Electrical Impedance Tomography to Set Positive End Expiratory Pressure During Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure... Is it Feasible?

BackgroundVarious Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration strategies have been proposed to optimize ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to compare PEEP titration strategies based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to methods derived from respiratory system mechanics with or without esophageal pressure measurements, in terms of PEEP levels and association with recruitability.MethodsNineteen patients with ARDS were enrolled. Recruitability was assessed by the estimated Recruitment-to-Inflation ratio (R/Iest) between PEEP 15 and 5 cmH2O. Then, a decremental PEEP trial from PEEP 20 to 5 cmH2O was performed. PEEP levels determined by the following strategies were studied: (1) plateau pressure 28–30 cmH2O (Express), (2) minimal positive expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Positive PLe), (3) center of ventilation closest to 0.5 (CoV) and (4) intersection of the EIT-based overdistension and lung collapse curves (Crossing Point). In addition, the PEEP levels determined by the Crossing Point strategy were assessed using different PEEP ranges during the decremental PEEP trial.ResultsExpress and CoV strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Positive PLe and Crossing Point ones (17 [14–17], 20 [17–20], 8 [5–11], 10 [8–11] respectively, p < 0.001). For each strategy, there was no significant association between the optimal PEEP level and R/Iest (Crossing Point: r2 = 0.073, p = 0.263; CoV: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.941; Express: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.920; Positive PLe: r2 = 0.037, p = 0.461). The PEEP level obtained with the Crossing Point strategy was impacted by the PEEP range used during the decremental PEEP trial.ConclusionsCoV and Express strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Crossing Point and Positive PLe strategies. Optimal PEEP levels proposed by these four methods were not associated with recruitability. Recruitability should be specifically assessed in ARDS patients to optimize PEEP titration.

IntroductionComputed tomography of the lung has shown that ventilation shifts from dependent to nondependent lung regions. In this study, we investigated whether, at the bedside, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) at the cranial and caudal thoracic levels can be used to visualize changes in ventilation distribution during a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial and the relation of these changes to global compliance in mechanically ventilated patients.MethodsVentilation distribution was calculated on the basis of EIT results from 12 mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery at a cardiothoracic ICU. Measurements were taken at four PEEP levels (15, 10, 5 and 0 cm H2O) at both the cranial and caudal lung levels, which were divided into four ventral-to-dorsal regions. Regional compliance was calculated using impedance and driving pressure data.ResultsWe found that tidal impedance variation divided by tidal volume significantly decreased on caudal EIT slices, whereas this measurement increased on the cranial EIT slices. The dorsal-to-ventral impedance distribution, expressed according to the center of gravity index, decreased during the decremental PEEP trial at both EIT levels. Optimal regional compliance differed at different PEEP levels: 10 and 5 cm H2O at the cranial level and 15 and 10 cm H2O at the caudal level for the dependent and nondependent lung regions, respectively.ConclusionsAt the bedside, EIT measured at two thoracic levels showed different behavior between the caudal and cranial lung levels during a decremental PEEP trial. These results indicate that there is probably no single optimal PEEP level for all lung regions.

Objective. We will describe our clinical experience using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in the management of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure and to determine to which extent EIT-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting differed from clinically set values. Approach. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study performed in a hub centre for the treatment of acute respiratory failure and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Main results. Between January 2017 and December 2019, EIT was performed 54 times in 41 patients, not feasible only in one case because of signal instability. More than 50% was on veno-venous ECMO support. In 16 cases (30%), EIT was used for monitoring mechanical ventilation, i.e. to evaluate recruitability or sigh setting. In 37 cases (70%), EIT was used to set PEEP both with incremental (11 cases in nine patients) and decremental (26 cases, 18 patients) PEEP trial. Clinical PEEP before the decremental PEEP trial (PEEPPRE) was 14.1 ± 3.4 cmH2O and clinical PEEP set by clinicians after the PEEP trial (PEEPPOST) was 13.6 ± 3.1 (p = ns). EIT analyses demonstrated that more hypoxic patients were higher derecruited when compared to less hypoxic patients that were, on the contrary, more overdistended (p < 0.05). No acute effects of PEEP adjustment based on EIT on respiratory mechanics or regional EIT parameters modification were observed. Significance. The variability of EIT findings in our population confirmed the need to provide ventilation settings individually tailored and EIT was confirmed to be an optimal useful clinical bedside noninvasive tool to provide real-time monitoring of the PEEP effect and ventilation distribution.

