Resynchronization Protocols Research Articles

Reproductive Efficiency of Nelore Cows in Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination Programs with Early Resynchronization.

We aimed to evaluate the reproductive efficiency of Nelore cows in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) programs with early resynchronization. A total of 468 Nelore cows were divided into two experimental groups: R30-conventional resynchronization at 30 days (n = 234); R22-early resynchronization at 22 days (n = 234). Both groups followed a synchronization protocol using intravaginal progesterone devices combined with the administration of steroids and gonadotropins. The R30 protocol involved resynchronization 30 days after FTAI, while the R22 protocol implemented early resynchronization 22 days after FTAI without prior pregnancy diagnosis. In both groups, one FTAI was followed by two resynchronizations. The results showed similar pregnancy rates between the groups, with the pregnancy rate in the 1st FTAI being 50.85% in the R30 group and 48.72% in the R22 group (p = 0.742). During the 1st resynchronization, the rates were 45.22% in the R30 group and 46.67% in the R22 group (p = 0.742). The cumulative pregnancy rate after the 1st FTAI, 1st, and 2nd resynchronizations was 80.77% in the R30 group and 82.91% in the R22 group (p = 0.643), with no significant difference observed. Follicular dynamics were also monitored, with ovulation occurring in 78.95% of cases in the 1st FTAI, 91.67% in the 1st resynchronization, and 88.98% in the 2nd resynchronization. The mean diameter of the ovulatory follicle was 13.64 ± 3.48 mm, and the largest follicle diameter was significantly greater (14.47 ± 2.76 mm) in cows that ovulated compared to those that did not (11.54 ± 4.24 mm) (p < 0.05), reinforcing the association between follicle size and the likelihood of ovulation. These findings indicate that both early and conventional resynchronization protocols perform similarly, with early resynchronization offering advantages in reducing the calving interval. Furthermore, the relationship between follicular diameter and ovulation confirms the importance of follicle size as an indicator of reproductive success.

The economic effect of cow-based reproductive management programs with a systematic use of reproductive hormones

Hormone-based reproductive management programs can be beneficial to improve dairy cow's reproductive performance. This study aimed to compare the economic impact of reproductive management programs using systematic hormonal treatments to individual cows with a specific DIM range with a reproductive management program using cow-specific hormonal treatment based on a veterinary diagnosis of ovarian dysfunction during a fertility check. An existing individual cow-based, dynamic, and stochastic bio-economic simulation model, mimicking the production dynamics of a 200 cow-herd in daily time steps, was extended with ovarian dysfunction and fertility inputs. Four hormone-based reproductive management programs were modeled. In the default reproductive management program, reflecting the current reproductive management of Dutch herds, lactating dairy cows are inseminated based on detection of estrus and non-cyclic dairy cows are treated with hormones based on a veterinary diagnosis of ovarian dysfunction during a fertility check. Hormone treatments prescribed by the veterinarian for anestrus, cystic, and sub-estrus cows were an 8-d progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID)-Synch protocol (PRIDsynch), an Ovsynch protocol, and a PGF2⍺ treatment, respectively. The 3 other reproductive management programs reflected systematic hormonal treatments to cows at specific DIM and included a 1) Double-Ovsynch protocol for TAI with nonpregnant cows submitted to a resynchronization protocol (FTAI), 2) Double-Ovsynch protocol for TAI with nonpregnant cows detected in estrus or submitted to a resynchronization protocol (FTAI+ED), and 3) detection of estrus with cows not detected submitted to a PRIDsynch protocol (ED+TAI). All nonpregnant cows were submitted to a resynchronization protocol based on the absence (PRIDsynch) or presence (Ovsynch protocol) of a corpus luteum (CL). The annual mean net economic return (NER) was calculated for all reproductive management programs. Compared with the default reproductive management program, the highest NER was observed for the FTAI+ED reproductive management program with €23,764 higher net revenues, followed by the FTAI and the ED+TAI reproductive management programs with €19,550 and €14,314 higher net revenues, respectively. Overall, systematic hormone-based reproductive management programs gave higher costs due to more hormones administered and higher calving and feed costs due to more pregnant cows. Nevertheless, the additional revenues of milk and calves in the systematic hormone-based reproductive management programs outweighed the total cost. For instance, the FTAI+ED reproductive management program gave €8,953 higher total cost per year compared with the default but with €32,654 higher revenues. In summary, reproductive management programs where hormones were systematically used gave economic advantages over the current default reproductive management program in which hormones are administered to individual cows based on a veterinary diagnosis of ovarian dysfunction during a fertility check.

