Negotiating a Perilous Empowerment: Appalachian Women's Literacies. Erica Abrams Locklear. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2011.Literacy, most commonly thought of as the ability to read and write, is generally considered to be necessary and desirable. Erica Abrams Locklear complicates both the definition and perception of literacy in her study of Appalachian women's stories. Looking at fiction and autobiography, Locklear considers the literacy stories of four Appalachian authors - Harriette Simpson Arnow, Linda Scott DeRosier, Denise Giardina, and Lee Smith - to highlight how, For Appalachian women, the transformative powers of education, and more specifically literacy, are no doubt empowering, but they can also be perilous, concluding that [gaining new technical, social, and cultural literacies, especially ones that might not be shared by those in the learner's home community, almost always comes at a (2). This price is often the sacrifice of relationships with the individual's community of origin.Locklear builds on the work of James Paul Gee who asserts that Discourses are ways of being in the world, or forms of life which integrate words, acts, values, beliefs, attitudes, and social identities, as well as gestures, glances, body positions, and clothes and then defines literacy as mastery of a secondary Discourse (5-6). This definition is the crux of Locklear's argument as she examines how the acquisition of a secondary literacy is far more complicated than we tend to believe.When literacy becomes more than simple reading and writing, but instead is understood as fluency with a different cultural subjectivity, it becomes a far more complex phenomenon. As the title of her work suggests, literacies empower, but also expose negative implications. As all of the writers and characters Locklear studied reveal, their new literacy makes them suspect to their own communities. Many of the women are accused of not knowing their rightful place in society. The assumption is that by acquiring a second literacy, you are acknowledging the inadequacy of your own culture. In addition, the new perspectives that come with literacy cause the women to see their original communities differently. In other words, they both perceive and are perceived differently.Locklear also addresses perception when she discusses mainstream society's problematic views of Appalachian literacy. She cites many studies, documentaries, and other texts that reinforce stereotypes that Appalachians are both unintelligent and unable to read and write. Both Locklear and the authors she studies separate the two assumptions and then challenge them by presenting a more complex portrayal, showing not only how limiting the stereotypes surrounding the region are, but also how a second literacy can have as many negative effects as positive ones. …
Read full abstract