Herschel and the Established ChurchesThe astronomer William Herschel (1738-1822) was educated in the Garrison School in Hanover where the boys were taught religious studies in the Protestant tradition, along with reading, writing and arithmetic. Around the age of 14 he would have been confirmed and taken Holy Communion for the first time, the normal Easter rite of passage a child left school and went out into the world.In adult life, a musician living in England, he took the Sacrament' on 7 September 1766 when entering on his post organist to the (Anglican) parish church of Halifax in Yorkshire; and in Bath from 1766 to 1782 he was organist to two private chapels, the Octagon and then Margaret's, and was responsible for the religious music performed there.2After he left Bath in 1782 in the wake of his discovery of Uranus, to take up his post astronomer to the Court at Windsor Castle, evidence that he ever attended church is hard to find. But Herschel's attitude to the Church of England and conventional Christianity is revealed by his response in November 1813 to a request from his son John for guidance in choosing the career to follow after he had graduated from Cambridge. John was attracted to law; what did his father think?If John had seriously felt in need of advice from his father he would surely have made the journey from Cambridge to Slough; but instead, he wrote. His father had made it a matter of principle not to attempt to influence his son in matters of religion,3 and John had grown up to become a firm believer in religion established by nature but a sceptic in the Anglican religion as by law4 - a view probably not very different from that of his father. Too many divines of John's acquaintance treated Holy Orders not the opportunity to spread the Christian Gospel, but the passport to a life of comfort and even luxury, and John despised them for it.Unfortunately this was just what Herschel recommended to his son. A shocked John replied all too frankly (in terms he instantly regretted5): I cannot help regarding the source of church emolument with an evil eye.6It was now the turn of his father to be shocked:You say the church requires the necessity of keeping up a perpetual system of self deception, or something worse for the purpose of supporting the theological tenets of any particular set of men. The most conscientious clergyman may preach a sermon full of sound morality, and no one will require him to enter into theological subtilties.... Now cast a look upon the Law and Lawyers. Is it not evident that at least one half of them do act against their better knowledge and conscience?... On the other hand a Clergyman may get his bread, and always act conscientiously, and do good to every person with whom he has any connection.... Without the least derangement of his ostensible means of a livelihood [he] has time for the attainment of the more elegant branches of literature, for poetry, for music, for drawing, for natural history, for short pleasant excursions of travelling, for being acquainted with the spirit of the laws of his country, for history, for political economy, for mathematics, for astronomy, for metaphysics, and for being an author upon any one subject in which his most advantageous and respectable situation has qualified him to excel. He may also be a happy family man, a husband, a father, and with a paternal fortune added to his other means he will have all the real enjoyments of life within his reach.7Herschel's complete unconcern to whether his son actually was Christian no doubt reflects his own attitude to the Church.Herschel and the Creator of the UniverseThere is however a curious dedication to the Creator of the universe - in whom Herschel most certainly believed - at the foot of the final page of a folio volume dating from 1782/83 in which Caroline Herschel had written out the stars of the constellations in Flamsteed's catalogue. …
Read full abstract