BackgroundBrachytherapy for gynaecological cancer is reported to cause pain, anxiety and distress with no clear guidance for optimising patient experiences. The aim of this study was to explore patient experiences of brachytherapy and views on improvements. Materials and MethodsSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with patients who had received brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Two cohorts were recruited: cohort one had recently had brachytherapy, cohort two were a year post brachytherapy. Four recruitment sites were selected, where brachytherapy is given in different ways, some with short day case procedures and others having one or two overnight stays with applicators in place. Consecutive patients were invited to interview. Participants were asked to retell their brachytherapy story, with views on their care and ideas for improvement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and data analysed following Braun and Clarke's method for reflexive thematic analysis.16 ResultsThirty five interviews were conducted (20 in cohort one and 15 in cohort two). Participant's ages ranged from 28 to 87 years. The interview duration ranged from 22 to 78 minutes. Difficult and traumatic experiences were reported, including periods of severe pain and perceptions of poor care. However, some participants described positive experiences and what went well.Three themes were developed: 1) How I got through it 2) Unpleasantness, discomfort and the aftermath 3) Emotional consequences and traumaSome aspects of medium and long duration brachytherapy were found to be more problematic compared with short duration brachytherapy. Exploring experiences at one year post brachytherapy has provided insights into the long-lasting impact of brachytherapy experiences. ConclusionHearing the patient voice has demonstrated that further work is needed to improve patient care in modern brachytherapy techniques using different regimes and durations, to minimise difficult and traumatic patient experiences. Study insights will inform future work to develop clinical care recommendations.
Read full abstract