Sedation Research Articles

Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination on spinal block characteristics in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery - A randomised clinical trial.

One major limitation of the spinal block remains the inability to extend the duration of the block intraoperatively unless planned before with spinal or epidural catheters and/or intrathecal additives. This study was designed to compare the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination infusion on spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. This randomised study was conducted in 60 patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into Group D (n = 30) (0.5 µg/kg of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine bolus followed by maintenance infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h) and Group LKD (n = 30) (IV bolus of 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 0.2 mg/kg of ketamine, followed by maintenance infusions of dexmedetomidine and ketamine at 0.5 µg/kg/h and 0.2 mg/kg/h, respectively). Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4 was maintained. The t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters between groups. The mean sacral segment 1 (S1) regression time was 390.3 [standard deviation (SD):84.38] [95% confidence interval (CI): 360.13, 420.53] versus 393.23 (SD: 93.01) (95% CI: 363.04, 423.43) min in Group D versus Group LKD respectively ((P = 0.701). The number of episodes of hypotension was significantly higher in Group D (19 patients) compared to Group LKD (nine patients) (P = 0.001). Pre- and postoperative stress markers (24 h) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and shivering were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). Tramadol requirement in the postoperative period was significantly less in Group LKD compared to Group D (P = 0.003). The duration of S1 regression was similar between group dexmedetomidine (Group D) and group low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Group LKD).

Application of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the surgery of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in elderly patients.

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly. Between January 2020 and January 2023, a total of 141 elderly patients (45 males, 96 females; mean age: 72.5±6.8 years; range, 65 to 87 years) who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) surgery for intertrochanteric fracture of femur were included in this single-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (experimental group) was a general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) group preserving spontaneous breathing, Group B (control group 1) was a general anesthesia with LMA group for mechanical ventilation, and Group C (control group 2) was a tracheal intubation anesthesia group for mechanical ventilation. The differences of related indexes among the three groups were compared. The mean onset time of anesthesia (6.23±1.45 vs. 12.78±2.78 vs. 13.73±2.43 min), postoperative recovery time of consciousness (8.13±0.83 vs. 11.34±0.89 vs. 12.45±0.86 min), and postoperative complete awakening time (10.45±2.34 vs. 18.87±2.56 vs. 19.62±2.93 min) were significantly shorter in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). The duration of analgesic effect was longer in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). After anesthesia, the Ramsay Sedation Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05). The mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) scores were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). Hemodynamic parameters showed that blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) levels were significantly higher in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05). Our study results indicate that combined anesthesia preserving spontaneous breathing is safe and feasible in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly, with faster anesthesia recovery than the mechanical ventilation group.

Comparing the Effect of Acupressure and Oral Midazolam on Controlling Preoperative Anxiety in Children: A Randomized Trial

Background: Preoperative anxiety in children is a common problem that can affect the anesthesia and postoperative period. Numerous methods, mainly pharmacological ones, have been used for controlling preoperative stress. Acupressure is a simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective method that has been used as a perioperative medicine for controlling pain or preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. The present study aimed to comparatively investigate the effect of acupressure and oral midazolam on preoperative anxiety control. Methods: 76 patients were randomly included in the study before surgery. Whereas in one group, 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam was prescribed 15 minutes before the induction, in another group, acupressure of EXHN-3 point was applied for 15 minutes. In both groups, the patients’ separation anxiety level, Ramsay score, recovery length, and RN satisfaction factor were recorded and compared. Results: Children aged 1–7 years received either oral midazolam or acupressure. Although the children in the midazolam group had lower rates of preoperative anxiety and showed easier separation from their parents, the difference was not statistically significant P= (0.076). Ramsay sedation scale, was compared in the two groups. The overall difference was not statistically significant. The satisfaction of the PACU nurse was recorded using a 4-point scale. The two groups were statistically comparable in this regard (P=0.155). The only variable with a significant difference between the two groups was the mean recovery time, which was significantly shorter in acupressure group (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Acupressure can reduce preoperative anxiety in children; however, this effect is less than the effect of oral midazolam.