BackgroundDespite international guidelines for lung protective ventilation in neonatal or pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (nARDS/ pARDS), prospective data on bedside monitoring tools for regional ventilation distribution and lung mechanics are still rare. As a bedside and radiation-free procedure, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) offers a practical and safe approach for analyzing regional ventilation distributions. Recent trials in adults have shown the efficacy of an individualized EIT guided strategy for the improvement of ventilator induced lung injury (VILI).MethodsWe performed a single-center prospective feasibility study from November/2021 to December/2023 in the department of neonatal and pediatric intensive care medicine at the University Children´s Hospital in Bonn. All patients with diagnosis of nARDS (or history of perinatal lung disease-PLD)/ pARDS were screened for study inclusion. In all patients a decremental PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) trial was performed with a continuous EIT monitoring for an individual analysis of the EIT guided pixel compliance (CEIT) and PEEP finding (EIT-PEEP). In the offline analysis, further EIT derived indices, such as global inhomogeneity index (GI), and center of ventilation (CoV), were calculated.ResultsOverall, 40 EIT measurements were performed in 26 neonatal and pediatric patients (nARDS/PLD, n = 6; and pARDS, n = 20) within a predefined decremental PEEP trial. Thirteen patients were classified as having severe nARDS (PLD)/ pARDS with an Oxygen Saturation Index (OSI) > 12 or Oxygenation Index (OI) > 16. In-hospital mortality rate was 27% in the overall cohort. The median EIT-PEEP (11mbar) was calculated as lowest, as compared to the clinically set PEEP (11.5mbar, p < 0.001), and the ARDSnetwork PEEP table recommendation (ARDSnet-PEEP, 14mbar, p = 0.018). In patients with nARDS/PLD, the EIT-PEEP was calculated 3mbar below the clinically set PEEP (p = 0.058) and 11 mbar below the ARDSnet-PEEP (p = 0.01). In the linear regression analysis, EIT-PEEP and the dynamic compliance (CDYN) at -2mbar presented a significant correlation with a Cohen´s R2 of 0.265 (β: 0.886, p = 0.005).ConclusionEIT is feasible and can be performed safely in patients with diagnosis of nARDS/PLD and pARDS, even during ongoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. An individualized PEEP finding strategy according to the EIT compliance might optimize regional ventilation distribution in these patients and can potentially decrease VILI.Clinical trial registrationThe study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (GCT; trial number: DRKS 00034905, Registration Date 15.08.2024). The registration was performed retrospectively after inclusion of the last patient.

Assessment of electrical impedance tomography to set optimal positive end-expiratory pressure for veno-venous ECMO-treated severe ARDS patients.

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is unknown in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation receiving mechanical ventilation with very low tidal volume. To evaluate the ability of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to monitor a PEEP trial and to derive from EIT the best compromise PEEP in this setting. A decremental PEEP trial (20-0 cm H2O) in 5 cm H2O steps was monitored by EIT, with lung images divided into four ventral-to-dorsal horizontal regions of interest. The EIT-based PEEP providing the best compromise between overdistention and collapsed zones was arbitrarily defined as the lowest pressure able to limit EIT-assessed collapse to less than or equal to 15% with the least overdistention. Driving pressure was maintained constant at 14 cm H2O in pressure controlled mode. Tidal volume, static compliance, tidal impedance variation, end-expiratory lung impedance, and their respective regional distributions were visualized at each PEEP level in 15 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Low tidal volume (2.9-4 ml/kg ideal body weight) and poor compliance (12.1-18.7 ml/cm H2O) were noted, with significantly higher tidal volume and compliance at PEEP10 and PEEP5 than PEEP20. EIT-based best compromise PEEPs were 15, 10, and 5 cm H2O for seven, six, and two patients, respectively, whereas PEEP20 and PEEP0 were never selected. The broad variability in optimal PEEP observed in these patients with severe ARDS under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation reinforces the need for personalized titration of ventilation settings. EIT may be an interesting noninvasive bedside tool to provide real-time monitoring of the PEEP impact in these patients.

