Risk Of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Research Articles

Relationship between Mechanical Ventilation and Histological Fibrosis in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Open Lung Biopsy.

Background: Mechanical ventilation brings the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, which can lead to pulmonary fibrosis and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who received open lung biopsy between March 2006 and December 2019. Results: A total of 68 ARDS patients receiving open lung biopsy with diffuse alveolar damage (DAD; the hallmark pathology of ARDS) were analyzed and stratified into non-fibrosis (n = 56) and fibrosis groups (n = 12). The duration of ventilator usage and time spent in the intensive care unit and hospital stay were all significantly higher in the fibrosis group. Hospital mortality was higher in the fibrosis than in the non-fibrosis group (67% vs. 57%, p = 0.748). A multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that mechanical power at ARDS diagnosis and ARDS duration before biopsy were independently associated with histological fibrosis at open lung biopsy (odds ratio 1.493 (95% CI 1.014–2.200), p = 0.042; odds ratio 1.160 (95% CI 1.052–1.278), p = 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that prompt action aimed at staving off injurious mechanical stretching of lung parenchyma and subsequent progression to fibrosis may have a positive effect on clinical outcomes.

Mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study

BackgroundMechanical power is a composite variable for energy transmitted to the respiratory system over time that may better capture risk for ventilator-induced lung injury than individual ventilator management components. We sought to evaluate if mechanical ventilation management with a high mechanical power is associated with fewer ventilator-free days (VFD) in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS).MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospective observational international cohort study.ResultsThere were 306 children from 55 pediatric intensive care units included. High mechanical power was associated with younger age, higher oxygenation index, a comorbid condition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, higher tidal volume, higher delta pressure (peak inspiratory pressure—positive end-expiratory pressure), and higher respiratory rate. Higher mechanical power was associated with fewer 28-day VFD after controlling for confounding variables (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 Subdistribution Hazard Ratio (SHR) 0.93 (0.87, 0.98), p = 0.013). Higher mechanical power was not associated with higher intensive care unit mortality in multivariable analysis in the entire cohort (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 OR 1.12 [0.94, 1.32], p = 0.20). But was associated with higher mortality when excluding children who died due to neurologic reasons (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 OR 1.22 [1.01, 1.46], p = 0.036). In subgroup analyses by age, the association between higher mechanical power and fewer 28-day VFD remained only in children < 2-years-old (per 0.1 J·min−1·Kg−1 SHR 0.89 (0.82, 0.96), p = 0.005). Younger children were managed with lower tidal volume, higher delta pressure, higher respiratory rate, lower positive end-expiratory pressure, and higher PCO2 than older children. No individual ventilator management component mediated the effect of mechanical power on 28-day VFD.ConclusionsHigher mechanical power is associated with fewer 28-day VFDs in children with PARDS. This association is strongest in children < 2-years-old in whom there are notable differences in mechanical ventilation management. While further validation is needed, these data highlight that ventilator management is associated with outcome in children with PARDS, and there may be subgroups of children with higher potential benefit from strategies to improve lung-protective ventilation.Take Home Message: Higher mechanical power is associated with fewer 28-day ventilator-free days in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. This association is strongest in children <2-years-old in whom there are notable differences in mechanical ventilation management.

New insights in mechanical ventilation and adjunctive therapies in ARDS

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often require mechanical ventilation (MV) and may experience high morbidity and mortality. The ventilatory management of ARDS patients has changed over the years to mitigate the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and improve outcomes. Current recommended MV strategies include the use of low tidal volume (VT) at 4–6 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and plateau pressure (PPLAT ) below 27 cmH2O. Some patients achieve better outcomes with low VT than others, and several strategies have been proposed to individualize VT , including standardization for end-expiratory lung volume or inspiratory capacity. To date, no strategy for individualizing positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on oxygenation, recruitment, respiratory mechanics, or hemodynamics has proven superior for improving survival. Driving pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and mechanical power have been proposed as markers to quantify risk of VILI and optimize ventilator settings. Several rescue therapies, including neuromuscular blockade, prone positioning, recruitment maneuvers (RMs), vasodilators, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), may be considered in severe ARDS. New ventilator strategies such as airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) have demonstrated potential benefits to reduce VILI, but further studies are required to evaluate their clinical relevance. This review aims to discuss the cornerstones of MV and new insights in ARDS ventilatory management, as well as their rationales, to guide the physician in an individually tailored rather than a fixed, sub-physiological approach. We recommend that MV be individualized based on physiological targets to achieve optimal ventilatory settings for each patient.

