In 1977 we contemplated investigating in local school children a possible correlation between intermittent loss of hearing and their scholastic performance.1 We expected to get much essential information from the school health service, which since its establishment in 1967 has worked on the principle that a school doctor should examine every child at some time during his school life to exclude or confirm the presence of handicap that might hamper his education. With progress in medical and educational science and changes in conditions new priorities have emerged in school child health. During the past decade the importance of normal hearing as a prerequisite for a child's all-round development has been recognised,2 and consequently the school health service has introduced a pro? gramme of audiological screening as a routine procedure. For children whose loss of hearing was identified at screening procedures expert advice was made available in special units and in hospital departments. In local primary schools the auditory screening programme is organised as follows. Pure tone audiometry sweep test (AST) is carried out by a non medical, appropriately trained member of the school health service staff on all school entrants some time after their first school term and before their first school medical examination. According to a DHSS recommendation3 the ambient noise in the testing room should not exceed 30 dB. Children who do not indicate that they hear sounds in selected frequencies at 25 dB of intensity fail the test and should be reported to the school doctor at his next visit to the school or, when necessary, to their general practitioner or to an audiology clinic or unit. It should also be brought to the notice of their teacher. A senior nursing officer supervises the programme. Hearing-for-speech test (HFST) is carried out by a school doctor on each child at the first medical examination, even if he has passed the pure tone audiometry sweep test. Hearing for pure tone and hearing for speech, though closely related, are not identical; the pure tone audiometry sweep test shows the degree of hearing loss, the sound frequencies affected, and the nature of the obstacle, while the hearing-for-speech test provides informa? tion on the child's comprehension of words and sentences, failure of which may or may not be due to deafness. The school doctor thereafter has a choice of referrals to specialist units and is expected to discuss with teachers the child's hearing difficulty and its learning consequences. Clinical findings are recorded by school doctors in the child's medical file either by code (0= further observation; R=referral; NT = not tested, etc) or by description. The frequency and number of each test per child varies considerably, depending not so much on educational or medical as on administrative considerations, such as availability of doctors, school nurses, or session time. This auditory screening programme offered by the school health service seemed to us reliable and adequate and indicated that the bulk of data required for our future study should be contained in the school medical record and that the hospital records would be needed in only a few cases. After some discussion with a few members of local school health service staff we concluded that before embarking on a full-scale inquiry we should carry out a short pilot study to evaluate the retro? spective information in school medical records and the methods by which they were obtained. For this purpose we selected a single school in the London Borough of Lambeth, considered to be a social priority area. Such a school, we thought, would test to the full the degree of efficiency of the school health service in achieving its objectives.4 The school has very few children from classes I and II. Forty per cent of pupils receive free school dinners and another 20% are probably eligible. Nearly half the children do not live with both their natural parents. In an unscientific survey conducted within the school 40% of the parents could not name King's College Hospital Medical School, London SE5 8RX OLGA NIETUPSKA, mfcm, dph, formerly senior lecturer and consultant, department of child health, King's College Hospital, and at present research fellow
Read full abstract