The study is determined by the needs of professional growth in the current conditions of the national educational sphere and the desire to find the most promising direction of the strategy of all civilizational development of the Fatherland and offer effective means to improve quality of life, combat pandemics and collapses. Therefore, the main goal is to critically analyze the predictions of the future for humanity as a whole and assess the usefulness and strategic direction of the main analytical materials of NASU on civilization choices and government decisions and plans for the next ten years. Specific tasks include the presentation of the author’s results in the analysis of Homo’s transition from cannibalism to agrarian humanism and the impact on modern archetypes that determine events in Ukraine and Western Europe. The methods are theoretically based on the fundamental laws of philosophy and combine the main achievements of the exact sciences and humanities. In the applied aspect, we prefer to take into account the latest developments in many young scientific sectors and promising areas we have opened, which we propose to call “nooscience”. We combine textual and infographic presentation of explanations and suggestions. The main results include a philosophical and ideological explanation of the reasons and features of Homo’s transition from cannibalism to agrarian humanism in the range of 15000-7000 years ago, proving the crucial role of the ancestors of Ukrainians and European farmers. The difference between our explanation of this Neolithic revolution and the attempts of our predecessors to emphasize industrial change is to prove the crucial role of inventing a promising worldview as a means of uniting the forces and intellects of thousands to defeat humanism and form a proto-Ukrainian and humane archetype. Its spread from the Atlantic to the Trans-Urals, its disappearance in Western Europe during the genocide during the years of the Great Trypillia and its further preservation in the zones of its influence has been proved. On this basis, critical remarks were made on the proposals of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the plans of the leaders of Ukraine. They ignore our archetype and mistakenly consider European post-genocidal models which are unsuitable for us. Conclusions and proposals include an emphasis on the orientation of the development strategy of Ukraine-XXI on the accelerated application of nootechnologies and the formation of the entire humanitarian sphere on the worldview paradigm of our ancient ancestors.