This essay describes the most important aspects of the relationship between religion and the state, especially in the case of Indonesia. It argues that, on the one hand, religion and belonging to one’s religion should be acknowledged as a fundamental human right, and on the other, religion should also be protected by the state. Unfortunately, most of the time the state seems to prioritise religion over the people. As a result, minority groups may experience marginalisation, violence, and discrimination. In this regard, I will show that Habermas' view of the relation between reason and faith offers a cogent framework for structuring Indonesia's normative interaction between politics and religion. This paper makes the case that the state's function in the Indonesian pluralistic society is to ensure religious freedom rather than to defend religion. Habermas holds that religion in has a substantial role in the public sphere even in a secular society. On the other hand, religions in a pluralistic society must also learn to reconcile disparities of their core ethical and metaphysical ideas. As a result, religions living in Indonesia may contribute to uphold democracy, human rights, equality, and freedom.
Read full abstract