Risk Of Primary Cancer Research Articles

Risk of second primary cancer from proton arc therapy of pediatric brain tumors.

Proton arc therapy (PAT) is currently explored for clinical implementation, despite its associated low-dose bath. This study therefore aimed at evaluating the risk of radiation-induced second primary cancer (SPC) for PAT in pediatric brain tumor patients. Two brain-specific models for SPC induction were applied in five cases to compare volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and PAT surrogate plans. The PAT integral dose was reduced by a median of 29% compared to VMAT, and 17% compared to IMPT. For both models, the estimated SPC risks were consistently the lowest for PAT.

Pre-diagnostic cigarette smoking and risk of second primary cancer: The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study

Enhanced survival following a diagnosis of cancer has led to a steep rise in the number of individuals diagnosed with a second primary cancer. We examined the association between pre-cancer cigarette smoking and risk of second cancer in 9785 participants diagnosed with first invasive cancer after enrolment in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Follow-up was from date of first invasive cancer until diagnosis of second primary invasive cancer, death, or 31 July 2019, whichever came first. Data on cigarette smoking was collected at enrolment (1990–94) along with information on other lifestyle factors including body size, alcohol intake and diet. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for incident second cancer with several smoking measures, adjusted for potential confounders. After a mean follow-up of 7.3 years, 1658 second cancers were identified. All measures of smoking were associated with increased risk of second cancer. We observed a 44 % higher risk of second cancer for smokers of ≥ 20 cigarettes/day (HR=1.44, 95 % CI: 1.18–1.76), compared with never smokers. We also observed dose-dependent associations with number of cigarettes smoked (HR=1.05 per 10 cigarettes/day, 95 % CI: 1.01–1.09) and duration of smoking (HR=1.07 per 10 years, 95 % CI: 1.03–1.10). The risk of second cancer increased by 4 % per 10 pack-years of smoking (HR=1.04, 95 % CI: 1.02–1.06; p < 0.001). There was suggestive evidence of stronger associations with number of cigarettes smoked and pack-years of smoking for women (pinteraction<0.05), particularly for the highest risk categories of both variables. These associations with pre-diagnostic smoking were markedly stronger for second cancers known to be smoking-related than for others (phomogeneity<0.001). Our findings for pre-diagnostic cigarette smoking indicated increased risk of second primary cancer for cancer sites considered smoking-related, highlighting the importance of assessing smoking habits in cancer survivors.

Reduced risk of secondary primary extra pulmonary cancer in advanced/metastatic lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundLung cancer survivors are at high risk of developing a second primary cancer (SPC). We explored the Unicancer Epidemiology Strategy Medical-Economics for advanced or metastatic lung cancer (AMLC) database to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on the risk of SPC in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer. Patients and methodsThis retrospective study used data from patients with AMLC, with treatment initiated between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2018. Patients with lung cancer as the second primary cancer were excluded and a 6-months landmark threshold was applied to exclude patients with synchronous SPC, patients dead without SPC or with a follow-up inferior to 6 months. A propensity score (PS) was calculated on the following baseline covariates: Age at locally advanced or metastatic diagnosis, sex, smoking status, metastatic status, performance status and histological type. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used on the analyses aiming to assess the impact of ICI administered for AMLC, on the risk of occurrence of SPC. ResultsAmong the 10 796 patients, 148 (1.4%) patients had a diagnosis of SPC in a median interval of 22 (min–max: 7–173) months. All the patients (100%) with locally advanced or metastatic LC received at least one systemic treatment including (chemotherapy regimen (n = 9 851, 91.2%); ICI (n = 4 648, 43.0%); targeted treatment (n = 3 500; 32.4%). 40 (0.9%) SPC were reported in the 4 648 patients with metastatic LC treated with ICI vs 108 (1.7%) out of the 6 148 who did not receive immunotherapy (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis identified that treatment with ICI in patients with AMLC is associated with a reduced risk of SPC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.27–0.58). ConclusionTreatment with ICI in AMLC patients was associated with a significantly reduced risk of SPC. Prospective studies are required to confirm these results.

Second primary breast cancer in young breast cancer survivors.

