Sera from fowls infected with Eimeria tenella acquired the capacity to lyse second-generation merozoites in vitro. Serum became positive for lysins approximately 8 days following a moderate oral inoculation of oocysts although the time of appearance and the intensity of the lytic reaction were influenced by the size of the oocyst dose. Surgically cecectomized birds produced lysins, presumably in response to an active infection in the large intestine. The lytic response in bursectomized chickens was weaker than in nonbursectomized controls. First-generation merozoites formed approximately 72 hr after infection probably provided a major stimulus to lysin production. The lytic effect was diminished in heated immune serum. Dialysis against 0.85% NaCl caused no diminution of the lytic activity. Fractionation by gel filtration and separation by disc electrophoresis showed that the behavior of the lytic component was that which would be expected of globulins of intermediate size. Sporozoites, unlike merozoites, were lysed in normal serum and this effect was enhanced following an infection. Evidence for the presence of an antibody response explaining the acquired resistance to cecal coccidiosis has been sought by many investigators. Indirect evidence for protective humoral resistance was given by Burns and Challey (1959) and by Horton-Smith, Beattie, and Long (1961). In both studies, protection was induced in one cecal pouch through an immunizing infection in the other. Direct evidence has also appeared that an antibody response is elicited during infection of the chicken with Eimeria tenella. McDermott and Stauber (1954) reported the agglutination of second-generation merozoites by sera of chickens recovered from cecal coccidiosis. Rose and Long (1962) demonstrated precipitins in immune sera, but showed that their presence was not required for a solid resistance to infection. Further evidence for the lack of protective humoral antibody was indicated by the inability of Pierce, Long, and Horton-Smith (1963) to passively transfer immunity to E. tenella with hyperimmune serum. Long, Rose, and Pierce (1963) and Rose (1963) reported the in vitro lysis of E. tenella sporozoites and merozoites by sera from resistant chickens. The lytic activity resembled a typical complement-requiring antibody reaction. The presence of serum lysins was evidently not required for immunity since birds immunized by injections of parasite extracts Received for publication 21 September 1964. * This research was supported by research grant AI-04101 from NIAID, U. S. Public Health Service and in part by the Graduate School Research Committee, University of Wisconsin. yielded lytic sera yet remained susceptible to oral infection with oocysts. This paper confirms the presence of lysins in the serum of infected chickens and provides some additional information on factors influencing their appearance and activity. We have als made a preliminary characterization of the lytic factor from immune serum. MATERIALS AND METHODS White Leghorn cockerels were obtained as dayold chicks from local hatcheries and were fed an all mash ration containing no antibiotics or coccidiostats. The birds were kept in isolation until needed for experimental use. Periodic fecal examinations for oocysts were made to assure freedom from accidental infections. Fresh oocyst cultures were prepared routinely from the ceca of donor birds 7 days after inoculation with 2 to 5 X 103 oocysts. Second-generation merozoites were obtained from scrapings of the cecal mucosa of birds killed 90 hr after inoculation of 1 to 2 X 10? oocysts. The scrapings were homogenized in 80 ml of 0.85% saline in a micro-Waring blendor and the mixture was poured into two 50-ml centrifuge tubes. After standing for about 10 min the homogenate became stratified into a lower liquid portion, a flocculent layer above it, and a foamy layer at the top. The liquid portion was removed with a pipette and centrifuged. The sediment contained large numbers of merozoites, host erythrocytes, and tissue debris. After two washings with saline the merozoites were resuspended in 8.0 ml of saline. Suspensions of first-generation merozoites were prepared in the same fashion from chicks infected 72 hr previously. Much cleaner merozoite suspensions were obtained by passing homogenates prepared as above through a column (2.0 by 4.0 cm) composed of Whatman ashless cellulose powder equilibrated against 0.85% saline. This removed much of the