Revision Rate Research Articles

Impact of Segmental Lordosis Restoration During Degenerative Spinal Fusion on Two-Year Adjacent Segment Disease and Revision Rates.

Retrospective cohort study. Assess the impact of inadequate correction of L4-S1 lordosis during transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment disease and revision rates. Restoring alignment is an important consideration in spinal fusions. Failure to correct to level-specific alignment goals could promote the development of adjacent segment disease. As such, it is crucial to investigate the role of sagittal segmental alignment on clinical outcomes following short segment lumbar fusion. Patients who underwent 1- to 3-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and had two-year outcomes data were included in this retrospective cohort study. Segmental lumbar lordosis was assessed in all patients with L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 constructs. Demographics, radiographic spinopelvic alignment, and complications were compared in a sub-group of patients fused at L4-S1 with adequate (i.e., within 35-45°) and inadequate (i.e., <35°) L4-S1 lordosis. Among the 168 included patients, mean age was 61.7 years, 56.0% were female, and mean follow-up was 32.3 months. Segmental lumbar lordosis did not change significantly after TLIF of L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 (P>0.05). Two-year postoperatively, 32.7% developed adjacent segment disease and 19.6% underwent revisions. After stratification by adequate (N=15) or inadequate (N=54) restoration of L4-S1 lordosis following initial TLIF surgery, adequately-restored patients had higher preoperative L4-S1 lordosis (Adequately-Restored=39.3° vs Inadequately-Restored=29.5°, P<0.001) and lower two-year postoperative adjacent segment disease (6.7% vs. 33.3%, P=0.032) and revision (5.7% vs. 25.9%, P=0.l33) rates. Adjacent segment disease patients had higher implant-related complications (Adjacent Segment Disease=36.8% vs No Adjacent Segment Disease=8.0%, P=0.008) and subsequent revisions (61.1% vs. 8.7%, P<0.001). Adjacent segment disease and revisions after degenerative lumbar spinal fusion are common. In this cohort, suboptimal restoration of L4-S1 lordosis was associated with higher rates of adjacent segment disease and subsequent revisions, thus highlighting the importance of restoring sagittal alignment in degenerative spine surgery. III.

Complications and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty are similar between patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

There is wide variability in the conclusions of studies examining the effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty (SA). The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in complication profiles between patients with DM and those without undergoing anatomic and reverse total SA. A retrospective review of patients undergoing SA in a single center from January 2014 to December 2019 was performed. Patients were then stratified into two cohorts, patients with controlled DM (mean hemoglobin A1C < 7%) and those without. Outcomes analyzed included intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and revision surgery rates. Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days were also recorded. A total of 595 patients underwent SA. No significant difference was found between the diabetes (n = 151) and control group (n = 444) with regard to length of stay (P = .168), complications (P = .286), infection rate (P = .977), 30-day ED visits (P = .789), and readmissions (P = .230). The average time to revision was 26.8 months in the diabetes group and 26.6 months in the control group (P = .989). Following SA patients with controlled DM showed no increased risk of postoperative infection, ED visitation,hospital readmission, and revision surgery rate when compared to non-diabetics. Level III-retrospective cohort.

Comparative postoperative prognosis of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the clinical outcomes between ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing surfaces in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a pooled analysis and evidence update. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to March 2023 for studies that compared the bearing surfaces of CoC and CoP in patients undergoing THA. The primary outcomes were the incidence of common postoperative complications and the rate of postoperative revision. The secondary outcome was the Harris Hip Score. A total of 10 eligible studies involving 1,946 patients (1.192 CoC-THA versus 906 CoP-THA) were included in the evidence synthesis. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in the rates of common postoperative complications (dislocation, deep vein thrombosis, infection, wear debris or osteolysis) and of revision. After eliminating heterogeneity, the postoperative Harris Hip Score was higher in the CoC group than in the CoP group. However, the strength of evidence was moderate for the Harris Hip Score. CoC articulations are more commonly used in younger, healthier, and more active patients. While the performance of conventional polyethylene is indeed inferior to highly cross-linked polyethylene, there is currently a lack of sufficient research comparing the outcomes between highly cross-linked polyethylene and CoC bearing surfaces. This area should be a focal point for future research, and it is hoped that more relevant articles will emerge. Given the limited number of studies included, the heterogeneity and potential bias of those included in the analysis, orthopaedic surgeons should select a THA material based on their experience and patient-specific factors, and large multicentre clinical trials with >15 years of follow-up are needed to provide more evidence on the optimal bearing surface for initial THA.

