Ribosomal Protein Operon Research Articles

Translational regulation of the spc operon in Escherichia coli: Identification and structural analysis of the target site for S8 repressor protein

The spc ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli is feedback-regulated by ribosomal protein S8, a translational repressor. We have analyzed the region of the spc mRNA that is responsible for this regulation. First, we have established that the S8 target site on the mRNA is near the translation start site of the third gene encoding ribosomal protein L5 in the operon. This was done by constructing hybrid plasmids carrying spc operon ribosomal protein genes under lac transcriptional control, as well as their deletion derivatives, and carrying out both in vivo and in vitro protein synthesis experiments. Next, the secondary structure of this region was studied by analyzing 5′ end-labeled RNA synthesized from the phage SP6 promoter using structure-specific nucleases. A secondary structure model consistent with the results was deduced with the aid of a computer prediction of RNA folding. In addition, we cloned and sequenced the corresponding region from Salmonella typhimurium, Proteus vulgaris and Serratia marcescens and found five “compensating” substitutions that support some of the deduced helical structures of mRNA. None of the base changes was inconsistent with the deduced secondary structure model. Finally, site-directed mutagenesis experiments have identified bases important for regulation, including two base-paired sites representing each of two helical regions. This has led to the conclusion that some specific nucleotide residues located between these two helical regions are directly involved in S8 recognition, and that the function of the two helical regions is to maintain the proper orientation of these nucleotide residues. Comparison of the structure of the S8 target site on the spc mRNA with the known S8 binding site on rRNA has revealed a striking similarity in both primary and secondary structures. In particular, primary sequences of rRNA conserved among distantly related bacterial species in this region is found to be identical with the sequences at the corresponding positions in mRNA. These results suggest that the same structural features of the S8 repressor protein are involved in the interaction with both 16 S rRNA and the mRNA target site.

Secondary structure of the leader transcript from the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon.

Genetic analysis of the autogenous control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli has suggested that the secondary or tertiary structure of the leader transcript is important for this regulation. We have therefore determined the secondary structure of the leader by enzyme digestion and chemical modification. Our results suggest that the 172 base leader exists in two forms, differing only immediately upstream of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the first gene. We discuss the possibility that the equilibrium between these alternate structures is important for the L4-mediated regulation of translation of the S10 operon. We have also determined the structure of several mutant transcripts. Correlation of these structures with the regulatory phenotypes suggest that a hairpin about 50 bases upstream of the first gene is essential for the control of translation of the operon. Finally, our results show that a two base substitution in an eight base loop destabilizes the attached stem.

Non-autogenous control of ribosomal protein synthesis from the trmD operon in Escherichia coli

The trmD operon of Escherichia coli encodes the ribosomal proteins S16 and L19, the tRNA(m 1G37)methyltransferase and a 21,000 M r protein of unknown function. Here we demonstrate that, in contrast to the expression of other ribosomal protein operons, the amount of trmD operon mRNA and the rate of synthesis of the proteins encoded by the operon respond to increased gene dosage. The steady-state level of the mRNA was about 18 times higher, and the relative rate of synthesis of the ribosomal proteins S16 and L19, the tRNA(m 1G37)methyltransferase and the 21,000 M r protein was 15, 9, 25 and 23 times higher, respectively, in plasmid-containing cells than in plasmid-free cells. Overproduced tRNA(m 1G37)methyltransferase and 21,000 M r protein were as stable as E. coli total protein, whereas the two ribosomal proteins were degraded to a large extent. The steady-state amount of S16 and L19 in the plasmid-containing cells exceeded that in plasmid-free cells by threefold and twofold, respectively. No significant effect on the synthesis of the trmD operon proteins from the chromosomally located genes was observed when parts of the operon were expressed on different plasmids. Taken together, these results suggest that the expression of the trmD operon is not subject to transcriptional or translational feedback regulation, and demonstrate that not all ribosomal protein operons are regulated in the same manner. We propose that ribosomal protein operons that do not encode proteins that bind directly to rRNA are not under autogenous control. Metabolic regulation at the transcriptional level and protein degradation are plausible mechanisms for the control of expression of such operons.