10503 Background: Prior data suggests that the risk of second primary breast cancer (SPBC) is higher among women diagnosed with primary breast cancer (BC) before age 40. There is evidence that risk differs by primary tumor characteristics, cancer treatments, and genetic predisposition. However, studies investigating risk of SPBC by clinical risk factors are often limited by low numbers of young women and lack of complete patient data, particularly regarding germline genetic risk. Methods: Using the Young Women’s BC Study (YWS), a prospective cohort of 1,302 women ≤40 years diagnosed with BC from 2006-2016, we sought to compare clinical and treatment characteristics among women who developed an SPBC vs. those who did not. The analytic cohort included women diagnosed with Stage 0-III BC who did not undergo bilateral mastectomy (N = 685). Demographics, genetic testing and results, clinical events, and treatment data were collected through self-report on baseline and follow-up surveys (every 6 months for 3 years, then annually). Detailed tumor and treatment information, confirmation of genetic testing results, and new and recurrent cancer events were obtained through regular and triggered medical record review. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of age, race, genetic testing results, hormone receptor status, stage, and grade of primary tumor, and cancer treatments with SPBC. Participants were censored at the time of local recurrence, metastasis, death, or loss of follow-up. Results: At a median follow-up time of 9.9 years [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 6.6-12.0 y], 17 patients developed an SPBC (2.5%), in whom 3 occurred in the ipsilateral breast after lumpectomy as primary BC surgery. Median time from primary BC diagnosis to SPBC diagnosis was 4.2 years (IQR = 3.3-5.6 y). Compared to those who did not develop an SPBC, a greater percentage of women who developed an SPBC had in situ disease as their primary BC (24% v. 6%) and were of Ashkenazi descent (12% v. 5%). In the 577 women who had had genetic testing, 544 (94%) were non-carriers of pathogenic variants. Risk of SPBC was 2.2% (N = 12) in non-carriers and 9.1% (N = 3) in the 33 carriers. In Cox univariate analyses, carriers had a 4.1 times higher risk of SPBC compared to non-carriers (HR = 4.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.67-14.66, p = 0.03), and primary diagnosis with in situ BC was associated with a 5-fold increased risk of SPBC (HR = 5.02, 95% CI = 1.63-15.41, p = 0.005). Both factors remained strongly associated with SPBC when tested together in a multivariate model. Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrated a low risk of SPBC in the first 10 years after diagnosis of early BC in young women who are not germline pathogenic variant carriers. The finding that risk of SPBC was higher after in situ primary BC at a young age warrants further investigation. These findings have important implications for the treatment and follow-up care of young women with BC.

FRI-436 - Risk of primary liver cancer in alcohol-related cirrhosis-Danish and English cohort studies

FRI-436 - Risk of primary liver cancer in alcohol-related cirrhosis-Danish and English cohort studies

Cancer in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study With Matched Controls

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary disorder that predisposes patients to colorectal cancer (CRC). Prophylactic colectomy has greatly reduced the risk of CRC. However, new associations between FAP and the risk of other cancers have subsequently emerged. In this study, we assessed the risk of specific primary and secondary cancers among patients with FAP compared with matched controls. All known patients with FAP up until April 2021 were identified in the nationwide Danish Polyposis Register and paired with 4 unique controls matched by birth year, sex, and postal code. The risk of overall cancers, specific cancer types, and risk of a second primary cancer was assessed and compared with controls. The analysis included 565 patients with FAP and 1890 controls. The overall risk of cancer was significantly higher for patients with FAP than for controls (hazard ratio [HR], 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.28-5.17; P < .001). The increased risk was mainly due to CRC (HR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.58-8.22; P < .001), pancreatic cancer (HR, 6.45; 95% CI, 2.02-20.64; P= .002), and duodenal/small-bowel cancer (HR, 14.49; 95% CI, 1.76-119.47; P= .013), whereas no significant difference was observed for gastric cancer (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 0.53-20.23; P= .20). Furthermore, the risk of a second primary cancer was significantly higher for patients with FAP (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.02-3.50; P= .042). Between 1980 and 2020, the risk of cancer among patients with FAP decreased by ∼50%. Despite an absolute reduction in the risk of developing cancer among patients with FAP, the risk remained significantly higher than for the background population due to colorectal, pancreatic, and duodenal/small-bowel cancers.

Second primary cancers and survival among neuroendocrine tumor patients.

