MLRy 100.3, 2005 813 works, the title-page disguises the relationship between text and paratext. The Def? fence is reproduced first(pp. 11-85), with no notes or critical apparatus. There follow an extensive 'commentaire' upon the text (pp. 89-370), a modest section of variants and notes (pp. 371-411) and selected extracts from Speroni's Dialogo delle lingue (pp. 412-26), and finallya selective critical bibliography (largely dominated by studies in French) and fine index. It is a shame that the editors were not able to include the whole of Speroni's text, nor Aneau's Quintil horatien. The explanation for this probably lies in a discreet reference (p. 372) to another forthcoming edition of the Def? fence, with Classiques Didier, which should contain these materials. None the less, the lacuna is the more evident here since the 'commentaire' is effectivelya monographlength study of the rhetorical context of the Dejfence. Its author, Goyet, does not?as one might have expected?follow the Deffence chapter by chapter; rather,he provides a synthetic and discursive study of seminal passages. He chooses to focus particularly upon the relationship between Du Bellay's treatment of elocutio and its status in key classical authors (notably in Cicero's Orator) and in Du Bellay's immediate predecessors (Dolet's La Maniere de bien traduire is subjected to a rigorous critical analysis). This argument prizes elocutio as the key to understanding Du Bellay's concept of imitation. Goyet sets himself the Herculean task of not only balancing polemical and technical approaches to the text, but also, in his analysis of Du Bellay's poetics, of retaining the enthusiasm forthe Deffencewhich, he argues, is missing from the work of so many eminent scholars of his rhetoric, from Villey and Chamard to Cornilliat and Meerhoff. He humorously likens the progression of his analysis to the plot of a thriller. It is a testimony to his judicious blend of detailed scholarship and sheer verve that the term is not ill-judged. This is clearly a volume for specialists, not students. It will provide not only a useful companion to our trusted volumes of Chamard, but also essential reading for all those working on mid-sixteenth-century French poetics and rhetoric. Oxford Brookes University Valerie Worth-Stylianou Early Modern French Thought: The Age of Suspicion. By Michael Moriarty. Ox? ford: Oxford University Press. 2003. xiv + 27ipp. ?53. ISBN0-19-926146-6. Michael Moriarty follows a meticulous survey of previous scholarship on theology and history with chapters on 'Descartes' forma future' (pp. 60-99), 'Pascal* s Critique of Experience' (pp. 100-50), and Malebranche: 'What is falsely called experience' (pp. 151-49). In analysing suspicion he sedulously avoids attributing a modern under? standing of the self to his three authors. Conscientia in Descartes is set within the scholastic context of the rational soul's knowledge of itself which subsumes moral responsibility, requiring the reflexive and reflecting cogito (pp. 59-65), which adumbrates Malebranche's link between meta? physics and ethics. In Cartesian dualism the transparency of the mind, far from being a given, presupposes sifting of many commonsensical objections (pp. 65-70). Descartes uses spontaneous experience to affirmthe soul-body union, promoting well-modulated passions, which encompass formulated and unvoiced judgements. Some, notably honour, may unconsciously serve invaluable social ends. When tracing the repugnance towards painful truths about the self which constitutes a leitmotif of seventeenth-century reflection, all three authors decry prejudices engendered by imagination and conditioning. Although men are presented as tenants of a rational divine God, the ultimate guarantor of Cartesian truth, inadequate weighting is given to Descartes's magnificent ontological argument, and Pascal's incisive reprimand in the 'chiquenaude' fragment (Pensees, 1001, ed. by Lafuma). 814 Reviews Although Moriarty devotes pp. 102-21 to imagination in Pascal, he etiolates the tensions woven between social bonds based on forceand imagination and the ferocious onslaught against natural justice (pp. 128-29), neglecting Pascal's ironic accolade of the 'opinionsdu peuple saines' (Pensees, 101, ed. by Lafuma), whichcelebrates human gumption in establishing laws based on indisputable external signs, and devising the 'regle des partis'. This rule corroborates our rationality when we stake our all on uncertainty both in...
Read full abstract