... And woe unto all living that it would live without disputes over weight and scales and weighers!--Nietzsche, Zarathustra, II, 13 Introduction: What's at Stake in Discussing Future of Humanities The start of 21st century may very well be final era in which humanities enjoy substantial autonomy and prestige. Advances in genetics, evolutionary and biological psychology, combined with increasing sophistication of statistical models of behavior prediction, may make current justifications for study of humanities sound quaint at best, and obscurantist at worse. To be sure, end of humanities has been predicted before, and its decline or demise may never happen. (1) this essay is not written in hope that it will happen, only with awareness that, as Walter Kaufmann put it, the refusal to reflect on goals invites disaster. (2) In this respect, following pages will consider prospects for humanities without two implicit, and wishfully sentimental, assumptions, namely that, without humanities, something irreplaceably precious will be lost, or that, once we move beyond humanities, what follows would inevitably be better. The fact is that we simply don't know how educational practices will look from standpoint of future generations. (3) Rather; our task should be to identify what is most valuable in humanities, asking whether our current practices in fact achieve our goals. Hence, this essay seeks aid in discussion of aims and means by turning to Walter Kaufmann who, a generation ago, had some interesting ideas about what was at stake in study of humanities. I will present some of Kaufmann's main views on this subject, highlighting ongoing relevance of his sharp critique of contemporary education. Specifically, I will focus on his mostly forgotten 1977 volume, The Future of Humanities, arguing that it is not only worth reading today, but may help humanities maintain their viability altogether. To reach this end, I will place Kaufmann in his historical context, providing an exposition of his main pedagogical ideas, focusing especially on what he called the art of reading. (4) Once a picture of Kaufmann's main contribution has emerged, I will finish piece by linking Kaufmann to a well-publicized concern in pedagogy, namely Gerald Graff's efforts to integrate students into argument culture by teaching conflicts. (5) This sets stage for an overarching conclusion, where I argue that, while Kaufmann certainly does not allay all anxieties about future of humanities, his ideas about education (primarily, though not exclusively, college education) prepare us well to face a critical and neglected aspect of problem: our own uncertainties and sense of doubt as to whether we instructors can convey something of value in humanities altogether. Who Was Walter Kaufmann and Why Should Pedagogy Care? Walter Kaufmann (1921-1980) was a prolific and incisive writer who deserves much more attention than he has yet received. Spending his career as professor of philosophy at Princeton, Kaufmann's specialty was German philosophy and through that he is not entirely unknown today. For most part, academic public opinion tends to remember him as a transmitter and popularizer, more than a thinker in his own right. This incorrect assumption tends to impede a full appreciation of Kaufmann's work. To be sure, Kaufmann played a significant role in bringing central European thought to United States. He was one of first to produce reliable translations of Nietzsche to a broad American public. His 1954, The Portable Nietzsche, included Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and by end of his career, Kaufmann had provided accurate and readable translations of eleven of Nietzsche's major works. (6) These, along with Kaufmann's own 1950 monograph (revised and expanded in 1956, 1968 and 1974) Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist gave Nietzsche a prominent place in American academia, one that he never held before, and has never lost since. …