Optimisation of Early Pregnancy Diagnosis andResynchronisation in Beef Cows.

The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the effects of the preovulatory follicle (POF) size on the accuracy of Doppler-based early pregnancy detection, and (2) to determine whether the removal of PGF2α (PGF) treatment during the resynchronisation protocol would affect fertility in beef cows. In Experiment 1, Nelore suckling cows (n = 224) were enrolled in an estradiol-progesterone-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol. At TAI, cows were separated based on the range of POF diameters, as follows: ≤11.0 mm (n = 50), 11.1-12.9 mm (n = 64), 13.0-14.4 mm (n = 62) and ≥14.5 mm (n = 48). On day 22 after TAI, the corpus luteum (CL) blood flow (CLBF) of all cows was examined by colour Doppler ultrasonography to diagnose nonpregnant cows. The cows with the largest POF had the greatest positive predictive value (88.6%; 31 of 35) and diagnostic accuracy (91.7%; 44 of 48). In Experiment 2, Nelore cows (n = 233) were subjected to the same TAI protocol. Fourteen days after TAI, all cows were started on a resynchronisation protocol. Cows diagnosed as nonpregnant based on CLBF, on day 22, received 0.5 mg estradiol cypionate intramuscular (im) and were assigned to receive either 150 μg of PGF (PGF; n = 50) or 2 mL of saline (control; n = 47). Cows treated with PGF had a P/AI of 30.0% compared with a 48.9% P/AI in controls (p = 0.06). Our findings demonstrate that the POF size affects the accuracy of a CLBF-based early pregnancy diagnosis and that the removal of PGF treatment from the resynchronisation protocol tended to increase P/AI of the second TAI.

Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol benzoate plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone to initiate a progesterone-based timed artificial insemination resynchronization protocol in lactating dairy cows

The present study compared 2 strategies to initiate a progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol for lactating dairy cows: only GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) plus GnRH (EB+GnRH). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 487; 184 primiparous and 303 multiparous) from 2 commercial dairy herds were used for their second or greater services postpartum. Each week, cows that were nonpregnant at the pregnancy diagnosis 32 d after a previous AI were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups that differed only in the strategy to initiate (d 0) the TAI protocol. On d 0, every cow received a 2.0-g P4 implant; in the EB+GnRH group, cows were treated with 2.0 mg i.m. of EB and 16.8 µg i.m. of the GnRH analog buserelin acetate, whereas in the GnRH group, cows received only 16.8 µg i.m. of GnRH. On d 7 after the initial treatment, 0.530 mg i.m. of cloprostenol sodium (PGF) was administered in all cows, followed by a second dose on d 8, concomitant with 1.0 mg i.m. of estradiol cypionate and P4 implant withdrawal. The TAI was performed on d 10 (48 h after P4 device withdrawal) in both experimental groups. Only conventional Holstein semen was used throughout the study. The percentage of cows with corpus luteum (CL) on d 0 (73%) and overall ovulation rate after d 0 (54%) did not differ between groups. The CL regression between d 0 and the first PGF treatment was greater in the EB+GnRH group than the GnRH group (42% vs. 31%). Consequently, the proportion of cows with CL at PGF was greater when only GnRH was used on d 0 compared with EB+GnRH (86% vs. 82%), and the mean number of CL at PGF was greater (1.23 vs. 1.11). The expression of estrus near TAI was greater in GnRH group (84% vs. 77%), and cows showing estrus had greater (44% vs. 10%) pregnancy per AI (P/AI) on d 32 for both treatments. We found no effect of the presence of CL on d 0 or at PGF, nor of ovulation after d 0 or CL regression between d 0 and d 7 on fertility. However, fertility was critically impaired when cows did not have CL at both times, d 0 and at PGF treatment. We did not observe any interaction between treatment and other variables, and the P/AI was similar in cows receiving EB+GnRH or only GnRH on d 0 (37.8% vs. 36.6%). In summary, although there was no detectable difference in P/AI between treatments, this study demonstrated potential negative physiological outcomes caused by EB treatment on d 0 (greater incidence of luteolysis after d 0 and fewer cows with CL at PGF treatment). Overall, we found no benefit of adding EB at the initiation of a P4-based TAI protocol on fertility compared with using GnRH alone, despite differences in ovarian dynamics and expression of estrus.