Electrical Impedance Tomography to Set Positive End Expiratory Pressure During Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure... Is it Feasible?

Electrical Impedance Tomography to Set Positive End Expiratory Pressure During Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure... Is it Feasible?

Mechanical Ventilation during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition involving acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Mechanical ventilation remains the cornerstone of management for ARDS; however, potentially injurious mechanical forces introduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, multiple organ failure, and death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a salvage therapy aimed at ensuring adequate gas exchange for patients suffering from severe ARDS with profound hypoxemia where conventional mechanical ventilation has failed. ECMO allows for lower tidal volumes and airway pressures, which can reduce the risk of further lung injury, and allow the lungs to rest. However, the collateral effect of ECMO should be considered. Recent studies have reported correlations between mechanical ventilator settings during ECMO and mortality. In many cases, mechanical ventilation settings should be tailored to the individual; however, researchers have yet to establish optimal ventilator settings or determine the degree to which ventilation load can be decreased. This paper presents an overview of previous studies and clinical trials pertaining to the management of mechanical ventilation during ECMO for patients with severe ARDS, with a focus on clinical findings, suggestions, protocols, guidelines, and expert opinions. We also identified a number of issues that have yet to be adequately addressed.

Stochastic Modelling of Respiratory System Elastance for Mechanically Ventilated Respiratory Failure Patients.

While lung protective mechanical ventilation (MV) guidelines have been developed to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), a one-size-fits-all approach cannot benefit every individual patient. Hence, there is significant need for the ability to provide patient-specific MV settings to ensure safety, and optimise patient care. Model-based approaches enable patient-specific care by identifying time-varying patient-specific parameters, such as respiratory elastance, Ers, to capture inter- and intra-patient variability. However, patient-specific parameters evolve with time, as a function of disease progression and patient condition, making predicting their future values crucial for recommending patient-specific MV settings. This study employs stochastic modelling to predict future Ers values using retrospective patient data to develop and validate a model indicating future intra-patient variability of Ers. Cross validation results show stochastic modelling can predict future elastance ranges with 92.59 and 68.56% of predicted values within the 5–95% and the 25–75% range, respectively. This range can be used to ensure patients receive adequate minute ventilation should elastance rise and minimise the risk of VILI should elastance fall. The results show the potential for model-based protocols using stochastic model prediction of future Ers values to provide safe and patient-specific MV. These results warrant further investigation to validate its clinical utility.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-associated Vasculitides: An ELSO Registry Analysis.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides with pulmonary involvement include granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and can present with life-threatening pulmonary hemorrhage in up to 40% of patients. Mortality in those patients who require intubation and mechanical ventilation can reach 77%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used to support these patients through definitive diagnosis and treatment, although minimizing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. We aimed to determine factors associated with favorable outcomes in patients with (ANCA)-associated vasculitides supported on ECMO. We performed a retrospective observational study using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry of pediatric and adult patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis supported on ECMO from 2010 to 2020. One hundred thirty-five patients were included for analysis. Many patients had renal involvement (39%) in addition to pulmonary involvement (93%). Survival was 73% in AAV patients supported on ECMO. The presence of pulmonary hemorrhage was not associated with worse outcomes in our cohort. Older age, the use of venoarterial ECMO, ECMO-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or sustaining a cardiac arrest before ECMO was associated with decreased survival. In conclusion, venovenous ECMO should be considered as a supportive bridge to definitive diagnosis and treatment in (ANCA)-associated vasculitides, regardless if pulmonary hemorrhage is present.

