Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Disease Research Articles

Acute angle-closure glaucoma before, during, and after the outbreak of COVID-19 in China

ObjectivesAcute angle-closure glaucoma (AACG) is a major cause of irreversible and severe visual function loss. Robust rise in AACG was observed in the ophthalmic outpatient clinics concomitant with the outbreak of COVID-19 infection in China after the relaxing of “zero-COVID policy” in early December 2022. Here we compared the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with AACG before, during and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Underlying mechanisms were tentatively investigated. MethodsThis is a retrospective comparative study. Consecutive cases with newly diagnosed AACGs in a tertiary eye hospital were retrospectively collected during December 17, 2022 to January 8, 2023. Data from the same period in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, 2020–2021 and 2021–2022, and 2023–2024 were collected as pre-pandemic, pandemic-control, and post-pandemic control, respectively. For the patients in 2022–2023 outbreak group, COVID-19 infection was confirmed by reversed transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction or antibody test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from nasopharyngeal swabs. Ocular parameters, serum electrolytes and coagulative parameters were compared between COVID-19 positive and negative AACGs in observational group. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in the aqueous humor was detected. ResultsA total of 106 AACG cases were diagnosed during the outbreak period in 2022–2023. In contrast, 18 (in 2018–2019) and 22 (in 2019–2020) cases were included during pre-pandemic period, and 21 (in 2023–2024) during the post-pandemic period. Only 13 and 4 newly onset AACG were included in 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 during the pandemic-control period, respectively. Younger age and higher proportion of bilateral involvement were detected in COVID-19 outbreak group than that of other groups (p = 0.034 and p = 0.080). Sixty-eight (64.2 %) patients in the outbreak group had a confirmed COVID-19 infection. Intervals between infection and AACG attack was 52 ± 85h (0-15d). Fifty-three patients (77.9 %) reported the applications of ibuprofen or other antipyretic medications and 25 (36.8 %) reported large volume water intake before AACG attack. COVID-19-positive AACG patients had higher level of D-dimer than their negative counterparts (1.13 ± 2.60 mg/L vs. 0.46 ± 0.43 mg/L, p = 0.083). No difference in IOP, serum electrolytes, and coagulative parameters other than D-dimer was observed between COVID-19 positive and negative cases. SARS-CoV-2 were negative in the aqueous humor from 14 COVID-19 positive and 8 negative patients. ConclusionCOVID-19 infection surged the onset of AACG in patients at risk. Mental stress, water intake, increased choroidal thickness due to SARS-CoV-2 induced ACE receptor activation, and hyper-coagulation, may contribute to the disease onset. Ocular involvement should not be ignored in both routine and new systemic emergent conditions.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio on Admission to Predict Mortality of COVID-19 Elderly Patients

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus Disease-2 (SARS-COV-2) is the cause of COVID-19, which led to a global pandemic and high mortality rate, especially in elderly patients. The declining immune system in elderly patients and comorbid diseases lead to more severe symptoms and an increased mortality rate. Many studies have shown that a high Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) value can predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19. However, studies on NLR in elderly patients in Indonesia have rarely been conducted. This study aimed to determine the role of NLR on admission as a mortality predictor in COVID-19 elderly patients who underwent in-hospital treatment. This research is an analytical observational study with a retrospective cohort method conducted in Bethesda Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The research subjects were selected from July 2020 to October 2021 according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were all elderly COVID-19 patients with an age limit of > 60 years old who had complete hemogram data on admission, demographic data, diagnostic criteria, types of comorbid diseases, and patient outcomes (survivor or non-survivor). The exclusion criteria were elderly COVID-19 patients with incomplete Electronic Medical Records (EMR). This study found 122 elderly patients with COVID-19 with a mortality rate of 30.33%. The result showed that NLR on admission significantly increased significantly in the non-survivor group compared to the survivor group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis presented severity (RR: 5.181; CI 1.662-16.154; p=0.005), comorbid diabetes mellitus (RR: 2.829; CI: 1.115-7.178), NLR > 6.04 (RR: 6.356; CI: 2.428-16.639) and other comorbid, namely thyroid, autoimmune, cancer, and anemia (RR: 15.836; CI: 1.841-136.234; p=0.012) as factors of mortality in hospitalized elderly patients.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SMALL MOLECULES AND NATURAL PLANT COMPOUNDS AS THERAPEUTIC INHIBITORS TARGETING RdRp AND NUCLEOCAPSID PROTEINS OF SARS COV 2: AN IN SILICO APPROACH

