Проведена экспертная оценка особенностей применения способов обоснования соответствия зданий и сооружений требованиям пожарной безопасности с учетом правовых положений и практического опыта применения. Даны предложения по корректировке нормативно-правовых актов. An expert assessment of the application peculiarities of methods to substantiate the compliance of buildings and structures with fire safety requirements was carried out taking into account legal provisions and practical application experience. Proposals for the adjustment of regulatory legal acts are given. It is noted that in Article 6 of Federal Law 123-FZ, the methods of justification are present in a list, which creates the illusion, for example, that the choice of method is not limited by anything. In fact, each method of justification, as shown in this article, has its own scope of application. The changes affected both the list of compliance conditions and the regulatory legal acts issued in the development of the considered justification methods. This requires not only a deeper study of the system of technical regulation of fire safety in construction as a whole, but also to examine the specifics of the application of each of the methods of justification for fire safety of objects of protection. A situation where the requirements of the technical regulations will be met and only the standards of organizations, or only the calculation of risk, or only special technical conditions will be used, is impossible in practice. In any case, the conditions of the codes of rules will be fulfilled, just in some part there will be certain deviations from them through special technical conditions, standards of organizations or fire risk calculation. At the same time, there is no concept of "deviation from the rulebook". Keywords: technical regulations, fire safety in construction, code of rules, fire risk, special technical conditions, calculation justifications, organization standard
Read full abstract