Exemplary Bodies: Constructing the Jew in Russian Culture since the 1880s, by Henrietta Mondry. Borderlines: Russian and East-European Studies. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2009. 301 pp. $58.00. Henrietta Mondry explores the ongoing construction of the physical and psychological in the works of and Russian writers, and how this construct was created by anthropologists and doctors, from the 1880s to the present. By analyzing fiction, movies, and scientific anthropological works, she examines constructs of the that were absorbed by Russian-Jewish and Russian writers (p. 19). At the turn of the century, the pseudo-scientific discourse on biological determinism and the theory of degeneration was at its apogee. Thus, Mondry states, the construct of the Jew as a biological and racial Other was immensely popular. Her main argument is that the remains the site for writers to define their Jewishness, while for Russian writers it is the of the Other and the body where culture inscribes the meaning (p. 20). Mondry employs a vast range of theorists on the such as Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, Gilles Deleuze, and Elizabeth Grosz. She grounds her arguments in Sander Gilman's and Daniel Boyarin's works, stated that the construct of a physical Jew was indebted to the racial degeneration theories of the late nineteenth century. But the twist is that the stereotypes of the physical Jew were also appropriated by writers, Zionists, artists, and scholars. She convincingly argues that the stereotype has become one of the most enduring discursive formations of Russian culture, especially during the rise of Russian nationalism (p. 18). In addition, Mondry examines the mechanisms of defining what constitutes the type. She starts her introduction by looking at Afanasy Fet, a Russian German was believed to be by his contemporaries. Ivan Turgenev, Nikolay Chernyshevsky, and Ilya Ehrenburg believed that Fet was Jewish, not only because of his Jewish look but also because of his presumably inherited madness. Mondry explores the physical stereotypes associated with appearance and the racial discourse that caused some intellectuals to assume that Fet was Jewish. She states that, for some, Fet's inclination to madness and his allegedly physical appearance served as scientific proof for their speculations (p. 15). These assumptions were believed in part because of Cesare Lombroso's theories. Her book consists of eleven chapters and begins with a brief overview of the anthropological discourse in the Russian Empire at the turn of the century. In Chapter Two, Stereotypes of Pathology she turns to Anton Chekhov's short stories (Tina, Tumbleweed, and his play Ivanov). She shows that Chekhov used folkloric stereotypes as well as anthropological and medical discourses when depicting his characters, with very little allusion to the antisemitic Russian literary tradition. Chekhov represented the sick character by conflating physiology and psychology, which constituted for him the markers of otherness. In Chapter Four, Mondry addresses Vasily Rozanov's interpretation of the carnal body. In Chapter Five, she provides a close reading of Ehrenburg's two novels, The Extraordinary Adventures of Julio Jurenito and his Disciples and The Stormy Life of Lasik Roitschwantz. She shows that Ehrenburg was familiar with Rozanov's body politics and assigned Jurenito and Lasik some of the stereotypical regarding aromas and bodily secretions (pp. 90, 91). He parodied the stereotypical depiction of a Jew in Jurenito and Lasik by assigning Jurenito physical that would be recognized by antisemites and Jews who had internalized these features (p. …
Read full abstract
Jan 2, 2014
Irina Pohlan 
Open Access