RNA Triplex Research Articles

Recognition of ATT Triplex and DNA:RNA Hybrid Structures by Benzothiazole Ligands.

Interactions of an array of nucleic acid structures with a small series of benzothiazole ligands (bis-benzothiazolyl-pyridines—group 1, 2-thienyl/2-benzothienyl-substituted 6-(2-imidazolinyl)benzothiazoles—group 2, and three 2-aryl/heteroaryl-substituted 6-(2-imidazolinyl)benzothiazoles—group 3) were screened by competition dialysis. Due to the involvement of DNA:RNA hybrids and triplex helices in many essential functions in cells, this study’s main aim is to detect benzothiazole-based moieties with selective binding or spectroscopic response to these nucleic structures compared to regular (non-hybrid) DNA and RNA duplexes and single-stranded forms. Complexes of nucleic acids and benzothiazoles, selected by this method, were characterized by UV/Vis, fluorescence and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and molecular modeling. Two compounds (1 and 6) from groups 1 and 2 demonstrated the highest affinities against 13 nucleic acid structures, while another compound (5) from group 2, despite lower affinities, yielded higher selectivity among studied compounds. Compound 1 significantly inhibited RNase H. Compound 6 could differentiate between B- (binding of 6 dimers inside minor groove) and A-type (intercalation) helices by an induced CD signal, while both 5 and 6 selectively stabilized ATT triplex in regard to AT duplex. Compound 3 induced strong condensation-like changes in CD spectra of AT-rich DNA sequences.

Role of Nuclear Non-Canonical Nucleic Acid Structures in Organismal Development and Adaptation to Stress Conditions.

Over the last decades, numerous examples have involved nuclear non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the regulation of gene expression. ncRNAs can interact with the genome by forming non-canonical nucleic acid structures such as R-loops or DNA:RNA triplexes. They bind chromatin and DNA modifiers and transcription factors and favor or prevent their targeting to specific DNA sequences and regulate gene expression of diverse genes. We review the function of these non-canonical nucleic acid structures in regulating gene expression of multicellular organisms during development and in response to different stress conditions and DNA damage using examples described in several organisms, from plants to humans. We also overview recent techniques developed to study where R-loops or DNA:RNA triplexes are formed in the genome and their interaction with proteins.

Cooperativity and Interdependency between RNA Structure and RNA-RNA Interactions.

Complex RNA–RNA interactions are increasingly known to play key roles in numerous biological processes from gene expression control to ribonucleoprotein granule formation. By contrast, the nature of these interactions and characteristics of their interfaces, especially those that involve partially or wholly structured RNAs, remain elusive. Herein, we discuss different modalities of RNA–RNA interactions with an emphasis on those that depend on secondary, tertiary, or quaternary structure. We dissect recently structurally elucidated RNA–RNA complexes including RNA triplexes, riboswitches, ribozymes, and reverse transcription complexes. These analyses highlight a reciprocal relationship that intimately links RNA structure formation with RNA–RNA interactions. The interactions not only shape and sculpt RNA structures but also are enabled and modulated by the structures they create. Understanding this two-way relationship between RNA structure and interactions provides mechanistic insights into the expanding repertoire of noncoding RNA functions, and may inform the design of novel therapeutics that target RNA structures or interactions.

Dynamic bulge nucleotides in the KSHV PAN ENE triple helix provide a unique binding platform for small molecule ligands.

Cellular and virus-coded long non-coding (lnc) RNAs support multiple roles related to biological and pathological processes. Several lncRNAs sequester their 3' termini to evade cellular degradation machinery, thereby supporting disease progression. An intramolecular triplex involving the lncRNA 3' terminus, the element for nuclear expression (ENE), stabilizes RNA transcripts and promotes persistent function. Therefore, such ENE triplexes, as presented here in Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) polyadenylated nuclear (PAN) lncRNA, represent targets for therapeutic development. Towards identifying novel ligands targeting the PAN ENE triplex, we screened a library of immobilized small molecules and identified several triplex-binding chemotypes, the tightest of which exhibits micromolar binding affinity. Combined biophysical, biochemical, and computational strategies localized ligand binding to a platform created near a dinucleotide bulge at the base of the triplex. Crystal structures of apo (3.3 Å) and ligand-soaked (2.5 Å) ENE triplexes, which include a stabilizing basal duplex, indicate significant local structural rearrangements within this dinucleotide bulge. MD simulations and a modified nucleoside analog interference technique corroborate the role of the bulge and the base of the triplex in ligand binding. Together with recently discovered small molecules that reduce nuclear MALAT1 lncRNA levels by engaging its ENE triplex, our data supports the potential of targeting RNA triplexes with small molecules.

