Risk Of Primary Cancer Research Articles

Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers Among Adult-Onset 5-Year Cancer Survivors in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.

The number of cancer survivors who develop subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) is expected to increase. We evaluated the overall and cancer type-specific risks of SPCs among adult-onset cancer survivors by first primary cancer (FPC) types considering sex and age. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database of South Korea including 5-year cancer survivors diagnosed with an FPC in 2009 to 2010 and followed them until December 31, 2019. We measured the SPC incidence per 10,000 person-years and the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) compared with the incidence expected in the general population. Among 266,241 survivors (mean age at FPC: 55.7 years; 149,352/266,241, 56.1% women), 7348 SPCs occurred during 1,003,008 person-years of follow-up (median 4.3 years), representing a 26% lower risk of developing SPCs (SIR 0.74, 95% CI 0.72-0.76). Overall, men with 14 of the 20 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs; women with 7 of the 21 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs. The risk of developing any SPC type differed by age; the risk was 28% higher in young (<40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42; incidence: 30 per 10,000 person-years) and 27% lower in middle-aged and older (≥40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.74; incidence: 80 per 10,000 person-years) compared with the age-corresponding general population. The most common types of FPCs were mainly observed as SPCs in cancer survivors, with lung (21.6%) and prostate (15.2%) cancers in men and breast (18.9%) and lung (12.2%) cancers in women. The risks of brain cancer in colorectal cancer survivors, lung cancer in laryngeal cancer survivors, and both kidney cancer and leukemia in thyroid cancer survivors were significantly higher for both sexes. Other high-risk SPCs varied by FPC type and sex. Strong positive associations among smoking-related cancers, such as laryngeal, head and neck, lung, and esophageal cancers, were observed. Substantial variation existed in the associations between specific types of FPC and specific types of SPC risk, which may be linked to hereditary cancer syndrome: for women, the risks of ovarian cancer for breast cancer survivors and uterus cancers for colorectal cancer survivors, and for men, the risk of pancreas cancer for kidney cancer survivors. The varying risk for SPCs by age, sex, and FPC types in cancer survivors implies the necessity for tailored prevention and screening programs targeting cancer survivors. Lifestyle modifications, such as smoking cessation, are essential to reduce the risk of SPCs in cancer survivors. In addition, genetic testing, along with proactive cancer screening and prevention strategies, should be implemented for young cancer survivors because of their elevated risk of developing SPCs.

Histology-specific standardized incidence ratio improves the estimation of second primary lung cancer risk

BackgroundLung cancer (LC) survivors are at increased risk for developing a second primary cancer (SPC) compared to the general population. While this risk is particularly high for smoking-related SPCs, the published standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for lung cancer after lung cancer is unexpectedly low in countries that follow international multiple primary (IARC/IACR MP) rules when compared to the USA, where distinct rules are employed. IARC/IACR rules rely on histology-dependent documentation of SPC with the same location as the first cancer and only classify an SPC when tumors present different histology. Thus, SIR might be underestimated in cancer registries using these rules. This study aims to assess whether using histology-specific reference rates for calculating SIR improves risk estimates for second primary lung cancer (SPLC) in LC survivors.MethodsWe (i) use the distribution of histologic subtypes of LC in population-based cancer registry data of 11 regional cancer registries from Germany to present evidence that the conventional SIR metric underestimates the actual risk for SPLC in LC survivors in registries that use IARC/IACR MP rules, (ii) present updated risk estimates for SPLC in Germany using a novel method to calculate histological subtype-specific SIRs, and (iii) validate this new method using US SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program) data, where different MP rules are applied.ResultsThe adjusted relative risk for lung cancer survivors in Germany to develop an SPLC was 2.98 (95% CI 2.53–3.49) for females and 1.15 (95% CI 1.03–1.27) for males using the novel histology-specific SIR. When using IARC/IACR MP rules, the conventional SIR underestimates the actual risk for SPLC in LC survivors by approximately 30% for both sexes.ConclusionsOur proposed histology-specific method makes the SIR metric more robust against MP rules and, thus, more suitable for cross-country comparisons.

