Scholarly Collaboration Research Articles

PhD-DNP Collaboration: An Integrative Review of Scholarly Partnerships in Nursing.

Nurses holding terminal degrees, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Doctor of Nursing Science (DNS), and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), fulfill different roles in nursing. The continued growth of nursing science and practice is dependent on alliances between these nurses that produce state-of-the-art knowledge and support the translation of evidence to practice. This integrative review described characteristics of scholarly collaborations between nurses holding a research-focused degree, the PhD, and those holding a practice-focused degree, the DNP. Five major nursing, medicine, and education databases were searched for peer-reviewed, original articles addressing or describing the characteristics of PhD-DNP scholarly collaborations, published through March 2023. In total, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria, and an integrative synthesis was conducted using constant comparison and thematic analysis. Findings included one overarching theme, Role Clarification, as well as four subthemes that emerged across the sample, describing key characteristics of collaborative PhD-DNP scholarship: (1) Mutual understanding and appreciation of strengths; (2) Strategic project planning and team building; (3) Clear organizational/administrative directives and guidance; and (4) Shared goals for the nursing profession. Articles describing the collaboration between nurses holding doctoral degrees are limited and provide primarily lower-level research evidence and evidence-based practice outcomes. Despite efforts to foster scholarly collaborations among nurses holding terminal degrees, more research is needed to clarify individual roles, offer tangible strategies for collaboration, and measure outcomes of collaboration benefitting healthcare systems, patient outcomes, and the nursing profession. This integrative review involved only the review of the extant literature.

Exploring Research Dynamics in Aggression and Violence

Background: From 1994 to 2023, the research landscape on the subjects of aggression and violence has grown considerably, influenced by a growth in concerns around mental health, the prevention of violence, and cross-disciplinary approaches in the study of human behavior. The rising complexity of such fields requires a bibliometric analysis for an understanding of the thematic trends, key research areas, and scholarly collaborations that have shaped this body of knowledge. Objective: This study attempts to conduct an inclusive bibliometric analysis representing important themes, research trends, and interdisciplinary relationships of scholarship on psychology, aggression, violence prevention, and other public health-related topics in the past three decades. This paper aims at identifying influential topics, authors, and emerging areas of interest as well as shedding light on potential gaps in this research area. Methods: A bibliometric approach has been applied using VOSviewer for network visualization and mapping. The dataset includes scholarly publications in the period between 1994 and 2023; co-authorship, citation analysis, and keyword co-occurrence are included. Major research clusters, prominent authors, and thematic trends identified in this paper represent the main findings in a visual manner. An overview of key topics and their interrelations is shown visually in word clouds and network visualizations. Findings: Results show that psychology is the most dominant discipline in the discourse of aggression, violence, and public health. Dominant topics include mental health, suicide prevention, poison control, and occupational safety. Other fast-growing topics deal with cyber-aggression and media-fueled violence, reflecting technological changes impinging on behavioral studies. There is considerable interdisciplinary interaction, especially between psychology and medicine and/or public health. These three issues do not cover the broadness of research; other areas, such as environmental health and substance abuse, are underrepresented in the scholarship. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis underlines the role of psychology and public health as significant in addressing aggression, violence, and mental health. The research landscape is large and interdisciplinary, with future research needing to cover environmental, socio-economic, and systemic factors of public health even more. Enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration and embedding of hitherto less explored topics will play a decisive role in the further development of a comprehensive understanding of the complex issues at play. Novelty: The paper therefore carves out a distinctive bibliometric perspective on the evolution of research in psychology, aggression, and violence within the period 1994-2023, pointing not just toward the themes at the forefront, but also the emergent trends and lacunae in the literature. By identifying key areas of scholarly concentration and underrepresented areas, the analysis constructs a roadmap to future research and advances a more integrated approach toward resolving behavioral and public health problems.

