Building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) are becoming more common in urban spaces. The impact of shading from nearby trees on BIPV performance and the potential conflict between the carbon sequestration benefits of trees and the carbon mitigation benefits of BIPV is not well documented in research. Therefore, this paper investigates the cost-benefit relationship of the carbon storage potential of trees vs. their shading effects on a nearby BIPV facade from the perspective of a life cycle assessment (LCA) using a high-resolution BIPV model and temporally sensitive tree growth model. The study is based on a typical Swiss residential building with adjacent vegetation and includes various BIPV facade permutations with different cell types, module orientations, inverter types, facade azimuths, grid emissions profiles, and tree planting scenarios. The results indicate that the removal of trees does not necessarily influence the overall carbon balance when considering LCA to the same degree as other features of the model space such as the grid carbon intensity or the configuration of the BIPV array. Furthermore the parametric-based analysis enables reporting on which BIPV configurations operate with the highest system efficiency under partial shading.