Arthrodesis as Salvage for Failed Metacarpophalangeal Arthroplasty.

Surgical management of failed metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasties includes revision arthroplasty and arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to review the indications and outcomes of arthrodesis as a salvage procedure for failed MCP arthroplasties. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing salvage MCP arthrodesis at a single institution from 1990 to 2020. Patient charts were reviewed for patient demographics, indication for salvage, surgical technique, revision rate, and time to radiographic union. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and an MCP-specific questionnaire detailing pain, functional, appearance, and patient satisfaction, were also collected. Eleven digits in 9 patients (6 women, 3 men, median age of 66) with median 36-month follow-up were included. The majority (91%) of patients also had concomitant soft tissue deformities, including joint contractures, extension lag, and collateral ligament insufficiency. The overall revision rate following arthrodesis was 45% with 3 digits requiring one revision each, and 2 digits undergoing 3 revisions. The overall union rate was 91% with median time to union of 4 months from most recent arthrodesis. Patient-reported outcomes obtained from 4 patients demonstrated improvements in pain and function. Despite a high revision rate of 45%, salvage MCP arthrodesis following arthroplasty has a high eventual union rate of 91% and is associated with improved pain and function based on 4 patients' experiences. Arthrodesis as a salvage procedure for failed MCP arthroplasties should be considered in patients with persistent joint instability and functionally limiting soft tissue deformities.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as a Supplement to Posterior Instrumentation in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients: A Pilot Randomized Study With a Median of Eight Years of Follow-Up.

Aim We aim to assess the long-term revision rates in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) undergoing posterior instrumentation with or without supplemental anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with a median of eight years of follow-up. Materials and methods Based on a previous pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) from 2012, all previous participants were invited to a clinical and radiographicfollow-up. Full medical records from the total cohort were reviewed from the time of operation to the follow-up, and information on revision surgery due to mechanical failure was obtained and compared between the groups. Results Of the original 17 patients included in the RCT, 15 were available for follow-up and 10 attended the clinical and radiographic examination. A retrospective review was performed of the entire original cohort. The median age at follow-up was 67 (61-71) years, and the median follow-up time was 7.7 (5.1-8.8) years. Revision rates amongALIF patients were three out of seven (43%) and eight out of 10 (80%) amongnon-ALIF patients with pseudoarthrosis and rod breakage being the main cause. Time to failure was longer in ALIF patients with a median of 47 (28-53) months compared with non-ALIF patients with a median of 26 (9-31) months. Conclusion This study revealed a lower rate of revision surgery and a longer time to failure in patients undergoing ASD surgery with supplemental ALIF compared with posterior instrumentation alone. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to make conclusions on the effect of a supplemental ALIF to posterior instrumentation on lowering the risk of mechanical failure in patients with adult spinal deformity.

Long-term clinical results and patient satisfaction of a metaphyseal-engaging anatomic cementless femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.