Evaluation of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategies in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Background: Different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategies are available for subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. We aimed to evaluate three conventional PEEP strategies on their effects on respiratory mechanics, gas exchanges, and hemodynamics.Methods: This is a prospective, physiologic, multicenter study conducted in China. We recruited 20 intubated subjects with ARDS and confirmed COVID-19. We first set PEEP by the ARDSnet low PEEP–fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) table. After a recruitment maneuver, PEEP was set at 15, 10, and 5 cm H2O for 10 min, respectively. Among these three PEEP levels, best-compliance PEEP was the one providing the highest respiratory system compliance; best-oxygenation PEEP was the one providing the highest PaO2 (partial pressure of arterial oxygen)/FIO2.Results: At each PEEP level, we assessed respiratory mechanics, arterial blood gas, and hemodynamics. Among three PEEP levels, plateau pressure, driving pressure, mechanical power, and blood pressure improved with lower PEEP. The ARDSnet low PEEP–FIO2 table and the best-oxygenation strategies provided higher PEEP than the best-compliance strategy (11 ± 6 cm H2O vs. 11 ± 3 cm H2O vs. 6 ± 2 cm H2O, p = 0.001), leading to higher plateau pressure, driving pressure, and mechanical power. The three PEEP strategies were not significantly different in gas exchange. The subgroup analysis showed that three PEEP strategies generated different effects in subjects with moderate or severe ARDS (n = 12) but not in subjects with mild ARDS (n = 8).Conclusions: In our cohort with COVID-19–induced ARDS, the ARDSnet low PEEP/FIO2 table and the best-oxygenation strategies led to higher PEEP and potentially higher risk of ventilator-induced lung injury than the best-compliance strategy.Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04359251.

Calculation of Transpulmonary Pressure From Regional Ventilation Displayed by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Transpulmonary driving pressure (DPL) corresponds to the cyclical stress imposed on the lung parenchyma during tidal breathing and, therefore, can be used to assess the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Its measurement at the bedside requires the use of esophageal pressure (Peso), which is sometimes technically challenging. Recently, it has been demonstrated how in an animal model of ARDS, the transpulmonary pressure (PL) measured with Peso calculated with the absolute values method (PL = Paw—Peso) is equivalent to the transpulmonary pressure directly measured using pleural sensors in the central-dependent part of the lung. We hypothesized that, since the PL derived from Peso reflects the regional behavior of the lung, it could exist a relationship between regional parameters measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and driving PL (DPL). Moreover, we explored if, by integrating airways pressure data and EIT data, it could be possible to estimate non-invasively DPL and consequently lung elastance (EL) and elastance-derived inspiratory PL (PI). We analyzed 59 measurements from 20 patients with ARDS. There was a significant intra-patient correlation between EIT derived regional compliance in regions of interest (ROI1) (r = 0.5, p = 0.001), ROI2 (r = −0.68, p < 0.001), and ROI3 (r = −0.4, p = 0.002), and DPL. A multiple linear regression successfully predicted DPL based on respiratory system elastance (Ers), ideal body weight (IBW), roi1%, roi2%, and roi3% (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.001). The corresponding Bland-Altmann analysis showed a bias of −1.4e-007 cmH2O and limits of agreement (LoA) of −2.4–2.4 cmH2O. EL and PI calculated using EIT showed good agreement (R2 = 0.89, p < 0.001 and R2 = 0.75, p < 0.001) with the esophageal derived correspondent variables. In conclusion, DPL has a good correlation with EIT-derived parameters in the central lung. DPL, PI, and EL can be estimated with good accuracy non-invasively combining information coming from EIT and airway pressure.

Effect of Lowering Vt on Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Varies with Respiratory System Elastance.

Rationale: If the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is causally determined by driving pressure rather than by Vt, then the effect of ventilation with lower Vt on mortality would be predicted to vary according to respiratory system elastance (Ers). Objectives: To determine whether the mortality benefit of ventilation with lower Vt varies according to Ers. Methods: In a secondary analysis of patients from five randomized trials of lower- versus higher-Vt ventilation strategies in ARDS and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, the posterior probability of an interaction between the randomized Vt strategy and Ers on 60-day mortality was computed using Bayesian multivariable logistic regression. Measurements and Main Results: Of 1,096 patients available for analysis, 416 (38%) died by Day 60. The posterior probability that the mortality benefit from lower-Vt ventilation strategies varied with Ers was 93% (posterior median interaction odds ratio, 0.80 per cm H2O/[ml/kg]; 90% credible interval, 0.63-1.02). Ers was classified as low (<2 cm H2O/[ml/kg], n = 321, 32%), intermediate (2-3 cm H2O/[ml/kg], n = 475, 46%), and high (>3 cm H2O/[ml/kg], n = 224, 22%). In these groups, the posterior probabilities of an absolute risk reduction in mortality ≥ 1% were 55%, 82%, and 92%, respectively. The posterior probabilities of an absolute risk reduction ≥ 5% were 29%, 58%, and 82%, respectively. Conclusions: The mortality benefit of ventilation with lower Vt in ARDS varies according to elastance, suggesting that lung-protective ventilation strategies should primarily target driving pressure rather than Vt.

