• Townsend hypothesis can explain large-scale motions near rough and smooth walls. • Is unable to describe all roughness regimes and does not scale d-type roughness. • Wall similarity hypothesis faces both supporting and conflicting evidence. • Roughness function can be scaled with height and effective slope of roughness. • Available models do not point to agreed conclusions or trends for all roughness types, Surface roughness can significantly influence the fluid dynamics and heat transfer in convective flows by inducing perturbations in the velocity profile which affect surface drag, turbulent mixing and heat transfer. While surface roughness can often negatively affect the performance of systems, it can also lead to performance improvements, such as in convective flows where roughness elements have been shown to enhance heat transfer. Turbulent flows over rough surfaces have been studied for about a century leading to significant developments in this field. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) has made significant contributions to the knowledge of turbulent flows over rough surfaces as well as evaluation of the developed theories. Moreover, the turbulent closures model has seen wide use for simulation of rough-wall turbulent flows in practical applications where DNS is hindered by its complexity and computational resources. Despite a significant number of experimental and CFD studies and the latest advances in this field, a recent review was not available. Therefore, this review surveys the past and recent experimental and numerical studies to address the fundamentals and theories related to the structure of turbulent flows over rough walls. This study chiefly investigates the structure of mean flow profile over rough surfaces, and its correlation with smooth wall mean flow profile. This review study can contribute to prospective experimental and CFD work, and for characterising rough-wall turbulent flows and heat transfer in different academic and engineering applications such as aerodynamics, hydraulics, meteorology, and manufacturing. The review concludes that despite significant progress, the structure of turbulent flow is still not fully understood. This is mainly due to a lack of systematic studies on the structure of turbulent flow and also due to the variety of roughness which influence the dynamics of the flow in the roughness sublayers. The current roughness scale (sand-grain roughness height) fails to completely characterise roughness in many cases. Therefore, there is a need for a universal roughness scale that can describe every type of roughness and be used in any rough-flow regimes, including fully rough and transitionally rough regimes.
Read full abstract