Correlation between kinematic parameters, ataxia and ground-to-lip distance in detomidine sedated horses.

An accurate evaluation of the degree of sedation is mandatory to adjust the dosage of sedative drugs. To determine the correlation between head height above the ground and ataxia degree in horses sedated with detomidine and the correlation existing between accelerometric variables and both parameters. Retrospective study. Twelve horses were given 0.01 mg/kg of detomidine hydrochloride iv. Measured accelerometric parameters, with one accelerometer positioned between both sacral tuberosities, included speed, stride frequency and length, regularity, dorsoventral, longitudinal, mediolateral and total accelerometric activities, relative force index and dorsoventral, longitudinal and mediolateral parts of the accelerometric activities. Head height above the ground (cm) and subjective ataxia degree were also measured. Baseline values (-15 min) and values measured 5 and 15 min after the injection and then every 15 min for a period of 2 h were obtained. There was a negative and strong correlation between head height above the ground and ataxia degree (Pearson r = -0.78, p < 0.001), particularly during the first 45 min. A significant correlation was found between head height above the ground and almost all accelerometric parameters. This correlation was very strong with stride frequency, regularity and dorsoventral and total accelerometric activities in both cases, but for ataxia, also with total accelerometric activity. Experimental conditions may not represent real clinical situations. Stride frequency and regularity are the most reliable parameters to determine degree of sedation and are related to the sedation produced. Ataxia should not be considered a separate property of sedation and does not need to be assessed separately to the depth of sedation.

Impact of inhaled sedation on delirium incidence and neurological outcome after cardiac arrest – A propensity-matched control study (Isocare)

RationalePoor neurological outcome is common following a cardiac arrest. The use of volatile anesthetic agents has been proposed during post-resuscitation to improve outcome. ObjectivesTo determine the effects of inhaled isoflurane on neurological outcome, delirium incidence, ICU length-of-stay, ventilation duration, mortality during post-resuscitation care of ICU patients. Patients510 patients were admitted within our medical ICU following a cardiac arrest during the study period, 401 of them being sedated using intravenous sedation prior to 2017 and 109 of them using inhaled isoflurane according to a standardized protocol following 2017. ResultsMatched-pair analysis depicted a delirium incidence decrease, without improved neurologic outcome on ICU discharge (CPC ≤ 2) for isoflurane patients (16.1% vs 32.2%, p 0.03 and 29% vs 23%, p 0.47, respectively). Ventilation duration and ICU length of stay were shorter for isoflurane patients (78 vs 167 h, p 0.01 and 7.9 vs 8.5 days, p 0.01 respectively). Isoflurane had no impact on mortality. ConclusionIn this propensity-matched control study, isoflurane sedation during the post-resuscitation care of ICU patients was associated with a lower incidence of delirium, a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and a reduced ICU length of stay. Prospective data are needed before its widespread use.

(339) SURGICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING OUTPATIENT INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is commonly performed in a hospital or ambulatory setting which accommodates overnight stay. Recent literature has demonstrated that IPP surgery is increasingly being performed as same-day procedures in outpatient settings, not requiring an overnight stay. The implementation of outpatient IPP surgeries aligns with trends in patient-centered care, efficiency, and optimal resource use, encouraging flexible and efficient healthcare delivery. Objective We sought to investigate the rate of complications amongst patients following day surgery insertion of an IPP. The following was collected within 6 weeks of their procedure, 1. infection, 2. hospital admission, 3. emergency/urgent care visit, and 4. additional prescription for analgesia. Methods A mixed-methods study has been performed since February 2023 of all patients undergoing day surgery insertion of an IPP at an outpatient ambulatory surgical centre. Only patients who are classified as ASA 1 or 2 and suitable for day surgery are deemed eligible for outpatient surgery. Patients were enrolled and consented on the day of the procedure. Patients were prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole BID 2 days before surgery along with a Dexedin/Hibiclens wash. Vancomycin and gentamycin were given pre-operatively. Intraoperative Irrisept wash was used during the case for irrigation and implant preparation. All procedures involved the use of a 3-piece prosthetic device and were performed under spinal anesthesia or deep intravenous sedation with local anesthesia using an infra pubic approach. Patients were discharged with a catheter and a drain. Post-operatively, gabapentin, celecoxib and acetaminophen were given for analgesia. Results Currently, 52 patients are enrolled in this study with a mean patient age of 62.5 ± 3.1 years. All procedures were performed successfully with no intra-operative complications. The mean procedure length defined as the time from incision to dressing time was 65.2 ± 17.9 minutes. The mean postoperative duration of stay defined as patient entry into the post-operative recovery room to the time they left the clinic was 115.85 ± 58.2 minutes. Patients were cleared to use the device after 6 weeks. One patient (1.9%) developed a wound infection treated with oral antibiotics, another presented to the emergency department for an untreated pneumonia and 4 patients (7.7%) required additional post-operative analgesia. No patients required hospital admission. Conclusions Our preliminary results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of performing an IPP in the outpatient setting, with rates of complications reflecting those reported in the literature. Safely performing these procedures in an outpatient setting can increase accessibility and reduce wait times while utilizing overnight facilities more effectively. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Scientific.