Ressincronização de estro em ovinos utilizando duas ou três inseminações artificiais com sêmen congelado

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of two or three estrus synchronizations followed by artificial insemination (AI) by laparoscopy with frozen semen in sheep. Santa Inês sheep (n=147) were randomly distributed into two groups: Re-sync - 2FTAI (n=72) and Doppler - 3FTAI (n=75), synchronized with a short protocol associated with GnRH and AI by laparoscopy with frozen semen 50 h after removing the P4 device (D0). Two AIs were performed in the Re-sync group, with the start of the resynchronization protocol on D23 and gestational diagnosis on D30; the non-pregnant females were inseminated again. The sheep were resynchronized (D10) in the Doppler group and the gestation diagnosis was made early at 17 days using Doppler ultrasound. The open females were inseminated again, totaling three inseminations in 42 days. Early gestation diagnoses were confirmed at 30 days. Re-sync (29.16%) and Doppler (21.33%) were similar to each other in terms of cumulative gestation rate (P&gt;0.05). The indicators of the non-gestation diagnosis technique at 17 days were sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 28%, positive predictive value of 21.3%, negative predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 39.8%. Early diagnosis allowed sheep to be inseminated two to three times in the same period and was effective in diagnosing truly non-pregnant females. Therefore, estrus resynchronization associated with AI by laparoscopy using frozen semen can be applied in sheep, but a higher gestation rate could not be achieved with two or three inseminations at the end of the breeding season.

Lightweight Encryption and Authentication for Controller Area Network of Autonomous Vehicles

With the rapid development of autonomous vehicles (AVs), vehicle safety has attracted attention. Controller area network (CAN) bus without authentication and encryption mechanisms is a weakness of the in-vehicle network (IVN), and attackers always primarily target the CAN bus. Attacks on the AVs' CAN bus are more frequent because AVs have more external interfaces and sensors than ordinary vehicles. To address the abovementioned issues, this paper proposes a lightweight encryption and authentication scheme for the CAN bus of AVs using message authentication codes and Grain stream cipher. The scheme realizes efficient authentication between electronic control units and a counter re-synchronization protocol is used to ensure that authentication failure owing to counter inconsistency is prevented. Blom key management scheme is employed to rapidly distribute and update session keys, avoiding the complicated process of updating pairwise keys. In addition, considering the scalability of the IVN, a key distribution protocol for new nodes was provided. The security proof using Burrows-Abadi-Needham logic and security analysis prove that the proposed scheme can satisfy the security requirements of the IVN. In addition, performance analysis shows that the proposed scheme can meet real-time requirements and has little impact on the busload.

Pregnancies following Protocols for Repetitive Synchronization of Ovulation in Primiparous Buffaloes in Different Seasons.

Primiparous buffaloes were tested in two periods of the year characterized, by either low or high reproductive efficiency. They were subjected to two protocols for synchronization of ovulation: (i) Ovsynch (OV) and (ii) progesterone based (P4) treatment. After calving, the animals underwent a series of four cycles of re-synchronization protocols. The season did not affect pregnancy rates when the results of the two treatments were pooled together with regard to the first synchronization protocol, followed by AI. Pregnancy rates were similar during the low breeding season (50.3% vs. 57.4% in OV and P4, respectively), but different during the high breeding season (50.4% vs. 67.7% in OV and P4, respectively; p = 0.000). Logistic regression confirmed a significant effect of treatment and season interaction on pregnancy (p = 0.003). Following re-synchronization, a treatment by season interaction was detected during the low breeding season (odds ratio = 2.233), in favor of P4. Finally, a survival analysis showed a better response of animals subjected to P4 treatment from the second AI onward. In conclusion, the pooled data of pregnancy rates from both treatments between seasons are not different following AIs. Better results, though, were obtained from the implementation of P4 treatment, and are recorded in a season-fashioned mode when the comparison is made following first or cumulative AIs.