Leadership as Métissage: Seeking to Indigenize our faculty of education

As a faculty of education, we have ethical, professional, and legal commitments that compel us to make meaningful and significant contributions to reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people. This work is long overdue, justice has too long been denied, the ongoing legacies of colonization that play out through education need to be disrupted now. Yet this work must be done in a good way, decolonization is required, many complexities exist stemming from the past and present dominance of Eurocentric knowledge in our society, K-12, and post-secondary education systems. The authors of this paper made up all of the full-time staff members in a faculty of education. We used a collaborative scholarship of teaching and learning research project and a Métissage methodology to seek to collectively lead the Indigenization of learning, teaching, leadership, and scholarship in our faculty. In braided narrative vignettes, we situate ourselves in relationship to this work, explore tensions and complexities, wrestle with axiological considerations, reflect on practices we have engaged in, share how we have taken up this work with our students, colleagues, and school partners, identify questions and steps in front of us, and reflect on how Métissage has served as a shared leadership process to support the Indigenization of our faculty and our University as a whole. Our stories are situated in a Bachelor of Education after degree program that serves approximately 120 students located in the traditional territories of the Blackfoot Confederacy, the Tsuut’ina Nation, and the Stoney Nakoda Nations.

Large Language Models in Biomedical and Health Informatics: A Review with Bibliometric Analysis.

Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly become important tools in Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), potentially enabling new ways to analyze data, treat patients, and conduct research. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of LLM applications in BHI, highlighting their transformative potential and addressing the associated ethical and practical challenges. We reviewed 1698 research articles from January 2022 to December 2023, categorizing them by research themes and diagnostic categories. Additionally, we conducted network analysis to map scholarly collaborations and research dynamics. Our findings reveal a substantial increase in the potential applications of LLMs to a variety of BHI tasks, including clinical decision support, patient interaction, and medical document analysis. Notably, LLMs are expected to be instrumental in enhancing the accuracy of diagnostic tools and patient care protocols. The network analysis highlights dense and dynamically evolving collaborations across institutions, underscoring the interdisciplinary nature of LLM research in BHI. A significant trend was the application of LLMs in managing specific disease categories, such as mental health and neurological disorders, demonstrating their potential to influence personalized medicine and public health strategies. LLMs hold promising potential to further transform biomedical research and healthcare delivery. While promising, the ethical implications and challenges of model validation call for rigorous scrutiny to optimize their benefits in clinical settings. This survey serves as a resource for stakeholders in healthcare, including researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, to understand the current state and future potential of LLMs in BHI.

Promoting Collaborative Scholarship During the COVID-19 Pandemic Through an Innovative COVID-19 Data Explorer and Repository at Yale School of Medicine: Development and Usability Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic sparked a surge of research publications spanning epidemiology, basic science, and clinical science. Thanks to the digital revolution, large data sets are now accessible, which also enables real-time epidemic tracking. However, despite this, academic faculty and their trainees have been struggling to access comprehensive clinical data. To tackle this issue, we have devised a clinical data repository that streamlines research processes and promotes interdisciplinary collaboration. This study aimed to present an easily accessible up-to-date database that promotes access to local COVID-19 clinical data, thereby increasing efficiency, streamlining, and democratizing the research enterprise. By providing a robust database, a broad range of researchers (faculty and trainees) and clinicians from different areas of medicine are encouraged to explore and collaborate on novel clinically relevant research questions. A research platform, called the Yale Department of Medicine COVID-19 Explorer and Repository (DOM-CovX), was constructed to house cleaned, highly granular, deidentified, and continually updated data from over 18,000 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from January 2020 to January 2023, across the Yale New Haven Health System. Data across several key domains were extracted including demographics, past medical history, laboratory values during hospitalization, vital signs, medications, imaging, procedures, and outcomes. Given the time-varying nature of several data domains, summary statistics were constructed to limit the computational size of the database and provide a reasonable data file that the broader research community could use for basic statistical analyses. The initiative also included a front-end user interface, the DOM-CovX Explorer, for simple data visualization of aggregate data. The detailed clinical data sets were made available for researchers after a review board process. As of January 2023, the DOM-CovX Explorer has received 38 requests from different groups of scientists at Yale and the repository has expanded research capability to a diverse group of stakeholders including clinical and research-based faculty and trainees within 15 different surgical and nonsurgical specialties. A dedicated DOM-CovX team guides access and use of the database, which has enhanced interdepartmental collaborations, resulting in the publication of 16 peer-reviewed papers, 2 projects available in preprint servers, and 8 presentations in scientific conferences. Currently, the DOM-CovX Explorer continues to expand and improve its interface. The repository includes up to 3997 variables across 7 different clinical domains, with continued growth in response to researchers' requests and data availability. The DOM-CovX Data Explorer and Repository is a user-friendly tool for analyzing data and accessing a consistently updated, standardized, and large-scale database. Its innovative approach fosters collaboration, diversity of scholarly pursuits, and expands medical education. In addition, it can be applied to other diseases beyond COVID-19.

