The linkages and underlying structure of a comprehensive model relating role conflict to its antecedents and consequences were tested using multivariate behavioral research methodology. Data were drawn from professional-level employees representing five major roles in nine organizations. Role conflict was treated as a multivariate construct consisting of various conflict types. Antecedents of role conflict included objective role requirements (i.e., integration and boundary-spanning activities, personnel supervision activities, and nonsupervisory scientific research activities) and characteristics of the role set (i.e., average organizational distance and average authority of role senders). Consequences included job-related tension and satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and attitude toward role senders. Using a cluster analytic approach, five distinct conflict orientation groups were isolated. An analysis of the simultaneous linkages between antecedents and conflict orientation revealed an additive continuum composed of objective role conditions which stratified the five conflict orientations, highlighting the impact of simultaneous role requirements. Finally, work-related outcomes were shown to be significantly different for individuals in different conflict orientation groups. In addition to providing support for previous findings, this comprehensive approach provides new insights into the nature of conflict in organizations.