Use of injectable progesterone at the beginning of the TAI protocol is not necessary in super-early resynchronization started 14 days after artificial insemination in Bos indicus beef heifers

In a protocol for the resynchronization of ovulation starting 14 days (D14) after timed artificial insemination, the effects of short-action injectable progesterone (P4i) administration and the length of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone (P4) device on follicular dynamics, the conception rate (P/AI) and the percentage of false positives were evaluated in 1065 Nelore heifers previously timed-inseminated. On D14, P4 devices were inserted, and heifers allocated, based on a 2 × 2 factorial design, to receive (P4i) or not 50 mg of P4i (NoP4i), and to remove the P4 device after 6 (6Day) or 8 days (8Day). At the time of P4 device removal (D20 and D22), non-pregnancy diagnosis was performed using vascularization of the corpus luteum (VCL) evaluated. At this time, non-pregnant heifers received 150 μg of D-cloprostenol, 0.6 mg of estradiol cypionate and 300IU of eCG. TAI was performed 48 h after P4 device removal. For these heifers, ultrasound examinations were performed at P4 device removal and at TAI to evaluate follicular dynamics and at 30 days after TAI to evaluate the P/AI. Pregnant heifers based on VCL were evaluated using B-mode ultrasonography 10 days after Doppler ultrasound to evaluate the percentage of false positives. Statistical analyses were performed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. There were no interaction effects between P4i and duration of treatment with a P4 device. The P/AI was diagnosed by Doppler, 1st TAI, 2nd TAI, total and percentage of false positives did not differ between heifers receiving or not P4i. Similarly, duration of treatment with a P4 device did not influence the P/AI by Doppler, 1st TAI, 2nd TAI and total. However, the percentage of false positives diagnoses was higher in 6Day heifers (P = 0.01). The diameter of largest follicle at P4 device removal was greater in the 8Day heifers (P = 0.001), and at TAI was higher in the P4i-treated heifers (P = 0.03). Additionally, the percentage of false positives diagnoses was lower in heifers that ovulated to the 1st TAI protocol (P = 0.001). In conclusion, for resynchronization 14 days after TAI, it is not necessary to inject P4i at the beginning of the protocol. In addition, P4 device removal after 6 instead of 8 days increases the percentage of false positives because of the earlier diagnosis (20 days after TAI), but does not interfere in P/AI of resynchronization protocol. Furthermore, the percentage of false positives is higher in heifers that did not ovulate to 1st TAI protocol.

Efficiency of Two Protocols of Resynchronization of Estrus and Ovulation in High-Producing Dairy Cows at Peak Lactation

Abstract The reproductive efficiency of the cows was monitored after two resynchronization protocols: Ovsynch (OVS) and Double Ovsynch (DOS). The research initially included 70 HF cows who entered the first synchronization protocol – Presynch. Cows that did not conceive after the first synchronization were divided into two groups and introduced to two resynchronization protocols. In the first group of cows (n=35), the DOS protocol began with the application of GnRH on day 22 after the Presynch TAI (Timed Artificial Insemination), and seven days later pregnancy check-up was done and PGF2α was applied only to non-pregnant cows (n=23), which remained in the study. In the second group of cows, the OVS protocol started on day 32 after Presynch TAI only in non-pregnant animals (n=20). Progesterone (P4) concentration was determined at the time of application of GnRH1, PGF2α and GnRH2 in both groups of cows, and then 30 days after Resynch TAI, ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis was done. A higher percentage of pregnant cows were recorded in the OVS group compared to the DOS group (45% and 35%, respectively). The concentration of P4 in the serum of cows in the DOS group during the first measurement (GnRH1) was significantly higher than the value in cows that did not conceive (p&lt;0.05), while in the third measurement (GnRH2) the average concentration of P4 in conceiving cows was significantly lower (p&lt;0.001) compared to cows that did not coincive. The open days period was significantly longer in pregnant cows that were resynchronized using the DOS protocol compared to cows from the OVS protocol. In conclusion, the OVS protocol of estrus resynchronization in dairy cows proved to be more successful than the DOS protocol. However, considering the advantages the OVS, it is needed to determine which day of the sexual cycle is the best to start resynchronization.