There is an increased risk of second primary cancers (SPCs) after neuroendocrine tumor (NET) diagnosis. The clinical significance of SPCs in this population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between SPCs after NET diagnosis and survival. We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of NET patients (gastrointestinal, pancreatic, or lung primary) from 2000-2016 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cox regression models assessed the association between SPCs and NET-specific (NET-SS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Of 58,553 NET patients, 7.9% experienced a SPC. SPCs were associated with worse OS (HR 2.14, 95%CI 1.94-2.36) and CSS (HR 2.31, 95%CI 2.06-2.59) with no difference in NET-SS (HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.87-1.23). Stratified analyses by histologic grade showed similar results for well and moderately differentiated NETs, but no difference in OS or CSS for poorly differentiated NETs (p>0.05). In stratified analyses by NET site, SPCs were associated with worse OS (HR 3.41, 95%CI 3.01-3.87) and CSS (HR 4.96, 95%CI 4.28-5.74) in gastrointestinal NETs and worse OS (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.03-1.52) with no difference in CSS (HR 1.08, 95%CI 0.85-1.36) in lung NETs. SPCs were not associated with a difference in OS or CSS in pancreatic NETs (p>0.05). In conclusion, SPCs after NETs were associated with inferior OS and CSS compared to no SPC, but were not associated with NET-SS. These data highlight the need for long-term follow-up in NETs to include detection of SPCs to ensure early diagnosis and timely management.

Risk of second primary cancer among women in the Kaiser Permanente Breast Cancer Survivors Cohort

BackgroundBreast cancer survivors are living longer due to early detection and advances in treatment and are at increased risk for second primary cancers. Comprehensive evaluation of second cancer risk among patients treated in recent decades is lacking.MethodsWe identified 16,004 females diagnosed with a first primary stage I-III breast cancer between 1990 and 2016 (followed through 2017) and survived ≥ 1 year at Kaiser Permanente (KP) Colorado, Northwest, and Washington. Second cancer was defined as an invasive primary cancer diagnosed ≥ 12 months after the first primary breast cancer. Second cancer risk was evaluated for all cancers (excluding ipsilateral breast cancer) using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and a competing risk approach for cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for KP center, treatment, age, and year of first cancer diagnosis.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 6.2 years, 1,562 women developed second cancer. Breast cancer survivors had a 70% higher risk of any cancer (95%CI = 1.62–1.79) and 45% higher risk of non-breast cancer (95%CI = 1.37–1.54) compared with the general population. SIRs were highest for malignancies of the peritoneum (SIR = 3.44, 95%CI = 1.65–6.33), soft tissue (SIR = 3.32, 95%CI = 2.51–4.30), contralateral breast (SIR = 3.10, 95%CI = 2.82–3.40), and acute myeloid leukemia (SIR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.18–3.48)/myelodysplastic syndrome (SIR = 3.25, 95%CI = 1.89–5.20). Women also had elevated risks for oral, colon, pancreas, lung, and uterine corpus cancer, melanoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR range = 1.31–1.97). Radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for all second cancers (HR = 1.13, 95%CI = 1.01–1.25) and soft tissue sarcoma (HR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.17–4.78), chemotherapy with decreased risk for all second cancers (HR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.78–0.98) and increased myelodysplastic syndrome risk (HR = 3.01, 95%CI = 1.01–8.94), and endocrine therapy with lower contralateral breast cancer risk (HR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.38–0.60). Approximately 1 in 9 women who survived ≥ 1 year developed second cancer, 1 in 13 developed second non-breast cancer, and 1 in 30 developed contralateral breast cancer by 10 years. Trends in cumulative incidence declined for contralateral breast cancer but not for second non-breast cancers.ConclusionsElevated risks of second cancer among breast cancer survivors treated in recent decades suggests that heightened surveillance is warranted and continued efforts to reduce second cancers are needed.

Cholecystectomy and risk of liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 million individuals.

There is still a lack of knowledge on the association between cholecystectomy and liver disease. This study was conducted to summarize the available evidence on the association of cholecystectomy with liver disease and quantify the magnitude of the risk of liver disease after cholecystectomy. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched systematically from database inception to January 2023 to identify eligible studies that evaluated the association between cholecystectomy and the risk of liver disease. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain a summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. We identified 20 studies with a total of 27 320 709 individuals and 282 670 liver disease cases. Cholecystectomy was associated with an increased risk of liver disease (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.34-1.98). In particular, cholecystectomy was found to be significantly associated with a 54% increased risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.18-2.01), a 173% increased risk of cirrhosis (OR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.81-4.12), and a 46% increased risk of primary liver cancer (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.18-1.82). There is an association between cholecystectomy and the risk of liver disease. Our results suggest that strict surgical indications should be implemented to reduce unnecessary cholecystectomy. Additionally, the routine assessment of liver disease is necessary for patients with a history of cholecystectomy. More prospective large-sample studies are required for better estimates of the risk.