Abstract PO1-03-03: STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival

Abstract Background: Standardized definitions of efficacy endpoints are needed to improve clinical trial designs, data reporting and interpretation of results, and to allow cross-trial comparisons. STEEP (Standardized Definitions for Efficacy Endpoints) criteria were proposed in 2007 by an expert panel from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to provide common definitions for clinical trials in early breast cancer (BC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) was selected as a candidate surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials and has been widely used in the last 15 years. Advances in BC systemic treatment led to review these criteria (STEEP v2.0), with the definition of a new modified endpoint: invasive BC-free survival (IBCFS). IBCFS excludes second primary non-breast invasive cancers from IDFS which may better detect efficacy effects when the toxicity profile of the intervention is well-known and the risk of second primary cancer is small. Methods: We proposed a multi-trial analysis of 8 adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials from GEICAM and TRIO to evaluate the different surrogate endpoints defined in the STEEP v2.0. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through correlation between the ln hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the ln HR of the different studied endpoints across trials. The correlation was estimated by the weighted, by trial size, least squares regression (WLS) line and evaluated comparing the R2 values between OS and the corresponding endpoint tested. Primary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with IDFS/IBCFS. Secondary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with other STEEP v2.0 endpoints (distant disease-free survival [DDFS], distant relapse-free survival [DRFS], recurrence-free survival [RFS], recurrence-free interval [RFI] and distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI]) and explored the surrogacy between OS and all endpoints in specific groups of patients (pts) according to their risk of relapse: hormone receptors positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) pts with intermediate/high and high-risk and triple negative (TN) pts. Results: A total of 14,473 pts were included. Median age was 50 years (range, 20–82). All were female, and 51.8% were postmenopausal. With a median follow-up of 115 months (range, 0.0–188) we found 2,504 OS events, 4,146 IDFS events (60.9% being distant recurrences) and 3,810 IBCFS events (62.4% being distant recurrences). For each trial, HR of OS, IDFS and IBCFS indicated same conclusions. If HR&amp;lt; 1 for OS, it was also for IDFS and IBCFS and the same was true when HR &amp;gt;1. R2 results of the weighted linear correlations between the ln HR of OS versus (vs) IDFS and OS vs IBCFS were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Confidence intervals (CI) at 95% were both overlapping. All other efficacy endpoints showed strong correlation with OS in the overall analysis. R2 values for HR+/HER2- intermediate/high and high-risk pts were 0.89 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.84 (OS vs IBCFS). For TN pts the correlations were weaker, being 0.63 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.73 (OS vs IBCFS). All WLS R2 values are described in the table. Conclusions: All tested STEEP v2.0 endpoints were strongly correlated with OS (R2 close to 1), meaning that their use as surrogate endpoints for adjuvant CT trials is appropriate. Notably, no differences were found between them in this multi-trial analysis. Therefore, none of them is more appropriate than other to discriminate the value of a new intervention vs comparator in adjuvant CT studies with mature data and long-term follow-up. Table: Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, Marina Pollan, Ander Urriticoechea, Eva Carrasco, Gonzalo Spera, Miguel Martín, Begoña Bermejo, Linnea Chap, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, John Crown, Jose Angel García-Sáenz, Arlene Chan, Angel Guerrero, Valerie Bee, Lourdes Calvo, Rodrigo Fresco, Andrea Blasco, Andrés Hernando, Dennis Slamon. STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-03.

Abstract PO3-11-10: Second primary non-breast cancers in young breast cancer survivors

