Risk Of Recurrent Dislocation Research Articles

THE FATE OF REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR INSTABILITY

Instability is a common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, even after the initial revision, some patients continue to have recurrent dislocations. This study investigates those at risk for recurrent dislocation after revision THA for instability at a single institution.Between 2009 and 2019, 163 patients underwent revision THA for instability at a single institution. Thirty-three of these patients required re-revision THA due to recurrent dislocation. Cox proportional hazard models with death as a competing event were used to analyze risk factors, including prosthesis sizing and alignment. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to assess patient outcomes (Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical score, VR-12 mental score, Harris Hip Score, and hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement).Duration of follow-up until either re-revision or final follow-up was a mean of 45.3 ± 38.2 months. The 1-year cumulative incidence for recurrent dislocation after revision was 8.7%, which increased to 19.6% at 5 years and 32.9% at 10 years postoperatively. In the multivariable analysis, high ASA score [HR 2.71], being underweight (BMI<18 kg/m2) [HR 36.26] or overweight/obese (BMI>25 kg/m2) [HR 4.31], use of specialized liners [HR 5.51–10.71], lumbopelvic stiffness [HR 6.29], and postoperative abductor weakness [HR 7.20] were significant risk factors for recurrent dislocation. Increasing the cup size decreased the dislocation risk [HR 0.89]. The dual mobility construct did not affect the risk for recurrent dislocation in univariate or multivariable analyses. VR-12 physical and HHS (pain and function) scores improved postoperatively at midterm.Patients requiring revision THA for instability are at risk for recurrent dislocation. Higher ASA scores, abnormal BMI, use of special liners, lumbopelvic stiffness, and postoperative abductor weakness are significant risk factors for re-dislocation.

Distance to Dislocation and Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Rethinking the Glenoid Track Concept

Background: The “distance to dislocation” (DTD) calculation has been proposed as 1 method to predict the risk of recurrent dislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair for an “on-track” shoulder. Rates of recurrent dislocation at specific DTD values are unknown. Hypothesis: Among patients with “on-track” shoulder lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair, the rate of recurrent dislocation would increase as DTD values decrease. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 188 patients with “on-track” shoulder lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic anterior labral repair between 2007 and 2019, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs interval, glenoid track, and DTD were determined from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. The rate of recurrent dislocation was determined at 2-mm DTD intervals. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between recurrent dislocation, patient characteristics, and bone loss variables. A multivariate regression model was created to predict the probability of failure at continuous DTD values. A subgroup analysis of failure rate based on collision sports participation was also performed. Results: A total of 29 patients (15.4%) sustained recurrent dislocations. Patient age (P = .046), multiple dislocations (P = .03), glenoid bone loss (P < .001), Hill-Sachs interval length (P < .001), and DTD (P < .001) were all independent predictors of failure. As the DTD decreased, the rate of recurrent dislocation increased. Below a DTD threshold of 10 mm, the recurrent dislocation rate increased exponentially. Up to a threshold of 24 mm, the failure rate for collision athletes remained >12.3%, independent of the DTD. Conversely, the failure rate among noncollision athletes decreased steadily as the DTD increased. Conclusion: For “on-track” shoulder lesions, as the DTD approached 0 mm (“off-track” threshold), the risk of recurrent dislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair increased significantly. Below a DTD threshold of 10 mm, the risk of failure increased exponentially. The risk of recurrent dislocation for collision sports athletes remained elevated at higher DTD values than for noncollision athletes.

A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing Bankart repair and remplissage with the Latarjet procedure in patients with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol

IntroductionAnterior dislocations, the most common type of shoulder dislocation, are often complicated by subsequent instability. With recurrent dislocations there often is attrition of the labrum and progressive loss of the anterior bony contour of the glenoid. Treatment options for this pathology involve either soft tissue repair or bony augmentation procedure. The optimal management remains unknown and current clinical practice is highly varied.Methods and analysisThe Shoulder instability Trial comparing Arthroscopic stabilization Benefits compared with Latarjet procedure Evaluation (STABLE) is an ongoing multi-centre, pilot randomized controlled trial of 82 patients who have been diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss. Patients are randomized to either soft tissue repair (Bankart + Remplissage) or bony augmentation (Latarjet procedure). The primary outcome for this pilot is to assess trial feasibility and secondary outcomes include recurrent instability as well as functional outcomes up to two years post-operatively.ConclusionsThis trial will help to identify the optimal treatment for patients with recurrent shoulder instability with a focus on determining which treatment option results in reduced risk of recurrent dislocation and improved patient outcomes. Findings from this trial will guide clinical practice and improve care for patients with shoulder instability.Trial registrationThis study has been registered on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov with the following identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03585491, registered 13 July 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03585491?term=NCT03585491&draw=2&rank=1.Ethics and disseminationThis study has ethics approval from the McMaster University/Hamilton Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (REB) (approval #4942). Successful completion will significantly impact the global management of patients with recurrent instability. This trial will develop a network of collaboration for future high-quality trials in shoulder instability.

