Testing Procedures Influence Allocentric and Egocentric Neglect Associations Hemispatial visual neglect is common after right hemisphere (RH) stroke and can impact attention to the left side of view (egocentric) or the left side of objects irrespective of location (allocentric). Allocentric and egocentric neglect correlations have been reported as high as 0.80; however, others report low correlations and dissociations between them using the same task but with different administration procedures. To determine if divergent results are due to distinct procedures, we compared allocentric and egocentric neglect presence and severity between the two. Thirty-eight adults (21 female, age 65±15 years, 14±2 years education, 21 black/16 white) completed neglect testing within 10 days of RH stroke. Neglect testing comprised circling 10 complete circles (egocentric task) and crossing out 20 circles with gaps (10 left gaps, 10 right gaps; allocentric task). All participants completed testing once with allocentric and egocentric tasks on separate pages and once with both tasks on the same page. We used paired t -tests, Pearson correlations, and Fisher’s Exact test for analyses. Neglect severity did not differ across single- and separate-page conditions ( allocentric : t (32)=0.68, p =0.50; egocentric : t (36)=-1.27, p =0.21). Single- and separate-page severity scores were strongly associated ( allocentric : r =0.65, p <0.001; egocentric : r =0.52, p =0.004). Allocentric and egocentric neglect severity were moderately associated for single-page ( r =0.45, p =0.008) but not separate-page ( r =0.10, p =0.60) conditions. Diagnosis of allocentric ( single-page : 6%, separate-page : 3%), egocentric ( single-page : 12%, separate-page : 9%), or allocentric and egocentric ( single-page : 27%, separate-page : 39%) neglect was not dependent on page condition ( p =0.75). To conclude, assessment procedures influenced association of allocentric and egocentric neglect severity but not categorical diagnosis, and presence of both appeared more common than either alone. Studies that reported high correlations between the allocentric and egocentric neglect on the same task may have included participants with lesions causing both types of neglect due to their size and/or location.