Abstract Adolescent and young adults (AYAs) (15-39 years) have a heightened risk of developing a second primary malignancy due to extended periods of survivorship, higher incidence of germline cancer predisposing variants, and increased susceptibility to treatment-induced malignancies. Research on survivors of specific AYA cancer types, including breast cancer (BC) survivors, is limited. Among BC survivors, while much survivorship research focuses on risk of locoregional recurrence or contralateral BC, little is known about overall risk, and risk factors, of developing second non-breast primaries. This prospective cohort study examined women diagnosed with BC from 2006-2016 at age ≤40 years enrolled in the Young Women’s BC Study (YWS) (N=1297). Women were excluded from the analytic cohort if initially diagnosed with Stage IV breast cancer (N=64). To enable investigation of how BC treatments may impact second primary risk, women were also excluded if they reported another cancer before primary BC diagnosis (N=3). Patient characteristics, treatment information, and clinical events were collected via serial surveys. Tumor characteristics and detailed treatment data were obtained from medical record review. Five- and 10-year risk of second non-breast primary was estimated via the cumulative incidence function after applying the Fine-Gray competing risks model with time starting at primary BC diagnosis. Death, metastasis, or diagnosis with a second primary BC were considered as competing events. Univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray sub-distribution models were used to estimate sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for second non-breast primary cancer risk. Risk factors considered included age, race, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use, income, family history of cancer, germline pathogenic variant (PV) carrier status, tumor stage, grade, and ER status, primary surgery type, and receipt of radiation, chemotherapy, or endocrine therapy (yes/no). Multivariate models tested individual associations with additional adjustment for radiation therapy and PV carrier status, as both are consistently associated with second primary in the literature. Over a median follow-up of 10.1 years (inter-quartile range (IQR) =7.9-12.1 y), 47 patients (4%) developed a second non-breast primary cancer. Median age at second non-breast primary was 43 years (IQR=39-46), and median time between primary BC and second non-breast primary was 7.3 years (IQR=4.1-9.3). Second primary types included melanoma (n=10), thyroid (n=10), ovarian (n=4), sarcoma (n=4), uterine (n=3), rectal (n=3), bladder (n=2), cervical (n=2), head and neck (n=2), lung (n=2), lymphoma (n=2), pancreatic (n=2), and kidney (n=1). During the study, 22 patients (2%) developed a second primary BC, 167 (19%) developed metastasis, and 15 (1%) died from causes other than BC. Among the patients who developed a second primary BC, two later developed another non-breast cancer (ovarian and brain cancer). When incorporating competing risks, five and 10-year cumulative incidence of second non-breast primary was 1.4% and 3.2%, respectively. No patient or treatment factors were statistically significantly associated with second non-breast primary in univariate or multivariate models, including radiation and PV carrier status. In this population of young BC survivors, 10-year cumulative incidence of second non-breast primary cancer was 3.2%, with the most common second cancers being melanoma and thyroid cancer. Incidence rates of all second primary cancer types in this cohort were higher than population-based incidence rates for healthy women under 50 years of age, highlighting the importance of long-term surveillance for other cancer events in this young population. While risk of second non-breast primary was not associated with primary BC treatment in this study, cases were limited, and the follow-up interval was relatively short. Citation Format: Bessie Zhang, Kristen Brantley, Shoshana Rosenberg, Gregory Kirkner, Laura Collins, Kathryn Ruddy, Rulla Tamimi, Lidia Schapira, Virginia Borges, Ellen Warner, Steven Come, Eric Winer, Ann Partridge. Second primary non-breast cancers in young breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-11-10.

Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers in Thyroid Cancer Survivors according to the Dose of Levothyroxine: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Current research has not investigated the effect of thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy with levothyroxine on the risk for developing subsequent primary cancers (SPCs). This study aimed to investigate the association between levothyroxine dosage and the risk for SPCs in thyroid cancer patients. We conducted a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study form Korean National Health Insurance database. This cohort included 342,920 thyroid cancer patients between 2004 and 2018. Patients were divided into the non-levothyroxine and the levothyroxine groups, the latter consisting of four dosage subgroups according to quartiles. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to evaluate the risk for SPCs by adjusting for variables including cumulative doses of radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. A total of 17,410 SPC cases were observed over a median 7.3 years of follow-up. The high-dose levothyroxine subgroups (Q3 and Q4) had a higher risk for SPC (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 and 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.24 and 1.17- 1.37; respectively) compared to the non-levothyroxine group. In particular, the adjusted HR of stomach (1.31), colorectal (1.60), liver and biliary tract (1.95), and pancreatic (2.48) cancers were increased in the Q4 subgroup. We consistently observed a positive association between high levothyroxine dosage per body weight and risk of SPCs, even after adjusting for various confounding variables. Moreover, similar results were identified in the stratified analyses according to thyroidectomy type and RAI therapy, as well as in a subgroup analysis of patients with good adherence. High-dose levothyroxine use was associated with increased risk of SPCs among thyroid cancer patients regardless of RAI therapy.

Second primary cancer risks according to race and ethnicity among U.S. breast cancer survivors.

Breast cancer survivors have an increased risk of developing second primary cancers, yet risks by race and ethnicity have not been comprehensively described. We evaluated second primary cancer risks among 717,335 women diagnosed with first primary breast cancer (aged 20-84 years and survived ≥1-year) in the SEER registries using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs; observed/expected). SIRs were estimated by race and ethnicity compared with the racial- and ethnic-matched general population, and further stratified by clinical characteristics of the index breast cancer. Poisson regression was used to test for heterogeneity by race and ethnicity. SIRs for second primary cancer differed by race and ethnicity with the highest risks observed among non-Hispanic/Latina Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander (AANHPI), non-Hispanic/Latina Black (Black), and Hispanic/Latina (Latina) survivors and attenuated risk among non-Hispanic/Latina White (White) survivors (SIRAANHPI = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.44-1.54; SIRBlack = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.37-1.45; SIRLatina = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.41-1.49; SIRWhite = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.08-1.10; p-heterogeneity<.001). SIRs were particularly elevated among AANHPI, Black, and Latina survivors diagnosed with an index breast cancer before age 50 (SIRs range = 1.88-2.19) or with estrogen receptor-negative tumors (SIRs range = 1.60-1.94). Heterogeneity by race and ethnicity was observed for 16/27 site-specific second cancers (all p-heterogeneity's < .05) with markedly elevated risks among AANHPI, Black, and Latina survivors for acute myeloid and acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (SIRs range = 2.68-3.15) and cancers of the contralateral breast (SIRs range = 2.60-3.01) and salivary gland (SIRs range = 2.03-3.96). We observed striking racial and ethnic differences in second cancer risk among breast cancer survivors. Additional research is needed to inform targeted approaches for early detection strategies and treatment to reduce these racial and ethnic disparities.