Evaluation and management of patellar instability.

Patellar instability is a common clinical problem that primarily affects the adolescent and young adult population. The demographic and anatomic risk factors that predispose patients to patellar instability are multifactorial and include young age, female sex, trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), patella alta, femoral and tibial malalignment, ligamentous laxity, and lack of neuromuscular control. There have been substantial efforts to predict which patients who sustain a first-time dislocation will go on to incur additional dislocations. This is particularly important because with each dislocation event, there is a significant risk of injury to the patellofemoral joint including both medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) stretch or rupture and damage to the cartilage which can range from simple fissures to full-thickness cartilage defects and osteochondral fractures. Prediction models have demonstrated that amongst first time dislocators, young patients with trochlear dysplasia are at the highest risk for redislocation. The current standard of care for treatment of first-time dislocators without a loose body or osteochondral fracture is nonoperative management. However, recently there has been a focus on implementing a risk-stratified approach to the surgical indications for a first-time dislocator as the high-risk population might be better treated with early surgical stabilization to prevent or reduce their risk of recurrent dislocation and its associated morbidity. Likewise, for patients with recurrent dislocations, it remains to be determined whether an isolated MPFL reconstruction is sufficient for high-risk patients with several poor prognostic risk factors or if bony realignment procedures should be implemented concurrently.

Increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove and patellar height indicate a higher risk of recurrent patellar dislocation following medial reefing

PurposeIdentifying anatomical risk factors on recurrent dislocation after medial reefing is important for deciding surgical treatment. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based parameters of patients treated with medial reefing and whether these parameters lead to a higher risk of recurrent dislocation.MethodsFifty-five patients (18.6 ± 6.6 years) who underwent medial reefing after primary traumatic patellar dislocation (84% with medial patellofemoral ligament [MPFL] rupture) were included. Patients were followed up for at least 24 months postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.2 years) to assess the incidence of recurrent patellar dislocation. In patients without recurrent dislocation, the Kujala and subjective IKDC scores were assessed. Moreover, the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), sulcus angle, patellar tilt, patellar shift, and lateral trochlea index (LTI) were measured. The patellar height was measured using the Caton-Dechamps (CDI), Blackburne-Peel (BPI), and Insall-Salvati index (ISI). The cohort was subclassified into two groups with and without recurrent dislocation. Differences between groups were analyzed with respect to the MRI parameters.ResultsForty percent had a pathological sulcus angle of > 145°, 7.2% had an LTI of < 11°, 47.3% had a patellar tilt of > 20°, and 36.4% had a TT-TG of ≥ 16 mm. Increased patellar height was observed in 34.5, 65.5, and 34.5% of the patients as per CDI, BPI, and ISI, respectively. Nineteen (34.5%) patients suffered from recurrent dislocation. Compared with patients without recurrent dislocation, those with recurrent dislocation had a significantly lower LTI (p = 0.0467). All other parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Risk factor analysis showed higher odds ratios (OR > 2), although not statistically significant, for MPFL rupture (OR 2.05 [95% confidence interval 0.38–11.03], LTI (6.6 [0.6–68.1]), TT-TG (2.9 [0.9–9.2]), and patellar height according to ISI (2.3 [0.7–7.5]) and CDI (2.3 [0.7–7.5])). Patients without recurrent dislocation had a Kujala score of 93.7 ± 12.1 (42–100) points and an IKDC score of 90.6 ± 11.7 (55.2–100) points.ConclusionAnatomical, MRI-based parameters should be considered before indicating medial reefing. A ruptured MPFL, an LTI < 11°, a TT-TG ≥ 16 mm, a patellar tilt > 20 mm, and an increased patellar height according to ISI and CDI were found to be associated, although not significantly, with a higher risk (OR > 2) of recurrent patellar dislocation after medial reefing. Thorough preoperative analysis is crucial to reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation in young patient cohorts.Level of evidenceLevel IV

Soft tissue reinforcement with a Leeds-Keio artificial ligament in revision surgery for dislocated total hip arthroplasty.