Sex-related difference in the risk of second primary cancers among cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors

Sex-related difference in the risk of second primary cancers among cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors

Risk of second primary lung cancer in patients with thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis based on big population studies.

Previous studies have revealed that the number of cancer survivors developing a second primary malignancy is increasing, especially among thyroid cancer patients, and lung cancer is still the main cause of cancer death. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the risk of second primary lung cancer (SPLC) in patients with thyroid cancer. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases up to November 24, 2021, for relevant research and merged the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to evaluate the risk of developing SPLC in patients with thyroid cancer. Fourteen studies involving 1480,816 cases were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled result demonstrated that thyroid cancer patients may have a higher risk of SPLC than the general population (SIR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, P < 0.01, I2 = 81%, P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis stratified by sex indicated that female patients may have a markedly higher risk of SPLC than male patients (SIR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.40-1.94, P < 0.01, I2 = 75%, P < 0.01). Thyroid cancer patients are more likely to develop SPLC than the general population, especially women. However, other risk factors must be investigated, and more prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: No. CRD42021285399.

Abstract 6014: Cancer risk diagnosis by epimutation burden: a multicenter prospective study

Abstract Aberrant DNA methylation, induced by aging and accelerated by chronic inflammation, accumulates in normal tissue. Accumulation of DNA methylation in multiple genes, namely epimutation burden, is closely associated with cancer risk. Indeed, we demonstrated that the measurement of the methylation level of a marker gene in normal tissue is useful for cancer risk prediction of metachronous cancers, by a multicenter prospective study with gastric cancer patients (Asada, Gut, 64:388, 2015: Maeda, Gut, 66:1721, 2017). In this study, we attempted to predict the risk of primary gastric cancer by performing a new multicenter prospective study. We recruited 1,880 healthy people, after Helicobacter pylori eradication, with a clinically high risk of gastric cancer. Biopsy specimens were obtained from the antrum and body, and the methylation level of RIMS1, which is a preselected epigenomic risk marker for this study, was measured in 1,757 participants. The participants are annually being followed-up to detect primary gastric cancer, for 5-8 years. Currently, the median follow-up is 4.05 years, and 27 people have developed primary gastric cancers (as of September 2022). The results of statistical analysis are being determined. This study will establish the clinical utility of a cancer risk diagnosis by epimutation burden in normal tissue, and is promising for application in various inflammation-associated cancers. Citation Format: Harumi Yamada, Masahiro Maeda, Seiichiro Abe, Taichi Shimazu, Takayuki Ando, Kazunari Murakami, Shinji Tanaka, Takao Maekita, Osamu Inatomi, Ken Sugimoto, Tetsuro Kawagoe, Nobutake Yamamichi, Toshikazu Ushijima. Cancer risk diagnosis by epimutation burden: a multicenter prospective study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6014.

Abstract 761: Integrated environmental, lifestyle, and epigenetic risk prediction of primary gastric cancer