Driving pressure monitoring during acute respiratory failure in 2020.

Assess the most recent studies using driving pressure (DP) as a monitoring technique under mechanical ventilation and describe the technical challenges associated with its measurement. DP is consistently associated with survival in acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and can detect patients at higher risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. Its measurement can be challenged by leaks and ventilator dyssynchrony, but is also feasible under pressure support ventilation. Interestingly, an aggregated summary of published results suggests that its level is on average slightly lower in patients with coronavirus disease-19 induced ARDS than in classical ARDS. The DP is easy to obtain and should be incorporated as a minimal monitoring technique under mechanical ventilation.

Antenatal Endotoxin Impairs Lung Mechanics and Increases Sensitivity to Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Newborn Rat Pups.

Perinatal inflammation due to chorioamnionitis and ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) at birth is independent risk factors for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We have previously shown that antenatal endotoxin (ETX) causes abnormal lung structure and function in 2-week-old rats, but whether ETX impairs lung mechanics at birth and increases risk for VILI is unknown. Fetal rats were exposed to 10 μg endotoxin or saline via intra-amniotic injection. At birth (D0) or 7 days (D7), rats received 90 min of lung protective ventilation [PROTECT group; tidal volume (Vt) = 6 ml/kg with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 2 cmH2O]; P20 ventilation [plateau pressure (Pplat) = 20 cmH2O, PEEP = 0]; or P24 ventilation (Pplat = 24 cmH2O, PEEP = 0, only applied to D7). Prior to prolonged ventilation at D0, endotoxin-exposed rats had decreased compliance and inspiratory capacity (IC) compared to controls. At D7, endotoxin was associated with reduced compliance. High-pressure ventilation (P20 and P24) tended to increase IC and compliance in all saline-treated groups. Ventilation at D0 with P20 increased IC and compliance when applied to saline-treated but not endotoxin-exposed pups. At D7, P24 ventilation of endotoxin-exposed pups increased elastance, bronchoalveolar lavage protein content, and IL-1b and TEN-C mRNA expression in comparison to the saline group. In summary, antenatal endotoxin exposure alters lung mechanics at birth and 1 week of life and increases susceptibility to VILI as observed in lung mechanics, alveolocapillary barrier injury, and inflammatory mRNA expression. We speculate that antenatal inflammation primes the lung for a more marked VILI response, suggesting an adverse synergistic effect of antenatal and postnatal exposures.

Elastic Power of Mechanical Ventilation in Morbid Obesity and Severe Hypoxemia.

To minimize ventilator-induced lung injury, the primary clinical focus is currently expanding from measuring static indices of the individual tidal cycle (eg, plateau pressure and tidal volume) to more inclusive indicators of energy load, such as total power and its elastic components. Morbid obesity may influence these components. We characterized the relative values of elastic subcomponents of total power (ie, driving power and dynamic power) in subjects with severe hypoxemia, morbid obesity, or their combination. We analyzed data from subjects receiving mechanical ventilation divided into 4 groups. [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] < 150 mm Hg (severe hypoxemia) indicated probable reduction of lung compliance while body mass index > 40 kg/m2 (morbid obesity) suggested a possible contribution to reduced respiratory system compliance from the chest wall. Group 1 included subjects with no expected abnormality of lung compliance or chest wall compliance; Group 2 included subjects with expected reduction of lung compliance on the basis of severe hypoxemia but with no morbid obesity; Group 3 included subjects with morbid obesity without severe hypoxemia; and Group 4 included subjects with morbid obesity and severe hypoxemia. All ventilator-induced lung injury predictors were compared among groups using mixed-effects linear models. Groups 1-4 included 61, 52, 49, and 51 subjects, respectively. Mean body mass index averaged 28.7 kg/m2 for nonobese subjects and 52.1 kg/m2 for morbidly obese subjects. Mean driving pressure, dynamic power, and driving power of Groups 2 and 3 exceeded the corresponding values of Group 1 but fell into similar ranges when compared with each other. These values were highest in Group 4 subjects. In Group 2, mean dynamic power and driving power values were comparable to those in Group 3. In mechanically ventilated subjects, stress and energy-based ventilator-induced lung injury indicators are influenced by the relative contributions of chest wall and lung to overall respiratory mechanics. Numerical guidelines for ventilator-induced lung injury risk must strongly consider adjustment for these elastic characteristics in morbid obesity.