EDITORIAL

In the dynamic realm of academic publishing, embracing change is crucial. Beginning in its issue 46.1, International Sports Studies (ISS) is transitioning from a subscription-based model to a fully open-access platform, enhancing inclusivity and scholarly collaboration. This shift addresses the barriers posed by traditional paywalls, enabling unrestricted access to high-quality research for all, especially those from underfunded institutions and developing nations. The new model emphasizes transparency, replicability, and public engagement in scientific research. To sustain rigorous peer review under open access, ISS has implemented a socialized Article Processing Charge (APC) system and substantial discount programs for scholars from low-income regions. This transition aligns with global trends toward open science, fostering a collaborative and innovative research environment. ISS extends gratitude to its editorial team and reviewers, whose efforts are vital in this transformative journey, heralding a new era dedicated to the free flow of knowledge.

Using Social Learning Spaces to Think Beyond and Innovate Conventional Conferencing Formats

Across the academic landscape, scientific organizations host conferences that enable researchers to come together to foster learning, stimulate innovation, and promote change. Within the diverse field of kinesiology, conferences can help develop and disseminate knowledge on a range of issues such as athlete development and coach education. The purpose of the present article is to discuss the possibilities of thinking beyond conventional conferencing formats by creating dynamic social learning spaces that promote networking, critical thinking, and reflexivity. The theory underpinning social learning spaces is explained, followed by a narrative chronology of the three phases of evolution of the blue room group, an interdisciplinary collaboration of youth sport scholars who aim to foster innovation across subdisciplines of kinesiology. An interpretative summary of the blue room group as a social learning space is presented, in accordance with the principles of caring to make a difference, engaging uncertainty, and paying attention. The perceived benefits of kinesiology, as well as the challenges and limitations of the blue room, are discussed based on the authors’ experiences operating within a continuously evolving and shifting social learning space.

Braiding frameworks for collaborative stewardship scholarship

Human-environment relationships are most frequently viewed from evolutionary perspectives, despite the vast body of literature which highlights how many Indigenous peoples engage with and understand place, plants, and animals as kinship relations. My goals in this essay are twofold: first, to suggest we adopt the phrase stewardship to recognize and uphold notions of respect, reciprocity, and relationships that are common within many Indigenous worldviews, and secondly, to advocate for the use of pluralistic approaches to our collaborative scholarship. I offer examples from my own experiences in reconstructing stewardship histories across people, plants, and places in the Pacific Northwest.

Perceptions of the Leadership Through Scholarship Fellowship Graduates: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Leadership.

