Perioperative outcomes using computer navigation in primary total shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract

IntroductionThe utilization of computer navigation to improve glenoid component placement in primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, there is a paucity of literature examining the perioperative outcomes and cost of this technology compared to standard instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative complications and healthcare utilization between computer navigation and standard instrumentation in primary TSA. MethodsThe Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2016 to 2020 to identify patients who underwent elective primary TSA. Patients who underwent TSA with computer navigation (n = 752) were propensity score matched in a 1:3 proportion to patients who underwent TSA with standard instrumentation (n = 2256) for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol abuse, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, and chronic lung disease. Bivariate statistical analyses were performed to compare preoperative demographic and comorbidity data, postoperative complications, and hospital utilization metrics between the 2 groups. Chi-square and student t-tests identified differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. ResultsPatients undergoing TSA with computer navigation exhibited lower rates of revision within 180 days (P < .001) and lower rates of certain postoperative medical and surgical complications, including acute renal failure (P = .006), urinary tract infection (P = .015), acute respiratory distress syndrome (P = .045), surgical site infection (P = .022), dislocation (P = .012), and prosthetic loosening (P = .032). Computer navigation patients had a higher cost of initial admission (P < .001) but were less likely to have extended hospital stays (P = .047), less likely to be discharged with home healthcare (P < .001), and more likely to be discharged routinely (P < .001). ConclusionTSA with computer navigation was associated with lower revision rates and reduced postoperative complications. Although greater initial costs were observed, decreased extended hospital stays and more routine discharges show promise for long-term cost efficiency. These findings underscore the advantages of computer navigation in TSA and should be considered by orthopedic surgeons when evaluating choice of instrumentation.