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a virus-borne infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Nucleocapsid protein and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) activity in viral structural membrane, transcription, and replication have been identified as desirable targets for the development of novel antiviral strategies. The SARS-COV-2 N protein binds to the viral genome to promote the precise folding of the hammerhead ribozyme, preventing ineffective RNA confirmations, and directs them into a helical capsid shape or ribonucleoprotein complex, which is vital for viability. RNA synthesis requires RdRp to form phosphodiester bonds based on the RNA template. SARS-CoV-2 RNA synthesis, transcription, and replication depend on RdRp’s complex with nsp7 and nsp8. Methods: Our study targeted SARS-COV-2 RdRp and N proteins with natural plant compounds and small molecules. Hyperchem software optimized their structures geometrically and energetically. Based on MolDock, Rerank, and H-bonding energy, the best ligands were selected using the Molegro virtual docker. Results: In our analysis, we have identified nine compounds against N protein and seven compounds against RdRp protein that had more potent inhibitory effects with the lowest MolDock scores. The top 6 (Alpha solanine, Betanin, cairicoside I, Ginsenoside rb 1, Naringin, Polyphyllin I) compounds that have better inhibitory effects against both proteins. Conclusion: We conclude that the top six compounds have greater inhibitory efficacy against N and RdRp protein than other compounds. However, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, as well as clinical trials, are required to achieve the desired result.

Drug-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid Associated with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine: Case Report

Drug-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid Associated with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine: Case Report

Epidemiology and Predisposing Factors of Post-COVID Venous Thrombosis: A Concise Review.

Long-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterized by a pathologic continuum of signs, symptoms, and also laboratory/radiologic abnormalities that may persist for a long time after recovering from an acute severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus disease 2 infection. Among the various components of this postviral condition, the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 remains considerably higher after discharge, especially in older individuals, in men, in patients with longer hospital stays and more aggressive treatment (e.g., mechanical ventilation and/or intensive care), when thromboprophylaxis is not used, and in those with a persistent prothrombotic state. Patients who have these predisposing factors should be monitored more closely to intercept any thrombosis that may occur in a post-COVID time-related manner but may also benefit from extended thromboprophylaxis and/or antiplatelet therapy.

Maternal SARS-CoV-2, Placental Changes and Brain Injury in 2 Neonates.

Long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae are a potential concern in neonates following in utero exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We report 2 neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers, who displayed early-onset (day 1) seizures, acquired microcephaly, and significant developmental delay over time. Sequential MRI showed severe parenchymal atrophy and cystic encephalomalacia. At birth, neither infant was SARS-CoV-2 positive (nasopharyngeal swab, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), but both had detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and increased blood inflammatory markers. Placentas from both mothers showed SARS-CoV-2-nucleocapsid protein and spike glycoprotein 1 in the syncytiotrophoblast, fetal vascular malperfusion, and significantly increased inflammatory and oxidative stress markers pyrin domain containing 1 protein, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 βη, stromal cell-derived factor 1, interleukin 13, and interleukin 10, whereas human chorionic gonadotropin was markedly decreased. One infant (case 1) experienced sudden unexpected infant death at 13 months of age. The deceased infant's brain showed evidence of SARS-CoV-2 by immunofluorescence, with colocalization of the nucleocapsid protein and spike glycoprotein around the nucleus as well as within the cytoplasm. The constellation of clinical findings, placental pathology, and immunohistochemical changes strongly suggests that second-trimester maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection with placentitis triggered an inflammatory response and oxidative stress injury to the fetoplacental unit that affected the fetal brain. The demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 in the deceased infant's brain also raises the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 infection of the fetal brain directly contributed to ongoing brain injury. In both infants, the neurologic findings at birth mimicked the presentation of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy of newborn and neurologic sequelae progressed well beyond the neonatal period.

