UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2009) Another look at velar deletion in Turkish, with special attention to the derived environment condition Sharon Inkelas 1. Introduction Turkish velar deletion applies to /k/ and /g/ at the ends of stems, when rendered intervocalic by the addition of a suffix (e.g. Lewis 1967:10-11, Zimmer & Abbott 1978, Sezer 1981, Goksel & Kerslake 2005:14-17) 1 : ‘baby’ /bebek/ (nominative) Dative /-A/ Genitive /-In/ [be.bek] [be.be.e] [be.be.in] [ka.ta.log] [ka.ta.lo.a] [ka.ta.lo.un] bebek ‘catalog’ /katalog/ katalog bebege kataloga bebegin katalogun ‘mathematics’ /matematik/ [ma.te.ma.tik] [ma.te.ma.ti.e] [ma.te.ma.ti.in] matematik matematige matematigin Deleted velars are represented in the orthography as “ g ”. In some dialects they are pronounced as velar glides. 2 This paper documents the speech represented in TELL (Turkish Electronic Living Lexicon), in which the velars are phonologically and phonetically deleted. This is the pattern reported in Lewis 1967, Zimmer & Abbott 1978 and Sezer 1981, as well. The productivity of velar deletion is evidenced by its applicability to recent loans and confirmed by an experimental study by Zimmer & Abbott (1978), in which subjects were presented with a set of loanwords and asked to use them in an third person singular possessive context; the possessive suffix -/I/ is a velar deletion trigger. Zimmer & Abbott observed a deletion rate of 80-90% in the made-up words meeting the conditions for velar deletion. Velar deletion appears to be a classic derived environment effect. It applies to stem-final consonants when rendered intervocalic by suffixation, as in (1), but not to consonants which are intervocalic within a root morpheme, as in (2). Except where otherwise noted, Turkish data cited in this paper come from TELL (Turkish Electronic Living Lexicon; http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/TELL). I am grateful to Larry Hyman and Aylin Kuntay for comments on the paper, and take responsibility for any errors. 2 Even in standard Istanbul Turkish, “g” is sometimes reported to manifest as a weak labial glide between round vowels or as a weak palatal glide between front vowels (e.g. Lewis 1967:5, Goksel & Kerslake 2005:8). These glides are arguably excrescent, the expected phonetic transitions between vowels rendered adjacent by velar deletion, as in diger [dier] ‘other’.