Since dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) greatly diminishes patient's quality of life, the THA frequently needs revision. However, it is common for the dislocation not to heal even after reconstruction, but rather to become intractable. The 17 patients with dislocated THA, mean age of 71 years (range 51-87 years), who underwent a revision THA together with soft tissue reinforcement with a Leeds-Keio (LK) ligament were enrolled. The purposes of reinforcement with LK ligament were to restrict the internal rotation of the hip joint, and to encourage the formation of fibrous tissue in the posterior acetabular wall to stabilise the femoral head. We determined the success rate of surgical treatment for dislocation, the Harris Hip Score (HHS), a factor of recurrent dislocation. There was no recurrent dislocation in 82% of the cases (14 joints) during the mean postoperative follow-up period of 63.5 months (15-96 months). The HHS was 82 ± 18 points preoperatively and 82 ± 14 points postoperatively. Recurrent dislocation after this surgical procedure occurred in 2 hips with breakage of the LK ligaments, and intracapsular dislocation in 1 hip with loosening of the LK ligament. Although the risk of recurrent dislocation still exists with this procedure, when performed to provide reinforcement with an LK ligament for dislocated THA it may be useful in intractable cases with soft tissue defects around the hip joint.

Balloon treatment of posterior shoulder dislocation with reverse Hill–Sachs injury: description of a new technique

Posterior shoulder dislocations are rare, and are usually the result of seizures. Anterior defects of the humeral head known as "reverse Hill-Sachs lesions" may increase the risk of recurrent dislocation and are difficult to treat. We developed a percutaneous technique for reduction of the dislocation or reduction of the anterior impaction fracture, using percutaneous balloon dilatation and cement fixation. From 2009 to 2012, three patients aged 33, 72 and 75 years were admitted to our institution with a posterior shoulder dislocation showing an anterior "reverse Hill-Sachs" impaction fracture. One case was bilateral (four fractures). Patients were operated upon in the sitting position; the humeral head was stabilised by external fixator pins during balloon inflation. Reduction or filling of the defect was obtained in all cases. All patients were followed up and two patients (three fractures) were examined after one year by an independent observer. The clinical results were assessed using the Constant score and the RAND-36 physical components score. A computed tomography (CT) scan was obtained in all patients before and after the operation and at the latest follow-up. At three months postoperatively, all patients had resumed work or daily life activities with no limitation. The mean Constant score was 71 and RAND-36 score was 85.5. After one year, the mean Constant score was 73 and the RAND-36 score was 86.4 for the two patients who had sufficient follow-up. On the postoperative radiograph and CT scan, sphericity of the humeral head was restored, and the reverse Hill-Sachs impaction was filled or reduced in all cases. There was no recurrent dislocation. Based on this small series, we believe that this technique should be added to our current armamentarium for posterior shoulder dislocations showing a deep impaction fracture of the humeral head that are at risk for recurrent dislocation.

Indications in the treatment of patellar instability.

Recent developments in patellar instability have focused on the passive restraints against mediolateral patellar motion. Viewed from this perspective, muscle alignment is considered secondary because, although muscle forces are important, their ability to cause or prevent patellar dislocation depends on passive stability or the lack thereof. In the normal knee, the patella seats quickly in the trochlea in early flexion, so that the ligamentous restraints are important only near full extension. In the unstable patellofemoral joint, the trochlea frequently is deficient and patella alta often exists. In such cases, the ligaments assume a greater role in preventing excessive lateral patellar displacement. The most pressing questions at the moment are: 1) which of the anatomical abnormalities must be corrected, alone or in combination, to prevent further patellar instability; and 2) what is the relative risk of corrective procedures compared to the natural history or competing surgical approaches? These questions must be addressed by clinical trials. Only a minority of patients who experience patellar dislocation will redislocate the patella, and surgical treatment does not always yield results that are superior to conservative care. Treatment recommendations should be based on an individual's risk of recurrent dislocation, pain, and disability, a thorough understanding of his or her anatomy, and clear treatment objectives. Lateral release has no role in the treatment of a hyperlax patellofemoral joint, as it adds additional laxity to a system that is already unstable. If surgery is performed, current evidence suggests techniques aimed at repair or reconstruction of the passive retinacular restraints are as effective as more extensive procedures at preventing subsequent dislocations. Among the latter procedures, realignment procedures use active muscle forces to help seat the patella in the femoral groove; however, biomechanical costs are associated with this approach and superior results have not been demonstrated with distal and combined realignments compared with more limited proximal procedures.