Abstract LB151: Association of radiotherapy with the risk of subtype-specific lung cancer among breast cancer survivors in the United States

Abstract Background Breast cancer survivors face an elevated risk of subsequent primary lung cancer (SPLC), especially those who received radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the association of radiotherapy for breast cancer and the risk of subtype-specific lung cancer is unknown. Methods Females diagnosed with first primary breast cancer at ages 20-84 years from 1992-2020 were identified from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Follow-up began at 2 months from breast cancer diagnosis and ended at subsequent lung cancer diagnosis, last known vital status, death, or December 31, 2020. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs, per 10,000 women) were calculated for each histological subtype of lung cancer (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and others) using expected rates of each subtype in the SEER population. Subgroup analyses were conducted by treatment for breast cancer (radiotherapy yes or no/unknown), overall and stratified by the relative position (ipsilateral and contralateral) of the breast and SPLC. Results Of all 550,007 breast cancer survivors (&amp;gt;50 years old, 74%; non-Hispanic Whites, 67%; localized, 51%), 8,014 SPLCs were diagnosed during a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. 52.6% of the participants received radiotherapy treatment. Compared with the general population, breast cancer survivors had a statistically significantly higher risk of lung cancer with subtype-specific SIR being greatest for adenocarcinoma (Observed N=4337; SIR=1.20, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.16-1.24; EAR=1.35), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (Observed N=1368; SIR=1.11, 95% CI=1.05-1.17; EAR=0.26) and small cell carcinoma (Observed N=1026; SIR=1.08, 95% CI=1.02-1.15; EAR=0.14). When stratified by radiotherapy receipt, the increased risk associated with adenocarcinoma did not vary across strata. In contrast, the increased risk for squamous and transitional cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma were confined to those who received radiotherapy (SIR=1.16, 95% CI=1.08-1.24 vs SIR=1.06, 95% CI=0.98-1.15 for squamous and transitional cell carcinoma; SIR=1.15, 95% CI=1.06-1.25 vs SIR= 1.00, 95% CI=0.91-1.09 for small cell carcinoma). Further analysis by laterality showed that associations of treatment receipt with increased risk of lung cancer were confined to ipsilateral SPLC for these two subtypes. Conclusion Different subtypes of lung cancer may have distinct associations with prior radiation treatment in individuals who have survived breast cancer. The findings have implications for evaluating risks and implementing surveillance for subsequent primary lung cancer in the growing population of breast cancer survivors. Citation Format: Chenxi Jiang, Rachel A. Freedman, Ahmedin Jemal, Hyuna Sung. Association of radiotherapy with the risk of subtype-specific lung cancer among breast cancer survivors in the United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB151.

34 Use of health services and cancer screening among immigrant cancer survivors with second primary cancer

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Due to clinical advances, cancer survivors are living longer but have an increased risk of a second primary cancer (SPC). This cross-sectional study aims to examine SPC prevalence in immigrant women and compare healthcare use (HCU) and cancer screening in immigrants with SPC versus (1) immigrants with a single cancer and (2) US-born women with SPC. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The study population will include adult women with breast/gynecologic primary cancer (PC) from the 2005, 2008, 2010, 2013, and 2015 National Health Interview Survey. First-generation immigrant or US-born status will be defined by region of birth. SPC includes diagnosis with a second cancer type ≥1 year after the initial PC diagnosis. We will compare the prevalence of ≥1 SPC in immigrant and US-born women. To evaluate HCU and cancer screening differences, we will assess sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, risk behaviors, length of US residence, and citizenship status with descriptive statistics. In regression analyses, we will compare number of provider visits and cancer screening rates in immigrant women with SPC versus immigrants with PC alone and US-born women with SPC after matching by age and PC type. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Disparities in cancer diagnosis, quality of care, receipt of recommended treatment, and screening rates among immigrants in the US are well documented. Therefore, we hypothesize that immigrant cancer survivors will have similar or higher rates of SPC compared to women born in the US with variations based on health status. We further hypothesize that immigrants with SPC will report lower rates of HCU after diagnosis of their first cancer and cancer screening compared to US-born women. However, we expect that immigrants with SPC will report similar or higher rates of HCU and cancer screening compared to immigrant women with PC alone. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: To our knowledge, this study will be the first to describe SPC among immigrant cancer survivors in the US. This research will inform interventions to improve cancer care delivery and ultimately reduce SPC in immigrants with cancer.

