Abstract

PurposeIdentifying anatomical risk factors on recurrent dislocation after medial reefing is important for deciding surgical treatment. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based parameters of patients treated with medial reefing and whether these parameters lead to a higher risk of recurrent dislocation.MethodsFifty-five patients (18.6 ± 6.6 years) who underwent medial reefing after primary traumatic patellar dislocation (84% with medial patellofemoral ligament [MPFL] rupture) were included. Patients were followed up for at least 24 months postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.2 years) to assess the incidence of recurrent patellar dislocation. In patients without recurrent dislocation, the Kujala and subjective IKDC scores were assessed. Moreover, the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), sulcus angle, patellar tilt, patellar shift, and lateral trochlea index (LTI) were measured. The patellar height was measured using the Caton-Dechamps (CDI), Blackburne-Peel (BPI), and Insall-Salvati index (ISI). The cohort was subclassified into two groups with and without recurrent dislocation. Differences between groups were analyzed with respect to the MRI parameters.ResultsForty percent had a pathological sulcus angle of > 145°, 7.2% had an LTI of < 11°, 47.3% had a patellar tilt of > 20°, and 36.4% had a TT-TG of ≥ 16 mm. Increased patellar height was observed in 34.5, 65.5, and 34.5% of the patients as per CDI, BPI, and ISI, respectively. Nineteen (34.5%) patients suffered from recurrent dislocation. Compared with patients without recurrent dislocation, those with recurrent dislocation had a significantly lower LTI (p = 0.0467). All other parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Risk factor analysis showed higher odds ratios (OR > 2), although not statistically significant, for MPFL rupture (OR 2.05 [95% confidence interval 0.38–11.03], LTI (6.6 [0.6–68.1]), TT-TG (2.9 [0.9–9.2]), and patellar height according to ISI (2.3 [0.7–7.5]) and CDI (2.3 [0.7–7.5])). Patients without recurrent dislocation had a Kujala score of 93.7 ± 12.1 (42–100) points and an IKDC score of 90.6 ± 11.7 (55.2–100) points.ConclusionAnatomical, MRI-based parameters should be considered before indicating medial reefing. A ruptured MPFL, an LTI < 11°, a TT-TG ≥ 16 mm, a patellar tilt > 20 mm, and an increased patellar height according to ISI and CDI were found to be associated, although not significantly, with a higher risk (OR > 2) of recurrent patellar dislocation after medial reefing. Thorough preoperative analysis is crucial to reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation in young patient cohorts.Level of evidenceLevel IV

Highlights

  • Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury with a primary patellar dislocation incidence of up to 108/100,000 in Western Europe between the age of 10 and 19 years [19, 45]

  • Recurrent patellar dislocation is reported in 22.7–29.4% depending on the injury pattern, various anatomical risk factors assessed by magnetic resonance imaging

  • 40.0% of the patients had a pathological sulcus angle of > 145°, 7.2% had a low lateral trochlea index (LTI) of < 11°, 47.3% had a patellar tilt of > 20°, and 36.4% had a tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) of ≥ 16 mm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury with a primary patellar dislocation incidence of up to 108/100,000 in Western Europe between the age of 10 and 19 years [19, 45]. There is no single gold standard or treatment algorithm available for treating primary patellar dislocation. Whether it can be treated surgically or non-surgically is still a subject of debate, and there is insufficient evidence to support either of the options [40, 44]. Surgical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is widely performed, and there are several publications available that report different techniques, outcomes after treatment, and the analysis of the potential risk factors of recurrent dislocation [6, 16, 30, 31, 41]. An analysis of potential anatomical risk factors on recurrent dislocation after medial reefing is still lacking

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call