. Recently, virtual and augmented reality simulators are being produced, but there is no research on whether these more realistic experiences cause problematic and greater stress responses as compared to standard manikin simulators.ObjectiveThe purpose of this research is to examine the psychological and physiological effects of augmented reality (AR) in medical simulation training as compared to traditional manikin simulations.MethodsA within-subjects experimental design was used to assess the responses of medical students (N=89) as they completed simulated (using either manikin or AR) pediatric resuscitations. Baseline measures of psychological well-being, salivary cortisol, and galvanic skin response (GSR) were taken before the simulations began. Continuous GSR assessments throughout and after the simulations were captured along with follow-up measures of emotion and cortisol. Participants also wrote freely about their experience with each simulation, and narratives were coded for emotional word use.ResultsOf the total 86 medical students who participated, 37 (43%) were male and 49 (57%) were female, with a mean age of 25.2 (SD 2.09, range 22-30) years and 24.7 (SD 2.08, range 23-36) years, respectively. GSR was higher in the manikin group adjusted for day, sex, and medications taken by the participants (AR-manikin: –0.11, 95% CI –0.18 to –0.03; P=.009). The difference in negative affect between simulation types was not statistically significant (AR-manikin: 0.41, 95% CI –0.72 to 1.53; P=.48). There was no statistically significant difference between simulation types in self-reported stress (AR-manikin: 0.53, 95% CI –2.35 to 3.42; P=.71) or simulation stress (AR-manikin: –2.17, 95% CI –6.94 to 2.59; P=.37). The difference in percentage of positive emotion words used to describe the experience was not statistically significant between simulation types, which were adjusted for day of experiment, sex of the participants, and total number of words used (AR-manikin: –4.0, 95% CI –0.91 to 0.10; P=.12). There was no statistically significant difference between simulation types in terms of the percentage of negative emotion words used to describe the experience (AR-manikin: –0.33, 95% CI –1.12 to 0.46; P=.41), simulation sickness (AR-manikin: 0.17, 95% CI –0.29 to 0.62; P=.47), or salivary cortisol (AR-manikin: 0.04, 95% CI –0.05 to 0.13; P=.41). Finally, preexisting levels of posttraumatic stress disorder, perceived stress, and reported depression were not tied to physiological responses to AR.ConclusionsAR simulators elicited similar stress responses to currently used manikin-based simulators, and we did not find any evidence of AR simulators causing excessive stress to participants. Therefore, AR simulators are a promising tool to be used in medical training, which can provide more emotionally realistic scenarios without the risk of additional harm.

P114 The effect of simulation-based training on airway management in simulated pediatric resuscitation

P114 The effect of simulation-based training on airway management in simulated pediatric resuscitation