Risk of recurrent dislocation and avascular necrosis after proximal femoral varus osteotomy in children with cerebral palsy

A retrospective review was conducted on 50 children with cerebral palsy, having 89 femoral varus osteotomy at an average age of 7.4 years, trying to identify risk factors for complications, particularly redislocation and avascular necrosis. Among the well-reduced hips, new subluxation developed in 12 cases; postoperative radiographic measurements showed a mean neck-shaft angle of 135 degrees and an acetabular slope of 32 degrees . Main risk factors for secondary dislocation seem to be insufficient correction of preexisting valgus and uncorrected acetabular dysplasia. Avascular necrosis was observed in 33 hips (37%): 26 minor and seven severe. Older age at surgery and high preoperative Reimer's migration index seem statistically significant risk factors.

Open Instability Repair: The Anterior-Inferior Capsular Shift

Shoulder dislocations in the young patient have been shown to have a high risk of recurrent dislocation or symptomatic subluxation. Repeated episodes of instability can be disabling in the short term and lead to long term degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint. The associated injuries involve an avulsion of the anterior-inferior glenoid labrum as well as deformation of the capsule. There is a higher rate of failure if these injuries are not addressed at the time of surgery. This article describes our technique of surgical management of recurrent anterior instability: the anterior-inferior capsular shift. This approach includes both capsular shift as well as reattachment of the displaced labrum. This technique allows for titration of the capsular plication for the individual patient.

Posterior bone block procedure for posterior shoulder instability

The posterior bone block procedure is an uncommon surgical procedure used in the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study is to report the results of the posterior bone block procedure in the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. We retrospectively reviewed 21 shoulders that had undergone a posterior bone block procedure in the treatment of recurrent posterior shoulder instability between 1984 and 2001. Fifteen patients (16 shoulders) had a prior traumatic posterior glenohumeral dislocation and 5 patients (5 shoulders) had a prior traumatic posterior glenohumeral subluxation. The mean age at surgery was 24.8 years (range 17-40 years). Patients were evaluated with the Constant score, the Duplay score, a subjective result, and radiography. Preoperatively, ten shoulders had glenoid fractures, two shoulders had loss of the normal contour of the posterior osseous glenoid, and ten shoulders had humeral head impaction fractures (reverse Hill-Sachs lesion). Seventeen shoulders underwent preoperative computed tomography and had average glenoid retroversion of 9.6 degrees (range 0-21 degrees ). At an average follow-up of 6 years, all patients reported their subjective results as good or excellent. At follow-up the mean Constant score was 93.3 points (range 80-103 points), and the mean Duplay score was 85.6 points (range 40-100 points). Fifteen patients returned to sports at their pre-injury level. Three patients were considered clinical failures; one with a recurrent posterior dislocation and two with substantial posterior apprehension on follow-up examination. Two shoulders had glenohumeral arthritis on radiographs at the latest follow-up. The posterior bone block is a good treatment option for posterior dislocation. The risk of recurrent dislocation is low following this procedure.

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 80 Years of Age and Older

One hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients (162 total hip arthroplasties) 80 years of age and older were observed for one year after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Clinical results and complications were recorded. The indication for surgery was degenerative joint disease (DJD) in one half of the patients and complications to proximal femoral fractures in the other half. The mean age was 83 years old in both groups. In 80% of the patients, no complications were recorded during the first year. Three patients died during the first three months. Two deep infections occurred (1.2%). The dislocation rate was 9.2% (15/162). There was a lower dislocation rate (4/84) in the DJD group compared to the fracture group (11/78). All nine recurrent dislocations occurred in the fracture group and were treated with either trochanteric osteotomy (five) or removal of the prosthesis (four). In the patients operated on with trochanteric osteotomy, no further dislocations occurred. The mean hospital stay was 13 days. After one year, 88% (112/127) of the patients who could be observed had good or excellent results. Total hip arthroplasty in the elderly is a reasonably safe method and yields good functional results. Dislocations, however, were common in patients operated on for complications from proximal femoral fractures, and the risk for recurrent dislocation was high (9/11). In these patients, trochanteric osteotomy is recommended.