While humans typically saccade every ∼250 ms in natural settings, studies on vision tend to prevent or restrict eye movements. As it takes ∼50 ms to initiate and execute a saccade, this leaves only ∼200 ms to identify the fixated object and select the next saccade goal. How much detail can be derived about parafoveal objects in this short time interval, during which foveal processing and saccade planning both occur? Here, we had male and female human participants freely explore a set of natural images while we recorded magnetoencephalography and eye movements. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we demonstrate that future parafoveal images could be decoded at the feature and category level with peak decoding at ∼110 ms and ∼165 ms respectively, while the decoding of fixated objects at the feature and category level peaked at ∼100 ms and ∼145 ms. The decoding of features and categories was contingent on the objects being saccade goals. In sum, we provide insight on the neuronal mechanism of pre-saccadic attention by demonstrating that feature and category specific information of foveal and parafoveal objects can be extracted in succession within a ∼200 ms intersaccadic interval. These findings rule out strict serial or parallel processing accounts but are consistent with a pipeline mechanism in which foveal and parafoveal objects are processed in parallel but at different levels in the visual hierarchy.Significance Statement We provide neural evidence that future parafoveal saccade goals are processed surprisingly quickly at the feature and the category level before we saccade to them. Specifically, using multivariate pattern analysis applied to magnetoencephalography and eye-tracking data, we found that information about the colour and the category of parafoveal objects emerged at ∼110 ms and ∼165 ms respectively, with the same information about foveal objects emerging ∼100 ms and ∼145 ms. Our findings provide novel insight into the neuronal dynamics of parafoveal previewing during free visual exploration. The dynamics rule out strict serial or parallel processing, but are consistent with a pipelining mechanism in which foveal and parafoveal objects are processed in parallel but at different levels in the visual hierarchy.