Abstract Aberrant DNA methylation accumulates in non-malignant gastric mucosa after exposure to environmental pathogens such as H. pylori (HP). To understand how environmental factors and DNA methylation interplay to influence primary gastric cancer (GC) risk, we performed an integrated analysis of clinical factors and DNA methylation data of gastric tissues from a longitudinally monitored cohort in Japan, with validation in a separate cohort from Singapore. The Japanese check-up cohort included 4,234 healthy subjects who underwent gastric mucosal biopsy. The median observation period was 4.2 years, and 77 subjects developed GC. GC incidence correlated with age, drinking, smoking, GC family history, and HP status in the multivariable Cox model. Next, we conducted comprehensive DNA methylation analysis using Infinium MethylationEPIC arrays on gastric tissues (n=164), including (1) mucosal biopsies from subjects who later developed GC (“future GC patients”), (2) mucosal biopsies from HP(+) subjects who did not later develop GC (“future non-GC subjects”), (3) mucosal biopsies from future non-GC HP(−) subjects (“control mucosae”), and (4) GCs and surrounding mucosae. Infinium data of gastric mucosae (n=137) collected in the GCEP cohort (Singapore) were also analyzed. DNA methylation of promoter region observed in GCs, accumulated not only in mucosae adjacent to GCs but also in the biopsy mucosae of future GC patients. Mucosae of future non-GC subjects were more methylated than control mucosae but less methylated than mucosae of future GC patients. Similar findings were observed in the GCEP cohort. DNA methylation levels were associated with clinical factors and histopathological alterations - however, in multivariable analyses, DNA methylation remained an independent GC risk factor. Methylation levels were predictive of not only higher GC risk but also a shorter period to GC incidence. We then focused on the associations between environmental factors and methylation. Heavy drinking and smoking were associated with the accumulation of DNA methylation only in HP(+) subjects. The increases in methylation over time in subjects who quit smoking were significantly attenuated compared to continuous smokers. These results suggest that pro-carcinogenic epigenetic alterations initiated by HP exposure are amplified by unfavorable but modifiable lifestyle choices. Furthermore, target genes methylated by each environmental factor may overlap in part; however, they were not necessarily methylated similarly, suggesting that the best markers for stratifying GC risk may differ for each subgroup classified by exposure to environmental factors. Indeed, candidate markers for stratifying GC risk overlapped among subgroups, whereas markers unique to each subgroup were also identified, highlighting the potential of integrating environmental, lifestyle, and epigenetic information to inform GC precision prevention. Citation Format: Genki Usui, Keisuke Matsusaka, Kie K. Huang, Feng Zhu, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Masaki Fukuyo, Bahityar Rahmutulla, Norikazu Yogi, Tomoka Okada, Motoaki Seki, Eiji Sakai, Kazutoshi Fujibayashi, Stephen K. Tsao, Christopher Khor, Tiing L. Ang, Hiroyuki Abe, Hisahiro Matsubara, Masashi Fukayama, Toshiaki Gunji, Nobuyuki Matsuhashi, Teppei Morikawa, Tetsuo Ushiku, Khay G. Yeoh, Patrick Tan, Atsushi Kaneda. Integrated environmental, lifestyle, and epigenetic risk prediction of primary gastric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 761.

Abstract 3057: Second primary cancer risks for female and male breast cancer survivors

Abstract Background: Second primary cancer (SPC) incidence is rising among breast cancer (BC) survivors, but these risks remain unclear. We estimated SPC risks for male and female BC survivors using large-scale electronic health record data from a linkage of National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service data and Hospital Episode Statistics surgical records in England. Material and Methods: We used a retrospective cohort study design comprising 763,578 female and 4,795 male BC survivors first diagnosed with BC between 1995-2018. We calculated overall and site-specific SPC standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) by comparing observed and expected SPC counts for 19 cancer sites. Study participants were followed from one year after the first BC diagnosis until either a SPC diagnosis (excluding ipsilateral breast and non-melanoma skin cancers), death, migration, relevant surgical procedures, or the end of 2019. Expected SPC counts were calculated using year-, age- and sex-specific cancer incidence rates in the general English population. We stratified the SIRs by age group, sex, and cancer site. We estimated Kaplan-Meier absolute risks of site-specific SPCs and assessed the influence of age at first BC diagnosis using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 68,550 and 720 incident SPCs among female and male BC survivors, respectively. There was a significant increased risk of all SPCs combined for female BC survivors (SIR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.18-1.20). There were significant increased risks for SPC at all sites combined, all non-breast sites combined, and at 12 further specific sites for females and at 2 specific sites for males. Among females, the increase was greatest for contralateral breast (SIR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.79-1.85) and uterine cancers (SIR: 1.80, 95%CI: 1.76-1.85). The risk at all sites combined was higher for women first diagnosed with BC before age 50 (SIR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.85-1.92) compared to women diagnosed with BC at age 50 or over (SIR: 1.11, 95%CI: 1.10-1.12). The largest associations were observed for contralateral breast (SIR: 3.19, 95%CI: 3.11-3.29) and uterine (SIR: 1.77, 95%CI: 1.73-1.82) SPCs in the younger and older age groups, respectively. Increasing age at first female BC diagnosis was associated with decreasing CBC absolute risks, but significantly increased absolute risks of all other SPCs. Male BC survivors were at increased risk of contralateral breast (SIR: 42.39, 95%CI: 28.39-60.89) and prostate (SIR: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.13-1.46) SPCs. Conclusions: This is the largest study to date to assess SPC risks following BC in either men or women. SPC risks were significantly increased, both in combination and at specific sites. These findings could help guide clinical management, such as screening recommendations, for BC survivors. Further analysis is underway to investigate the effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, comorbidities, or germline BC susceptibility. Citation Format: Isaac Allen, Tameera Rahman, Andrew Bacon, Craig Knott, Sophie Jose, Sally Vernon, Hend Hassan, Catherine Huntley, Lucy Loong, Yvonne Walburga, Katrina Lavelle, Eva Morris, Steven Hardy, Beth Torr, Diana Eccles, Clare Turnbull, Marc Tischkowitz, Paul Pharoah, Antonis C. Antoniou. Second primary cancer risks for female and male breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3057.

