S2AI Screw Research Articles

Freehand S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Placement Technique in Lumbosacral Spinal Tumors: A Preliminary Study.

ObjectiveS2‐alar‐iliac (S2AI) screw technique is widely used in spinal surgery, but it is rarely seen in the field of spinal tumors. The aim of the study is to report the preliminary outcomes of the freehand S2AI screw fixation after lumbosaral tumor resection.MethodsThe records of patients with lumbosacral tumor who underwent S2AI screw fixation between November 2016 to November 2020 at our center were reviewed retrospectively. Outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, complications, accuracy of screws, screw breach, and overall survival. Mean ± standard deviation or range was used to present continuous variables. Kaplan–Meier curve was used to present postoperative survival.ResultsA total of 23 patients were identified in this study, including 12 males and 11 females, with an average age of 47.3 ± 14.5 (range,15–73). The mean operation time was 224.6 ± 54.1 (range, 155–370 min). The average estimated blood loss was 1560.9 ± 887.0 (600–4000 ml). A total of 46 S2AI screws were implanted by freehand technique. CT scans showed three (6.5%) screws had penetrated the iliac cortex, indicating 93.5% implantation accuracy rate. No complications of iatrogenic neurovascular or visceral structure were observed. The average follow‐up time was 31.6 ± 15.3 months (range, 13–60 months). Two patients' postoperative plain radiography showed lucent zone around the screw. One patient underwent reoperation for wound delayed infection. At the latest follow‐up, eight patients had tumor‐free survival, 11 had survival with tumor, and four died of disease.ConclusionThe freehand S2AI screw technique is reproducible, safe, and reliable in the management of lumbosacral spinal tumors.

Clinical outcomes of S2 Alar-Iliac screw technique in the treatment of severe spinal sagittal imbalance: a retrospective 2-year follow-up study

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) remains a significant challenge, especially in elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the S2AI screw technique in the treatment of severe spinal sagittal imbalance with a minimum 2-year follow-up.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2015 to December 2018, 23 patients with severe degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent placement of S2AI screws for long segment fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (no mechanical complications, 13 cases) and group B (with mechanical complications, 10 cases) according to the occurrence of mechanical complications at the last follow-up. Radiographic parameters were compared between groups preoperatively, 1 month postoperatively and at the last follow-up. Risk factors for mechanical complications were analyzed.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The incidence of mechanical complications was 43.5% and the revision rate was 17.4%. At 1 month postoperatively, sagittal correction was better in group A than in group B (p<0.05). The area under the curve for predicting mechanical complications of sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI (pelvic incidence)-LL at 1 month postoperatively were 0.762 (p=0.035), 0.896 (p=0.001) and 0.754 (p=0.041) respectively and the best cut-off values were 24.1°, 32.8°and 12.0°. The sagittal correction of both groups was partially lost at the last follow-up.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> A high incidence of mechanical complications was observed in long-segment corrective surgery with the S2AI screw technique for severe spinal sagittal imbalance. Inadequate sagittal correction is a risk factor for the development of mechanical complications.</p><p class="abstract"> </p>

The Utilization of Dual Second Sacral Alar-Iliac Screws for Spinopelvic Fixation in Patients with Severe Kyphoscoliosis.