Rox Index Dynamics According to High Flow Nasal Cannula Success in Intensive Care Unit Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Failure

High-flow nasal cannula therapy has been shown to be useful in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus disease-2. The ROX index can help predict the success of high-flow nasal cannula in coronavirus disease-19-related acute respiratory failure. However, the timing of ROX- index assessment is still unclear to protect the patients from complications due to early or delayed intubation. To evaluate the relation between ROX index patterns within the first 48 hours of the therapy and high-flow nasal cannula success rates. The secondary aim was to determine other possible predictors of high-flow nasal cannula failure. A cross-sectional study. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit between April 2020 and January 2022 with coronavirus disease-19-related acute respiratory failure and treated with high-flow nasal cannula were included in the study. Patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics and laboratory findings at intensive care unit admission; ROX indices at initiation, 2nd, 8th, 12th, 24th and 48th hours of high-flow nasal cannula; and outcomes were recorded. In the study period, 69th patients were managed with high-flow nasal cannula for at least 2 hours. While 24 patients (34.7%) were successfully weaned from high-flow nasal cannula, 45 (65.3%) patients failed. Overall mortality at day 28 was 44.9%. ROX indices were lower in the high-flow nasal cannula failure group through the 12th, 24th, and 48th hours of the therapy, no significant change was observed (P = 0.33). While an overall increase in ROX index patterns were detected in patients weaned from high-flow nasal cannula (P = 0.002). Pairwise analyses revealed that ROX indexes remain stable during the first 8th hours in both groups, then improved to 12th hours of the therapy in successfully high-flow nasal cannula-weaned patients. Dynamic assessments of the ROX indexes could be more suggestive rather than a point assessment to identify patients who would benefit from the high-flow nasal cannula or deteriorate in coronavirus disease-19 related acute respiratory failure.

COVID-19 and Biomarkers: The Contribution of the Journal

Three years after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), several features of the pathogenesis and innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2) have now been clarified [...].

A diagnostic accuracy study comparing RNA LAMP, direct LAMP, and rapid antigen testing from nasopharyngeal swabs.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the early detection and isolation of individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) through mass testing can effectively prevent disease transmission. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid rapid detection based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) may be appropriate to include in testing procedures. We used 860 nasopharyngeal specimens from healthcare workers of Huashan Hospital and COVID-19 patients collected from April 7th to 21st, 2022, to assess the clinical diagnostic performance of the LAMP assay marketed by Shanghai GeneSc Biotech and compared it to the result of a rapid antigen test (RAT) head-to-head. Overall, the diagnostic performance of LAMP assay and RAT were as follows. The LAMP assay represented higher sensitivity and specificity than RAT, especially in the extracted RNA samples. The sensitivity was 70.92% and 92.91% for direct LAMP and RNA-LAMP assay, respectively, while the specificity was 99.86% and 98.33%. The LAMP assay had overall better diagnostic performance on the specimens with relatively lower C t values or collected in the early phase (≤7 days) of COVID-19. The combination of LAMP assay and RAT improved diagnostic efficiency, providing new strategies for rapidly detecting SARS-CoV-2. The LAMP assay are suitable for mass screenings of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the general population.

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Secondary Gram-negative Bacteria Isolated from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Disease 2 Patients in A Tertiary Care Hospital

Prior to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the rise in antimicrobial resistance was a major source of concern in public health. However, due to the novelty of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic, antibiotics were administered prior to laboratory testing for secondary gram-negative bacteria (SGNB) in order to avoid or reduce the occurrence of SGNB infection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiology, prevalence, and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolated from SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Respiratory and blood samples were collected from confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. They were subsequently cultured and bacterial isolates identified according to standard microbiological protocols. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed and interpreted according to Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2021 guidelines. A total of sixty-four non-repetitive GNB were isolated from respiratory samples and twenty-two GNB from blood samples. K. pneumoniae was the major cause of SGNB, followed by Acinetobacter species. K. pneumoniae had over 60% resistance to β-Lactam combination agents, cephalosporin, and the carbapenem group of antibiotics. In the current study, we observed that K. pneumoniae was the major cause of SGNB and had high resistance to the antimicrobial agents. Hence, it is important that the epidemiology and susceptibility patterns of circulating organisms causing SGNB infection are always monitored to inform clinical treatment and decrease the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Comparison of Two Different Quantitative Tests for Anti-Spike Measurement After Two Doses of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthcare Professionals