Background Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration is crucial for preserving lung mechanics and physiology in mechanically ventilated patients. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and compliance can be used for this purpose. Based on these parameters, the Recruitment/Inflation ratio (R/I) has been used to estimate lung recruitability. We aimed to investigate the relationship between driving pressure and the Recruitment/Inflation ratio at two consecutive PEEP levels for appropriate PEEP selection in patients receiving mechanical ventilation support. Methods End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) was measured during a decremental PEEP trial (PEEP levels of 20,15,10 and 5 cmH₂O). The PEEP level associated with the lowest driving pressure among the four tested PEEP levels was selected. Patients were then ventilated at this selected PEEP level for 24 hours. Subsequently, using the collected data, the R/I rate was calculated between consecutive PEEP levels. If the R/I rate was equal or above a pre-defined cut-off value, the higher of the two consecutive PEEP levels was considered potentially recruiting. If the R/I rate was below the cut-off value, the lower PEEP level was considered appropriate. Finally, the relationship between the PEEP level associated with the lower driving pressure (between two consecutive PEEP steps) and the PEEP level deemed appropriate based on the R/I rate cut-off was examined. Results The highest value of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO₂/FiO₂) was measured at the 20 cmH₂O PEEP level. EELV was found to be higher in patients classified as high recruiters (Group C and Group A) (P = 0.033). The PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio was also higher in the high-recruiter Group C (P = 0.008). In our study, the relationship between driving pressure and the R/I rate for appropriate PEEP selection has been determined. The agreement between PEEP selection guided by driving pressure and PEEP selection guided by the R/I rate did not reach statistical significance in our study. Conslusion: Sufficient and robust evidence to support the standalone use of the R/I rate in clinical practice has not yet been established. Further studies are needed for this purpose.

Obese patients are characterized by normal chest-wall elastance and high pleural pressure and have been excluded from trials assessing best strategies to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The authors hypothesized that severely obese patients with ARDS present with a high degree of lung collapse, reversible by titrated PEEP preceded by a lung recruitment maneuver. Severely obese ARDS patients were enrolled in a physiologic crossover study evaluating the effects of three PEEP titration strategies applied in the following order: (1) PEEPARDSNET: the low PEEP/FIO2 ARDSnet table; (2) PEEPINCREMENTAL: PEEP levels set to determine a positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure; and (3) PEEPDECREMENTAL: PEEP levels set to determine the lowest respiratory system elastance during a decremental PEEP trial following a recruitment maneuver on respiratory mechanics, regional lung collapse, and overdistension according to electrical impedance tomography and gas exchange. Fourteen patients underwent the study procedures. At PEEPARDSNET (13 ± 1 cm H2O) end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure was negative (-5 ± 5 cm H2O), lung elastance was 27 ± 12 cm H2O/L, and PaO2/FIO2 was 194 ± 111 mmHg. Compared to PEEPARDSNET, at PEEPINCREMENTAL level (22 ± 3 cm H2O) lung volume increased (977 ± 708 ml), lung elastance decreased (23 ± 7 cm H2O/l), lung collapse decreased (18 ± 10%), and ventilation homogeneity increased thus rising oxygenation (251 ± 105 mmHg), despite higher overdistension levels (16 ± 12%), all values P < 0.05 versus PEEPARDSnet. Setting PEEP according to a PEEPDECREMENTAL trial after a recruitment maneuver (21 ± 4 cm H2O, P = 0.99 vs. PEEPINCREMENTAL) further lowered lung elastance (19 ± 6 cm H2O/l) and increased oxygenation (329 ± 82 mmHg) while reducing lung collapse (9 ± 2%) and overdistension (11 ± 2%), all values P < 0.05 versus PEEPARDSnet and PEEPINCREMENTAL. All patients were maintained on titrated PEEP levels up to 24 h without hemodynamic or ventilation related complications. Among the PEEP titration strategies tested, setting PEEP according to a PEEPDECREMENTAL trial preceded by a recruitment maneuver obtained the best lung function by decreasing lung overdistension and collapse, restoring lung elastance, and oxygenation suggesting lung tissue recruitment.