Despite increasing numbers of faculty identifying as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) over the last few decades, URiM representation in academic medicine leadership has changed little. The Society of Teachers of Family Medicine funded the Leadership Through Scholarship Fellowship (LTSF) to target this population and provide a framework for scholarly success. Based on responses to open-ended questions from a leadership survey, we characterize how early-career URiM family medicine faculty view leadership and assess attitudes and perceptions of leadership development. A survey, developed by survey experts from multiple institutions and consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions, was sent to the first two cohorts after the LTSF program. All LTSF participants identified as URiM and as early-career (5 years or less since fellowship or residency) family medicine faculty. Fellowship faculty collected anonymous survey responses through Qualtrics (Qualtrics, LLC). We conducted thematic analysis with emergent and iterative coding by two experienced qualitative researchers. All of the fellows surveyed (N=19) completed the survey. The qualitative researchers identified the following themes: leadership development (with subthemes of collaborative scholarship and request for mentoring), and barriers to leadership and scholarship (with subthemes of lack of time, lack of support, and diminished opportunities for advancement). These themes represent lessons learned from URiM faculty participating in a single faculty development fellowship. Collaborative scholarship, both as an early-career faculty need and a leadership responsibility, is a new contribution to the existing literature. While identified by URiM family medicine faculty, these themes are likely familiar to early-career faculty across all medical specialties and faculty identities. These lessons can guide senior academic leaders in preparing early-career faculty for leadership in academic medicine.

Analysis of the ethical issues in authorship of collaborative research. Observations inspired by the historical case study of Gerard L. Blaes' (Blasius) claim to sole authorship of 'Anatome medullae spinalis'.

This paper discusses the historical context of collaborative research and authorship disputes, exemplified by the complex relationship between Dutch anatomist and physician Gerard L. Blaes and his East-Central European mentee, Daniel Gödtke, during the study of medulla spinalis. The study employs historical analysis to unravel the dynamics of scholarly collaboration, emphasizing the significance of mentorship in scientific progress and the communal nature of knowledge exchange. This historical analysis is based on primary sources and historical records. It underscores Blaes's strategy to circumvent public confrontations regarding the authorship of the seminal work 'Anatome medullae spinalis, et nervorum inde provenientium' (1666). As a teacher, he facilitated his student's participation in a public disputation to avert public authorship conflicts over the book. This ultimately led to the publication of two distinct versions of 'Anatome medullae spinalis.' The first one was co-authored by the mentor and his mentee, while the latter was solely attributed to the mentor. This historical narrative raises essential questions about attributing individual contributions in medical sciences, echoing concerns still pertinent in contemporary academia. Additionally, it makes visible the power dynamics inherent in faculty-students relationships and the potential repercussions of authorship disputes on scholars' reputations. By drawing parallels between historical and modern authorship dilemmas, this study contributes to ongoing discussions on equitable authorship in scientific research and publishing. It not only highlights a historical precedent for the complex dynamics of mentor-mentee collaborations and authorship disputes but also illuminates how these practices continue to influence contemporary academic and publishing customs.

Becoming a Collaborative Scholar: A Metalogue

In this article, the three authors, each of whom has been collaborating in various ways with practitioners for over 40 years, engage in a metalogue to explore their experiences of engaging in collaborative research. A metalogue is a reflective conversation whereby the mode of conversation mirrors the topic being discussed. In this illustration of a metalogue, the authors explore how they have developed as collaborative scholars. Both in the respective stories and in the metalogue the themes of being in a space of not-knowing, relevance and relationships emerged. The article offers an account of how the authors grew into their respective collaborative scholarship approaches, the key themes that emerged and of the metalogue process as a method for shared reflection on the practice of scholarship.