Serological tests developed to detect antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigens are used to demonstrate immunity level, vaccine efficacy and duration of protection. However, the evaluation of these tests and the interpretation of the results are still under investigation. In this study, it was aimed to compare the anti-spike measurement values in healthcare workers who have not experienced Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) after vaccination with two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with two commercial quantitative antibody detection tests which were used to give results in the same unit and work with different methods. The results obtained with Elecys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and Aeskulisa Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 (Aesku diagnostics, Wendelsheim, Germany) kits of the serum samples of 90 healthcare workers were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively in line with the recommendations of both manufacturers. Quantitative values given as units/mL (U/mL) were also evaluated by converting the binding antibody unit (BAU)/mL with the conversion factor obtained as a result of the studies carried out by the manufacturers with the World Health Organization anti-SARS-CoV-2 international standard. Positive results were obtained in 86 (95.6%) samples and negative results in 4 (4.4%) samples with the Elecsys kit; 55 (61.1%) positive, 20 (22.2%) negative and 15 (16.7%) intermediate results were obtained with the Aeskulisa kit. In common with both kits, negative results were obtained in four samples, and positive results were obtained in 55 samples. While the percent agreement observed with both kits was found to be 78.6 in 75 samples, excluding 15 samples in the intermediate with Aeskulisa kit, Cohen's kappa value was calculated as 0.26, indicating a close to moderate agreement, statistically. A high correlation was observed in the correlation analysis of the measurements of both kits (r= 0.611). When the scattering of the differences against the mean of the quantitative measurements made with both kits was examined by Bland-Altman analysis; higher measurements were determined with the Elecsys kit than with the Aeskulisa kit and the mean difference was found to be 58.68 ± 52.62. As a result of the studies carried out by the manufacturers, it was observed that the average difference decreased to 41.09 ± 50.22 when the U/mL values were converted to BAU/mL with the conversion factor. In the whole sampling, the measurements determined with the Elecsys kit were found to be 4.58 ± 3.44 times higher on average compared to the Aeskulisa kit while the measurements were found to be 2.35 ± 1.77 when the BAU/mL values were recalculated. The measurement values found with the Elecsys kit used in our study were found to be higher than that of Aeskulisa kit and qualitatively more positive results were obtained with Elecsys kit than with the Aeskulisa kit. In this study, Elecsys kit measurements were on average 4.06 times higher than Aeskulisa kit in samples (n= 55) with results compatible with both kits. The increase in these rates to 4.30 and 7.72 values, respectively, for 15 samples reported as intermediate and 16 as negative with the Aeskulisa kit, suggested that the success of quantitation decreased with the Aeskulisa kit at low antibody values. Since the harmonization of anti-SARS-CoV-2 tests has not yet been achieved, individual immune monitoring should be performed using the same method and even the results converted to BAU/mL should be specific to the antigen subunit.

Ongoing Dizziness Following Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Single Center Pediatric Case Series.

Dizziness is a common concern discussed at adolescent medical visits. In this series, we describe 9 pediatric patients with postacute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who presented with persistent, debilitating dizziness for weeks to months after their acute infection. Among the 9 patients, median age was 14 years (range: 11 to 17), 6 were female, and 8 had not received any SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Five patients met diagnostic criteria for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) by active standing testing and benefited from a combination of nonpharmacologic therapy (NPT) and medication. NPT alone did not improve symptoms in any patients. Patients who did not meet conventional criteria for POTS, but continued to have symptoms despite NPT compliance, also demonstrated subjective improvement in dizziness when medications were initiated. The majority of patients experienced improvement in dizziness and quality of life, including returning to sports teams and a regular school schedule. A review of the postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 literature demonstrates increasing recognition of a subset of patients who develop autonomic dysfunction, including POTS, although the etiology and prognosis are not completely understood. Our case series aims to highlight the phenomenon of dysautonomia after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and its response to therapy.

Preferred practice guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity screening during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of preventable infant blindness in the world and predominantly affects babies who are born low birth weight and premature. India has the largest number of surviving preterm births born annually. ROP blindness can be largely prevented if there is a robust screening program which detects treatment requiring disease in time. ROP treatment must be provided within 48 h of reaching this threshold of treatment making it a relative emergency. During the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in 2020 ROP screening was disrupted throughout the world due to lockdowns and restriction of movement of these infants, their families, specialists and healthcare workers. The Indian ROP Society issued guidelines for ROP screening and treatment in March 2020, which was aimed at preserving the chain-of-care despite the potential limitations and hazards during the (ongoing) pandemic. This preferred practice guideline is summarized in this manuscript.

Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis E virus and development of chronic infection: The wider impact of COVID-19.