Sexual disparity and the risk of second primary thyroid cancer: a paradox.

Despite extensive research on sex differences in primary thyroid cancer, there is a lack of data on the role of sex in the risk of developing second primary thyroid cancer (SPTC). We aimed to investigate the risk of SPTC development according to patient sex, with an emphasis concerning previous malignancy location as well as age. Cancer survivors diagnosed with SPTC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The SEER*Stat software package obtained standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and absolute excess risks of subsequent thyroid cancer development. Data for 9,730 (62.3%) females and 5,890 (37.7%) males were extracted for a total of 15,620 SPTC individuals. Asian/Pacific Islanders had the highest incidence of SPTC [SIR =2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.49-2.86]. The risk of SPTC was higher in males (SIR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.94-2.08) than when compared to females (SIR =1.83, 95% CI: 1.79-1.88; P<0.001). Head and neck tumors had significantly higher SIRs for SPTC development in males when compared to females. Survivors of primary malignancies have an increased risk SPTC, especially males. Our work suggests that oncologists and endocrinologists may consider the need for increased surveillance of both male and female patients given their increased risk of SPTC.

Advances in radiotherapy and its impact on second primary cancer risk: A multi-center cohort study in prostate cancer patients

BackgroundModelling studies suggest that advanced intensity-modulated radiotherapy may increase second primary cancer (SPC) risks, due to increased radiation exposure of tissues located outside the treatment fields. In the current study we investigated the association between SPC risks and characteristics of applied external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) protocols for localized prostate cancer (PCa). MethodsWe collected EBRT protocol characteristics (2000–2016) from five Dutch RT institutes for the 3D-CRT and advanced EBRT era (N = 7908). From the Netherlands Cancer Registry we obtained patient/tumour characteristics, SPC data, and survival information. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated for pelvis and non-pelvis SPC. Nationwide SIRs were calculated as a reference, using calendar period as a proxy to label 3D-CRT/advanced EBRT. ResultsFrom 2000-2006, 3D-CRT with 68–78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, delivered with 10–23 MV and weekly portal imaging was the most dominant protocol. By the year 2010 all institutes routinely used advanced EBRT (IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy), mainly delivering 78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, using various kV/MV imaging protocols. Sixteen percent (N = 1268) developed ≥ 1 SPC. SIRs for pelvis and non-pelvis SPC (all institutes, advanced EBRT vs 3D-CRT) were 1.17 (1.00–1.36) vs 1.39 (1.21–1.59), and 1.01 (0.89–1.07) vs 1.03 (0.94–1.13), respectively. Nationwide non-pelvis SIR was 1.07 (1.01–1.13) vs 1.02 (0.98–1.07). Other RT protocol characteristics did not correlate with SPC endpoints. ConclusionNone of the studied RT characteristics of advanced EBRT was associated with increased out-of-field SPC risks. With constantly evolving EBRT protocols, evaluation of associated SPC risks remains important.