Organization of ribosomal protein genes rp123, rp12, rps19, rp122 and rps3 on the Euglena gracilis chloroplast genome

The nucleotide sequence (4,814 bp) was determined for a cluster of five ribosomal protein genes and their DNA flanking regions from the chloroplast genome of Euglena gracilis. The genes are organized as rpl23-150 bp spacer-rpl2-59 bp spacer-rps19-110 bp spacer-rpl22-630 bp spacer-rps3. The genes are all of the same polarity and reside 148 bp downstream from an operon for two genes of photosystem I and four genes of photosystem II. The Euglena ribosomal protein gene cluster resembles the S-10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli in gene organization and follows the exact linear order of the analogous genes in the tobacco and liverwort chloroplast genomes. The number and positions of introns in the Euglena ribosomal protein loci are different from their higher plant counterparts. The Euglena rpl23, rps19 and rps3 loci are unique in that they contain three, two and two introns, respectively, whereas rpl2 and rpl22 lack introns. The introns found in rpl23 (106, 99 and 103 bp), rps19 (103 and 97 bp) and rps3 intron 2 (102 bp) appear to represent either a new class of chloroplast intron found only in constitutively expressed genes, or possibly a degenerate version of Euglena chloroplast group II introns. They are deficient in bases C and G and extremely rich in base T, with a base composition of 53-76% T, 25-34% A, 3-10% G and 2-7% C in the mRNA-like strand. These six introns show minimal resemblance to group II chloroplast introns. They have a degenerate version of the group II intron conserved boundary sequences at their 5' and 3' ends. No conserved internal secondary structures are apparent. By contrast, rps3 intron 1 (409 bp) has a potential group II core secondary structure. The five genes, rpl23 (101 codons), rpl2 (278 codons), rps19 (95 codons), rpl22 (114 codons) and rps3 (220 codons) encode lysine-rich polypeptides with predicted molecular weights of 12,152, 31,029, 10,880, 12,819, and 25,238, respectively. The Euglena gene products are 18-50%, and 29-58% identical in primary structure to their E. coli and higher plant counterparts, respectively. Oligonucleotide sequences corresponding to Euglena chloroplast ribosome binding sites are not apparent in the intergenic regions. Inverted repeat sequences are found in the upstream flanking region of rpl23 and downstream from rps3.

Feedback regulation of the rplJL- rpoBC ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli requires a region of mRNA secondary structure

The rplJ- rpoBC (L10) operon of Escherichia coli is regulated in part through translational repression (feedback regulation) by ribosomal protein L10 or a complex of ribosomal proteins L10 and L7 L12 ( L10- L7 L12 ). We have constructed mutants in the untranslated leader region of a rplJ- lacZ fusion by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. The mutations include several deletions and a number of single base changes, all of which fail to exhibit normal feedback regulation. Chemical probing of part of the rplJ mRNA leader in the mutagenized region confirms that all of the mutations lie in a stem structure located 140 nucleotides upstream from the translation start-site. The structure includes a 12 base-pair stem, a four base stem-loop, and a six base bulge-loop. Point mutations that abolish feedback regulation are presumed to disrupt this stem structure. Pseudorevertants of selected point mutations were constructed by combining pairs of single base mutations. In these cases, both the secondary structure of the RNA and feedback regulation were restored. The results allow us to define a region of secondary structure in the rplJ mRNA leader that is necessary for feedback regulation.

Cloning and DNA sequence determination of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris: translational feedback regulation of the Escherichia coli L11 operon by heterologous L1 proteins.

In Escherichia coli the genes encoding ribosomal proteins L11 (rplK) and L1 (rplA) are contained in a single operon and their expression is translationally regulated by L1. We have cloned the homologous genes from two other enterobacteria, Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris, and determined nucleotide sequences. The genes are organized in a similar way to that found in E. coli. Conservation of nucleotide and amino acid sequences relative to E. coli in the protein coding regions are 89.2% and 94.7% for S. marcescens, and 80.9% and 88.6% for P. vulgaris. Nucleotide sequences of L11 mRNA leader regions were strongly conserved for the primary as well as the secondary structures in the L1 target site. We have also constructed plasmids carrying E. coli L11 and either P. vulgaris or S. marcescens L1 genes fused to the lac promoter, with or without the E. coli leader containing the L1 target site. Induction of transcription of the operons possessing the E. coli mRNA leader did not lead to overproduction of L11, indicating translational regulation of the chimeric operon as well as the chromosomal operon by the plasmid encoded L1. Repression of the chromosomal L11 operon was directly demonstrated upon induction of the chimeric operons without the leader, which also lack the L11 initiation signal but have a mutation allowing L1 translation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Autogenous control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: genetic dissection of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation.