BackgroundTransmission of hepatitis E virus (HEV) within the healthcare setting is extremely rare. Additionally, the development of chronic HEV infection in association with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and/or its immunomodulatory therapy has not been reported previously.AimsTo describe the investigation and management of a nosocomial HEV transmission incident during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.MethodsEpidemiological and molecular investigation of two individuals hospitalised with COVID-19 who were both diagnosed with HEV infection.ResultsFindings from our investigation were consistent with transmission of HEV from one patient with a community-acquired HEV infection to another individual (identical HEV sequences were identified in the two patients), most likely due to a breach in infection control practices whilst both patients shared a bed space on the intensive care unit (ICU). Chronic HEV infection requiring treatment with ribavirin developed in one patient with prolonged lymphopaenia attributable to COVID-19 and/or the immunomodulators received for its treatment. Further investigation did not identify transmission of HEV to any other patients or to healthcare workers.ConclusionsThe extraordinary demands that the COVID-19 pandemic has placed on all aspects of healthcare, particularly within ICU settings, has greatly challenged the ability to consistently maintain optimal infection prevention and control practices. Under the significant pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic a highly unusual nosocomial HEV transmission incident occurred complicated further by progression to a chronic HEV infection in one patient.

Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Persons Attending the RT-PCR center at a Medical College Hospital in Telangana: A Case- Control Study.

In January 2021, India's drug regulator issued restricted emergency approval for COVISHIELD and COVAXIN, which were manufactured in India. In mid-January 2021, in India, there were 10.5 million confirmed cases and 0.15 million deaths. The objectives were to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines made in India against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. A test-negative case-control study was conducted from May 2021 to December 2021 for a duration of 8 months among people attending a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) center at a medical college hospital for RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. The baseline characteristics and RT-PCR report were collected from the RT-PCR center. The exposure to COVID-19 vaccines was enquired via phone call or was checked with data available with the health authorities. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and case and control definitions, a total of 380 participants (95 cases and 285 controls) were included. The adjusted VE of two doses of COVISHIED vaccine against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 52.2% (41.7 to 62.1), and that of a single dose was 40.88% (31.26 to 51.29). The adjusted VE of two doses of COVAXIN vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection was 39% (29.40 to 49.27). The overall VE was 48.20% (37.90 to 58.22) for two doses of any vaccines. Vaccines made in India were nearly 50% effective. Further new studies should be conducted as new variants of SARS-CoV-2 are emerging. We do not know the VE against the variants, and whether booster doses are required or not is not yet established.

Clinical Presentation and Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health-Care Personnel Working in Dedicated COVID-19 Hospital During 2 Pandemic Waves in India.

Health-care personnel (HCPs) are predisposed to infection during direct or indirect patient care as well as due to the community spread of the disease. We observed the clinical presentation and course of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in HCPs working in a dedicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) care hospital during the first and the second wave. A total of 100 and 223 HCPs were enrolled for the first wave and the second wave, respectively. Cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose, and headache was seen in 40 (40%) and 152 (68%) (P < 0.01), 15 (15%) and 64 (29%) (P = 0.006), 40 (40%) and 119 (53.3%) (P = 0.03), 9 (9%) and 66 (30%) (P < 0.01), 20 (20%) and 125 (56%) (P < 0.01), respectively. Persistent symptoms at the time of joining back to work were seen in 31 (31%) HCPs and 152 (68%) HCPs, respectively (P ≤ 0.01). Reinfection was reported in 10 HCPs. Most of the HCPs had mild to moderate infections. Symptoms persist after joining back to work. Upgradation of home-based care and teleconsultation facilities for active disease and redressal of residual symptoms will be helpful.

Age-Stratified Risk of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) as a part of the thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome is a rare adverse drug reaction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Estimated background rate of CVST with thrombocytopenia is 0.1 per million per month. We assessed the age-stratified risk of CVST with and without thrombocytopenia after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We estimated the absolute risk of CVST with and without thrombocytopenia within 28 days of a first dose of 4 SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations using data from the European Medicines Agency's EudraVigilance database (until June 13, 2021). As a denominator, we used data on vaccine delivery from 31 European countries. For 22.8 million adults from 25 countries, we estimated the absolute risk of CVST after the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 per age category. The absolute risk of CVST within 28 days of first-dose vaccination was 7.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-8.3), 0.7 (95% CI 0.2-2.4), 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7), and 0.6 (95% CI 0.3-1.1) per million of first doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Ad26.COV2.S, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273, respectively. The absolute risk of CVST with thrombocytopenia within 28 days of first dose vaccination was 4.4 (95% CI 3.9-4.9), 0.7 (95% CI 0.2-2.4), 0.0 (95% CI 0.0-0.1), and 0.0 (95% CI 0.0-0.2) per million of first doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Ad26.COV2.S, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273, respectively. In recipients of ChAdOx1 nCov-19, the absolute risk of CVST, both with and without thrombocytopenia, was the highest in the 18- to 24-year-old group (7.3 per million, 95% CI 2.8-18.8 and 3.7 per million, 95% CI 1.0-13.3, respectively). The risk of CVST with thrombocytopenia in ChAdOx1 nCov-19 recipients was the lowest in the age group ≥70 years (0.2, 95% CI 0.0-1.3). Age <60 years compared to ≥60 years was a predictor for CVST with thrombocytopenia (incidence rate ratio 5.79, 95% CI 2.98-11.24, p < 0.001). The risk of CVST with thrombocytopenia within 28 days of first-dose vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 was higher in younger age groups. The risk of CVST with thrombocytopenia was slightly increased in patients receiving Ad26.COV2.S compared with the estimated background risk. The risk of CVST with thrombocytopenia was not increased in recipients of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.