Comparison between Intramuscular and Intranasal Administration of Sedative Drugs Used for Piglet Castration.

The aim of this study was to test the intranasal administration of different anaesthetics in piglets less than seven days of age undergoing castration for their suitability for providing good-quality sedation and short induction and recovery time with minimal stress. Azaperone alone at a high (5 mg/kg), medium (3 mg/kg) and low dosage (2 mg/kg) and in two combinations with either alfaxalone or midazolam were applied intramuscularly (i.m.) or intranasally (i.n.) to 120 healthy piglets. Compared to intramuscular application, intranasal application showed longer induction times, shorter recovery times and higher scores for defence and vocalisation. In conclusion, the intranasal protocols did not meet the requirements in all groups and their use can therefore not be recommended. A rapid induction phase and good quality of sedation could not be guaranteed.

Anaesthesia Concepts in Patients with Chronic Progressive External Ophthalmoplegia Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery-A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) belongs to the group of mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. Anaesthesia for patients with CPEO may be associated with an increased risk due to known drug effects on mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, the aim of this analysis was to evaluate anaesthesiological concepts in patients with CPEO requiring ophthalmic surgery. This is a retrospective, monocentric cohort analysis of eleven patients with CPEO undergoing ophthalmic surgery either with general anaesthesia or local anaesthesia in a German university hospital from January 2012 to February 2022. A total of twelve ophthalmic surgery procedures were performed in eleven adult patients with CPEO. Six patients underwent surgery after receiving local anaesthesia (LA cohort). Five patients underwent six surgical procedures under general anaesthesia (GA cohort). In five cases within the GA cohort, propofol and remifentanil were used for the maintenance of anaesthesia. In one case, balanced anaesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil was used. The median duration of general anaesthesia was 37.5 min (range, 25-65 min). Patients stayed in the recovery room for a median of 48.5 min (range, 35-70 min). All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. No relevant complications occurred in either the LA or GA cohort. Both local and general anaesthesia are feasible concepts for patients with CPEO undergoing ophthalmic surgery. Propofol, at least with a short duration (less than one hour) of use, appears to be a feasible hypnotic drug in CPEO patients.