Effect of a Mobile App on Prehospital Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effect of a Mobile App on Prehospital Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Impact of a Mobile App on Paramedics' Perceived and Physiologic Stress Response During Simulated Prehospital Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Study Nested Within a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are stressful, high-stake events that are associated with low survival rates. Acute stress experienced in this situation is associated with lower cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance in calculating drug dosages by emergency medical services. Children are particularly vulnerable to such errors. To date, no app has been validated to specifically support emergency drug preparation by paramedics through reducing the stress level of this procedure and medication errors.ObjectiveThis study aims to determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based mobile app compared with that of the conventional preparation methods in reducing acute stress in paramedics at the psychological and physiological levels while safely preparing emergency drugs during simulated pediatric OHCA scenarios.MethodsIn a parent, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of 14 emergency medical services, perceived and physiologic stress of advanced paramedics with drug preparation autonomy was assessed during a 20-minute, standardized, fully video-recorded, and highly realistic pediatric OHCA scenario in an 18-month-old child. The primary outcome was participants’ self-reported psychological stress perceived during sequential preparations of 4 intravenous emergency drugs (epinephrine, midazolam, 10% dextrose, and sodium bicarbonate) with the support of the PedAMINES (Pediatric Accurate Medication in Emergency Situations) app designed to help pediatric drug preparation (intervention) or conventional methods (control). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Visual Analog Scale questionnaires were used to measure perceived stress. The secondary outcome was physiologic stress, measured by a single continuous measurement of the participants’ heart rate with optical photoplethysmography.ResultsFrom September 3, 2019, to January 21, 2020, 150 advanced paramedics underwent randomization. A total of 74 participants were assigned to the mobile app (intervention group), and 76 did not use the app (control group). A total of 600 drug doses were prepared. Higher State-Trait Anxiety Inventory–perceived stress increase from baseline was observed during the scenario using the conventional methods (mean 35.4, SD 8.2 to mean 49.8, SD 13.2; a 41.3%, 35.0 increase) than when using the app (mean 36.1, SD 8.1 to mean 39.0, SD 8.4; a 12.3%, 29.0 increase). This revealed a 30.1% (95% CI 20.5%-39.8%; P<.001) lower relative change in stress response in participants who used the app. On the Visual Analog Scale questionnaire, participants in the control group reported a higher increase in stress at the peak of the scenario (mean 7.1, SD 1.8 vs mean 6.4, SD 1.9; difference: −0.8, 95% CI −1.3 to −0.2; P=.005). Increase in heart rate during the scenario and over the 4 drugs was not different between the 2 groups.ConclusionsCompared with the conventional method, dedicated mobile apps can reduce acute perceived stress during the preparation of emergency drugs in the prehospital setting during critical situations. These findings can help advance the development and evaluation of mobile apps for OHCA management and should be encouraged.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03921346; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03921346International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s13063-019-3726-4

Effect of a Mobile App on Prehospital Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation

Medication errors are a leading cause of injury and avoidable harm, affecting millions of people worldwide each year. Children are particularly susceptible to medication errors, but innovative interventions for the prevention of these errors in prehospital emergency care are lacking. To assess the efficacy of an evidence-based mobile app in reducing the occurrence of medication errors compared with conventional preparation methods during simulated pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios. This nationwide, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 14 emergency medical services centers in Switzerland from September 3, 2019, to January 21, 2020. The participants were 150 advanced paramedics with drug preparation autonomy. Each participant was exposed to a 20-minute, standardized, fully video-recorded, realistic pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario concerning an 18-month-old child. Participants were tested on sequential preparations of 4 intravenous emergency drugs of varying degrees of preparation difficulty (epinephrine, midazolam, 10% dextrose, and sodium bicarbonate). Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) to the support of an app designed to assist with pediatric drug preparation (intervention; n = 74) or to follow conventional drug preparation methods without assistance (control; n = 76). The primary outcome was the rate of medication errors, defined as a failure in drug preparation according to predefined, expert consensus-based criteria. Logistic regression models with mixed effects were used to assess the effect of the app on binary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included times to drug preparation and delivery, assessed with linear regression models with mixed effects. In total, 150 advanced paramedics (mean [SD] age, 35.6 [7.2] years; 101 men [67.3%]; mean [SD] time since paramedic certification, 8.0 [6.2] years) participated in the study and completed 600 drug preparations. Of 304 preparations delivered using the conventional method, 191 (62.8%; 95% CI, 57.1%-68.3%) were associated with medication errors compared with 17 of 296 preparations delivered using the app (5.7%; 95% CI, 3.4%-9.0%). When accounting for repeated measures, with the app, the proportion of medication errors decreased in absolute terms by 66.5% (95% CI, 32.6%-83.8%; P < .001), the mean time to drug preparation decreased by 40 seconds (95% CI, 23-57 seconds; P < .001), and the mean time to drug delivery decreased by 47 seconds (95% CI, 27-66 seconds; P < .001). The risk of medication errors varied across drugs with conventional methods (19.7%-100%) when compared with the app (4.1%-6.8%). Compared with conventional methods, the use of a mobile app significantly decreased the rate of medication errors and time to drug delivery for emergency drug preparation in a prehospital setting. Dedicated mobile apps have the potential to improve medication safety and change practices in pediatric emergency medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03921346.

Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial.

BackgroundPrehospital emergency care of children is challenging. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, when medical personnel should use personal protective equipment against aerosol-generating procedures, the efficiency of medical procedures may decrease. The study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of different intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing biosafety Level-2 suits in simulated paediatric COVID-19 resuscitation.MethodsA prospective, randomized, crossover, single-blinded simulation trial was performed. Nursing staff attending Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support courses accredited by the American Heart Association participated in the study. A total of 65 nurses were recruited and randomly assigned to different study groups. They received standard training on intravascular access methods employing distinct devices. The participants wore biosafety Level-2 suits and performed vascular access with the following intraosseous devices: NIO-P, EZ-IO, and Jamshidi needle; intravenous (IV) access was used as a reference method. Both the order of participants and the access methods were random. Each participant performed intravascular access with each of the four methods tested. The effectiveness of the first attempt to obtain intravascular access and the following time parameters were analysed: the time between grasping the intravascular device out of the original packing until infusion line connection. The ease of the procedure was measured with a visual analogue scale (1 – easy; 10 – difficult).ResultsThe first attempt success rate of intravascular access by using NIO-P and EZ-IO equalled 100% and was statistically significantly higher than that with the Jamshidi needle (80.0%; p = 0.02) and with the IV method (69.2%; p = 0.005). The time required to connect the infusion line varied and amounted to 33 ± 4 s for NIO-P compared to 37 ± 6.7 s for EZ-IO (p<0.001), 43 ± 7 s for Jamshidi (p<0.001), and 98.5 ± 10 s for IV access (p<0.001). The procedure was easiest in the case of NIO-P and EZ-IO (2 ± 1 points; p=1.0) compared with Jamshidi (5 ± 3 points; p<0.001) and IV access (7 ± 2 points; p<0.001).ConclusionThe study provides evidence that nurses wearing biosafety Level-2 suits were able to obtain intraosseous access faster and more effectively as compared with IV access during simulated COVID-19 paediatric resuscitation. The most effective method of intravascular access was the NIO-P intraosseous device. Further clinical trials are necessary to confirm the results.

Use of Pediatric Injectable Medicines Guidelines and Associated Medication Administration Errors: A Human Reliability Analysis.

Background:In a recent human reliability analysis (HRA) of simulated pediatric resuscitations, ineffective retrieval of preparation and administration instructions from online injectable medicines guidelines was a key factor contributing to medication administration errors (MAEs).Objective:The aim of the present study was to use a specific HRA to understand where intravenous medicines guidelines are vulnerable to misinterpretation, focusing on deviations from expected practice (discrepancies) that contributed to large-magnitude and/or clinically significant MAEs.Methods:Video recordings from the original study were reanalyzed to identify discrepancies in the steps required to find and extract information from the NHS Injectable Medicines Guide (IMG) website. These data were combined with MAE data from the same original study.Results:In total, 44 discrepancies during use of the IMG were observed across 180 medication administrations. Of these discrepancies, 21 (48%) were associated with an MAE, 16 of which (36% of 44 discrepancies) made a major contribution to that error. There were more discrepancies (31 in total, 70%) during the steps required to access the correct drug webpage than there were in the steps required to read this information (13 in total, 30%). Discrepancies when using injectable medicines guidelines made a major contribution to 6 (27%) of 22 clinically significant and 4 (15%) of 27 large-magnitude MAEs.Conclusion and Relevance:Discrepancies during the use of an online injectable medicines guideline were often associated with subsequent MAEs, including those with potentially significant consequences. This highlights the need to test the usability of guidelines before clinical use.

Workload of learners during simulated paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

IntroductionLearner workload during simulated team-based resuscitations is not well understood. In this descriptive study, we measured the workload of learners in different team roles during simulated paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.MethodsPaediatric emergency...