Graph-based algorithm for exploring collaboration mechanisms and hidden patterns among top scholars

During past several decades, extensive interdisciplinary collaboration has greatly promoted the scientific innovation. Especially, collaborations among top scholars have become major driving forces in advancing scientific progress. Therefore, this article focusses on the mechanism and modes underlying collaboration of scholars. The advantage of this paper resides in its capacity to elucidate the hierarchical architecture and dynamics of top scholars' collaboration, discern the hidden collaborative association probabilities, and provide recommendation for fostering intellectual exchange and information dissemination. Results show that: (1) In terms of collaboration features, it exhibits a significant clustering effect. The largest three communities concentrate in Asia, Europe, and North America. Meanwhile, we further introduce dominant flow analysis, an algorithm originated from the geography, to excavate hierarchy architecture of collaborations. We have identified three kinds of scholars who perform distinct roles in the dissemination of knowledge: leading scholars tend to play a guiding role, senior scholars tend to act as a bridge to enlarge the collaboration range, and general scholars predominantly contribute to the collaborations. (2) In terms of formation mechanism of collaborations, we found the collaboration of top scholars are grounded in their publications’ quality instead of quantity. Furthermore, the closed rather than opened triangular configuration potently catalyzes knowledge transmission. (3) Meanwhile, hidden collaborative partnerships are extrapolated based on the model proposed in this article. In these hidden patterns, scholars who are geographically close and have similar research background potentially develop further research collaborations, and at least one scholar in collaborations has high citations.

The drivers, features, and influence of first scientific collaboration among core scholars from Chinese library and information field

AbstractCollaboration among scholars in scientific research is increasingly common, making it important to address how to recommend suitable collaborators, especially for their first cooperation. To address this issue, this study focuses on 1487 core scholars in the field of library and information science in China, and then analyzes the impact of academic differences between these scholars in their first collaboration by using the propensity matching score method. It uncovers potential driving factors for scholars to reach first collaborations, including similar research productivity, contrasting academic influence, aligned research directions, and distinct research focuses. Then, the distribution of features of three types of first cooperation demonstrates that if one or both partners publish the first paper in this collaboration, the collaborative relationship tends to be more enduring and stable. In addition, the subsequent collaboration of scholars and the change in their academic differences are related to the initial academic differences between the two parties in the first collaboration. These patterns can be used to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the scholar recommendation mechanism, hence promoting research collaboration and knowledge exchange.

Do universities support solutions-oriented collaborative research? Constraints to wicked problems scholarship in higher education

Questions abound over how universities should teach and prepare the next generation of researchers to confront current and future wicked problems. With so much focus on curriculum and training, it is crucial that we step back and reflect on higher education’s capabilities to foster solution-oriented, collaborative research. What do the institutional incentive structures in higher education support, in terms of practices and outputs related to scholarship? And are those structures felt evenly across the academy? Those doing research in these spaces—in terms of title, autonomy, power, privilege, and status—vary widely by their institutional locations as well as in terms of their ties to broader disciplinary norms. To assess whether these dynamic, contested institutional landscapes afford so-called wicked problem scholarship, this paper draws from survey and interview data collected from 44 researchers working at the nexus of food, energy, and water systems at Carnegie Research 1 universities in the United States. Findings point to an uneven institutional landscape, which is shown to shape in different ways the type of solutions-oriented, collaborative scholarship fostered across the five positions examined. The paper concludes by reflecting on the paper’s findings, particularly in terms of what the data tell us about higher education as a place that fosters wicked problems scholarship, while also highlighting the study’s limitations.

Critical Analysis of the Research on Digital Literacy

Aim Research critical analysis will provide a comprehensive overview of the complexities inherent in digital literacy and its pivotal role in shaping the future of academic scholarship. This study uses a systematic literature review methodology to comprehensively examine digitalization initiatives in Digital Literacy Research. We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing literature on Critical Analysis of Digital Literacy Research. conclusion, the exploration of digital literacy and its impact on scholarly endeavors across diverse academic disciplines has shed light on the multifaceted ethical considerations and the need for tailored ethical guidelines and best practices. As we look towards the future of digital literacy research, it is crucial to adopt a forward-looking and adaptable approach that encompasses emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual/augmented reality. Understanding the influence of these technologies on digital competencies and their role in interdisciplinary collaboration will be pivotal in shaping the future landscape of collaborative scholarship. The synthesis of these policy considerations provides a comprehensive roadmap for bridging the gap in digital literacy and lays the groundwork for inclusive digital literacy initiatives. Moving forward, it is imperative for future research to delve into the enablers and barriers of implementing these policy recommendations in diverse academic settings. This will involve conducting case studies and collaborative research projects to assess the effectiveness of integrating digital literacy education into curricula and the impact of accessible digital resources on scholarly productivity and collaboration.