Clinical Policies and Procedures for Critical Care Transport during a Respiratory Pandemic.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic of 2020-2021 created unprecedented challenges for clinicians in critical care transport (CCT). These CCT services had to rapidly adjust their clinical approaches to evolving patient demographics, a preponderance of respiratory failure, and transport utilization stratagem. Organizations had to develop and implement new protocols and guidelines in rapid succession, often without the education and training that would have been involved pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). These changes were complicated by the need to protect crew members as well as to optimize patient care. Clinical initiatives included developing an awake proning transport protocol and a protocol to transport intubated proned patients. One service developed a protocol for helmet ventilation to minimize aerosolization risks for patients on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). While these clinical protocols were developed specifically for COVID-19, the growth in practice will enhance the care of patients with other causes of respiratory failure. Additionally, these processes will apply to future respiratory epidemics and pandemics.

The Effects of Using a Clinical Prediction Rule to Prioritize Diagnostic Testing on Transmission and Hospital Burden: A Modeling Example of Early Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

BackgroundPrompt identification of infections is critical for slowing the spread of infectious diseases. However, diagnostic testing shortages are common in emerging diseases, low resource settings, and during outbreaks. This forces difficult decisions regarding who receives a test, often without knowing the implications of those decisions on population-level transmission dynamics. Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are commonly used tools to guide clinical decisions.MethodsUsing early SARS-CoV-2 as an example, we used data from electronic health records to develop a parsimonious 5-variable CPR to identify those who are most likely to test positive. To consider the implications of gains in daily case detection at the population level, we incorporated testing using the CPR into a compartmentalized model of SARS-CoV-2.ResultsWe found that applying this CPR (AUC: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.68 - 0.70)) to prioritize testing increased the proportion of those testing positive in settings of limited testing capacity. We found that prioritized testing led to a delayed and lowered infection peak (i.e., “flattens the curve”), with the greatest impact at lower values of the effective reproductive number (such as with concurrent community mitigation efforts), and when higher proportions of infectious persons seek testing. Additionally, prioritized testing resulted in reductions in overall infections as well as hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) burden.ConclusionWe highlight the population-level benefits of evidence-based allocation of limited diagnostic capacity.

Infected hip prosthesis in patient with suspected Covid-19 infection

BackgroundInfections following arthroplasty are one of the major risks during this type of surgery. Moreover, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus Disease 2), has developed into an unprecedented pandemic, posing enormous pressure on health-care providers around the world.Case presentationFour and half years after right hip arthroplasty, the patient came back to our attention with pain at the same hip. The instrumental examinations showed signs of cup detachment. After carefully analyzing the case, we decided to perform a sterile aspiration of the hip in the operating room under C-arm fluoroscopy. Microbiological examinations showed positivity for E. coli. The patient underwent surgery by which the prosthesis was removed and a spacer was implanted. A therapy with Cefotaxim 2 g three times a day for 6 weeks was then set, and then a total arthroplasty was performed. During this period, the COVID-19 pandemic occurred and therefore the patient received nasal-throat swabbing two times, and both yielded negative results. However, 1 week after the final surgery, his respiratory conditions deteriorated and chest X-ray and CT scan showed images of ground-glass opacification patterns (GGO). Due to the clinical symptoms and the characteristic images of the instrumental examinations, the patient was transferred to an observation ward. Thereafter, two more swab tests gave negative results. The patient was then transferred to the ward for patients with typical symptoms of COVID-19 but with negative swab tests for 2 weeks and was subsequently discharged home.ConclusionThe purpose of this case report was to point out the correct treatment of a PJI after the outbreak of COVID-19. Despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the guidelines in the case of periprosthetic hip infection further confirmed the correct management of the patient.