Background: The incidence of anomalous coronary anatomy is about 1%. The embryonic cause is unknown. Method: We searched cardiac catheterisation cases over 5 years (2013–2017) for the words “anomaly”, “anomalous”, “aberrant”, and common spelling mistake variations. For duplicates, only a patient's earliest procedure was included. A cardiologist reviewed the report and angiogram of each potential case to confirm coronary anomaly. We excluded cases of high take-off anterior right coronary origin, separate origin of LAD and circumflex, and coronary artery fistulae, because our methodology was unlikely to detect all such cases. Results: The incidence was 0.8% (109 of 14295) including: (1) Circumflex origin from right cusp or as proximal branch of right coronary (n = 61, 56%), (2) Right coronary origin from left cusp (n = 36, 33%), (3) Left coronary origin from right cusp (n = 8, 7.3%), and single cases (n = 1, 0.9%) of (4) single coronary from right cusp, (5) single coronary from left cusp, (6) right, circumflex and LAD coronaries with separate ostia from right cusp, and (7) LAD origin from right cusp. There was no difference between cases and non-cases regarding age, procedure duration, screening time, height, weight or gender. Conclusions: 0.8% proportion with coronary anomaly is similar to previous series. The commonest anomaly is circumflex arising from the right cusp or as a branch of the right coronary. Our cohort could be leveraged to perform GWAS or whole genome sequencing to investigate genetic contributions to anomalous coronary anatomy. Genetic studies of this phenotype do not yet appear to have been conducted.
Read full abstract