The S10 ribosomal protein operon is regulated autogenously by the product of one of the genes of the operon, the gene encoding ribosomal protein L4. We have used site-directed mutagenesis to isolate leader mutations affecting L4 control. The phenotypes of these mutants demonstrate that L4 regulates both transcription and translation of the S10 operon. Several mutations abolish both levels of L4 control; others eliminate either transcriptional or translational control with little or no effect on the other mode of regulation. We conclude that L4-mediated transcriptional and translational control share some sequence requirements, but the two regulatory processes recognize somewhat different features of the S10 leader. Primary as well as secondary structures within the S10 leader appear to be involved.

Mutational alterations of translational coupling in the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli.

The L11 operon in Escherichia coli consists of the genes coding for ribosomal proteins L11 and L1. It is known that translation of L1 does not take place unless the preceding L11 cistron is translated, that is, the two cistrons are translationally coupled, and this is the basis of coregulation of the translation of the two cistrons by a single repressor, L1. Several mutational analyses were carried out to define the region responsible for coupling L1 translation with L11 translation. First, by introducing several amber mutations into the L11 gene by a site-directed mutagenesis technique, it was shown that translation by ribosomes down to a position 21 nucleotides upstream, but not to a position 45 nucleotides upstream, from the end of the L11 cistron allowed the initiation of L11 translation. Second, deletion analysis indicated that a region located 23 to 20 nucleotides from the end of the L11 gene was involved in preventing independent initiation from L1 translation. Third, five different mutations obtained by screening for activation of the masked L1 initiation site were found to be clustered in a small region immediately upstream from the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of L1, and all of them were G-to-A transitions. These results, together with some additional experiments with oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, defined the region involved in the coupling and suggest that some special feature of this region, probably different from simple masking of the initiation site by base pairing, is responsible for translational coupling. The present results also suggest that there might be specific differences in the primary nucleotide sequence that distinguish independent translational initiation sites from translationally coupled (i.e., masked) initiation sites.

Translational regulation of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: mutations that define the target site for repression by L1.

The L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes for L11 and L1 and is feedback regulated by the translational repressor L1. The mRNA target site for this repression is located close to the Shine-Dalgarno sequence for the first cistron, rp1K (L11). By use of a random mutagenesis procedure we have isolated and characterized a series of point mutations in the L11 leader mRNA which eliminate or greatly diminish the regulation by L1. The mutations define a region essential for translational regulation upstream of the L11 Shine-Dalgarno sequence and identify a region of structural homology with the L1 binding site on 23S rRNA. These results are also consistent with the previously proposed model for the secondary structure of the L11 leader mRNA.

Transcription of ribosomal genes during a nutritional shift-up of Escherichia coli

We measured the differential transcription rates of individual ribosomal operons after a nutritional shift-up. All operons showed a transient increase in transcription. However, the response of the S10 ribosomal protein operon was much stronger than that of any other operon. We propose that only the S10 operon is autogenously regulated by a transcription attenuation mechanism.

Translational regulation is responsible for growth-rate-dependent and stringent control of the synthesis of ribosomal proteins L11 and L1 in Escherichia coli.

The physiological importance of translational regulation in controlling the synthesis of ribosomal proteins from the L11 ribosomal protein operon was determined for the classical regulatory phenomena of growth rate dependence and stringent control. Translational regulation of the L11 operon by ribosomal protein L1, the L11 operon-specific translational repressor protein, was abolished by introducing a chromosomal mutation that causes an alteration of the site where L1 interacts with L11 operon mRNA. It was found that abolishing translational regulation of the L11 operon also abolished growth-rate-dependent regulation and stringent control of the L11 operon ribosomal proteins without affecting the normal regulation of ribosomal proteins from other operons that are not regulated by L1. These results show that both growth-rate-dependent control and stringent control of ribosomal protein synthesis in the L11 operon are a direct result of translational regulation.

