South of Sudbury, the boundary between the Southern and Grenville provinces, the Grenville Front, is placed along the faulted southeastern edge the ca. 1.46 Ga Chief Lake complex (CLC). A southeast-dipping, thrust-sense mylonite zone lies in the immediate hanging wall of the Grenville Front boundary fault (GFBF), separating the CLC in the Southern Province from metasedimentary, granitoid, anorthositic and amphibolitic gneiss in the Grenville Province to the southeast. The GFBF also coincides with an abrupt break in the continuity of southeast-trending diabase dykes of the 1.24 Ga Sudbury swarm. The northern CLC is a composite intrusion whose units include, and are separated by, large rafts of the early Paleoproterozoic Huronian Supergroup in which relict stratigraphy outlines engulfed folds. Mafic rocks along the northwest contact of the CLC, previously interpreted as metasomatized Nipissing gabbro (2.22 Ga), are in fact a phase of the Chief Lake intrusive suite, commingled with granite. The northwest contact coincides in part with a steep, southeast-side-down, pre-intrusion fault that was later reactivated with reverse sense of displacement. The Chief Lake granitoid rocks become increasingly foliated southeast toward the Grenville Front, but two features suggest that at least some of the deformation of the Chief Lake intrusive suite was syn-emplacement: (1) the granitoid component of commingled rocks may be strongly foliated in places where the mafic component is undeformed, and (2) included Huronian metasedimentary rocks in general lack the constrictional fabric of their enveloping plutonic rocks. Sudbury dykes cut across the fabric of the CLC, but the facts that they are themselves buckled, locally metamorphosed to greenschist facies, and are offset by faults marked by ultramylonite and cataclasite attest to tectonism of Grenvillian age in the footwall for a limited distance northwest of the GFBF. Granitoid rocks dated at 1.74 and 1.47 Ga southwest of the study area, and Archean tonalitic rocks and 2.47 Ga anorthositic gabbro to the northeast, occur on both sides of the Grenville Front. In the study area, units of paragneiss in the hanging wall of the GFBF cannot be assigned to specific Huronian formations in the Southern Province footwall. However, although not proven, it is reasonable to correlate other hanging wall rocks, namely mylonitic gabbroic anorthosite, amphibolite, and granitic gneiss, to the 2.47 Ga East Bull Lake intrusive suite, Nipissing gabbro, and Chief Lake granite, respectively, in the Southern Province. Whereas Sudbury dykes do not intrude the mylonitic rocks immediately above the GFBF, they do reappear to the southeast as dyke segments and pods within mylonite-bounded panels where they cut earlier isoclinal folds and exhibit a progressive increase in metamorphic grade across a gradient shallower than that in the enclosing gneissic rocks. They document that much of the tectonic history recorded by their host rocks is pre-Grenvillian. Even so, there is no evidence that the Grenville Front was ever the locus of a suture.
Read full abstract