ObjectivesAs a new pelvic fixation technique, the dual S2AI screws fixation technique could provide highly stable distal strength, and have wide clinical prospect in the correction of severe kyphoscoliosis. However, the ideal trajectory parameters, indications and clinical outcomes of this technique have not been reported so far. This study aimed to determine the anatomical parameters of dual S2AI screws in the normal Chinese adult population, investigating the indications of this technique and evaluating the feasibility and clinical outcomes.MethodsFifteen males and 15 females with normal pelvis underwent a pelvic CT scan to determine ideal dual S2AI screws trajectories. Sagittal angle (SA), transverse angle (TA), maximal length (ML), sacral length, and skin distance were measured. Subsequently, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 16 patients (seven males and nine females) who underwent dual S2AI screw fixation and 23 patients who underwent single S2AI screw fixation between January 2014 and December 2019. Preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow‐up measurements of Cobb angle, coronal balance (CB), spinal pelvic obliquity (SPO), and regional kyphosis (RK) were obtained. The mean follow‐up time was 16.7 ± 7.1 months (range: 12–30 months). Independent t‐test was used to determine the difference in the analysis of the trajectories. The paired sample non‐parametric Wilcoxon test was performed to assess the changes in radiographic parameters between different time points and different groups.ResultsFor both male and females, the proximal S2AI screws had significantly higher TA and ML, but a lower SA than distal screws. Females showed significantly more caudal (SA: 25.03° ± 2.32° vs. 29.82° ± 2.47°, t = 7.742, P < 0.001) trajectories of distal screw. Additionally, ML in the females were significantly shorter than that in males (106.81 mm ± 6.79 mm vs. 101.63 mm ± 6.55 mm, t = 3.007, P = 0.003, 124.41 mm ± 7.57 mm vs. 116.23 mm ± 7.03 mm, t = 4.337, P < 0.001). Eight had unilateral and eight had bilateral dual S2AI screw placement. Respectively, both the single S2AI and dual S2AI groups showed significant postoperative improvement of Cobb angle, RK angle and SPO angle. In patients with dual S2AI screws fixation, two patients found that screws loosening occurred in one of dual screws at 1‐year follow‐up, and in patients with single S2AI screws fixation, six patients found screw loosing as well as two patients found screw breakage at 1‐year follow‐up. None of all patients had any prominent loss of correction.ConclusionThe ideal trajectory of dual S2AI screw could be well established. The dual S2AI screw fixation technique is feasible in patients with severe kyphoscoliosis, and provides satisfactory correction of deformity with few postoperative complications.

The lateral entry point S2 alar-iliac (L-S2AI) screw: a preoperative computed tomography analysis of adult spinal deformity patients.

To radiographically compare lateral entry point S2-alar-iliac (L-S2AI) screw with conventional S2AI (C-S2AI) and conventional iliac screw (CIS) lengths and trajectories. Twenty-five preoperative CT scans of consecutive patients undergoing adult spinal deformity realignment surgery over a random 2-year period were analysed. Maximum in-bone length, caudal and lateral trajectories of CIS, C-S2AI, and L-S2AI screws were measured and compared using One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of high screw length discrepancy between C-S2AI and L-S2AI. Potential screw length was longest for CIS, followed by L-S2AI, then C-S2AI (114.5 ± 8.3mm vs 101.4 ± 9.6mm vs 80.6 ± 5.9mm, respectively) in all patients (p < 0.001). Actual screw lengths found both CIS and L-S2AI to be longer than C-S2AI (95.3 ± 8.5mm and 93.4 ± 7.5mm vs 82.1 ± 7.3mm; p = 0.008 and 0.003). Potential lateral angulation was smallest for CIS, followed by L-S2AI, then C-S2AI (21.9 ± 7.0° vs 31.9 ± 7.1° vs 40.9 ± 6.7°, respectively) in all patients (p < 0.001). L-S2AI and C-S2AI had the same caudal angulation (24.9 ± 6.8°), which was smaller than CIS (30.8 ± 5.8°) in all patients (p < 0.001). Univariate, but not multivariate analysis, revealed that lumbar lordosis > 40° (OR 7.2, p = 0.041), diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR 10.5, p = 0.017), and > 7 instrumented levels (OR 2.6, p = 0.049) were significantly associated with high screw discrepancies. The L-S2AI screw combines advantages of CIS and C-S2AI screws, which includes increased screw length, reduced lateral angulation, a low-profile screw head, ease of connection to proximal hardware, and the biomechanical advantage of a quadcortical purchase.

Improved Outcomes with Concurrent Instrumentation and Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients with Long Lumbosacral Constructs.

