Abstract Introduction/Objective Endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA) arising in close spatial association with Mullerian adenosarcoma (MA) is a recently described entity that should be distinguished from carcinosarcoma. Methods/Case Report We describe two cases of mixed MA and EA of the uterus that presented in our institution in the last 10 years. Both patients were in their 8th decade, showed low grade EA, low stage uterine tumor (pT1bN0), with MA with sarcomatous overgrowth. Clinically, they presented with post-menopausal bleeding and both with history of a first degree relative with colon cancer at the age of 41 and 25, respectively. In case 1, the MA measured 13 cm with rhabdomyosarcoma. Case 2 had a 6 cm polypoid mass protruding from the cervical os. In case 1, the patient had laparoscopic total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy (TAH-BSO) and bilateral sentinel node biopsies. The patient was disease-free for 6 months, after which she presented with abdominal recurrence by CT scan. She was treated with chemotherapy (Adriamycin and Doxorubicin) but passed away 15 months after surgery. Case 2 presented recently and has been asymptomatic and disease free 2 months after laparoscopic TAH-BSO and bilateral sentinel node biopsies. Both cases showed preservation of DNA mismatch repair protein expression. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion Twenty two out of 23 cases of this entity were described in the largest series by Hallani et al in the literature. It was suggested that the prognosis of these “mixed” tumors appears to be driven by the sarcomatous component, with only 2 deaths in the series due to MA with rhabdomyosarcoma or sarcomatous overgrowth. When MA with sarcomatous overgrowth was compared with carcinosarcoma by Krivak et al., MA with sarcomatous overgrowth had worse prognosis than carcinosarcoma. More cases of mixed MA and EA are needed for us to determine whether MA with sarcomatous overgrowth in this entity should be treated differently.