Controlling Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells Using Multiplexed Conditional Guide RNAs for Cas12a*.

Spatiotemporal control of the activity of CRISPR‐associated (Cas) proteins is of considerable interest for basic research and therapeutics. Here, we show that conditional guide RNAs (gRNAs) for Cas12a can be transcribed in mammalian cells by RNA polymerase II, followed by activation via input‐dependent processing of the 3′ tail of the gRNA transcript. We demonstrate processing using an RNA strand displacement mechanism, as well as microRNA‐dependent processing, and cleavage by a guanine‐responsive ribozyme. We further demonstrate that Cas12a along with several independently switchable gRNAs can be compactly integrated on a single transcript using stabilizing RNA triplexes, providing a route towards Cas12a‐based gene regulation constructs with multi‐input switching capabilities. The principle is shown to work in HEK and mouse fibroblast cells using luminescence, fluorescence, and is also demonstrated for the conditional upregulation of an endogenous gene.

A hypothetical model of trans-acting R-loops-mediated promoter-enhancer interactions by Alu elements

Enhancers modulate gene expression by interacting with promoters. Models of enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) in the literature involve the activity of many components, including transcription factors and nucleic acid. However, the role that sequence similarity plays in EPIs remains largely unexplored. Herein, we report that Alu-derived sequences dominate sequence similarity between enhancers and promoters. After rejecting alternative DNA:DNA and DNA:RNA triplex models, we propose that enhancer-associated RNAs (eRNAs) may directly contact their targeted promoters by forming trans-acting R-loops at those Alu sequences. We show how the characteristic distribution of functional genomic data, such as RNA-DNA proximate ligation reads, binding of transcription factors, and RNA-binding proteins, all align with the Alu sequences of EPIs. We also show that these aligned Alu sequences may be subject to the constraint of coevolution, further implying the functional significance of these R-loop hybrids. Finally, our results imply that eRNA and Alu elements associate in a manner previously unrecognized in EPIs and the evolution of gene regulation networks in mammals.

Chiral ruthenium(II) complexes as stabilizers for an RNA triplex: In contrast to Λ-enantiomer, Δ-enantiomer stabilizes the Watson-Crick duplex and the Hoogsteen strand without significant preference

To further determine the factors governing the triplex stabilization by chiral ruthium(II) polypyridyl complexes, two new dppz-beased binding reagents, Δ-[Ru(bpy)2(6-NO2-dppz)]2+ (Δ-1; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; 6-NO2-dppz = 6-nitro-dipyrido-3,2-a,2′,3′-c]phenazine) and Λ-[Ru(bpy)2(6-NO2-dppz)]2+ (Λ-1), have been synthesized and characterized in this work. Binding properties of the two enantiomers Δ-1 and Λ-1 with the RNA poly(U)•poly(A)*poly(U) triplex have been studied by spectroscopic technologies and viscosity measurements as well as melting measurements. Spectral titrations and viscosity experiments as well as light-scattering experiments show that although the two enantiomers bind to the triplex through an intercalative mode, the binding affinity of Δ-1 toward the triplex is slightly higer than that of Λ-1. Moreover, melting measurements show that the two enantiomers exhibit different stabilization effects on the triplex under the same conditions. The enantiomer Δ-1 stabilizes the triplex without significant preference, thereby almost equally stabilizing the Watson-Crick base-paired duplex (the template duplex) and the Hoogsteen base-paired strand (third-strand) of the triplex. In contrast to Δ-1, Λ-1 shows preference for stabilizing the template duplex rather than third-strand to a large extent. This suggests that the racemic complex [Ru(bpy)2(6-NO2-dppz)]2+ is similar as a non-specific metallointercalator for the triplex investigated in this study. The results obtained in this work show that in addition to chiralities of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes, substituent effects of the main ligands also play important roles in altering the ability and selectivity of the metal complex enantiomers to stabilize the triplex.