Intranasal Atomized Dexmedetomidine in Combination with Intranasal Atomized Butorphanol for dressing change sedation and analgesia in adult burn patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Intranasal Atomized Dexmedetomidine (IAD)+Intranasal Atomized Butorphanol (IAB) combination therapy on adult burn patients undergoing dressing changes. Herein, 46 adult burn patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: Dexmedetomidine-Butorphanol (DB) and Saline-Butorphanol (SB), treated with atomized dexmedetomidine+butorphanol and saline +butorphanol, respectively. The primary outcomes were the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. The secondary outcomes were Mean Blood Pressure (MBP), Heart Rate (HR), Respiratory Rate (RR), peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), total butorphanol consumption, and Adverse Effects (AEs). The two groups were comparable in age, sex, weight, and Total Burn Surface Area (TBSA). During dressing changes, the DB group exhibited significantly lower RSS levels (P<0.05). Besides, the two groups showed no significant differences in VAS scores across all measurement time points. Notably, the DB group exhibited decreased MBP at the beginning of the operation (P<0.0001), 10min after (P<0.0001), and 20min after (P=0.0205). HR decreased significantly at the beginning (P=0.0005) and 10min after (P=0.0088) in the DB group. Furthermore, the two groups showed no significant differences in RR and SpO2 levels. Additionally, the rescue butorphanol dose was lower in the DB group (P<0.001). Finally, dizziness and nausea incidences were significantly lower in the DB group (P<0.05). In conclusion, besides its hemodynamic adverse reactions, the IAD+IAB combination therapy exerted a better sedation effect in adult burn patients than IAB treatment alone.

Validation of the Arabic version of the sleep apnea scale of the sleep disorders questionnaire SDQ-SA

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a widespread syndrome characterized by breathing cessation or reduction. It has a wide range of significant symptoms, such as snoring and fatigue. This study aimed to assess the validity of the Arabic version of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire-Sleep Apnea Scale (SDQ-SA) as a screening tool in Arabic-speaking countries.MethodsThis study was conducted at a sleep disorders clinic at Damascus University’s hospitals from June 2023 to September 2023. Patients aged 18 to 75 who spoke Arabic were included, while those under 18 or over 75, with incomplete questionnaires, previous OSA diagnoses, or certain chronic diseases and sedative drug use were excluded. The questionnaire was translated into the Arabic language by two bilingual researchers. It was then given to around 15 patients to ensure clarity of the questions. The questionnaire was readministered to 30 participants to ensure reliability. After analyzing the results of the Arabic version of the SDQ-SA, we administered Polysomnography (PSG) type III tests to validate our results. Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS version 22.ResultsThe study included 103 participants, with an average age of 56.55 years. The SDQ-SA identified 85 (82.5%) participants as being at high risk for having OSA. Among those classified as high risk, 39 (45.9%) had severe OSA, 34 (40%) had moderate OSA, 8 (9.4%) had mild OSA, and 4 (4.7%) had no OSA based on the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) calculated by the PSG. On the other hand, 18 (17.5%) participants were classified as low risk for OSA, 3 (16.7%) had severe OSA, 3 (16.7%) had moderate OSA, 7 (38.9%) had mild OSA, and 5 (27.8%) had no OSA based on the AHI calculated by the PSG. For AHI ≥ 5, the sensitivity and specificity for men were 0.87 and 0.6, respectively, and for women, they were 0.84 and 0.5, respectively.ConclusionOur study showed that the Arabic version of the SDQ-SA questionnaire had good sensitivity and negative predictive value NPV, especially for patients with moderate to severe OSA. We recommend that physicians use this questionnaire and other similar questionnaires more frequently to identify and treat this underrecognized disease properly.

Daily Sedation Interruption vs Continuous Sedation in Pediatric Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

