Introduction: Experimental studies have reported associations between short-term exposure to natural outdoor environments (NOE) and health benefits. However, they lack insight into mechanisms, often have low external and ecological validity, and have rarely focused on ill populations. The objectives of this study were to investigate: (i) the effects of unconstrained exposure to real natural and urban environments on psycho-physiological indicators of people with poor mental health, (ii) the possible differential effects of 30 and 210-minute exposures, and (iii) the possible mechanisms explaining these effects. Methods: People with poor mental health were exposed to green, blue and urban environments in groups for a period of 210 minutes. During the exposure period, participants were instructed to do what they would usually do in that environment. Before, during (at 30 and 210 minutes) and after each exposure, several psycho-physiological measures were taken. Results: When compared with responses to urban environment, we found statistically significantly lower negative mood, and stress levels in the green exposure environment, and statistically significantly lower negative mood, and statistically significant favorable changes in HRV indicators in the blue exposure environment. Physical activity and restoration partially mediated the associations between NOE and mood. Physical activity and air pollution partially mediated the associations between NOE and HRV. Conclusions: Our study found that individuals exposed to NOE had better mood, lower stress levels, and higher physiological relaxation compared to those exposed to urban environments. Associations were partially mediated by physical activity, restoration, and/or air pollution.
Read full abstract