Substituent effects on the interactions of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes [Ru(bpy)2(6-R-dppz)]2+ (R = hydroxy and fluorine) with the RNA triplex poly(rU)·poly(rA) × poly(rU)

Two new ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(bpy)2(6-OH-dppz)]2+ (Ru1, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, 6-OH-dppz = 6-hydroxydipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) and [Ru(bpy)2(6-F-dppz)]2+ (Ru2, 6-F-dppz = 6-fluorodipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]-phenazine), have been synthesized and characterized in this work. The interactions of Ru1 and Ru2 with the RNA triplex poly(rU)·poly(rA) × poly(rU) have been investigated by spectroscopic and viscometric techniques. Spectral titrations and viscosity experiments show that the binding modes of Ru1 and Ru2 to the triplex are intercalation, with the binding affinity for Ru2 being greater than that for Ru1. Fluorescence titrations indicate that Ru2, unlike Ru1, can act as a “molecular light switch” for the triplex. Furthermore, thermal denaturation experiments suggest that Ru1 and Ru2 stabilize the Hoogsteen base-paired strand (third-strand) of the triplex without significant differences, while the two complexes exhibit different selective stabilizing effects toward the triplex. In contrast to Ru1, Ru2 shows a preference for stabilizing the template duplex under the conditions used in this study. Results of the present work demonstrate that the electronic effects of substituents on the main ligands can significantly affect the binding and stabilization effects of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes toward the RNA triplex poly(rU)·poly(rA) × poly(rU).

Genome-Wide Computational Analysis and Validation of Potential Long Noncoding RNA-Mediated DNA-DNA-RNA Triplexes in the Human Genome.

Long noncoding RNAs are well studied for their regulatory actions through interaction with DNA regulating biological roles of DNA, RNA, or protein. However, direct binding of lncRNA with DNA is rarely demonstrated in experiments. The present protocol explains genome wide computational strategies to choose lncRNAs that can bind directly to the chromatin by forming highly stable DNA-DNA-RNA triplexes. The chapter also focuses on biophysical methods that can be used to validate the computationally derived lncRNA-gene targets in vitro.

Deep learning based DNA:RNA triplex forming potential prediction

BackgroundLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can exert functions via forming triplex with DNA. The current methods in predicting the triplex formation mainly rely on mathematic statistic according to the base paring rules. However, these methods have two main limitations: (1) they identify a large number of triplex-forming lncRNAs, but the limited number of experimentally verified triplex-forming lncRNA indicates that maybe not all of them can form triplex in practice, and (2) their predictions only consider the theoretical relationship while lacking the features from the experimentally verified data.ResultsIn this work, we develop an integrated program named TriplexFPP (Triplex Forming Potential Prediction), which is the first machine learning model in DNA:RNA triplex prediction. TriplexFPP predicts the most likely triplex-forming lncRNAs and DNA sites based on the experimentally verified data, where the high-level features are learned by the convolutional neural networks. In the fivefold cross validation, the average values of Area Under the ROC curves and PRC curves for removed redundancy triplex-forming lncRNA dataset with threshold 0.8 are 0.9649 and 0.9996, and these two values for triplex DNA sites prediction are 0.8705 and 0.9671, respectively. Besides, we also briefly summarize the cis and trans targeting of triplexes lncRNAs.ConclusionsThe TriplexFPP is able to predict the most likely triplex-forming lncRNAs from all the lncRNAs with computationally defined triplex forming capacities and the potential of a DNA site to become a triplex. It may provide insights to the exploration of lncRNA functions.

Comparative studies on the binding interaction of two chiral Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes with triple- and double-helical forms of RNA