There is relatively little information on the long-term clinical results of patients aged < 50 years with a contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA), although a high rate of revision is projected for this group. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results (a minimum of 21 years) of a metaphyseal-engaging anatomic cementless total hip prosthesis in patients aged < 50 years at the time of their THA. This study included 360 patients (498 hips), specifically 212 men and 148 women. The mean age of the patients at the time of their THA was 45.8 ± 8.1 years. The predominant diagnosis was osteonecrosis (56%). Demographic data, the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were recorded. Radiographic evaluation and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning were used to evaluate implant fixation, bone remodelling, and osteolysis. The mean follow-up was 25.2 year (range 21-28 years). At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip, WOMAC, and UCLA activity scores were 93, 10, and 6.7 points, respectively. No patients had thigh pain. All hips had osseous integration of the acetabular and femoral components. No patient had grade 3 stress shielding. The 28-year survival rate was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95-100%) for the acetabular components and 98.8% (95% CI 95-100%) for the femoral components. Overall, 90% of the patients were satisfied with the THA results. The results suggest that a metaphyseal-engaging anatomic cementless femoral stem with alumina-on-alumina ceramic articulation provide outstanding long-term fixation and substantial pain relief well into the 3rd decade after surgery. Furthermore, there was no alumina ceramic fracture or osteolysis. Moreover, approximately 90% of the patients were satisfied with the results of their THA.

Revision rates of one new and two established hemiarthroplasty heads: a comparative cohort study from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register

Introduction: The anatomical Lubinus SPII-stem is commonly used in hemi-arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNF), combined with either the bipolar Variocup, the Unipolar Head (UH) and a newly introduced unipolar Modular Trauma Head (MTH). Similar constructs like the MTH are reported to have risk of corrosion and wear. This is the first publication evaluating the MTH. Aim: To describe the revision rate of the SPII-stems/heads which were divided into 3 groups (Variocup, UH, MTH). The head types are compared by their rate of revision at 2 years, due to any cause and to dislocation. Revision and mortality rates up to 10 years are reported. Methods: This observational cohort study based on prospectively registered data from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register included 33,059 patients with hemiarthroplasty 2005–2021 due to FNF. SPII-stems combined with Variocup ( n = 7,281), UH ( n = 23,980), MTH ( n = 1,798) were included. The follow-up ended at 10 years for Variocup and UH, for MTH at 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses was used, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Patients were censored at death or at the end of the study (31 December 2021). Results: The 2-year revision rate regardless of cause was similar between the groups: after Variocup 3.5% (CI, 3.1–4.0), UH 3.1% (CI, 2.9–3.4), MTH 3.5% (CI, 2.6–4.5). At 10 years, the Variocup and UH had similar revision rates; 4.6% (CI, 4.0–5.2) and 5.0% (CI, 4.4–5.6). For revision due to dislocation at 2 years Variocup 2.3% (CI, 1.9–2.7) had an inferior outcome compared to UH 1.5% (CI, 1.3–1.7). The MTH had an intermediate outcome, 1.7% (CI, 1.0–2.3). Variocup had a higher dislocation related revision rate, until the 10th year. The 2-year-mortality was 36% (CI, 35–37) after Variocup, 43% (CI, 42–43) after UH and 44% (CI, 41–47) after MTH. Conclusions: The hemi-heads have comparable revision rates within 2 and 10 years. The new MTH performs similar to the standard UH. The bipolar Variocup is associated with more revisions due to dislocation.

Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis sought to compare the efficacy of cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. A comprehensive search of the following databases was conducted: Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, the Web of Science, and MEDLINE. The objective was to identify literature comparing cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. Duplicate literature, low-quality literature, literature with incompatible observations, and literature for which the full text was not available were excluded. Two independent researchers employed the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature. The data then were extracted and subsequently meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.4. A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis, encompassing a cumulative of 2558 cumulative cases. Of these, 1258 were cemented and 1300 were cementless. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of cemented versus cementless Oxford UKA. The Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly longer surgery time than the cementless Oxford UKA group [mean difference (MD) = 9.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) (7.64,12.17)]. Additionally, the cemented Oxford UKA group demonstrated a significantly lower knee OKS score compared to the cementless Oxford UKA group. The mean difference (MD) was - 1.58 (95% CI: -2.30, -0.86), indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. Similarly, the mean difference (MD) was - 1.8 for the knee KSS clinical score, indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. The results demonstrated that the knee KSS functional score was significantly lower in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [MD=-1.72, 95% CI (-3.26, -0.37)]. 95% CI (-3.27,-0.17)], the cemented Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of radiolucent lines around the prosthesis than the cementless Oxford UKA group [ratio of ratios (OR) = 3.62, 95% CI (1.08,12.13)]. The revision rate was significantly higher in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [OR = 2.22, 95% CI (1.40,3.53)]. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of reoperation rate, five-year prosthesis survival rate, and complication rate. The findings indicated that, in comparison to cemented Oxford UKA, cementless Oxford UKA resulted in a reduction in surgical time, an improvement in knee OKS score, KSS clinical score, and KSS functional score, and a decrease in the incidence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines and the rate of revisions.

Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis.

This study conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the imaging and functional outcomes of patient-specific instrument-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P-UKA), robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA), and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA). A comprehensive search was performed on five electronic databases and major orthopedic journals as of September 24, 2023. We included randomized controlled studies featuring at least two interventions of P-UKA, R-UKA, or C-UKA. Primary outcomes encompassed the deviation angle of hip-knee-ankle angle, as well as the coronal and sagittal plane alignment of femoral and tibial components. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), surgery time, revision rate, and complication rate. Bayesian framework was employed for risk ratio (RR) or mean deviation (MD) analysis, and treatment hierarchy was established based on rank probabilities. This NMA included 871 knees from 12 selected studies. In sagittal plane, R-UKA exhibited a significantly reduced deviation angle of femoral component compared to P-UKA (MD: 4.16, 95% CI: 0.21, 8.07), and of tibial component in comparison to C-UKA (MD: -2.45, 95% CI: -4.20, -0.68). Notably, the surgery time was significantly longer in R-UKA than in C-UKA (MD: 15.98, 95% CI: 3.11, 28.88). However, no significant differences were observed in other outcomes. Compared with P-UKA or C-UKA, R-UKA significantly improves the femoral and tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane, although this does not translate into discernible differences in functional outcomes. Comprehensive considerations of economic and learning costs are imperative for the judicious selection of the appropriate procedure.

Rigid iatrogenic hallux varus: a decades’ worth experience with arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal joint

PurposeArthrodesis of the first ray metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) is the gold standard in iatrogenic hallux varus (IHV) in the presence of stiffness and osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to collect clinical and radiographic results and complications of MPJ arthrodesis in rigid iatrogenic HV.MethodsA retrospective evaluation of rigid iatrogenic HV undergoing arthrodesis with a minimum follow-up (FU) of two years was performed. The clinical parameters assessed were visual analog scale (VAS), the AOFAS Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale score and the satisfaction scale. The radiological parameters evaluated the first to second metatarsal angle (IMA) and the angle of hallux valgus (HVA). Complications were also analysed.ResultA total of 18 patients (19 procedures) with a mean FU of 5.5 ± 2.5 years were included. The mean VAS improved from 7.3 ± 1.6 to 1.3 ± 1.2 (p < 0.05) at the last FU. Similarly, the AOFAS Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal scale score significantly improved to 82 ± 9.2 (p < 0.05). Radiological evaluation demonstrated a 1–2 IMA improvement from 4.4 ± 2.2° preoperatively to 8.9 ± 2.4° at 3 months post-operatively. Similarly, there was a significant (p < 0.05) improvement of the HVA from − 22.7 ± 4.1° to 13.1 ± 4.1° at three months post-operative (p < 0.05). No signification loss of correction was noted at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). In one case, a delayed fusion at the arthrodesis site required surgical revision to promote fusion. No patient experienced pain with stress from the first MTP joint arthrodesis site or identified the arthrodesis site as a source of pain. No patient required implant removal. Re-operation and revision rates were 5.3%. The overall complications rate was 15.8%.ConclusionsMPJ fusion effectively corrects Iatrogenic Hallux Varus in cases of rigid and fixed deformities in the medium- to long-term follow-up, with lasting improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores. The procedure is characterised by a non-negligible risk of complications, reoperations and revisions.Level of evidenceLevel IV, case series.

