Abstract The objective of the essay was to address the philosophy of science and research, highlighting how scientific knowledge is developed, validated, and characterized. An empirical, systematic methodology based on rigorous observation and experimentation is emphasized, guaranteeing scientific findings based on verifiable evidence. In addition, the iterative nature of scientific research highlights the importance of flexibility to guide the development of new knowledge. As a basic criterion for distinguishing between science and non-science, Karl Popper’s falsifiability criterion states that a hypothesis must be experimentally disprovable. In addition, the theories of scientific revolutions and paradigms (Thomas Kuhn) are explored, highlighting how new ways of thinking about various things can lead to important advances in the understanding of science. It also considers the debate between realism and anti-realism, addressing research ethics, emphasizing issues of moral responsibility, ethical standards and equitable distribution of benefits or risks. In conclusion, critical and morally responsible conduct, which has a beneficial impact on society, is largely based on philosophical considerations of science. In order to ensure that the expansion of knowledge has a favorable impact on this society while respecting rigorous ethical standards, the philosophical importance in the critical appraisal of such scientific activity is emphasized. Keywords: philosophy, ethics, research, scientific knowledge.
Read full abstract