Two chiral Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes, Δ-[Ru(bpy)2(6-F-dppz)]2+ (Δ-1; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, 6-F-dppz = 6-fluorodipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) and Λ-[Ru(bpy)2(6-F-dppz)]2+ (Λ-1), have been synthesized and characterized as binders for the RNA poly(U)•poly(A)*poly(U) triplex and poly(A)•poly(U) duplex in this work. Analysis of the UV–Vis absorption spectra and fluorescence emission spectra indicates that the binding of intercalating Δ-1 with the triplex and duplex RNA is greater than that of Λ-1, while the binding affinities of the two enantiomers to triplex structure is stronger than that of duplex structure. Fluorescence titrations show that the two enantiomers can act as molecular “light switches” for triple- and double-helical RNA. Thermal denaturation studies revealed that that the two enantiomers are more stable to Watson-Crick base-paired double strand of the triplex than the Hoogsteen base-paired third strand, but their stability and selectivity are different. For Δ-enantiomer, the increase of the thermal stability of the Watson-Crick base-paired duplex (13 °C) is slightly stronger than of the Hoogsteen base-paired strand (10 °C), displaying no obvious selectivity. However, compared to the Hoogsteen base-paired strand (5 °C), the stability of the Λ-enantiomer to the Watson-Crick base-paired duplex (13 °C) is more significant, which has obvious selectivity. The overall increase in viscosity of the RNA-(Λ-1) system and its curve shape are similar to that of the RNA-(Δ-1) system, suggesting that the binding modes of two enantiomers with RNA are intercalation. The obtained results in this work may be useful for understanding the binding differences in chiral Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes toward RNA triplex and duplex.

Substitution-Inert Polynuclear Platinum Complexes Inhibit Reverse Transcription Preferentially in RNA Triplex-Forming Templates.

RNA triplexes are significant tertiary structure motifs that are found in many functional RNAs. Hence, small molecules capable of recognition, binding, and stabilization of the triple-helical RNA structures are emerging as attractive potential molecular biology tools and therapeutic agents. Here, we utilize methods of molecular biology and biophysics to study the interactions of a series of antitumor substitution-inert polynuclear platinum complexes (SI-PPCs) with triple-helical RNA structures. We show that SI-PPCs recognize and stabilize RNA triplexes and inhibit reverse transcription preferentially in the RNA template prone to the triplex formation. These so far unexplored properties of SI-PPCs suggest that the targeting of triple-stranded regions in RNA might contribute to the biological effects of SI-PPCs.

Stabilization of an intermolecular RNA triplex by two novel binders Lys- and Arg-rich Ru(II) polypyridyl metallopeptides

In this work, using [Ru(bpy)2(pip)]2+ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, pip = 2-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-f]-[1,10]-phenanthroline) as chromophores and neutral amino acid glycine as spacers, two novel Arg- and Lys-rich Ru(II) polypyridyl metallopeptides as an intermolecular triplex RNA stabilizers, namely [Ru(bpy)2(pic-Lys2-Gly-Lys2-Gly-Lys2)]8+ (Ru1; pic = 2-(4-carboxy-phenyl)imidazo-[4,5-f] [1,10] phenanthroline, Gly = glycine, Lys = lysine) and [Ru(bpy)2(pic-Arg2-Gly-Arg2-Gly-Arg2)]8+ (Ru2; Arg = arginine), have been synthesized and characterized. The binding properties of Ru1 and Ru2 with poly(U)·poly(A)∗poly(U) triplex have been studied by UV–Vis spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, viscosity measurements as well as circular dichroism and thermal denaturation. The obtained results suggest that attaching cationic peptides to a Ru(II) polypyridyl complex can obviously enhance the triplex stabilization. Considering the structure natures of Ru1 and Ru2, conceivably besides electrostatic interaction, the forces stabilizing the triplex should also involve hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen binding. Compared with the Lys-rich metallopeptide (Ru1), however, the third-strand stabilizating effect of the Arg-rich one (Ru2) is slightly more marked, which may be due to differences in the interactions of arginine and lysine residues with the third strand of the triplex. The results obtained here may be useful for understanding the interaction of triplex RNA poly(U)·poly(A)∗poly(U) with small molecule, particularly ruthenium(II) complexes.

Noncovalent Spin-Labeling of DNA and RNA Triplexes.

Studying nucleic acids often requires labeling. Many labeling approaches require covalent bonds between the nucleic acid and the label, which complicates experimental procedures. Noncovalent labeling avoids the need for highly specific reagents and reaction conditions, and the effort of purifying bioconjugates. Among the least invasive techniques for studying biomacromolecules are NMR and EPR. Here, we report noncovalent labeling of DNA and RNA triplexes with spin labels that are nucleobase derivatives. Spectroscopic signals indicating strong binding were detected in EPR experiments in the cold, and filtration assays showed micromolar dissociation constants for complexes between a guanine-derived label and triplex motifs containing a single-nucleotide gap in the oligopurine strand. The advantages and challenges of noncovalent labeling via this approach that complements techniques relying on covalent links are discussed.