Retrospective Cohort Study. Spinal fusion, specifically constructs connected to pelvic bones, has been consistently reported as a predisposing factor to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. The aim of this study is to compare SIJ outcomes in patients with constructs to the pelvis following instrumentation vs instrumentation plus fusion of the SIJ. Data of study subjects was extracted from a prospectively maintained database as well as retrospectively collected from records at a tertiary academic medical center in the United States between 2018 and 2020. A cohort of 103 patients was divided into 2 groups: 65 in Group 1 [S2AI screw without fusion device] and 38 in Group 2 [S2AI screw with fusion device]. None of the patients in Group 2 developed postoperative SIJ pain compared to 44.6% in Group 1. Sacroiliac joint fusion occurred in all Group 2 but none of Group 1 patients. The postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for lower extremity (LE) pain (.8 vs .5; P = .03) and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (18.7 vs 14.2; P < .01) were significantly higher in Group 1. The rate of distal junctional break, failure, and/or kyphosis (DJBFK) and time to DJBFK were not significantly different between the two groups, and the rate of DJBFK did not change in the presence of multiple covariates. The SIJs carry the heavy load of long lumbosacral fusion constructs extending to the pelvis. Simultaneous SIJ instrumentation and fusion decreases the risk of disability, prevents the development of postoperative SIJ pain, and may also protect the S2AI screw from loosening and failure.

Ball Tip Technique for S2AI Screw Placement in Sacropelvic Fixation: A Comparative Study with Conventional Freehand Technique.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficiency of the ball tip technique for S2AI screw placement and introduce this technique.MethodsSixty‐three patients who underwent pelvic fixation with S2AI screws were retrospectively reviewed. They were 29 males and 34 females with an average age of 59.6 ± 12.5 years. Among these patients, 35 patients (14 males and 21 females with an average age of 58.8 ± 11.3 years) received ball tip technique and 28 patients (15 males and 13 females with an average age of 63.7 ± 12.6 years) received conventional freehand technique. Ball tip technique was used in ball tip technique group. After a pedicle probe just penetrated the sacroiliac joint, a ball‐tipped probe consisting of a ball shaped metal tip with a flexible shaft was malleted to make a guide track within ilium. This ball‐tipped probe could bend automatically away from the cortex and forward through the cancellous bone when the tip met the cortical lamina of ilium, which can avoid penetration. After repeating the procedures, a guide hole was gradually formed. S2AI screw was inserted along the guide hole after tapping. In the conventional freehand group, S2AI screw was placed according to the conventional method. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to assess the accuracy of screws. The time cost of screw insertion and screw‐related complications were recorded. Independent t‐test was used to compare the time cost between ball tip group and conventional freehand group. A chi‐square test was used to compare the accuracies of the ball tip group with the conventional group.ResultsThere were 35 patients (70 S2AI screws) in ball tip group and 28 patients (56 S2AI screws) in conventional freehand group. No screw‐related complication occurred in all patients. Time costs were 9.8 ± 4.5 mins in ball tip group and 20.2.0 + 8.6 mins in conventional freehand group, respectively (P < 0.05). Four screws penetrated iliac cortex in the ball tip group vs 10 screws in conventional freehand group (5.7% vs 17.9%) (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe ball tip technique enhances the accuracy of screw placement and has less time cost compared with conventional freehand technique.

RESULTADOS CLÍNICO-RADIOLÓGICOS DO TRATAMENTO DA ESCOLIOSE NEUROMUSCULAR COM PARAFUSOS S2-ALAR-ILÍACO GUIADOS POR NAVEGAÇÃO INTRAOPERATÓRIA

ABSTRACT Objective: Analyze the clinical and radiological aspects of the S2AI screw technique in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing deformity correction surgery by intraoperative navigation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients undergoing neuromuscular scoliosis correction surgery with the S2-alar-iliac technique between 2017-2020. Results: In the total sample of 35 patients, 18 (51.4%) were female, with an average age of 14.9. The average preoperative coronal curve was 100° ± 26.2, with an average correction of 55% ± 16.3, with an average coronal curve of 44.8°± 19.5 at the end of surgery and 45 ° ± 19.6 at the end of follow-up. The average preoperative pelvic obliquity was 27.9°± 10.9, with a correction rate of 66.1% ± 27.6, being 8.2° ± 5.4 at the end of surgery and 9 .4°± 7.0 at the end of the follow-up. The average of operated levels was 17.3± 0.7. All 70 S2 screws had a diameter of 7mm. The average duration of surgeries was 416 ± 86 minutes, with estimated intraoperative bleeding of 921 ± 394.1 ml. The average density of screws in the sample was 1.3 ± 0.2 screws per level, and the average density in the lumbosacral spine was 1.5 ± 0.2. Conclusions: Intraoperative navigation can contribute to the rate of complications related to the S2AI screw decrease; in addition, the length of this screw appears to have significant relevance in maintaining the correction throughout the follow-up. Level of evidence IV; Case series.