One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Introduction: The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes, postoperative reinfection rates, and complication rates in patients undergoing one-stage versus two-stage surgical revision for periprosthetic hip infection. Methods: The study population included adult patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty. Comparative studies have compared two-stage and one-stage revision strategies. Searches were conducted using the major databases. Review Manager software was used to estimate the effects. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted. Results: Nine cohort studies including 2,502 hips were included. The success rate did not show significant differences between the groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 3.37). No difference was noted in reinfection (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56-1.19). Life quality per Harris Hip Score was higher for one-stage revision strategies (mean difference [MD] 9.00, 95% CI 2.23-15.78). No differences were noted in mortality, aseptic loosening, or revision rates. Age (MD 2.32, 95% CI 1.34-3.29) and body mass index (BMI) (MD 1.88, 95% CI 0.38-3.38) were lower in the two-stage group. Sinus tract presence was higher in the one-stage group (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.95). Paprosky I acetabulum was higher in the one-stage group, and Paprosky III was higher in the two-stage group. Conclusions: The results did not demonstrate notable clinical differences between one-stage and two-stage hip arthroplasties, regardless of the treated microorganism. However, the quality of life may be somewhat better in the one-stage group. Age, body mass index, and Paprosky classification are factors that influence procedure selection.

Synthetic cartilage implant vs. first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for the treatment of hallux rigidus.

This study evaluated the outcome of the Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) in the treatment of hallux rigidus. In the present retrospective matched case-control study, we compared 18 patients with Cartiva SCI (mean follow-up: 17.7 months) to 18 patients with metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis (mean follow-up: 20 months) using multiple function measures, along with four specified visual analog subscales for pain. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were compared, and radiographic abnormalities were documented. We observed no significant differences in function measures between groups. While both groups experienced significant pain reduction, the arthrodesis group reported significantly lower exertion pain than the Cartiva SCI group (p = 0.004). Radiographic abnormalities, including implant site enlargement (6/18, 33.3%), erosive changes of the metatarsal bone (11/18, 61.1%) or articular surfaces (10/18, 55.6%), and bright sclerotic margins (12/18, 66.7%), occurred in the Cartiva SCI group. The present study showed good functional results and a high satisfaction rate after MTP joint arthrodesis, which is considered the gold standard surgical treatment for higher grade hallux rigidus. While the Cartiva SCI group did not show significant differences from the arthrodesis in most aspects of function and clinical scores, the arthrodesis group tended to have better results in terms of satisfaction, residual pain, and revision rate. Even after the short follow-up period, there were some remarkable radiographic findings in the Cartiva SCI group, the long-term effects of which are not yet evident, but which may lead to implant loss. Cartiva SCI has advantages for patients who prioritize postoperative mobility, but the potential risks should be considered in the patient's informed consent. Therefore, the present study highlights the importance of MTP joint arthrodesis for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Level IV - Retrospective matched case-control study.

Revision rate of displaced femoral neck fractures in non-elderly adults: a retrospective comparative study of the femoral neck system and cannulated screws