Electrical impedance tomography: A compass for the safe route to optimal PEEP

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by multilobar pneumonia (MLP) is markedly different from typical ARDS in pathology, imaging characteristics, and lung mechanics. Regional lung assessment is required. We aimed to analyze the relationship between two regional assessment tools, lung ultrasound (LUS) and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration, and determine an appropriate PEEP level. We conducted a prospective study of patients with ARDS caused by MLP with PaO2/FiO2 < 150mmHg. All subjects were equipped with two EIT belts connected with a single EIT machine to measure upper and lower hemithorax impedance change alternatingly at each PEEP level. LUS score was simultaneously determined in chest wall regions corresponding to the EIT regions during PEEP titration. We acquired EIT and LUS data in eight regions of interest at seven PEEP levels in 12 subjects. Therefore, 672 pairs of data were obtained for analysis. There were significant relationships between LUS score and tidal impedance variation and pixel compliance (Cpix). The Spearman's rho between LUS score vs. tidal impedance variation and LUS score vs. the Cpix were -0.142, P < 0.001, and -0.195, P < 0.001, respectively. The relationship between the LUS score and Cpix remained the same at every PEEP level but did not reach statistical significance. The individual's mean expected PEEP by LUS was similar to the EIT [10.33(± 1.67) vs. 10.33(± 1.44) cm H2O, P = 0.15]. Regarding the MLP, the LUS scores were associated with EIT parameters, and LUS scores might proof helpful for finding individual PEEP settings in MLP.

RationaleThere are several approaches to select the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), resulting in different PEEP levels. The impact of different PEEP settings may extend beyond respiratory mechanics, affecting pulmonary hemodynamics.ObjectivesTo compare PEEP levels obtained with three titration strategies—(i) highest respiratory system compliance (CRS), (ii) electrical impedance tomography (EIT) crossing point; (iii) positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL)—in terms of regional respiratory mechanics and pulmonary hemodynamics.MethodsExperimental studies in two porcine models of acute lung injury: (I) bilateral injury induced in both lungs, generating a highly recruitable model (n = 37); (II) asymmetrical injury, generating a poorly recruitable model (n = 13). In all experiments, a decremental PEEP titration was performed monitoring PL, EIT (collapse, overdistention, and regional ventilation), respiratory mechanics, and pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics.Measurements and main resultsPEEP titration methods resulted in different levels of median optimal PEEP in bilateral lung injury: 14(12–14) cmH2O for CRS, 11(10–12) cmH2O for EIT, and 8(8–10) cmH2O for PL, p < 0.001. Differences were less pronounced in asymmetrical lung injury. PEEP had a quadratic U-shape relationship with pulmonary artery pressure (R2 = 0.94, p < 0.001), right-ventricular systolic transmural pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Minimum values of pulmonary vascular resistance were found around individualized PEEP, when ventilation distribution and pulmonary circulation were simultaneously optimized.ConclusionsIn porcine models of acute lung injury with variable lung recruitability, both low and high levels of PEEP can impair pulmonary hemodynamics. Optimized ventilation and hemodynamics can be obtained simultaneously at PEEP levels individualized based on respiratory mechanics, especially by EIT and esophageal pressure.

