Reviewed by: Menials: Domestic Service and the Cultural Transformation of British Society, 1650–1850 by Kristina Booker Ingrid Tague Kristina Booker. Menials: Domestic Service and the Cultural Transformation of British Society, 1650–1850. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell, 2018. Pp. xi + 195. $95. Debuting just a few years after the Great Recession, the British television series Down-ton Abbey was a huge hit in the U.S. as well as the U.K. Despite our national myth of having escaped from the stifling restrictions of a class-based society, American audiences breathlessly followed the travails of the Granthams and their servants. Part of the appeal of the series was doubtless the way it invited viewers to contrast their enlightened, modern views with those of characters like Maggie Smith’s Dowager Countess, who is so out of touch with working life that she does not understand the concept of a weekend. Yet, as Booker notes in a “Coda” to Menials, for all its apparent sympathy for those “downstairs,” the series nonetheless consistently presents the Granthams as enlightened and sympathetic, and punishes servants who resist their place in the social order. Downton Abbey, she suggests, is the heir to a body of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century literature that portrayed servants for ideological purposes. The “master classes” who produced this literature exploited the figure of the servant to present economic relations in ways that would enable them to retain their position at the top of the social hierarchy. In particular, Booker focuses on three key concepts: self-interest, emulation, and luxury. All three areas have been widely explored by economic and social historians, but Booker argues that fictional representations of servants are particularly useful for understanding what these concepts meant and how attitudes toward them changed over time. The first two chapters, which comprise roughly half the book, deal with self-interest. Booker outlines economic debates about self-interest from the cautious advocacy of seventeenth-century merchants like Edward Misselden and Thomas Mun, through Adam Smith’s celebration of self-interest as a force for economic and social benefit, to the nineteenth-century critiques of it in the works of Thomas Carlyle and John Ruskin. She then traces these ideas in key literary works, with a particular focus on the ways authors used servants to engage with the potential problems of a world governed by self-interest. Thus, in William Godwin’s Caleb Williams, for instance, the titular character provides the opportunity to explore “the tension between one’s own interests and one’s duty to the general good.” Caleb believes that he can serve the greater social good by pursuing his self-interest, but he consistently finds himself oppressed by Falkland, his tyrannical master, who uses his social power to promote only his own interests. In chapter 2, Booker turns to a criticism of self-interest that emerged at the turn of the nineteenth century: the idea that Smithian economic theory was too abstract and failed to account for “the real lives of English men and women, particularly the working classes.” Her example is Dickens’s Bleak House (1852–53), which demonstrates the impact of such criticism as Hortense, Lady Dedlock’s maid, suffers from her masters’ treatment of her [End Page 59] as a disposable commodity. While quite beyond Scriblerian’s chronological remit, the discussion is interesting, since what Dickens demonstrates with Hortense’s failed attempt at revenge “is that under the reign of [Smith’s] political economy, a maid with subjectivity is considered dangerous, even less than human.” The Rouncewells are offered as an alternative model where affection and mutual devotion provide both master and servant an opportunity to thrive. Chapter 3, on emulation, traces anxieties about servants’ perceived tendency to emulate their betters. Thus, Richardson’s Pamela is held up as a paragon of virtue because she consistently rejects opportunities to rise above her station, while her virtues themselves are the gift of the mistress who raised and educated her. B’s offers of fine clothes and jewelry are elements of seduction and sin; by rejecting them, Pamela maintains “her adherence to social dictates which she believes are natural and even divinely sanctioned.” In contrast, the character of the...