You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Non-invasive III (PD63)1 Sep 2021PD63-09 HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROULTRASOUND IMAGING AND MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI IN DETECTING AND LOCAL STAGING OF BLADDER CANCER: THE BUS-MISS PROTOCOL Pietro Diana, Alessandro Uleri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicola Frego, Roberto Contieri, Pier Paolo Avolio, Davide Maffei, Piergiuseppe Colombo, Luca Balzarini, Federico D'Orazio, Nicolomaria Buffi, Alberto Saita, Paolo Casale, Massimo Lazzeri, and Rodolfo Hurle Pietro DianaPietro Diana More articles by this author , Alessandro UleriAlessandro Uleri More articles by this author , Giovanni LughezzaniGiovanni Lughezzani More articles by this author , Nicola FregoNicola Frego More articles by this author , Roberto ContieriRoberto Contieri More articles by this author , Pier Paolo AvolioPier Paolo Avolio More articles by this author , Davide MaffeiDavide Maffei More articles by this author , Piergiuseppe ColomboPiergiuseppe Colombo More articles by this author , Luca BalzariniLuca Balzarini More articles by this author , Federico D'OrazioFederico D'Orazio More articles by this author , Nicolomaria BuffiNicolomaria Buffi More articles by this author , Alberto SaitaAlberto Saita More articles by this author , Paolo CasalePaolo Casale More articles by this author , Massimo LazzeriMassimo Lazzeri More articles by this author , and Rodolfo HurleRodolfo Hurle More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002107.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: MRI has been proposed as a new staging tool for bladder cancer (BC), but its use is limited by its high costs and availability. 29-MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound (mUS) technology has been suggested as a potential alternative to MRI for the detection of prostate cancer. The feasibility of mUS to detect BC and to distinguish between non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) and MIBC has been showed. However, no comparative analysis between mUS and MRI was performed. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mUS vs. MRI in differentiating histologic NMIBC and MIBC. METHODS: This is a prospective on going study of patients with a primary diagnosis of BC with either positive urine cytology (UC) or negative UC and a tumor size >25mm from a tertiary care high volume center. mUS, with the ExactVu system with an EV29L 29 MHz side-fire transducer, and a 3-Tesla MRI were performed before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in every patient before undergoing TURBT. We finally compared the results with the pathological report. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and November 2020, we prospectively enrolled 72 consecutive patients. After exclusion of 14 individuals, the analyzed population consisted of 58 individuals. The reported sensitivity, specificity, and positive, and negative predictive values for mUS were 85.0%, 76.3%, 65.4%, and 90.6%, respectively for mUS. The reported sensitivity, specificity, and positive, and negative predictive values for MRI were 85.0%, 50.0%, 47.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. In accuracy analysis, the AUC for mUS and MRI were respectively 0.807 and 0.675. Main limitation provided by mUS is the longitudinal sections of the bladder, thus, its accuracy to determine the location of a lesion may be suboptimal with a dislocation of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the measures of diagnostic accuracy indexes demonstrate an overall superiority of the mUS compared to MRI, which instead shows an important tendency in lesion upstaging compared to mUS. Further studies with a larger population are ongoing and warranted to better compare and to validate these techniques in the BC diagnostic work-up. Source of Funding: none © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e1141-e1141 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Pietro Diana More articles by this author Alessandro Uleri More articles by this author Giovanni Lughezzani More articles by this author Nicola Frego More articles by this author Roberto Contieri More articles by this author Pier Paolo Avolio More articles by this author Davide Maffei More articles by this author Piergiuseppe Colombo More articles by this author Luca Balzarini More articles by this author Federico D'Orazio More articles by this author Nicolomaria Buffi More articles by this author Alberto Saita More articles by this author Paolo Casale More articles by this author Massimo Lazzeri More articles by this author Rodolfo Hurle More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...