Incorporating 2-Thiouracil into Short Double-Stranded RNA-Binding Peptide Nucleic Acids for Enhanced Recognition of A-U Pairs and for Targeting a MicroRNA Hairpin Precursor.

Chemically modified short peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) recognize RNA duplexes under near physiological conditions by major-groove PNA·RNA-RNA triplex formation and show great promise for the development of RNA-targeting probes and therapeutics. Thymine (T) and uracil (U) are often incorporated into PNAs to recognize A-U pairs through major-groove T·A-U and U·A-U base triple formation. Incorporation of a modified nucleobase, 2-thiouracil (s2U), into triplex-forming oligonucleotides stabilizes both DNA and RNA triplexes. Thiolation of uracil causes a decrease in the dehydration energy penalty for triplex formation as well as a decrease in the pKa of the N3 atom, which may result in improved hydrogen bonding in addition to enhanced base stacking interactions, similar to the previously reported thiolation effect of pseudoisocytosine (J to L substitution). Here, we incorporated s2U into short PNAs, followed by binding studies of a series of s2U-modified PNAs. We demonstrated by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and thermal melting experiments that s2U and L incorporated into dsRNA-binding PNAs (dbPNAs) enhance the recognition of A-U and G-C pairs, respectively, in RNA duplexes in a position-independent manner, with no appreciable binding to the DNA duplex. Combining s2U and L modifications in dbPNAs facilitates enhanced recognition of dsRNAs and maintains selective binding to dsRNAs over ssRNAs. We further demonstrated through a cell-free assay the application of the s2U- and L-modified dbPNAs (8-mer, with a molecular mass of ∼2.3 kDa) in the inhibition of the pre-microRNA-198 maturation in a substrate-specific manner. Thus, s2U-modified dbPNAs may be generally useful for the enhanced and selective recognition of RNA duplexes and for the regulation of RNA functions.

Hypothesis: Regulation of neuroplasticity may involve I-motif and G-quadruplex DNA formation modulated by epigenetic mechanisms

Recent studies demonstrated the existence in vivo of various functional DNA structures that differ from the double helix. The G-quadruplex (G4) and intercalated motif (I-motif or IM) DNA structures are formed as knots where, correspondingly, guanines or cytosines on the same strand of DNA bind to each other. There are grounds to believe that G4 and IM sequences play a significant role in regulating gene expression considering their tendency to be found in or near regulatory sites (such as promoters, enhancers, and telomeres) as well as the correlation between the prevalence of G4 or IM conformations and specific phases of cell cycle. Notably, G4 and IM capable sequences tend to be found on the opposite strands of the same DNA site with at most one of the two structures formed at any given time. The recent evidence that K+, Mg2+ concentrations directly affect IM formation (and likely G4 formation indirectly) lead us to believe that these structures may play a major role in synaptic plasticity of neurons, and, therefore, in a variety of central nervous system (CNS) functions including memory, learning, habitual behaviors, pain perception and others. Furthermore, epigenetic mechanisms, which have an important role in synaptic plasticity and memory formation, were also shown to influence formation and stability of G4s and IMs. Our hypothesis is that non-canonical DNA and RNA structures could be an integral part of neuroplasticity control via gene expression regulation at the level of transcription, translation and splicing. We propose that the regulatory activity of DNA IM and G4 structures is modulated by DNA methylation/demethylation of the IM and/or G4 sequences, which facilitates the switch between canonical and non-canonical conformation. Other neuronal mechanisms interacting with the formation and regulatory activity of non-canonical DNA and RNA structures, particularly G4, IM and triplexes, may involve microRNAs as well as ion and proton fluxes. We are proposing experiments in acute brain slices and in vivo to test our hypothesis. The proposed studies would provide new insights into fundamental neuronal mechanisms in health and disease and potentially open new avenues for treating mental health disorders.