A Microdebriefing Crisis Resource Management Program for Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation in a Community Hospital: A Feasibility Study.

Crisis Resource Management (CRM) is a team training tool used in healthcare to enhance team performance and improve patient safety. Our program intends to determine the feasibility of high-fidelity simulation for teaching CRM to an interprofessional team in a community hospital and whether a microdebriefing intervention can improve performance during simulated pediatric resuscitation. We conducted a single-center prospective interventional study with 24 teams drawn from 4 departments. The program was divided into an initial assessment simulation case (pre), a 40-minute microdebriefing intervention, and a final assessment simulation case (post). Post and pre results were analyzed for each team using t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Primary outcome measures included (a) completion of program, (b) percent enrollment, (c) participant reaction, and (d) support of continued programs on completion. Secondary outcomes included (a) change in teamwork performance, measured by the Clinical Teamwork Scale; (b) change in time to initiation of chest compressions and defibrillation; and (c) pediatric advanced life support adherence, measured by the Clinical Performance Tool. We successfully completed a large-scale training program with high enrollment. Twenty-four teams with 162 participants improved in Clinical Teamwork Scale scores (42.8%-57.5%, P < 0.001), Clinical Performance Tool scores (61.7%-72.1%, P < 0.001), and time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation (70.6-34.3 seconds, P < 0.001). Our center ran a well-attended, well-received interprofessional program in a community hospital site demonstrating that teaching CRM skills can improve simulated team performance in a diverse experienced cohort.

Quality of chest compressions during pediatric resuscitation with 15:2 and 30:2 compressions-to-ventilation ratio in a simulated scenario

The main objetive was to compare 30:2 and 15:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio in two simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) models with single rescuer. The secondary aim was to analyze the errors or omissions made during resuscitation. A prospective randomized parallel controlled study comparing 15:2 and 30:2 ratio in two manikins (child and infant) was developed. The CPR was performed by volunteers who completed an basic CPR course. Each subject did 4 CPR sessions of 3 minutes each one. Depth and rate of chest compressions (CC) during resuscitation were measured using a Zoll Z series defibrillator. Visual assessment of resuscitation was performed by an external researcher. A total of 26 volunteers performed 104 CPR sessions. Between 54–62% and 44–53% of CC were performed with an optimal rate and depth, respectively, with no significant differences. No differences were found in depth or rate of CC between 15:2 and 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio with both manikins. In the assessment of compliance with the ERC CPR algorithm, 69.2–80.8% of the subjects made some errors or omissions during resuscitation, the most frequent was not asking for help and not giving rescue breaths. The conclusions were that a high percentage of CC were not performed with optimal depth and rate. Errors or omissions were frequently made by rescuers during resuscitation.

A mobile device app to reduce prehospital medication errors and time to drug preparation and delivery by emergency medical services during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: study protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

BackgroundEmergency drug preparation and administration in children is both complex and time-consuming and places this population at a higher risk than adults for medication errors. Moreover, survival and a favorable neurological outcome from cardiopulmonary resuscitation are inversely correlated to drug preparation time. We developed a mobile device application (the pediatric Accurate Medication IN Emergency Situations (PedAMINES) app) as a step-by-step guide for the preparation to delivery of drugs requiring intravenous injection. In a previous multicenter randomized trial, we reported the ability of this app to significantly reduce in-hospital continuous infusion medication error rates and drug preparation time compared to conventional preparation methods during simulation-based pediatric resuscitations. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this app during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods/designWe will conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare the PedAMINES app with conventional calculation methods for the preparation of direct intravenously administered emergency medications during standardized, simulation-based, pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios using a high-fidelity manikin. One hundred and twenty paramedics will be randomized (1:1) in several emergency medical services located in different regions of Switzerland. Each paramedic will be asked to prepare, sequentially, four intravenously administered emergency medications using either the app or conventional methods. The primary endpoint is the medication error rates. Enrollment will start in mid-2019 and data analysis in late 2019. We anticipate that the intervention will be completed in early 2020 and study results will be submitted in late 2020 for publication (expected in early 2021).DiscussionThis clinical trial will assess the impact of an evidence-based mobile device app to reduce the rate of medication errors, time to drug preparation and time to drug delivery during prehospital pediatric resuscitation. As research in this area is scarce, the results generated from this study will be of great importance and may be sufficient to change and improve prehospital pediatric emergency care practice.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03921346. Registered on 18 April 2019.