Psychopedagogy and literacy in hospital settings: a review study

The purpose of this paper is to study the work of the hospital psychopedagogue, and to see if this work is relevant to the field of education and to our society. The aim was to propose, by means of a review study, a reflexive analysis by consulting works, research and academic articles, and with the collaboration of various authors and scholars who research the work of the psychopedagogue in hospital environments in the institutional dimension by providing support to teachers in Hospital Classes and in the clinical dimension by offering preventive or interventional support to hospitalized children in the literacy phase who are away from so-called conventional schools. This is theoretically based, among others, on Blaszko and Portilho (2021), Favoretto (2023) and PÉREZ SOLÍS (2011). The results obtained from this study and through the perception of the authors visited indicated that the work of the psychopedagogue in hospital environments with the teachers of the Hospital Classes is positive and relevant, as well as with the children who are in the process of acquiring writing and reading and because they are in the hospitalization phase cannot attend the so-called conventional school, ratifying its relevance for education and for our society.

The Symbiosis of Language(s), Literature, and the Medical Humanities

This Special Collection focuses on the ‘pathological body’ in literature, from the socio-cultural anxieties around the human body to the sick body’s relationship with language(s) and translation. The six articles—from Italian, German, Spanish, French literatures—explore posthuman female body-subjectivity; catalepsy as a framework to reorient traditional gender narratives; the violence of maintaining a socially acceptable subjecthood; the body as language in creating identity; the emotional-psychological coupled with the environment; and translation as an epistemic category. The concept of the ‘pathological body’ arose from the professionalisation of European medicine from the mid-1800s, and literary texts and medical theories travelled across national boundaries in a mutually reinforcing interconnection that globally positioned bourgeois masculinity at the top of a medical-humanistic hierarchy. This Introduction calls for the collaboration of European Modern Languages scholars to begin undoing the consequent harmful models. Understanding that medical paradigms are formed through credible stories, the first section highlights literature as an activist (Thornber, 2013) and ethical site of knowledge that can deconstruct an apparently immutable medical narrative. Section II gives an historical overview of the rise of clinical medicine and its creation of the idealised man and woman, and examines the repercussions of not fulfilling these normative categories. Section III discusses the overlap of nineteenth-century scientific and literary texts, and the danger of translating ‘sickly’ texts. Section IV notes the signal importance of language and considers how non-normative and racialised identities can ‘write back’ against medical paradigms. Banner image: Max Simon Nordau, Entartung, Vol. 2, p. 401. 1893 edition. Berlin: C. Duncker. Image taken from Google Books.

Outcomes of a “virtual think tank” to establish collaborative leadership initiative plans (“CLIPs”)

GoalThe American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Leadership Development Special Interest Group (LD SIG) held a one-hour “Virtual Think Tank” (VTT) interactive session in 2020 for pharmacy educators interested in leadership development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of this VTT. MethodsVTT attendees worked together in small groups created based on pre-selected common interest areas related to leadership development to create collaborative leadership initiative plans (CLIPs), which were ideas for new collaborative scholarly or programmatic initiatives. Principal findingsQuantitative outcomes of this VTT included statistically significant increases in positive perceptions toward the organization hosting the VTT regarding networking, scholarly collaboration, educational collaboration, and professional service opportunities, as well as significant improvements in attitudes regarding engagement with the sponsoring organization. Additionally, 18.4% of VTT attendees continued communicating with CLIP groups post-VTT and 13.2% of respondents indicated that they successfully implemented the CLIP ideas that were generated during the VTT. Qualitative outcomes included findings that the two most commonly encountered barriers were insufficient traction of the initial idea and lack of time (41.9% (n = 13) for both). Other barriers included lack of alignment with priorities at 12.9% (n = 4). Practical applicationsThis leadership VTT for pharmacy academicians led to development and implementation of important scholarly and programmatic outcomes, and fostered cross-institutional partnerships. Findings from this study evaluating a VTT provide a framework of expectations for other organizations seeking to implement a similar initiative.

Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in Surgery Setting: A Bibliometrics Analysis and Literature Review.

In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, the imperative to ensure patient safety has driven the adoption of robust safety approaches. One of the most popular methods is Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA). This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of HFMEA research in a surgery setting to identify relevant authors, topics, and journals, highlighting the scholarly collaboration trends in this area. This analysis can provide valuable insights into the current state of research, emerging trends, and future research directions. The data was acquired online from the PubMed database on December 16th, 2023. The downloaded data were analyzed using Google Sheets to predict trends. The publication output was then analyzed using VOSviewer. Subsequently, Biblioshiny was used to analyze the characteristics of the study, productive author, institution, and country; thematic map analysis; and topic timeline analysis. This study analyzes 25 documents spanning 2005 to 2022, reflecting a collaborative effort involving 155 contributors. The upward trend in annual scientific publications, notably the surge from 2014 onwards and significant peaks in 2019 and 2022, underscores the growing recognition of HFMEA in enhancing patient safety within surgical environments. The prominent influence from prolific authors like Ahmed K, leading institutions such as King's College London, and the substantial contributions from Norway and the USA in shaping the HFMEA research landscape. This study contributes valuable insights that can shape the trajectory of HFMEA in the evolving landscape of surgical healthcare, ensuring enhanced patient safety and quality improvement.

국학자 히라타 아쓰타네의 신대문자 수집과 출판

This paper analyzes Hirata Atsutane's Kannahifumiden(神字日文傳) from the perspectives of collection and publication of Jindai moji. Kannahifumiden holds paramount significance in the history of Jindai moji in the early modern period, making it a subject of considerable interest in previous studies. However, prior research focused on Atsutane's discussions about Jindai moji and its alignment with Kokugaku philosophy without definitively concluding whether his Jindai moji' theory was a logical extension of Hirata Kokugaku or if the entire history of the early modern preriod Jindai moji should be viewed as a derivative of Hirata Kokugaku.
 Kannahifumiden not only compiles key contemporary Jindai moji-related materials and documents but also provides valuable insights into Atsutane's collection and investigation process for Jindai moji, as well as the scholarly collaborations among him and his associates. Consequently, in this study, while being mindful of potential errors and inaccuracies in Kannahifumiden we utilize this work as a starting point for investigating the history of Jindai moji of the early mondern period.
 In this paper, we aim to establish that Atsutane played a pivotal role in the history of Jindai moji and present arguments in three directions. Firstly, Jindai moji existed in the form of secret teaching associated with specific religious authority from the early modern era. Atsutane's Kannahifumiden transformed the mode of existence (mediation) of jindai moji from secret teaching to publications. Secondly, over time, jindai moji became recognized as a subject of investigation among a group of scholars. Many of the jindai moji included in Kannahifumiden were collected independently by Atsutane's associates out of their own scholarly interest, rather than being uniformly collected under Atsutane's direction. Thirdly, the core ideas and materials in Kannahifumiden closely resemble those in Sato Nobuhiro's Kannahifumikou(神字日文考). This implies that if Kannahifumikou was writtetn first, and Atsutane wrote Kannahifumiden by copying from that book, the traditional understanding that Atsutane's jindai moji theory was a result of Hirata Kokugaku would require significant revision.