BackgroundDisplaced femoral neck fractures are associated with a high revision rate. The new femoral neck system(FNS) offers advantages in fixation stability, potentially reducing the need for revision. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision rate of patients with different reduction quality treated with the FNS and cannulated screws (CS).MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with Garden III or IV femoral neck fractures who underwent osteosynthesis in a level 1 trauma center between July 2019 and June 2023. A total of 141 cases met the inclusion criteria and received treatment with either the FNS (N = 65) or CS (N = 76). The quality of fracture reduction, surgical complications (such as femoral neck shortening, avascular necrosis of femoral head, nonunion of fracture, implant failure and withdrawal), revision surgery and the reasons for revision were analyzed.ResultsThe mean age of the 141 cases was 52.0 years (range 18–65); with sixty-five cases being male (46.1%). Eighty-four fractures (59.6%) were classified as Garden type III. Reduction quality was good in 71 cases (50.4%) and fair in 70 cases. The mean follow-up period was 25.9 months (range 12–46). A total of 26 cases(18.4%) underwent revision surgery. The revision rate in cases with good reduction was 11.3% (8/71 cases), with seven cases (four hardware removal and three arthroplasty) in the CS group and one case (arthroplasty for fracture nonunion and implant failure) in the FNS group, a significant difference was found between the two groups(P = 0.041). Among the 18 cases (25.7%, 18/70) with fair reduction who underwent revision surgery, nine cases (six hardware removal and three arthroplasty) in the CS group, and nine cases (arthroplasty for implant failure and cut-out) in the FNS group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.672). The total revision rate between the FNS group (15.4%, 10/65) and the CS group (21.1%, 16/76) was not significantly different (P = 0.387).ConclusionsThe total revision rate between the FNS and CS group showed no difference. However, in cases with good reduction, the revision rate was lower in the FNS group compared to the CS group.

Continuous periprosthetic bone loss around the TOP® cup and inferior survival rate at an 8-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundThe trabeculae-oriented pattern (TOP®) cup was designed to minimize acetabular periprosthetic bone loss. In our previous prospective study comprising 30 patients with a two-year follow-up we found a substantial decrease in periprosthetic bone mineral density (pBMD) in the proximal and medial regions of the TOP cup. The present study aims to investigate pBMD changes in the mid-term and how this affects implant survival.MethodsWe followed the previous cohort and estimated implant survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis, evaluated pBMD with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and clinical outcome using the Harris Hip Score (HHS).ResultsMean follow-up was 8.6 (range 7.8–9.1) years. The eight-year implant survival rate for cup revision for all reasons was 83% (95% confidence interval {CI}: 70–97) and 86% (CI: 74–99) when cup revision due to aseptic loosening was the endpoint. Mean HHS at eight years was 95 (range 77–100). A further 12% (CI: 5–17) loss in pBMD was detected in the proximal Digas zone 1 and 12% (CI: 7–17) loss in Digas zone 2 also between two and eight years after surgery. pBMD continued to decrease up to 30% (CI: 24–36) in Digas zones 1, 2 and 3 compared to pBMD immediately postoperatively.ConclusionsThe TOP cup shows inferior mid-term survival rates compared to other uncemented cups, as well as a continuous decrease in pBMD. Periprosthetic bone loss cannot be prevented by this uncemented cup.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.

Perioperative outcomes using computer navigation in primary total shoulder arthroplasty

IntroductionThe utilization of computer navigation to improve glenoid component placement in primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, there is a paucity of literature examining the perioperative outcomes and cost of this technology compared to standard instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative complications and healthcare utilization between computer navigation and standard instrumentation in primary TSA. MethodsThe Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2016 to 2020 to identify patients who underwent elective primary TSA. Patients who underwent TSA with computer navigation (n = 752) were propensity score matched in a 1:3 proportion to patients who underwent TSA with standard instrumentation (n = 2256) for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol abuse, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, and chronic lung disease. Bivariate statistical analyses were performed to compare preoperative demographic and comorbidity data, postoperative complications, and hospital utilization metrics between the 2 groups. Chi-square and student t-tests identified differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. ResultsPatients undergoing TSA with computer navigation exhibited lower rates of revision within 180 days (P < .001) and lower rates of certain postoperative medical and surgical complications, including acute renal failure (P = .006), urinary tract infection (P = .015), acute respiratory distress syndrome (P = .045), surgical site infection (P = .022), dislocation (P = .012), and prosthetic loosening (P = .032). Computer navigation patients had a higher cost of initial admission (P < .001) but were less likely to have extended hospital stays (P = .047), less likely to be discharged with home healthcare (P < .001), and more likely to be discharged routinely (P < .001). ConclusionTSA with computer navigation was associated with lower revision rates and reduced postoperative complications. Although greater initial costs were observed, decreased extended hospital stays and more routine discharges show promise for long-term cost efficiency. These findings underscore the advantages of computer navigation in TSA and should be considered by orthopedic surgeons when evaluating choice of instrumentation.