Comparing the Effects of Tidal Volume, Driving Pressure, and Mechanical Power on Mortality in Trials of Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation.

The unifying goal of lung-protective ventilation strategies in ARDS is to minimize the strain and stress applied by mechanical ventilation to the lung to reduce ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The relative contributions of the magnitude and frequency of mechanical stress and the end-expiratory pressure to the development of VILI is unknown. Consequently, it is uncertain whether the risk of VILI is best quantified in terms of tidal volume (VT), driving pressure (ΔP), or mechanical power. The correlation between differences in VT, ΔP, and mechanical power and the magnitude of mortality benefit in trials of lung-protective ventilation strategies in adult subjects with ARDS was assessed by meta-regression. Modified mechanical power was computed including PEEP (Powerelastic), excluding PEEP (Powerdynamic), and using ΔP (Powerdriving). The primary analysis incorporated all included trials. A secondary subgroup analysis was restricted to trials of lower versus higher PEEP strategies. We included 9 trials involving 4,731 subjects in the analysis. Odds ratios for moderation derived from meta-regression showed that variations in VT, ΔP, and Powerdynamic were associated with increased mortality with odds ratios of 1.24 (95% CI 1.03-1.49), 1.31 (95% CI 1.03-1.66), and 1.37 (95% CI 1.05-1.78), respectively. In trials comparing higher versus lower PEEP strategies, Powerelastic was increased in the higher PEEP arm (24 ± 1.7 vs 20 ± 1.5 J/min, respectively), whereas the other parameters were not affected on average by a higher PEEP ventilation strategy. In trials of lung-protective ventilation strategies, VT, ΔP, Powerelastic, Powerdynamic, and Powerdriving exhibited similar moderation of treatment effect on mortality. In this study, modified mechanical power did not add important information on the risk of death from VILI in comparison to VT or ΔP.

Articles That May Change Your Practice: Novel Strategies for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Respiratory Failure

Articles That May Change Your Practice: Novel Strategies for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Respiratory Failure

Tracheal tube size in adults undergoing elective surgery - a narrative review.

Tracheal tubes are routinely used in adults undergoing elective surgery. The size of the tracheal tube, defined by its internal diameter, is often generically selected according to sex, with 7-7.5 mm and 8-8.5 mm tubes recommended in women and men, respectively. Tracheal diameter in adults is highly variable, being narrowest at the subglottis, and is affected by height and sex. The outer diameter of routinely used tracheal tubes may exceed these dimensions, traumatise the airway and increase the risk of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness. These complications disproportionately affect women and may be mitigated by using smaller tracheal tubes (6-6.5 mm). Patient safety concerns about using small tracheal tubes are based on critical care populations undergoing prolonged periods of tracheal intubation and not patients undergoing elective surgery. The internal diameter of the tube corresponds to its clinical utility. Tracheal tubes as small as 6.0 mm will accommodate routinely used intubation aids, suction devices and slim-line fibreoptic bronchoscopes. Positive pressure ventilation may be performed without increasing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury or air trapping, even when high minute volumes are required. There is also no demonstrable increased risk of aspiration or cuff pressure damage when using smaller tracheal tubes. Small tracheal tubes may not be safe in all patients, such as those with high secretion loads and airflow limitation. A balanced view of risks and benefits should be taken appropriate to the clinical context, to select the smallest tracheal tube that permits safe peri-operative management.