Medication errors during simulated paediatric resuscitations: a prospective, observational human reliability analysis

IntroductionMedication errors during paediatric resuscitation are thought to be common. However, there is little evidence about the individual process steps that contribute to such medication errors in this context.ObjectivesTo describe...

Rapid cycle deliberate practice improves and sustains paediatric resident PALS performance

ObjectivesPaediatric cardiopulmonary arrest resuscitation is a critically important skill but infrequently used in clinical practice. Therefore, resuscitation knowledge relies heavily on formal training which is vulnerable to rapid knowledge decay....

The role of video debriefing as a method of feedback following simulated pediatric resuscitation

The role of video debriefing as a method of feedback following simulated pediatric resuscitation

A mobile device application to reduce medication errors and time to drug delivery during simulated paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, crossover trial

Vasoactive drug preparation for continuous infusion in children is both complex and time consuming and places the paediatric population at higher risk than adults for medication errors. We developed a mobile device application (app) as a step-by-step guide for the preparation to delivery of drugs requiring continuous infusion. The app has been previously tested during simulation-based resuscitations in a previous single-centre trial. In this trial, our aim was to assess this app in various hospital settings. We did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, crossover trial to compare this app with an internationally used drug-infusion-rates table for the preparation of continuous drug infusion during standardised, simulation-based, paediatric post-cardiac arrest scenarios using a high-fidelity manikin. The scenarios were split into two study periods to assess the two preparation methods consecutively, separated by a washout distraction manoeuvre. Nurses in six paediatric emergency centres in Switzerland were randomly assigned (1:1) to start the scenario with either the app or the infusion-rates table and then complete the scenario using the other preparation method. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants committing a medication error, which was defined as a deviation from the correct weight dose of more than 10%, miscalculation of the infusion rate, misprogramming of the infusion pump, or the inability to calculate drug dosage without calculation and guidance help from the study team. The medication error proportions observed with both preparation methods were compared by pooling both study periods, with paired data analysed using the unconditional exact McNemar test for dependent groups with a two-sided α level of 0·05. We did sensitivity analyses to investigate the carryover effect. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03021122. From March 1 to Dec 31, 2017, we randomly assigned 128 nurses to start the scenario using the app (n=64) or the infusion-rates table (n=64). Among the 128 drug preparations associated with each of the two methods, 96 (75%, 95% CI 67-82) delivered using the infusion-rates table were associated with medication errors compared with nine (7%, 3-13) delivered using the mobile app. Medication errors were reduced by 68% (95% CI 59-76%; p<0·0001) with the app compared with the table, as was the mean time to drug preparation (difference 148·2 s [95% CI 124·2-172·1], a 45% reduction; p<0·0001) and mean time to drug delivery (168·5 s [146·1-190·8], a 40% reduction; p<0·0001). Hospital size and nurses' experience did not modify the intervention effect. We detected no carryover effect. Critically ill children are particularly vulnerable to medication errors. A mobile app designed to help paediatric drug preparation during resuscitation with the aim to significantly reduce the occurrence of medication errors, drug preparation time, and delivery time could have the potential to change paediatric clinical practice in the area of emergency medicine. Swiss National Science Foundation.

Comparison of iGEL and Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated pediatric resuscitation

Purpose of the study: The ability to maintain airway patency and the application of effective ventilation is one of the key elements of cardiopulmonary resuscitation which affects greatly the chances of the return of spontaneous circulation. The aim of the study was the comparison of two types of airway patency maintenance in a simulated resuscitation of a pediatric patient.