Abstract 7321: Second primary cancer risks following breast cancer in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers

Abstract Background: Second primary cancer (SPC) risk estimates in breast cancer (BC) survivors carrying germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) remain uncertain. We estimated relative and absolute SPC risks following BC in BRCA1/2 PV carriers using genetic testing laboratory data in England, linked for the first time to population-scale electronic health records data from the National Disease Registration Service and Hospital Episode Statistics. Material and methods: The cohort contained 27,154 women diagnosed with primary BC and tested for germline BRCA1/2 PVs between 1995-2019. Follow-up began at the latest of the genetic test dates and one year following the BC diagnosis and continued until the first SPC diagnosis, death, migration, relevant surgery, and the end of 2020, whichever came first. We estimated overall and site-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) by comparing observed and expected SPC counts, with expected counts calculated using incidences for the general English population accounting for calendar year, SPC site, age, and gender. We stratified the SIRs by age, estrogen-receptor status, and cancer site. We further assessed associations using Cox regression adjusted for age at BC diagnosis and estrogen-receptor status of the first BC, and estimated 10-year absolute SPC risks with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: There were 1909 BRCA1 (138 with SPCs) and 1926 BRCA2 (101 with SPCs) PV carriers, with mean follow-up lengths of 4.2 and 4.4y and median follow-up lengths of 3.4 and 3.6y. In BRCA1 PV carriers, there were elevated contralateral BC (SIR:15.3, 95%CI:11.5-19.8), ovarian (SIR:43.3, 95%CI:30.9-58.9), non-breast and non-ovarian combined (SIR:2.23, 95%CI:1.63-2.98), colorectal (SIR:4.72, 95%CI:2.58-7.92) and uterine (SIR:3.42, 95%CI:1.25-7.44) SPC risks. In BRCA2 PV carriers, there were increased contralateral BC (SIR:7.53, 95%CI:5.33-10.3), ovarian (SIR:16.5, 95%CI:10.1-25.5), non-breast and non-ovarian (SIR:1.72, 95%CI:1.27-2.27) and pancreatic (SIR:6.57, 95%CI:2.63-13.5) SPC risks. Consistently, when we compared BC survivors carrying a BRCA1 PV to BC survivors without a PV in either gene, they were at elevated contralateral BC (HR:3.94, 95%CI:2.91-5.33), ovarian (HR:35.7, 95%CI:21.3-60.0), non-breast and non-ovarian (HR:1.53, 95%CI:1.11-2.12) and colorectal (HR:2.95, 95%CI:1.56-5.55) SPC risks, whereas BRCA2 PV carriers were at increased contralateral BC (HR:2.59, 95%CI:1.83-3.65), ovarian (HR:12.3, 95%CI:6.93-21.9) and pancreatic (HR:5.32, 95%CI:2.30-12.3) SPC risks. We estimated 10-year cumulative contralateral BC, ovarian, and non-breast and non-ovarian SPC risks of 15%, 6.3%, and 7.8% in BRCA1 PV carriers and 12%, 2.9%, and 6.2% in BRCA2 PV carriers. Conclusions: Cancer risks were increased, at combined and specific sites, following BC in BRCA1/2 PV carriers. These findings could aid the clinical management of BC survivors carrying BRCA1/2 PVs. Citation Format: Isaac Allen, Hend Hassan, Yvonne Walburga, Catherine Huntley, Lucy Loong, Tameera Rahman, Beth Torr, Andrew Bacon, Craig Knott, Sophie Jose, Sally Vernon, Margreet Lüchtenborg, Joanna Pethick, Francesco Santaniello, Shilpi Goel, Sophie Allen, Katrina Lavelle, Fiona McRonald, Diana M. Eccles, Eva Morris, Steven Hardy, Clare Turnbull, Marc Tischkowitz, Paul Pharoah, Antonis C. Antoniou. Second primary cancer risks following breast cancer in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7321.