Clinical & radiological outcomes following the use of triangular sacro-iliac joint cages in addition to S2Ai screws (bedrock technique) to enhance spinopelvic fixation

Clinical & radiological outcomes following the use of triangular sacro-iliac joint cages in addition to S2Ai screws (bedrock technique) to enhance spinopelvic fixation

P16. Is there a difference in screw accuracy, robot time per screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the Mazor X and the renaissance? A propensity-matched analysis of 1,179 robot-assisted screws

P16. Is there a difference in screw accuracy, robot time per screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the Mazor X and the renaissance? A propensity-matched analysis of 1,179 robot-assisted screws

246. Is the implant in bone? The accuracy of CT and fluoroscopic imaging for detecting malpositioned pelvic screw and SI fusion implants

Spine fusions to the pelvis have been associated with increased strain to the sacroiliac joint (SI) and possibly continued postoperative low back pain. To minimize this, concomitant SI joint fusion at the time of lumbopelvic fixation has been advocated. This requires concomitant placement of sacral alar iliac screws (S2AI) for lumbopelvic fixation and triangular titanium rods (TTR) for the SI joint fusion. Traditionally, surgeons have mostly relied on fluoroscopic images to confirm final implant position and patient safety after pelvic instrumentation, although computer tomography (CT) has also been used.We wanted to know which imaging modality, if any, was superior in helping to identify malpositioned implants during concomitant lumbopelvic fixation and SI joint fusion. We instrumented pelvic sawbones models with S2AI screws, TTR's, or both in the correct anatomic positions or malpositioned variants that led to known cortical breaches. Pelvic models were then imaged with fluoroscopy and CT, and the images assessed by blinded reviewers (spine surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist) for the presence of cortical breaches, the identity of the breached implant, and its direction. The responses of the blinded reviewers were then compared to the known position of the implants and Kappa coefficient calculated to determine agreement.We found that thorough evaluation of implant position with multiple fluoroscopic views (kappa 0.641) or CT imaging (kappa 0.906) allowed reviewers to assess implant position, identity, and breach direction.These findings suggest that intraoperative CT imaging allows surgeons to make the best decision regarding implant position prior to leaving the operating room, thus potentially improving patient safety and unplanned returns to the operating room.Level of Evidence: V.

182. Catastrophic acute failure of pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity requiring revision surgery: a multicenter review of incidence, failure mechanisms, and risk factors

182. Catastrophic acute failure of pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity requiring revision surgery: a multicenter review of incidence, failure mechanisms, and risk factors

Is There a Difference in Screw Accuracy, Robot Time Per Screw, Robot Abandonment, and Radiation Exposure Between the Mazor X and the Renaissance? A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 1179 Robot-Assisted Screws.

Prospective single-cohort analysis. To compare the outcomes/complications of 2 robotic systems for spine surgery. Adult patients (≥18-years-old) who underwent robot-assisted spine surgery from 2016-2019 were assessed. A propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to match Mazor X to Renaissance cases. Preoperative CT scan for planning and an intraoperative O-arm for screw evaluation were preformed. Outcomes included screw accuracy, robot time/screw, robot abandonment, and radiation. Screw accuracy was measured using Vitrea Core software by 2 orthopedic surgeons. Screw breach was measured according to the Gertzbein/Robbins classification. After PSA, a total of 65 patients (Renaissance: 22 vs. X: 43) were included. Patient/operative factors were similar between robot systems (P > .05). The pedicle screw accuracy was similar between robots (Renaissance: 1.1%% vs. X: 1.3%, P = .786); however, the S2AI screw breach rate was significantly lower for the X (Renaissance: 9.5% vs. X: 1.2%, P = .025). Robot time per screw was not statistically different (Renaissance: 4.6 minutes vs. X: 3.9 minutes, P = .246). The X was more reliable with an abandonment rate of 2.3% vs. Renaissance:22.7%, P = .007. Radiation exposure were not different between robot systems. Non-robot related complications including dural tear, loss of motor/sensory function, and blood transfusion were similar between robot systems. This is the first comparative analyses of screw accuracy, robot time/screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the Mazor X and Renaissance systems. There are substantial improvements in the X robot, particularly in the perioperative planning processes, which likely contribute to the X's superiority in S2AI screw accuracy by nearly 8-fold and robot reliability by nearly 10-fold.