Changes in the half-life of ribosomal protein messenger RNA caused by translational repression

The half-life of ribosomal protein operon L11 mRNA in vivo was measured during exponential growth by following the kinetics of incorporation of radioactive precursors into L11 mRNA transcribed from multi-copy plasmids. The degree of translational feedback regulation by L1, the L11 operon-specific translational repressor protein, was changed by altering the site on the “L11 mRNA” where L1 interacts. The half-life of the overproduced L11 mRNA increased by about fivefold when translational repression was abolished, while the half-life of mRNA from the spc ribosomal protein operon, which is not translationally regulated by L1, stayed constant. Furthermore, the half-life of L11 operon mRNA carrying an additional mutation in the ribosome binding site that abolishes translation remains short. This indicates that the change in half-life observed during increased gene dosage is due to translational repression by L1 and is probably a consequence of L1 blocking translation of L11 mRNA and not due to some nucleolytic activity mediated by L1.

Genetic dissection of stringent control and nutritional shift-up response of the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon

The S10 operon of Escherichia coli is autogenously regulated by L4, one of 11 ribosomal proteins encoded by the operon. We have previously shown that L4 regulates transcription of the operon by modulating the level of read-through at an attenuator in the S10 leader. To determine the physiological roles of both L4-mediated attenuation and the regulation of transcription initiation, we have constructed mutations eliminating their two regulatory targets, the S10 leader and the S10 promoter. Our results indicate that stringent control requires only the S10 promoter and therefore is mediated at the level of initiation. However, growth-medium-dependent control after a nutritional shift-up involves regulation of both initiation of transcription at the promoter and transcription read-through at the attenuator.

Transcriptional control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli after a shift to higher temperature.

In the 5 to 10 min immediately following a shift from 30 to 42 degrees C, the differential synthesis rates of ribosomal proteins encoded by the 11-gene S10 operon are transiently decreased. This effect results largely from a two- to threefold decrease in the differential rate of transcription of the operon. The inhibition of mRNA synthesis is apparently due to two types of control: (i) initiation of transcription at the S10 promoter is inhibited and (ii) readthrough at the attenuator in the S10 leader is decreased. Both of these effects on transcription are independent of the heat shock regulatory gene, htpR. Furthermore, the inhibition of transcription is observed in both relA+ and relA cells, suggesting that the temperature-induced repression does not require the relA-dependent accumulation of guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp). However, recovery from the heat shock was slower in relA+ strains than in relA strains. None of the other ribosomal protein operons that we analyzed showed such a strong decrease in transcription after the heat shock.

Structure of the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon.

The complete structure of the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon is presented. Based on the DNA sequence, the deduced order of the 11 genes in the operon is rpsJ, rplC, rplD, rplW, rplB, rpsS, rplV, rpsC, rplP, rpmC, rpsQ. The estimated transcribed length of the operon is 5181 base pairs. Putative sequences involved in ribosome binding are discussed. The DNA sequence data corrects several errors in previously determined protein sequence data.

Characterization of an amber mutation in the structural gene for ribosomal protein L15, which impairs the expression of the protein export gene, secY, in Escherichia coli.

We have previously described a temperature-sensitive mutant, ts215, which is defective in protein secretion. Complementation studies indicated that the mutation was located at the distal part of the spc ribosomal protein operon and the gene secY is required for efficient protein secretion. We now report a more complete genetic and biochemical analysis of the ts215 mutant. These studies revealed that the ts215 mutant has an amber mutation in the gene rp10 for ribosomal protein L15, which is located upstream and adjacent to secY. The amber mutation exerts a polar effect on secY causing a defect in protein secretion. These conclusions were supported by the following observations. The mutant strain carries a phi 80 prophage containing a temperature-sensitive suppressor, supFts6. The strain contains decreased amounts of L15 and is suppressible by a temperature-independent nonsense suppressor. In addition, L15 contains an extra tyrosine residue when suppressed by supF. DNA sequence analysis revealed the presence of a single base change in rp10 resulting in an amber codon at the 38th codon of L15. The mutant phenotype is complemented by a plasmid carrying only the secY gene under lac promoter control. The mutant cells complemented by secY can grow and synthesize proteins at normal rates and abundances at 42 degrees C, despite the fact that their ribosomes contain barely detectable levels of L15. These results indicate that ribosomal protein L15 is dispensable for protein synthesis and cell growth. In contrast, the decreased level of expression of the secY gene leads to defective protein secretion and defective cell growth.