The effectiveness of daily sedation interruption (DSI, defined as temporary interruption of sedation) has yet to be demonstrated in critically ill pediatric patients. To compare the clinical outcomes of DSI vs continuous intravenous (IV) sedation in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) support in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A systematic search for studies was conducted using predefined keywords and Medical Subject Headings in 5 major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL [Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature], and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from database inception to October 31, 2023. Retrospective and prospective observational studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and systematic reviews were assessed for inclusion. Studies were eligible if they compared DSI to continuous IV sedation in patients aged 18 years or younger requiring MV in the PICU. Study characteristics, including the types of sedation, sedation protocols, and clinical outcomes, were extracted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. A random-effects model was used to pool results from articles for the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were duration of MV and length of PICU stay. Secondary outcomes included total sedative dose requirement, adverse events (eg, complications associated with MV, withdrawal, and delirium), and mortality. A total of 6 RCTs with 2810 pediatric patients (1569 males [55.8%]; mean age, 26.5 [95% CI, 15.0-37.9] months) were included in the final analysis; patients had a mean PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) score of 13.68 (95% CI, 10.75-16.61). Compared with continuous IV sedation, DSI was associated with a reduction in length of PICU stay (5 studies, n = 2770; mean difference [MD], -1.45 [95% CI, -2.75 to -0.15] days; P = .03]. There was no difference in MV duration (5 studies, n = 2750; MD, -0.93 [95% CI, -1.89 to 0.04] days; P = .06), total doses of midazolam (3 studies, n = 191; MD, -1.66 [95% CI, -3.95 to 0.63] mg/kg) and morphine used (2 studies, n = 189; MD, -2.63 [95% CI, -7.01 to 1.75] mg/kg), or adverse events (risk ratio [RR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.74-1.42]; P = .88). There was no difference in mortality between patients exposed vs not exposed to DSI (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.55-1.46]; P = .65). This systematic review and meta-analysis found that use of DSI in pediatric patients was associated with reduced length of PICU stay with no increase in adverse events. Further research is needed to ascertain whether this strategy is associated with improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in PICU survivors.

Effects of spinal-epidural anesthesia combined with intravenous etomidate on adrenocortical and immune stress in elderly patients undergoing anorectal surgery: A retrospective analysis.

The management of anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing surgery presents unique challenges, particularly in mitigating stress responses and ensuring stability. Etomidate may alleviate adrenocortical and immune stress. This study aims to investigate the anesthetic effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) supplemented with etomidate during anorectal surgery in elderly patients. The medical records of 49 cases treated with CSEA and etomidate (ETO group) and 48 cases treated with CSEA alone (control group) were reviewed and analyzed. All patients received ropivacaine hydrochloride for anesthesia, with the ETO group additionally receiving an infusion of etomidate for sedation. Parameters such as arterial blood gas, visual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation scale (RSS), serum cortisol and norepinephrine levels, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lymphocyte ratios were assessed at different time points. Compared to the control group, the ETO group showed increased mean arterial pressure, decreased heart rate, and elevated arterial SpO2 30 minutes after anesthesia. The ETO group also had higher RSS scores, lower VAS scores, and reduced serum cortisol and norepinephrine levels. Additionally, decreased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and IL-8, were observed, along with an increase in the regulatory cytokine IL-10. An increased proportion of CD4+ T cells and a higher CD4/CD8 ratio were also noted. This study demonstrates the benefits of using etomidate to mitigate adrenocortical and immune stress in elderly patients undergoing anorectal surgery.

Procedural sedation and analgesia in Swiss Pediatric Emergency Departments: a national subgroup analysis of a European cross-sectional survey

This study aims to provide a national overview of procedural sedation and analgesia practices within Pediatric Emergency Departments in Switzerland, focusing on the availability of pharmacologic agents, the presence of safety protocols, the utilization of non-pharmacological interventions, and to identify specific local limitations. We conducted a detailed subgroup analysis of Swiss data from a European cross-sectional survey on emergency department pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) practice, isolating data from Swiss sites. The survey, conducted between November 2019 and March 2020, covered various aspects of procedural sedation and analgesia practices. The survey included nine Swiss sites, treating a total of 252,786 patients in 2019. Topical analgesia, inhaled equimolar nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture, and ketamine were largely available. All sites had nurse-directed triage protocols in place; however, opioid administration was included in the protocols in only 66% of sites. Only 33% of hospitals reported common use of intravenous sedation. Barriers to procedural sedation and analgesia implementation included staffing shortages (89% of sites) and lack of dedicated spaces (78%).Conclusions: Despite a broad array of pharmacological and options available in Swiss Pediatric Emergency Departments, challenges remain in standardizing practices across the country. Limited space and staffing and enhancing training on non-pharmacological interventions were identified as potential areas for improving pain and anxiety management in pediatric emergency care. This study underscores the need for national guidelines to harmonize emergency department PSA practices across Switzerland, ensuring all children have access to effective and evidence-based procedural comfort.What is Known:• Recent research, conducted in European emergency departments, suggests that in pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) resources are limited, and practice is heterogeneousWhat is New:• Swiss pediatric hospitals offer a wide range of pharmacological options for pain and anxiety management. However, significant barriers to PSA were identified. These include external control of intravenous sedation and insufficient integration of non-pharmacological interventions, such as child life specialists and procedural hypnosis. National guidelines are needed to harmonize PSA practices