Complications in ambulatory pediatric patients with nonidiopathic spinal deformity undergoing fusion to the pelvis using the sacral-alar-iliac technique within 2 years of surgery.

Significant investigation in the adult population has generated a body of research regarding proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) following long fusions to the sacrum and pelvis. However, much less is known regarding early complications, including PJK and PJF, in the ambulatory pediatric patient. As such, the objective of this study was to address the minimal literature on early complications after ambulatory pediatric patients underwent fusion to the sacrum with instrumentation to the pelvis in the era of sacral-alar-iliac (S2AI) instrumentation. The authors performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients with nonidiopathic spinal deformity < 18 years of age with ambulatory capacity who underwent fusion to the pelvis at a multisurgeon pediatric academic spine practice from 2016 to 2018. All surgeries were posterior-only approaches with S2AI screws as the primary technique for sacropelvic fixation. Descriptive, outcome, and radiographic data were obtained. The definition of PJF included symptomatic PJK presenting as fracture, screw pullout, or disruption of the posterior osseoligamentous complex. Twenty-five patients were included in this study. Nine patients (36.0%) had 15 complications for an overall complication rate of 60.0%. Unplanned return to the operating room occurred 8 times in 6 patients (24.0%). Four patients (16.0%) had wound issues (3 with deep wound infection and 1 with wound breakdown) requiring reoperation. Three patients (12.0%) had PJF, all requiring reoperation. A 16-year-old female patient with syndromic scoliosis underwent extension of fusion due to posterior tension band failure at 6 months. A 17-year-old male patient with neuromuscular scoliosis underwent extension of fusion due to proximal screw pullout at 5 months. A 10-year-old female patient with congenital scoliosis underwent extension for PJF at 5 months following posterior tension band failure. One patient had pseudarthrosis requiring reoperation 20 months postoperatively. Fixation to the pelvis enables significant deformity correction, but with rather high rates of complications and unexpected returns to the operating room. Considerations of sagittal plane dynamics for PJK and PJF should be strongly analyzed when performing fixation to the pelvis in ambulatory pediatric patients.

Is the Greater Trochanter the Ideal Freehand Landmark for the S2AI Screw Angle in the Caudal Direction? Commentary on “Extra-articular Portion of the Sacroiliac Joint—Between the Sacral and Pelvic Tuberosities: An Anatomical Guide for the S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Trajectory” by Tatara et al

The author introduced a novel freehand technique for S2-Alar-Iliac screw placement Which demonstrated good clinical safety. However the optimal anatomical landmarks of the screw angle in the caudal direction have not been unified. The tip of the greater trochanter(TGT) was one of the most frequently chosen landmark in fluoroscopic or navigation guidance technique. Additional adjustments are always needed according to these studies. The freehand technique of the present study also choose the TGT as the as the landmark of the S2AI screw angle in the caudal direction, whether it also need any adjustment? We hope the author could explain more about this issue. Besides, the relationship between TGT and the sacral iliac bone is not static, which will make the reliability of the pre-surgery navigation software simulation doubtful.