Translational regulation of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: analysis of the mRNA target site using oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis.

The L11 ribosomal protein operon in Escherichia coli consists of the genes for proteins L11 and L1 and is feedback regulated by the translational repressor L1. The mRNA target site for this repression is located close to the translation initiation site of the first L11 cistron. Several mutant plasmid molecules carrying altered nucleotide sequences in the L1 target site were constructed by site-directed in vitro mutagenesis using synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Specifically, we examined the importance of a presumptive double-stranded stem structure that is common among L1 binding sites on rRNA from a variety of organisms and in L11 mRNA. Mutational alterations that disrupt the stem structure were found to abolish translational regulation as analyzed both in vitro and in vivo. Two of the mutations were combined so that the stem structure was restored but with a different primary nucleotide sequence. This double mutant was shown to restore the original phenotype, the ability to be translationally regulated by L1. These experiments show the importance of the stem structure, but not its primary sequence, for the interaction of L1 with the mRNA and support the concept that mRNA target sites share some structural features with the corresponding ribosomal protein binding sites of rRNA.

Role of attenuation in growth rate-dependent regulation of the S10 r-protein operon of E. coli.

We have investigated the transcription of the 11 gene S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli under various growth conditions. The differential synthesis rate of structural gene message increases 2- to 2.5-fold immediately after a shift-up from glycerol minimal medium to glucose plus amino acids. After the initial increase, the transcription rate goes through several oscillations before reaching the new steady-state rate. By comparing the rates of transcription of leader and structural genes, we conclude that these oscillations are due predominantly to changes in the level of read-through at the S10 attenuator. This regulation of attenuation can account for most of the variations in protein synthesis from the S10 operon after a shift. We also measured the level of read-through in cells growing exponentially in different growth media. Over a 2.5-fold range in growth rates, the read-through changed less than 50%. Thus, regulation of attenuation cannot explain the growth-dependent regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis during steady-state growth. Apparently, additional mechanisms are required to control the expression of the S10 operon in exponentially growing cells.

A defined mutation in the protein export gene within the spc ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: isolation and characterization of a new temperature-sensitive secY mutant.

We describe the properties of a temperature-sensitive mutant, ts24, of Escherichia coli. The mutant has a conditional defect in export of periplasmic and outer membrane proteins. At 42 degrees C, precursor forms of these proteins accumulate within the cell where they are protected from digestion by externally added trypsin. The accumulated precursors are secreted and processed very slowly at 42 degrees C. The mutation is complemented by expression of the wild-type secY (or prlA) gene, which has been cloned into a plasmid vector from the promoter-distal part of the spc ribosomal protein operon. The mutant has a single base change in the middle of the secY gene, which would result in the replacement of a glycine residue by aspartic acid in the protein product. These results demonstrate that the gene secY (prlA) is essential for protein translocation across the E. coli cytoplasmic membrane.

Promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Differential stringent control of the multiple promoters from ribosomal RNA and protein operons.

Using the in vitro mixed transcription system (Kajitani, M., and Ishihama, A. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 671-686; Kajitani, M., and Ishihama, A. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 3873-3889) we examined the effect of guanosine 3'-diphosphate, 5'-diphosphate (ppGpp), the chemical mediator of stringent control, on transcription of various Escherichia coli DNA fragments, each carrying a single specific promoter. We found that ppGpp inhibits transcription of stringently controlled genes, rrnE, rpsA, and rplJ, coding for ribosomal RNA, ribosomal protein S1 and L10, respectively, but not that of trp (tryptophan) and lacUV5 (lactose) genes. Among the multiple promoters of the rrnE and rpsA operons, the upstream promoters, rrnEp1 and rpsAp1, are subject to repression by ppGpp but the downstream promoters, rrnEp2 and rpsAp3, are insensitive. Taking these facts and the intrinsic strength of the respective promoters together, we suggest that the multiple promoters within the single and same operons play different physiological roles and are regulated by independent mechanisms. The inhibition by ppGpp takes place even after formation of open complexes, suggesting that the RNA polymerase bound to the sensitive promoters is accessible for interaction with ppGpp leading to rapid decay of the open complexes. During this study, we noticed that some promoters including recAp are activated in the presence of ppGpp, raising a possibility that ppGpp has dual effects on the promoter function.