The article discusses the reasons for the deprivation of parental rights provided for in Article 69 Family Code. When comparing them with the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, a conclusion is drawn about their significant difference, therefore, the thesis that the existing provisions of Russian law are determined by international obligations of the Russian Federation is not confirmed. Despite the fact that the six existing structures of deprivation of parental rights are independent, an analysis of law enforcement practice shows that the courts avoid a clear reduction of factual circumstances to the relevant compositions. Of course, this increases the risk of an unjust decision. The clarifications given in the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated November 14, 2017 No. 44, unfortunately, are insufficient. The norms establishing the basis for deprivation of parental rights in the Union of Independent States are generally similar to the Russian ones, however, in a number of cases, the latter show a desire for concretization. In Western European countries, such reasons, as a rule, are not particularly distinguished: violation of the rights of the child is considered as the basis for applying various measures of influence, among which the deprivation of parental rights is extreme, but even if it is used, the parents do not lose the opportunity to communicate with the child (if this does not contradict him interests). The latter should be provided for in Russian law. According to the author, one should restrictively formulate the grounds for depriving parents of their rights, reduce their number; at the same time, an explanation should be given to the courts about the need to clearly follow their content when making decisions.
Read full abstract