Second sacral sacralalar\u2010iliac (S2AI) screw placement in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients: an imaging study

BackgroundThe imaging characteristics of sacral sacralalar-iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients will be determined.MethodsS2AI screw trajectories were mapped on three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) reconstructions of 40 ADS patients. The starting point, placement plane, screw template, and a circle centered at the lowest point of the ilium inner cortex were set on these images. A tangent line from the starting point to the outer diameter of the circle was selected as the axis of the screw trajectory. The related parameters in different populations were analyzed and compared.ResultsThe trajectory length of S2AI screws in ADS patients was 12.00 ± 0.99 cm, the lateral angle was 41.24 ± 3.92°, the caudal angle was 27.73 ± 6.45°, the distance from the axis of the screw trajectory to the iliosciatic notch was 1.05 ± 0.81 cm, the distance from the axis of the screw trajectory to the upper edge of the acetabulum was 1.85 ± 0.33 cm, and the iliac width was 2.12 ± 1.65 cm. Compared with females, the lateral angle of male ADS patients was decreased, but the trajectory length was increased (P < 0.05). Compared to patients without ADS in previous studies, the lateral angle of male patients was larger, the lateral angle of female patients was increased, and the caudal angle was decreased (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThere is an ideal trajectory of S2AI screws in ADS patients. A different direction should be noticed in the placement of S2AI screws, especially in female patients.

Improvement of coronal alignment in fractional low lumbar curves with the use of anterior interbody devices.

Retrospective chart review. To determine if the addition of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) improves the fractional curve in adult spinal deformity correction when compared to posterior surgery alone. ALIF is commonly advocated to improve lordosis and fusion in adult deformity surgery. Improved fractional curve correction may help level the pelvis and minimize proximal malalignment. Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion to the pelvis with S2AI screws for deformity were identified and stratified into patients who had an ALIF as part of their deformity correction procedure (ALIF + PSF), and those who had a posterior approach alone. The posterior approach (PSF) includes patients who had a posterolateral fusion with or without a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Radiographic parameters measured included pre-op and post-op fractional coronal curve Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence and sacral slope, major Cobb angle, coronal and sagittal SVA. There were 31 cases in the ALIF + PSF group and 28 in the PSF group. Baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Mean pre-op fractional coronal Cobb (18.3° vs 13.4°, p = 0.027) was larger in the ALIF + PSF group, whereas lumbar lordosis (31.0° vs 33.6°, p = 0.487) and pelvic parameters were similar between the two groups. Post-op lumbar lordosis was similar (48.2° vs 43.0°, p = 0.092). Greater fractional coronal curve correction was achieved in the ALIF + PSF group (67%) compared to the PSF group (36%) with a smaller post-op fractional coronal curve in the ALIF + PSF group (6.1°) compared to the PSF group (8.6°, p = 0.053). There is a greater correction of the fractional curve in the ALIF + PSF group compared with the PSF group. While this may not be the primary indication for ALIF, it is a benefit which may facilitate overall deformity correction and leveling of the pelvis.

Minimum 2-Year Analysis of S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Study Design:Retrospective cohort.Objective:Determine the rate and risk factors for S2AI screw-related pain after adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up.Methods:A consecutive 83 spinal deformity patients undergoing surgical treatment between August 2015 and December 2017 with minimum 2-year follow-up for S2AI screw complication and screw-related pain were included. Linear regression was performed on various risk factors and postoperative S2AI screw-related pain. Subset analysis of 53 patients was performed on preoperative and postoperative SRS and ODI scores, operative data, and radiographic data.Results:The overall proportion of S2AI screw-related pain was 9.6%. An S2AI screw complication was identified radiographically in 10.8% of patients; among these, 22.2% experienced S2AI screw-related pain. 3.4% of all patients underwent S2A1 screw removal. The SRS, ODI, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and coronal alignment scores/measurements improved following treatment in all patients. However, the mean difference for the pre and postoperative SRS function score (1.2 ± 0.5 vs 0.9 ± 0.8) and SVA (4.0 ± 4.9 cm vs 2.1 ± 4.8 cm) were higher for the pain group.Conclusions:A minimum 2-year analysis of S2AI screw fixation in adult spinal deformity patients showed that 9.6% of patients experienced S2AI screw-related pain and 3.4% of patients had S2A1 screws removed. The size and the number of S2AI screws did not predict postoperative pain, nor were radiographic findings correlated with clinical outcomes. The patient outcome scores, coronal alignment, and SVA improved for all patients, but within the pain group there was an overall larger change in the SVA and SRS function score.