A novel radiological index uses the inner canal diameter and the Citak classification index to predict risk factor for aseptic loosening following hinged total knee arthroplasty.

It remains unclear if distal femoral morphology should be a key consideration when selecting the implant or fixation strategy. A novel radiological index has been proposed to classify patients' distal femoral morphology. This study aims to evaluate the validity of this classification system in a cohort of patients undergoing hinged Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine if distal femoral morphology is a risk factor for aseptic loosening or all cause revision following hinged TKA. This study was a retrospective analysis of our institutional database. Fifty-nine patients having undergone hinged TKA with adequate radiographs for examination were eligible for inclusion. Radiographic measurements were performed using the Citak radiological index criteria. The proportion of aseptic loosening and all-cause revisions were compared between the different classification groups. The analysis included 41 females (69.5%) and 18 males (30.5%). The mean age of the participants was 71.2 years (SD = 12.6). For inner canal diameter patients were classified as: Type A (31/59, 53%), Type B (19/59, 32%), and Type C (9/59, 15%). For the Index Classification Group, patients were classified as: Group A (26/59, 44%), Group B (20/59, 34%), and Group C (13/59, 22%). There was no significant difference in overall revision rate between the three groups (χ2 = 3.25, P = .197 from a Chi-square test). There was a significantly higher rate of aseptic loosening in Group C compared to Groups A and B, with no significant difference between Groups A and B in terms of aseptic loosening rates (χ2 = 8.72, P = .013 from a Chi-square test). Distal femoral morphology plays an important role in the risk of aseptic loosening following hinged knee replacement, and should be considered when deciding implant type and fixation in these patients.

What are the age-related factors linked to aseptic revisions in constrained and unconstrained TKA as well as UKA? A register-based study from the German arthroplasty registry (EPRD).

The implantation rate of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is continuously growing. Aseptic problems are a major cause of revision. The aim of the following study was to determinate the incidence of aseptic revisions in primary knee arthroplasty as well as aseptic revision rates and influencing factors according to the patients' age and type of procedure. Data collection was performed using the German Arthroplasty Registry. Influencing factors were analyzed according to the patients' age and type of procedure. Risk factors were calculated using multiple Log-rank test with the Holm's method. Incidence and comparison of aseptic revisions according to the patients' age and type of procedure were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier-estimates. Cox regression was applied to calculate the hazard ratio. Overall, 300,998 knee arthroplasties with 254,144 (84.4%) unconstrained TKA, 9,993 (3.3%) constrained TKA and 36,861 (12.3%) unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKA) were analyzed. Patients younger than 65 years suffered a significantly higher aseptic revision rate than older patients (p < 0.0001). After one year, a revision rate of 1.1% was recorded for patients 65-74 years, 1.6% for patients under 65 years, and 1.3% for patients beyond 74 years. After seven years, patients younger than 65 years sustained in 5.0%, patients 65-74 years in 2.9% and patients beyond 74 years in 2.4% revision. In unconstrained TKA, an increased Elixhauser-score (HR = 1,75; HR = 1,54; HR = 1,7; p < 0,001) was a risk factor regardless the age. A TKA volume of 101-250 regardless the age (HR = 0,66; HR = 0,69; HR = 0,79) and > 250 under 75 years (< 65: HR = 0,72; 65-74: HR = 0,78; p = 0,001) were protective for aseptic revision. In UKA, male gender (HR = 0,81; HR = 0,72; HR = 0,57; p < 0,001), a UKA volume ≥ 51 for patients under 75 years (< 65: HR = 0,62; 65-74: HR = 0,59; p = 0,003) as well as cemented UKA for patients younger than 75 years (< 65: HR = 0,37; 65-74: HR = 0,37; p < 0,001) were detected as preventive factors. A significant increased rate of aseptic revisions was reported for patients younger than 65 years compared to older patients. An increased Elixhauser score was a risk factor, whereas male and a high volume of performed UKA or TKA could be identified as preventive factors. III, cohort study.