Abstract 2194: Association of metabolic syndrome conditions with risk of second primary cancer of any organ in breast cancer survivors

Abstract Purpose: Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of developing second primary cancers; however, factors attributing to increased risk of second primary cancer in breast cancer survivors are under-studied. We evaluated the association of metabolic syndrome conditions with second primary cancer of any organ in breast cancer survivors. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 37,222 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2008-2020 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), an integrated healthcare system. We extracted data on cancer-related variables, sociodemographic and clinical variables from KPSC’s cancer registry and electronic health records. Among the metabolic conditions, we identified diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia using ICD-10 diagnosis codes at or 1-year prior to breast cancer diagnosis; obesity was based on body mass index (BMI≥30kg/m2). We included metabolic syndrome as a categorical variable: 0, 1-2, and 3+ metabolic conditions. We followed patients electronically from breast cancer diagnosis until patients developed second primary cancer of any organ, died, disenrolled from the health plan, or reached study’s end (12/31/2021), whichever occurred first. Proportional hazards regression was used to report association [HR (95%CI)] between metabolic conditions and any second primary cancer. Results: During a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.17 (2.75-8.58) years, 1701 (4.6%) patients developed any second primary cancer. More than half (53.1%) of the breast cancer survivors had 1-2 metabolic conditions at baseline; 19.4% had 3+ metabolic conditions, and the rest 27.5% did not have any metabolic condition. Hypertension was the most common metabolic condition (45.5%), followed by obesity (38.9%), dyslipidemia (36.5%), and diabetes (19.0%). Survivors with 0 and 1-2 metabolic conditions were 35% and 19% less likely to develop any second primary cancer than survivors with 3+ metabolic conditions, respectively [crude HR (95%CI): 0.65 (0.57-0.75) and 0.81 (0.72-0.91), respectively]. Reduced risk in survivors with 1-2 metabolic conditions persisted adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, breast cancer diagnosis year, breast tumor SEER summary stage, breast tumor estrogen-progesterone status, smoking status, and breast tumor treatment [adjusted HR (95%CI): 0.87 (0.77-0.99)]. Conclusion: Risk of second primary cancer of any organ was elevated in breast cancer survivors with three or more metabolic conditions. Citation Format: Amrita Mukherjee, Zheng Gu, Lie Hong Chen, Arnold L. Potosky, Reina Haque. Association of metabolic syndrome conditions with risk of second primary cancer of any organ in breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2194.

Abstract 3461: Shorter leukocyte telomere length and higher risk of primary liver cancer in a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background: Telomeres are conserved tandem repeats at chromosome ends that are vital to maintaining chromosomal stability and preventing degradation. Shorter telomere lengths (TL) are typically associated with older biological age or poor health status and can activate programmed cell death, whereas longer telomere lengths can be indicative of younger age or abnormal replication processes with oncogenic mutations. Previous research has identified a link between telomere length and carcinogenesis, but relatively few studies have investigated TL and primary liver cancer (PLC) risk despite it being one of the leading causes of cancer worldwide. The goal of this analysis was to study this association in a large prospective cohort. Methods: Data was extracted from the Singapore Chinese Cohort Health Study, a cohort of 63,257 men and women aged 45-74 years at enrollment during 1993-1998. Telomere length was measured in peripheral leukocytes of 26,540 participants who provided baseline blood samples, using a validated quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method. PLC incidence and death among cohort participants was annually surveilled using the nationwide Singapore Cancer Registry and the National Birth and Death Registry from study enrollment to 2015. For statistical analysis, a t test was performed to examine the differences in TL between participants who developed incident PLC and those who remained free of PLC. Cox proportional hazard method was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) of PLC incidence according to TL quartiles. Results: Over a 12-year follow-up, 199 participants developed incident PLC. The relative TL was significantly lower in participants with incident PLC than those without (-6.7%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression model showed an inverse association between TL quartile and risk of PLC (p for trend = 0.009). Compared with the lowest quartile, HRs (95% CIs) of PLC for the 2nd, 3rd, and highest quartile of TL were 0.78 (0.54-1.12), 0.75 (0.51-1.11), and 0.57 (0.37-0.88), respectively, after adjustment for age, sex, alcohol use, body mass index, and smoking status. Conclusion: The present analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between shorter telomere length and increased risk of PLC in a large prospective cohort of Singaporean Chinese. This inverse association for PLC is different from those for other cancer types in the same cohort. These results warrant further studies such as using Mendelian randomization to quantify genetic variation in TL with PLC development. Citation Format: Sindhu Karnam, Kathryn Demanelis, Kenneth B. Beckman, Renwei Wang, Jennifer Adams-Haduch, Woon-Puay Koh, Jian-Min Yuan. Shorter leukocyte telomere length and higher risk of primary liver cancer in a prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3461.