Durability and Failure Types of S2-Alar-Iliac Screws: An Analysis of 312 Consecutive Screws

S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws improve stability across the lumbosacral junction in spinopelvic fixation procedures by crossing the cortical surfaces of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), thereby increasing the biomechanical strength of the instrumentation. To investigate the durability and failure types of S2AI screws after spinopelvic reconstruction surgery. A single-center, single-surgeon consecutive series of patients who underwent spinopelvic fixation using bilateral S2AI screws with a≥1-yr follow-up and at least 1 postoperative computed tomographic scan were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, operative data, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. In total, 312 S2AI screws in 156 patients were evaluated (mean follow-up, 26.1 mo; range 12-71 mo). There were no significant differences in screw diameter, length, or insertion angle between right-side and left-side screws. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain, ambulatory status, and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved. A total of 10 patients (3.2%) experienced SIJ pain after S2AI screw installation. SIJ pain improved in 8 of them following SIJ block. In total, 7 screws (2.2%) showed partial periscrew lucency. Set screw dislodgement occurred in 7 screws (2.2%). Screw fracture occurred in 6 screws (1.9%): 5 neck fractures and 1 shaft fracture. A total of 5 patients (1.6%) underwent revision surgery for S2AI screw failure. Distal device (L4-pelvis region) breakage occurred in 5 patients. The radiographic and clinical outcomes of S2AI screw fixation were acceptable. However, S2AI screw fixation has several drawbacks, including screw fracture and dislodgement of the set screw. SIJ irritation symptoms after S2AI screw fixation occurred with considerable frequency.

105. ALIF generates better correction of the fractional lumbar curve vs posterior instrumentation alone in spinal deformity fusion to the pelvis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT ALIF is a widely accepted strategy to increase lumbar lordosis and improve fusion. It may also help reduce the fractional lumbar curve. Improved fractional curve correction can level the pelvis and facilitate proximal realignment. PURPOSE To determine if the addition of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to posterolateral fusion results in a more level pelvis by correcting the fractional lumbar curve. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective comparative observational cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion to the pelvis with S2AI screws for deformity. OUTCOME MEASURES Pre- and postop fractional curve Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and percent curve correction. METHODS Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion to the pelvis with S2AI screws for deformity were identified and stratified into patients who had an ALIF in addition to PSF (ALIF+PSF) and those who had a posterior instrumented fusion (PSF) only. Radiographic parameters measured included preop and postop fractional curve Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and percent curve correction. RESULTS There were 30 cases in the ALIF+PSF group and 31 in the PSF group. Baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Mean preop fractional coronal Cobb (18.2° vs 14.2°, p=0.069), lumbar lordosis (30.9° vs 334.2°, p=0.379) and pelvic parameters were similar between the two groups. Postop lumbar lordosis was similar (48.4° vs 44.1°, p=0.183). Greater fractional coronal curve correction was achieved in the ALIF+PSF group (69%) compared to the PSF group (29%, p CONCLUSIONS There is a greater correction of the fractional curve in the ALIF+PSF group compared with the PSF only group. While this may not be the primary indication for ALIF, it is a benefit that may level the pelvis and facilitate overall deformity correction. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

The S2-Alar-Iliac Screw for Pelvic Trauma.

Percutaneous sacro-iliac screw osteosynthesis is considered to be standard of care for most posterior pelvic ring fractures. However, special situations require alternative strategies for sufficient stabilization. In these cases, stabilization can often be achieved using posterior instrumentation e.g. using SIPS-screws (spina-iliaca-posterior-superior screws). However, this often leads to implant-related aggravation of the sometimes already critical soft tissue conditions after pelvic trauma. S2-Ala-Ilium screws (S2AI screws) are a suitable alternative. The starting point lies medial of the posterior superior iliac spine below the iliac level. It is almost in line with a potential spinal instrumentation and therefore usually causes fewer soft tissue problems. Although this technique has been widely used in spinal surgery in recent years, its use in orthopaedic traumatology is largely unknown. The possibilities but also the limitations of this technique for the treatment of injuries to the pelvis are illustrated by this retrospective case series.