DNA·RNA triple helix formation can function as a cis-acting regulatory mechanism at the human β-globin locus

We have identified regulatory mechanisms in which an RNA transcript forms a DNA duplex·RNA triple helix with a gene or one of its regulatory elements, suggesting potential auto-regulatory mechanisms in vivo. We describe an interaction at the human β-globin locus, in which an RNA segment embedded in the second intron of the β-globin gene forms a DNA·RNA triplex with the HS2 sequence within the β-globin locus control region, a major regulator of globin expression. We show in human K562 cells that the triplex is stable in vivo. Its formation causes displacement from HS2 of major transcription factors and RNA Polymerase II, and consequently in loss of factors and polymerase that bind to the human ε- and γ-globin promoters, which are activated by HS2 in K562 cells. This results in reduced expression of these genes. These effects are observed when a small length of triplex-forming RNA is introduced into cells, or when a full-length intron-containing human β-globin transcript is expressed. Related results are obtained in human umbilical cord blood-derived erythroid progenitor-2 cells, in which β-globin expression is similarly affected by triplex formation. These results suggest a model in which RNAs conforming to the strict sequence rules for DNA·RNA triplex formation may participate in feedback regulation of genes in cis.

Binding properties of ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(phen)2(dicnq)]2+ and [Ru(bpy)2(dicnq)]2+ with the RNA triplex poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U)

Using phen or bpy (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) as ancillary ligands and dicnq (dicnq = 6,7-dicyanodipyrido[2,2-d:2′,3′-f]quinoxaline) as the main ligand, two new Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes containing cyano groups, [Ru(phen)2dicnq]2+ (Ru1) and [Ru(bpy)2dicnq]2+ (Ru2) have been synthesized as binders for poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U) triplex. The binding properties of Ru1 and Ru2 with the triplex has been studied by spectroscopic methods and viscosity measurements. Analysis of the electronic absorption spectra suggests that the binding of intercalating Ru1 with the triplex is greater than that of Ru2, which is also supported by spectroscopic titrations and viscosity measurements. Thermal denaturation studies suggest that the two complexes stabilize the Watson-Crick base-paired duplex of the triplex structure almost without affecting the stability of the Hoogsteen base-paired third strand, suggesting that the electron-withdrawing effect of cyano group hardly increases the binding strengths of the third strand and the template duplex of the triplex under study here. Changes in the CD (CD = circular dichroism) spectra of the triplex indicate that the binding-induced CD perturbation of the triplex structure is more marked with Ru1. The main results obtained here indicate that small differences in the ancillary ligands play important roles in the triplex binding when ruthenium(II) complexes contain the same intercalative ligands.

Synthesis of Glycosidic (β-1''→6, 3' and 4') Site Isomers of Neomycin B and their Effect on RNA and DNA Triplex Stability.

Glycosidic (β-1′′→6, 3′ and 4′) site isomers of neomycin B (i.e., neobiosamine (β-1′′→6, 3′ and 4′) neamines) have been synthesized in a straightforward manner. Peracetylated neomycin azide was used as a common starting material to obtain neobiosamine glycosyl donor and 6, 3′,4′-tri-O-acetyl neamine azide that after simple protecting group manipulation was converted to three different glycosyl acceptors (i.e., 5,6,4′-, 5,3′,4′- and 5,6,3′-tri-O-acetyl neamine azide). Glycosylation between the neobiosamine glycosyl donor and the neamine-derived acceptors gave the protected pseudo-tetrasaccharides, which were converted, via global deprotection (deacetylation and reduction of the azide groups), to the desired site isomers of neomycin. The effect of these aminoglycosides on the RNA and DNA triplex stability was studied by UV-melting profile analysis.

Isolation and genome-wide characterization of cellular DNA:RNA triplex structures.

RNA can directly bind to purine-rich DNA via Hoogsteen base pairing, forming a DNA:RNA triple helical structure that anchors the RNA to specific sequences and allows guiding of transcription regulators to distinct genomic loci. To unravel the prevalence of DNA:RNA triplexes in living cells, we have established a fast and cost-effective method that allows genome-wide mapping of DNA:RNA triplex interactions. In contrast to previous approaches applied for the identification of chromatin-associated RNAs, this method uses protein-free nucleic acids isolated from chromatin. High-throughput sequencing and computational analysis of DNA-associated RNA revealed a large set of RNAs which originate from non-coding and coding loci, including super-enhancers and repeat elements. Combined analysis of DNA-associated RNA and RNA-associated DNA identified genomic DNA:RNA triplex structures. The results suggest that triplex formation is a general mechanism of RNA-mediated target-site recognition, which has major impact on biological functions.