Abstract 6147: Genome-wide association study identifies new genetic susceptibility loci for multiple primary cancers

Abstract Objectives: Genetic susceptibility is thought to contribute to the development of multiple primary cancers (MPC), often called secondary cancers. Although rare variants contribute to risk, these only account for a small fraction of MPC cases. The contribution of common variants to risk is unknown. Methods: To identify common genetic variants associated with the risk of MPC, we conducted a trans-ancestry meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including 7,360 MPC cases and 138,684 controls from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial and UK Biobank (UKBB). Association analyses were performed separately by genetic ancestry, genotype platform, and study, adjusting for age, sex, and principal components, and the results were meta-analyzed together using a fixed effects model. Genome-wide SNP heritability was estimated using GCTA. Pathway and functional enrichment analyses were conducted to gain insights into potential biological mechanisms underlying discovered loci. Results: We identified one novel locus at chromosome 3q26.2 (LRRC34, rs7621631) that was associated with MPC risk (P=1.16x10-8). Variants in this region have been previously associated with telomere length, suggesting a possible underlying mechanism. In sex-stratified analyses, we identified an additional locus at chromosome 12q24.33 (intergenic, rs10466868) associated with MPC in men (P= 7.76x10-8), but not women. Although the risk associated with these two discovered loci was small, the genome-wide SNP heritability was estimated to be 12%, suggesting that there are likely more common variants to be discovered for MPC risk. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that common genetic variation contributes to the risk of multiple primary cancers and suggests additional loci are likely to be identified with larger studies. Citation Format: Shisi He, James Perry, Shengchao Li, Braxton D. Mitchell, Yuji Zhang, Shuo Chen, Laura Beane-Freeman, Kathryn Hughes Barry, Sonja I. Berndt. Genome-wide association study identifies new genetic susceptibility loci for multiple primary cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6147.

257 risk of second primary cancer in HPV+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

257 risk of second primary cancer in HPV+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

Uncommon Metachronicity: Breast and Endometrial Carcinomas in a Young Woman with No Familial Cancer History - A Case Report

Background: Worldwide, breast and endometrial carcinomas are the two most common cancers of women, but their coexistence in a woman &lt;40 years of age is a rare event. The risk of developing a new second primary cancer is higher in cancer survivors compared to those without a history of cancer. The exact pathogenesis of two different primary malignancies is not clear. Still, the coexistence of breast and endometrial carcinoma may be due to germline mutations of p53, BRCA 1, and BRCA 2 genes, environmental, hereditary, and immune-mediated factors. Case Presentation: The present case report briefs the finding of a 37-year-old woman who presented to the Gynecological outpatient department with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding and a solid irregular lump in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast and the right axilla. She had a history of modified radical mastectomy for left breast ductal carcinoma five years back. She was diagnosed as a case of metachronous endometrial carcinoma (stage IA) with a recurrence of invasive ductal carcinoma in the right breast with metastasis to the right axillary lymph node. Conclusion: The metachronous development of breast and endometrial carcinoma in young women is relatively rare. In young patients &lt;40 years of age with gynecological or breast carcinoma, a thorough work-up, including genetic testing and follow-up, should be done for early diagnosis of metachronous or synchronous primary malignancies of other organs.

Triple Primary Cancers: An Analysis of Genetic and Environmental Factors.

In patients with three or more primary cancers, genetic predisposition explained a significant proportion of cases; however, treatment history, lifestyle habits, and other exposures appeared to play a less significant role. This highlights the value of early genetic screening and the need to develop more sensitive markers of cancer susceptibility. See related Spotlight, p. 193.

Incidence of late recurrence and second primary cancers 5-10 years after non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

The fraction of patients who are cancer-free survivors 5 years after curative-intended surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing, suggesting that extending surveillance beyond 5 years may be indicated. Here we estimate the incidence of late recurrence, metachronous CRC, and second primary cancers 5-10 years postoperative. All patients resected for UICC stage I-III CRC in Denmark through 2004-2013 were identified. Through individual-level linkage of nationwide health registry data, recurrence status was determined using a validated algorithm. Cancer-free survivors 5 years after surgery, were included. Cumulative incidence functions (CIF) of late recurrence, metachronous CRC, and second primary cancer 5-10 years postoperative were constructed. Subdistribution hazards ratios (sHR) were computed using Fine-Gray regression. Among 8883 patients, 370 developed late recurrence (5-10-year CIF = 4.1%, 95%CI: 3.7%-4.6%), 270 metachronous CRC (5-10-year CIF = 3.0%, 95%CI: 2.7%-3.4%), and 635 a second primary cancer (5-10-year CIF = 7.2%, 95%CI: 6.7%-7.7%). The risk of late recurrence was reduced for patients operated in 2009-2013 compared to 2004-2008 (2.9% vs. 5.6%, sHR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42-0.65). The risk of metachronous CRC was likewise reduced from 4.1% to 2.1% (sHR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.39-0.65). While the risk of second primary cancer did not change between 2009-2013 and 2004-2008 (7.1% vs. 7.1%, sHR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84-1.15). Using nation-wide 10-year follow-up data, we document that the incidences of late recurrence and metachronous CRC are low and decreasing from 2004 to 2013. Thus, despite increasing numbers of long-term cancer survivors, the data do not advocate for extending CRC-specific surveillance beyond 5 years.