Lower Limb Length and Body Weight are Surrogate Predictors of Peroneus Longus Autograft Diameter.

Graft diameters are essential in any ACL surgery, with diameters less than 8mm associated with higher revision rates. Peroneus longus (PL) grafts have garnered much attention recently due to ease of harvest and more reliable graft diameters. The present study aimed to study various anthropometric parameters associated with PL-graft diameters. We performed a prospective cohort study of 50 patients undergoing PL harvest for ACL surgery at a tertiary referral hospital. Age, gender, height, weight, length of the lower leg (lateral tibial plateau to the tip of the fibula), circumference at the head of the fibula and girth at the lateral malleolus were measured pre-operatively. The length of the graft doubled and tripled graft diameters were assessed intra-operatively. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to study the association between the pre-operative anthropometric variables and the intra-operative graft diameters and length of graft harvested. The mean doubled and tripled PL-graft diameter in our study population was 7.7 ± 0.9 mm and 8.7 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The mean length of the graft was 25.9 ± 3.5 cm. We found no significant correlation between graft diameters and age, gender or height of the patient. We found that the patient's weight significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with graft diameter. We also found that the length of the lower leg (p < 0.0001), circumference at the head of the fibula (p = 0.001) and girth at the lateral malleolus (p = 0.029) showed significant correlation with tripled PL-graft diameter. We found that weight, length of the lower leg and girth at the head of the fibula showed a strong correlation with tripled PL-graft diameter.

Rate of revision and wear penetration in different polyethylene liner compositions in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

The present Bayesian network meta-analysis compared different types of polyethylene liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of wear penetration (mm/year) and rate of revision. The type of liners compared were the crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (CPE/UHMWPE), Vitamin E infused highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE-VEPE), modified cross-linked polyethylene (MXLPE), highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE), Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE). This study was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. In June 2024, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were accessed. A time constraint was set from January 2000. All investigations which compared two or more types of polyethylene liners for THA were accessed. Only studies that clearly stated the nature of the liner were included. Data from 60 studies (37,352 THAs) were collected. 56% of patients were women. The mean age of patients was 60.0 ± 6.6 years, the mean BMI was 27.5 ± 2.0 kg/m2. The mean length of follow-up was 81.6 ± 44.4 months. Comparability was found at baseline between groups. XLPE and HXLPE liners in THA are associated with the lowest wear penetration (mm/year) and the lowest revision rate at approximately 7 years of follow-up.

The effect of tuberosity healing on functional outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcome measures in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fracture (PHF) with healed versus non-healed greater tuberosity (GT). We performed a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines querying PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies that stratified results by the GT healing status. Studies that did not attempt to repair the GT were excluded. We extracted and compared clinical outcomes including postoperative forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), Constant score, and complications and revision rates. Of the included patients, 295 (78.5%) demonstrated GT healing while 81 did not (21.5%). The healed GT cohort exhibited increased postoperative FF (P < .001), ER (P < .001), IR (P = .006), and Constant score (P = .006) compared to the non-healed GT cohort. The overall dislocation rate was 0.8% with no study differentiating GT status of dislocation cases. Healing of the GT after RSA for PHF yields improved postoperative range of motion and strength, whereas patient-reported pain and function were largely not affected by GT healing indicating merit to RSA for PHF regardless of the likelihood of the GT healing.