There is no universally accepted method for positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration approach for patients on spontaneous mechanical ventilation (SMV). Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) guided PEEP-titration has shown promising results in controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), current implemented algorithm for PEEP titration (based on regional compliance measurements) is not applicable in SMV. Regional peak flow (RPF, defined as the highest inspiratory flow rate based on EIT at a certain PEEP level) is a new method for quantifying regional lung mechanics designed for SMV. The objective is to study whether RPF by EIT is a feasible method for PEEP titration during SMV. Single EIT measurements were performed in COVID-19 ARDS patients on SMV. Clinical (i.e., tidal volume, airway occlusion pressure, end-tidal CO2) and mechanical (cyclic alveolar recruitment, recruitment, cumulative overdistension (OD), cumulative collapse (CL), pendelluft, and PEEP) outcomes were determined by EIT at several pre-defined PEEP thresholds (1–10% CL and the intersection of the OD and CL curves) and outcomes at all thresholds were compared to the outcomes at baseline PEEP. In total, 25 patients were included. No significant and clinically relevant differences were found between thresholds for tidal volume, end-tidal CO2, and P0.1 compared to baseline PEEP; cyclic alveolar recruitment rates changed by -3.9% to -37.9% across thresholds; recruitment rates ranged from − 49.4% to + 79.2%; cumulative overdistension changed from − 75.9% to + 373.4% across thresholds; cumulative collapse changed from 0% to -94.3%; PEEP levels from 10 up to 14 cmH2O were observed across thresholds compared to baseline PEEP of 10 cmH2O. A threshold of approximately 5% cumulative collapse yields the optimum compromise between all clinical and mechanical outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration by the RPF approach is feasible and is linked to improved overall lung mechanics) during SMV using a threshold of approximately 5% CL. However, the long-term clinical safety and effect of this approach remain to be determined.

During laparoscopy, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange are impaired because of pneumoperitoneum and atelectasis formation. We applied an open lung approach (OLA) consisting in lung recruitment followed by a decremental positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial to identify the level of PEEP corresponding to the highest compliance of the respiratory system (best PEEP). Our hypothesis was that this approach would improve both lung mechanics and oxygenation without hemodynamic impairment. We studied twenty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We continuously recorded respiratory mechanics parameters throughout a decremental PEEP trial in order to identify the best PEEP level. Furthermore, lung and chest wall mechanics, respiratory and transpulmonary driving pressures (ΔP), gas exchange and hemodynamics were recorded at three time-points: 1) after pneumoperitoneum induction (TpreOLA); 2) after the application of the OLA (TpostOLA); 3) at the end of surgery, after abdominal deflation (Tend). The "best PEEP" level was 8.1±1.3 cmH2O (range 6 to 10 cmH2O), corresponding to the highest compliance of the respiratory system (CRS). This "best PEEP" level corresponded with lowest ΔPL. OLA increased the compliance of the lung and of the chest wall, and decreased ΔPRS and ΔPL. PaO2/FiO2 increased from 299±125 mmHg to 406±101 mmHg (P=0.04). Changes in respiratory mechanics, driving pressures and oxygenation were maintained until Tend. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable throughout the study period. In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the OLA was suitable for bedside PEEP setting, improved lung mechanics and gas exchange without significant adverse hemodynamic effects.

RationaleDefining lung recruitability is needed for safe positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection in mechanically ventilated patients. However, there is no simple bedside method including both assessment of recruitability and risks of overdistension as well as personalized PEEP titration.ObjectivesTo describe the range of recruitability using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), effects of PEEP on recruitability, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, and a method to select optimal EIT-based PEEP.MethodsThis is the analysis of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from an ongoing multicenter prospective physiological study including patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome of different causes. EIT, ventilator data, hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases were obtained during PEEP titration maneuvers. EIT-based optimal PEEP was defined as the crossing point of the overdistension and collapse curves during a decremental PEEP trial. Recruitability was defined as the amount of modifiable collapse when increasing PEEP from 6 to 24 cm H2O (ΔCollapse24–6). Patients were classified as low, medium, or high recruiters on the basis of tertiles of ΔCollapse24–6.Measurements and Main ResultsIn 108 patients with COVID-19, recruitability varied from 0.3% to 66.9% and was unrelated to acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. Median EIT-based PEEP differed between groups: 10 versus 13.5 versus 15.5 cm H2O for low versus medium versus high recruitability (P < 0.05). This approach assigned a different PEEP level from the highest compliance approach in 81% of patients. The protocol was well tolerated; in four patients, the PEEP level did not reach 24 cm H2O because of hemodynamic instability.ConclusionsRecruitability varies widely among patients with COVID-19. EIT allows personalizing PEEP setting as a compromise between recruitability and overdistension.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04460859).

Fluid Balance: Another Variable to Consider with Diaphragm Dysfunction?