Zaokeanskie partnery: Amerika i Rossiia v 1830-1850-e gody. [Partners across Ocean: United States and Russia, 1830s-1850s]. By I.I. Kurilla. (Volgograd:Volgograd State University Press, 2005. Pp. 487. Illustrations. Cloth.)Since 1970s, studies of early Russian-American relations have multiplied, and pioneering books and articles of two specialists, N.N. Bolkhovitinov and Norman E. Saul, have laid groundwork for more focused monographs. Ivan Kurilla's new book concentrates on middle decades of nineteenth century, a fascinating period of revolution, warfare, and technological change. Drawing on an impressive array of archival materials, Kurilla elaborates many of themes discussed in Saul's Distant Friends: The United States and Russia, 1763-1867 (Lawrence, KS, 1991) and Bolkhovitinov's Russian-American Relations and Sale of Alaska, 1834-1867 (Moscow, 1990; trans. 1996). Kurilla affirms traditional interpretation of Russian-American partnership based on commercial growth, Anglophobia, a lack of potential sources of discord, and mutual public sympathy. The result constitutes a depiction of an era of confidence and fruitful collaboration during which Russia appears as foremost benefactor.Discussions of wide-ranging diplomatic relations constitute book's core, yet Kurilla also deals with America's role in economic and technological modernization of Russia and evolution of national images through prisms of travel accounts and popular press. The first part of book focuses on central mechanisms of Russian-American cooperation: international politics, geopolitical ambition, and technology transfer. The Russian Empire, led by efforts of its minister in Washington, Alexander Bodisko, supported United States against British expansion in North America and enhanced diplomatic position of United States in Pacific. In turn, American entrepreneurs played a major role in modernization of Russian navy, merchant marine, river transportation network, small arms industry, and telegraph system. At a time when Russian transportation was relatively primitive, American specialists provided advice on railway construction and established contracts for thousands of locomotives and wagons. In 1840s George Washington Whistler was such an important railway consultant that his son pondered what Russia would do without his father when they returned home (169). Kurilla acknowledges that the construction of Petersburg-Moscow railway line became one of first large projects in which Russian state relied on American technology and American engineers (174). Meanwhile, Russian journalists' coverage of American entrepreneurial activity helped fuel a growing sentiment in favor of United States among reading public.In Part Two, Kurilla surveys impressions left by Russian and American travelers who visited each other's countries. In general, Americans were impressed with pace of Russia's development, its resources, and power of autocrat, yet there was some variation: American shipping magnate Silas Burrows referred to Tsar Nicholas I as the Napoleon of our day, while Ambassador George Mifflin Dallas thought tsar's willingness to do good would have made him an excellent president (219); Tennessee Governor Neil Brown deplored Russian climate, but Ambassador Charles Stewart Todd claimed Russian winter was good for his health (251). Most Russian visitors came to America on official business, keen to observe industrial, maritime, and technological practices, but a few emigrants also recorded their thoughts about democratic organization of country. …