Second primary head and neck cancer risk among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after curative esophagectomy

Second primary head and neck cancer risk among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after curative esophagectomy

Pairwise association of key lifestyle factors and risk of solid cancers - A prospective pooled multi-cohort register study

Smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, and physical inactivity are key lifestyle risk factors for cancer. Previously these have been mostly examined singly or combined as an index, assuming independent and equivalent effects to cancer risk. The aim of our study was to systematically examine the joint pairwise and interactive effects of these lifestyle factors on the risk of a first solid primary cancer in a multi-cohort prospective setting.We used pooled data from seven Finnish health survey studies during 1972–2015, with 197,551 participants diagnosed with 16,373 solid malignant primary tumors during follow-up. Incidence of any cancer was analyzed separately without and with lung cancers using Poisson regression with main and interaction effects of key lifestyle factors.When excluding lung cancer, the highest risk of any cancer in men was observed for smokers with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2 (HR 1.36, 95 % CI 1.25–1.48) and in women for smokers consuming alcohol (HR 1.22, 1.14–1.30). No statistically significant interactions between any studied risk factor pairs were observed. When including lung cancer, the highest HRs among men were observed for smokers who consume alcohol (HR 1.72, 1.57–1.89) and among women for smokers who were physically inactive (HR 1.38, 1.27–1.49).Smoking combined with other lifestyle factors at any exposure level resulted in highest pairwise risks, both in men and women. These results highlight the importance of smoking prevention, but also the importance of preventing obesity and reducing alcohol consumption.

Variation in patterns of second primary malignancies across U.S. race and ethnicity groups: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis.

One in six incident cancers in the U.S. is a second primary cancer (SPC). Although primary cancers vary considerably by race and ethnicity, little is known about the population-based occurrence of SPC across these groups. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 12 data and relative to the general population, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for SPC among 2,457,756 Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asian American/Pacific Islanders (NHAAPI), non-Hispanic black (NHB), and non-Hispanic whites (NHW) cancer survivors aged 45years or older when diagnosed with a first primary cancer (FPC) from 1992 to 2015. The risk of second primary bladder cancer after first primary prostate cancer was higher than expected in Hispanic (SIR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01-1.38) and NHAAPI (SIR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.20-1.65) men than NHB and NHW men. Among women with a primary breast cancer, Hispanic, NHAAPI, and NHB women had a nearly 1.5-fold higher risk of a second primary breast cancer, while NHW women had a 6% lower risk. Among men with prostate cancer whose SPC was diagnosed 2 to <12months, NHB men were at higher risk for colorectal cancer and Hispanic and NHW men for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the same time frame for breast cancer survivors, Hispanic and NHAAPI women were significantly more likely than NHB and NHW women to be diagnosed with a second primary lung cancer. Future studies of SPC should investigate the role of shared etiologies, stage of diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle factors after cancer survival across different racial and ethnic populations.

Factors associated with the onset and survival of subsequent primary breast cancer in female non‐metastatic breast cancer survivors

AbstractThis study aimed to investigate the risk factors for the onset of subsequent primary breast cancer (SPBC) in women with a previous diagnosis of early‐stage breast cancer (BC) and to construct a prognostic prediction model for patients with SPBC. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐17 (SEER‐17) database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on women with initial primary early‐stage BC from 2004 to 2015. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated to determine the risk of subsequent primary cancer (SPC). A competing risk model was built to identify the risk factors for the onset of SPBC. And risk factors associated with breast cancer‐specific mortality in SPBC patients were evaluated and presented in the form of nomogram. Compared with the general population, the overall risk of SPC for all sites was significantly elevated in women with early‐stage BC (SIR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.20–1.23), and breast is the most frequent site. Age, race and ethnicity, year of diagnosis, history of other tumors, histological type, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, tumor size, positive lymph nodes numbers and ER status were independent risk factors (p &lt; .05) for the onset of SPBC. A new prognosis nomogram demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation with a C‐index of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.859–0.880), and showed favorable consistency and clinical usefulness. The incidence of SPBC and prognosis of patients with SPBC were well estimated based on a large cohort. Our nomogram model had excellent prediction performance and could be a useful tool to predict prognosis.