High Salt Intake Combined With Hypertension Elevated The Risk Of Primary Liver Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

High Salt Intake Combined With Hypertension Elevated The Risk Of Primary Liver Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

Pre-diagnostic anti-EBV antibodies and primary liver cancer risk: a population-based nested case-control study in southern China

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate associations between pre-diagnostic anti-Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibodies, including interactions with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and risk of primary liver cancer in southern China.MethodsIn a population-based nested case-control study, we measured pre-diagnostic immunoglobulin A (IgA) against EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and viral capsid antigen (VCA) in 125 primary liver cancer cases and 2077 matched controls. We also explored the interaction between HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-EBV antibodies.ResultsParticipants with positive EBNA1-IgA, positive VCA-IgA or single-positive anti-EBV antibodies had two-fold odds of developing liver cancer, compared with seronegative subjects. The odds ratios (ORs) between the relative optical density of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA and primary cancer, controlling for age and HBsAg, were 1.59 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17, 2.14) and 1.60 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.41), respectively. Subjects with both HBsAg and anti-EBV antibody seropositivity were at 50-fold increased risk compared with those negative for both biomarkers (OR: 50.67, 95% CI: 18.28, 140.46), yielding a relative excess risk due to interaction of 30.81 (95% CI: 3.42, 114.93).ConclusionPre-diagnostic seropositivity for EBNA1-IgA and/or VCA-IgA was positively associated with primary liver cancer risk, especially in combination with HBsAg positivity. EBV may interact with HBV in the development of primary liver cancer, and anti-EBV antibodies might be potential biomarkers for primary liver cancer in this high-risk population.

Treatment of Osteoporosis With Anabolic Agents and the Risk of Primary Bone Cancers: A Study of 44,728 Patients Treated With Teriparatide and Abaloparatide.

Bone anabolic agents can benefit orthopaedic patients perioperatively and improve outcomes after fragility fractures. However, preliminary animal data raised concern for the potential development of primary bony malignancies after treatment with these medications. This investigation examined 44,728 patients older than 50 years who were prescribed teriparatide or abaloparatide and compared them with a matched control group to evaluate risk of primary bone cancer development. Patients younger than 50 years with a history of cancer or other risk factors of bony malignancy were excluded. A separate cohort of 1,241 patients prescribed an anabolic agent with risk factors of primary bone malignancy, along with 6,199 matched control subjects, was created to evaluate the effect of anabolic agents. Cumulative incidence and incidence rate per 100,000 person-years were calculated as were risk ratios and incidence rate ratios. The overall risk of primary bone malignancy development for risk factor-excluded patients in the anabolic agent-exposed group was 0.02%, compared with 0.05% in the nonexposed group. The incidence rate per 100,000 person-years was calculated at 3.61 for the anabolic-exposed patients and 6.46 for control subjects. A risk ratio of 0.47 ( P = 0.03) and incidence rate ratio of 0.56 ( P = 0.052) were observed for the development of primary bone malignancies in patients undergoing treatment with bone anabolic agents. Among high-risk patients, 5.96% of the anabolic-exposed cohort developed primary bone malignancies and 8.13% of nonexposed patients developed primary bone malignancy. The risk ratio was 0.73 ( P = 0.01), and the incidence rate ratio was 0.95 ( P = 0.67). Teriparatide and abaloparatide can safely be used for osteoporosis and orthopaedic perioperative management without increased risk of development of primary bone malignancy.

Anthropometric indicators of adiposity and risk of primary liver cancer: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Background and aimsAdiposity is associated with an increased risk of primary liver cancer (PLC). As the most commonly used indicator of adiposity, the body mass index (BMI) has been questioned for its limitations in reflecting visceral fat. This study aimed to investigate the role of different anthropometric indicators in identifying the risk of PLC by accounting for potential non-linear associations. MethodsSystematic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Sinomed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the pooled risk. The dose-response relationship was assessed using a restricted cubic spline model. ResultsSixty-nine studies involving more than 30 million participants were included in the final analysis. Regardless of the indicator used, adiposity was strongly associated with an increased risk of PLC. When comparing the HRs per 1-standard deviation increment across indicators of adiposity, the association was strongest for waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) (HR = 1.39), followed by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (HR = 1.22), BMI (HR = 1.13), waist circumference (WC) (HR = 1.12), and hip circumference (HC) (HR = 1.12). A strong non-linear association was observed between each anthropometric parameter and the risk of PLC, regardless of whether the original or decentralised value was used. The positive association between WC and PLC risk remained substantial after adjusting for BMI. The incidence of PLC was higher with central adiposity (52.89 per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI = 50.33–55.44) than general adiposity (39.01 per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI = 37.26–40.75). ConclusionCentral adiposity seems to contribute more to the development of PLC than general adiposity. A larger WC, independent of BMI, was strongly associated with the risk of PLC and might be a more promising predictive indicator than BMI.