Abstract

Abstract 
 This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular. The sample of this study consisted of 2 classes, namely experimental class 1 and experimental class 2 using the NHT and STAD methods. This study used qualitative research methods. Data collection methods used are documentation and test methods. Research instruments in the form of learning tools and mathematics test results. Data analysis performed was a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students amounted to 76,875 and experimental class 2 amounted to 72,56667 which means that classroom learning outcomes taught by NHT type cooperative learning models were better than classroom learning outcomes taught by the STAD type cooperative learning models. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the NHT type of cooperative learning model is more effective when compared to the STAD type cooperative learning model on the subject of quadrilateral in class VII students of Cokroaminoto Batang Middle School Academic Year 2018/2019
 Keywords: STAD type cooperative learning model, NHT type cooperative learning model, learning outcomes
 .

Highlights

  • This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular

  • The results showed that the average learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students amounted to 76,875 and experimental class 2 amounted to 72,56667 which means that classroom learning outcomes taught by NHT type cooperative learning models were better than classroom learning outcomes taught by the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type cooperative learning models

  • Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, maka dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa hasil belajar matematika siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Numbered Head Together (NHT) lebih baik dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) pada siswa kelas VII SMP Cokroaminoto Batang tahun pelajaran 2018 / 2019

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular. Berdasarkan kutipan tersebut, ini artinya seorang guru harus dapat membuat suasana pembelajaran yang menyenangkan sehingga memudahkan siswa untuk menangkap materi pelajaran. Oleh karena itu diperlukan model pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pemahaman siswa tentang konsep materi ini.Salah satu model pembelajaran yang sesuai dengan tuntutan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan adalah model pembelajaran kooperatif.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.