Quantifying Regional Lung Deformation Using Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography: A Comparison of Conventional and Oscillatory Ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation strategies that reduce the heterogeneity of regional lung stress and strain may reduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In this study, we used registration of four-dimensional computed tomographic (4DCT) images to assess regional lung aeration and deformation in 10 pigs under baseline conditions and following acute lung injury induced with oleic acid. CT images were obtained via dynamic axial imaging (Siemens SOMATOM Force) during conventional pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), as well as high-frequency and multi-frequency oscillatory ventilation modalities (HFOV and MFOV, respectively). Our results demonstrate that oscillatory modalities reduce intratidal strain throughout the lung in comparison to conventional ventilation, as well as the spatial gradients of dynamic strain along the dorsal-ventral axis. Harmonic distortion of parenchymal deformation was observed during HFOV with a single discrete sinusoid delivered at the airway opening, suggesting inherent mechanical nonlinearity of the lung tissues. MFOV may therefore provide improved lung-protective ventilation by reducing strain magnitudes and spatial gradients of strain compared to either CMV or HFOV.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus conventional ventilatory support for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Background Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) should be considered when conventional mechanical ventilation failed to maintain adequate gas exchange. ECMO improved gas exchange and thus preventing hypoxia and ventilator-induced lung injury. Aim To compare between VV-ECMO and conventional mechanical ventilatory support with protective lung strategy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome regarding selection of patients, efficacy, complications, and outcome. Patients and methods We retrospectively studied 83 patients referred for VV-ECMO consideration to ECMO center in the ICU in Chest Disease Hospital in Kuwait between January 2015 and October 2018. We had two groups: ECMO group (N=38) and conventional mechanical ventilation group (control group) (N=45). We excluded from ECMO all patients with contraindication to ECMO. After 7 days, five patients shifted to rescue ECMO owing to worsening of their condition. Clinical, laboratory, ventilator parameters, complications, and survival rate were compared between both groups. Result The clinical, laboratory, and ventilator parameters of the patients on randomization were very bad for both groups. After 5 days, significant improvement was recorded among ECMO group. At the end point of the study, weaning from ECMO was successful in 32 (74.4%) of the 43 patients, whereas in the control group, 28 (70%) patients were weaned successfully. Mortality was nonsignificantly higher in the control group (30 vs. 25.6% for ECMO group). The most common fatal complication among ECMO group was bleeding (63.6%), whereas it was respiratory failure among the control group (75%). Advanced age, long duration of mechanical ventilation before ECMO, immunocompromised state, higher blood lactate level and higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and the underlying lung disease before ECMO were associated with poor outcome. Conclusion VV-ECMO can be considered as an alternative therapy for patients with severe but potentially reversible acute respiratory distress syndrome when conventional ventilation failed. ECMO reduced the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. ECMO significantly improved most of the clinical, laboratory, and ventilator parameters within days after ECMO application. ECMO had more favorable outcome and lower rate of mortality but with higher complications.

Specific Power and Risk of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Specific Power and Risk of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Adaptive Support Ventilation Attenuates Ventilator Induced Lung Injury: Human and Animal Study.

Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop ventilation, which can make automatic adjustments in tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate based on the minimal work of breathing. The purpose of this research was to study whether ASV can provide a protective ventilation pattern to decrease the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury in patients of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In the clinical study, 15 ARDS patients were randomly allocated to an ASV group or a pressure-control ventilation (PCV) group. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate and respiratory parameters between these two groups, suggesting the feasible use of ASV in ARDS. In animal experiments of 18 piglets, the ASV group had a lower alveolar strain compared with the volume-control ventilation (VCV) group. The ASV group exhibited less lung injury and greater alveolar fluid clearance compared with the VCV group. Tissue analysis showed lower expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and higher expression of claudin-4 and occludin in the ASV group than in the VCV group. In conclusion, the ASV mode is capable of providing ventilation pattern fitting into the lung-protecting strategy; this study suggests that ASV mode may effectively reduce the risk or severity of ventilator-associated lung injury in animal models.