Comparison of Patient and Operator Comfort Between Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine as Conscious Sedation Drugs for Patients Undergoing Bilateral Impacted Mandibular 3rdmolar Extraction

Comparison of Patient and Operator Comfort Between Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine as Conscious Sedation Drugs for Patients Undergoing Bilateral Impacted Mandibular 3rdmolar Extraction

A Randomised Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine-Ropivacaine Versus Fentanyl-Ropivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia.

Background An epidural block is a superior potent approach to labour analgesia, and ropivacaine combined with fentanyl has been successfully practised for it. Dexmedetomidine, as a novel form of labour analgesia, must be researched further. Our study results give insight into the epidural block and come up with a pioneering approach for labour analgesia. Methodology A total of 68 parturients were assigned to two equal groups and received either dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine (Group RD) or fentanylwith ropivacaine (Group RF). Parturients received a loading dose and maintenance was given using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Analgesia onset time, labour duration, rescue dose requirement, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were noted. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) scores of newborns, Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores of mothers, and maternal side effects were observed. Results Group RDshowed a shorter onset time of analgesia (group RD: 12.50 ± 1.31 minutes vs. group RF: 15.26 ± 1.46 min), less local anaesthetics requirement (group RD: 47.54 ±5.37 ml vs. group RF: 59.05 ± 6.62 ml), less number of bolus doses (group RD: 0.15 ± 0.36 vs. group RF: 1.21 ± 0.95), and shorter duration from the epidural administration to the delivery (group RD: 312.97 ± 42.40 minutes vs. group RF: 345.94 ±14.67 minutes) than group RF. VAS values of the RD group were significantly less than the RF group. The RSS scores were comparably low in both groups, and excessive sedation was not seen in any group. Newborn APGAR values were comparably on the higher side in the two groups. Adverse effects were observed in the two groups, like hypotension, nausea/vomiting, bradycardia, shivering, and pruritus, which were insignificant. Conclusion The RD group showed an improved analgesic effect with a quicker onset of action,reduced requirement of local anaesthetics, and lower VAS scores compared to the RF group. With ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine shows more efficacy than fentanyl during epidural block and is a safe alternative for labour pain management.

Why sedative hypnotics often fail in development.

Drug development to support anaesthesia and sedation has been slow with few candidates emerging from preclinical discovery and limited innovation beyond attempted reformulation of existing compounds. The market is well supported by low-cost generic products and development compounds have not been shown to improve patient outcomes or possess other distinctive characteristics to justify the cost of development. To make progress in a large-volume, low margin and highly competitive environment requires meaningful advances in relevant basic science. Opportunities exist, but probably require bolder initiatives than further attempts at reformulation or fiddling with the structure of propofol. Extending development ambitions to include nonanaesthesiologist providers challenges professional boundaries but may facilitate cost-effective changes in patterns of care.

Intravenous Sedation and Analgesia in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.

Background Painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department often require the use of sedation and analgesia to ensure adequate pain control, a right of children and adolescents. This study aims to describe the procedural sedation and analgesia with intravenous medications performed in a pediatric emergency department. Methods This is a retrospective descriptive study of intravenous sedoanalgesia used in a pediatric emergency department of a level II district hospital in the Lisbon metropolitan area from October 2018 to December 2023. The type of intervention, drugs used, and adverse events were analyzed. Results A total of 615 patients were included in the study; 65.7% (n=404) were male with a median age of 6 years. The most frequently performed procedures were wound suturing (50.9%, n=313) and fracture reduction (36.3%, n=223). The drugs used for sedation and analgesia were ketamine (99.2%, n=610), midazolam (95.8%, n=589), propofol (1.6%, n=10), and morphine (0.5%, n=3). The majority of patients received midazolam and ketamine in association (93.8%, n=577). A total of 50 adverse events (8.1%) were recorded in 42 patients. The most frequent side effects were transient oxygen desaturation (2%, n=12), vomiting (1.5%, n=9), apnea/bradypnea (1%, n=6), and hallucinations (0.8%, n=5). The occurrence of adverse events was not dose-dependent (p >0.05). Respiratory complications resolved without requiring invasive interventions. Children were sedated by a pediatric intensivist in 68.1% (n=419), by a general pediatrician in 26.7% (n=164), and by a pediatric resident in 2% (n=12). Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that intravenous sedoanalgesia, particularly the combination of ketamine and midazolam, is a safe method for sedation in pediatric patients, with a low rate of adverse events.

Advantages of remimazolam for sedation in impacted tooth extraction.

This study aims to compare the sedative effects of remimazolam and midazolam during impacted tooth extraction to provide a comfortable sedation treatment for patients with dental anxiety. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted, in which 60 patients undergoing intravenous sedation for mandibular impacted third molar extraction were evenly divided into either the remimazolam or midazolam group. Prior to receiving a nerve blocker, the patients were sedated with remimazolam or midazolam. Various parameters were recorded and analyzed, including onset time, awakening time, recovery time, modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS) scores before and after surgery, patient-doctor satisfaction levels, postoperative side effects within 24 hours, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at different time points. Compared with the midazolam group, patients in the remimazolam group demonstrated significantly shorter onset, awakening, and recovery times as well as lower postoperative MDAS scores and higher levels of patient-doctor satisfaction. Fewer postoperative side effects were reported in the remimazolam group, although the differences were not statistically significant. The use of remimazolam demonstrates faster onset and recovery, superior efficacy in reducing dental anxiety, and enhanced satisfaction among patients and doctors, thereby presenting distinct advantages for sedation treatment for patients with dental anxiety.

Abusive use of Zolpidem as a Result of COVID-19 and Perspectives of Continuity of the Problem in the Post-Pandemic Period.

Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic drug that works as a positive modulator of Gamma-Amino Butyric Acid-A (GABA-A) receptors, with high selectivity for α1 subunits. Given this selective binding, the drug has a strong hypnotic activity. Social isolation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has contributed to increased rates of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. As a result, studies have pointed to a possible increase in the indiscriminate use of drugs with sedative effects, such as Zolpidem, during the pandemic. The aim of this work was to present prospective evidence that warns of the possibility of the abusive use of Zolpidem even after the pandemic. High rates of addiction to this drug have been reported around the world after the emergence of the coronavirus. Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and from Medicaid support the continuing growth in prescription and indiscriminate use of Zolpidem during the pandemic and afterward. Therefore, there is enough evidence to support the indiscriminate use of this drug since the beginning of the pandemic. Rates of indiscriminate use of sedatives may continue to increase in the post-pandemic period, especially if strict control measures are not taken by health authorities.

A Systematic Review on Sedative and Hypnotics

Abstract: Sedative and hypnotic drugs are central nervous system depressants primarily used to induce calmness, reduce anxiety, and promote sleep. These medications include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and various non-benzodiazepine sleep aids, each varying in their mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profiles. Benzodiazepines, such as diazepam and alprazolam, enhance the effect of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) at the GABA-A receptor, resulting in sedative, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, and anticonvulsant effects. They are commonly prescribed for anxiety disorders, insomnia, seizures, and muscle spasms. However, their use is associated with risks of tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal symptoms. Barbiturates, such as phenobarbital, were once widely used for their sedative and hypnotic properties but have largely been replaced by benzodiazepines and other safer alternatives due to their higher risk of overdose and dependence. Barbiturates enhance GABAergic transmission but also directly activate GABA receptors, leading to more profound central nervous system depression. Non-benzodiazepine sleep aids, including drugs like zolpidem, eszopiclone, and zaleplon, act on the benzodiazepine receptor site but have a different chemical structure. These drugs are often preferred for short-term treatment of insomnia due to their relatively lower risk of dependence and adverse effects compared to benzodiazepines.