Comparison of estradiol benzoate doses for resynchronization of ovulation at 14 days after timed-AI in suckled beef cows

We aimed to compare the effects of use of 1 or 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) associated with an intravaginal progesterone (P4) device for resynchronization of ovulation 14 days after timed-AI (TAI) in suckled beef cows. Nelore cows were submitted to a TAI (D0) and on D14, received an intravaginal P4 device and were randomly assigned to EB-1 group [n = 516] or EB-2 group [n = 510], which that received 1 or 2 mg EB, respectively. Also, cows had the ovaries scanned by ultrasound to detect an active CL on D14. On D22, devices were removed and structural luteolysis was detected by color-Doppler ultrasonography. In cows which underwent luteolysis, the resynchronization protocol was continued and they were submitted to second TAI on D24. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 30–35 days after first or second TAI. A subgroup [n = 18–19/group] was submitted to daily ovarian ultrasound scanning from D14 to D22. Proportion of cows with an active CL on D14 did not differ (P > 0.1) between EB-1 and EB-2 groups. The proportion of cows with an active CL on D22 and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at first TAI were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in EB-1 (55% and 51%) than in EB-2 group (48% and 42%). The P/AI at second TAI did not differ (P > 0.1) between EB-1 (47% [106/227]) and EB-2 group (42% [110/259]). Cumulative pregnancy rate was greater in EB-1 (73% [370/508]) than in EB-2 group (64% [322/502]). No difference (P > 0.1) was observed in the proportion of non-pregnant cows with a synchronized follicular wave emergence between EB-1 and EB-2 groups. In conclusion, treatment with either 1 or 2 mg EB associated with an intravaginal P4 device at D14 after TAI are efficient to synchronize a new follicular wave emergence. The decreased P/AI from first TAI observed in the group of cows receiving 2 mg indicates that this dose is not recommended for use in resynchronization programs initiated 14 days after TAI. The use of 1 mg EB associated with a P4 device provides an elevated cumulative pregnancy rate after two TAIs with an interval of 24 days.

Influence of eCG and reproductive management in the resynchronization of ovulation in dairy goats.

Resynchronization protocols have been proposed as a way of shortening females’ unproductive time in the flock, with good results in cattle and sheep. In goats, initial studies have shown that a second progestogen device inserted before luteolysis and pregnancy diagnosis does not interfere with the corpus luteum lifespan or functionality. This study aimed to evaluate the follicular growth, ovulation pattern and pregnancy rate after insertion of a second and new progestogen device for resynchronizing, with or without equine Chorionic Gonadotrophin (eCG), submitted to natural mating (NM) or artificial insemination (AI) to propose a viable resynchronization protocol for dairy goats. A total of 38 multiparous Saanen goats underwent a short-term progesterone protocol [six days exposed to medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) intravaginal sponges + 200 IU eCG and 0.12 mg of cloprostenol sodium on the 5th day + 0.025 mg of lecirelin 34 hours after sponge withdrawal] and, on day 16th after the ovulation, received a new MAP device which was retained until day 21. At this moment females were split into four groups: GeCG+NM – 100 IU eCG with NM; GSal+NM – saline solution with NM; GeCG+AI – 100 IU eCG with AI; and GSal+AI – saline solution with AI. Ultrasound scans were performed every 12 h from sponge withdrawal (day 21) until 108 h after sponge withdrawal (day 25) for follicular dynamics evaluation, at 240 h (day 31) for assessing the presence of active corpus luteum, and on day 60 for pregnancy diagnosis. No differences were found regarding ovulation time, synchronization and follicle size. However, GeCG+NM presented a greater estrus manifestation rate (100%) and pregnancy rate (62.5%) when compared to GSal+AI. In conclusion, resynchronization protocols in dairy goats may present satisfactory results.

Hormonal combinations aiming to improve reproductive outcomes of Bos indicus cows submitted to estradiol/progesterone-based timed AI protocols

The aim was to study reproductive outcomes of Nelore (Bos indicus) cows submitted to a 7-d estradiol (E2)/progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol, receiving various combinations of doses and hormones. Primiparous (n = 962) and multiparous (n = 1935) cows were submitted to synchronization (n = 2012) and resynchronization (n = 885 non-pregnant cows at pregnancy diagnosis 30 d after TAI) protocols, following a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of eight treatments. At the initiation of the TAI protocol (Day −9), all cows received a 1.0 g intravaginal P4 insert, 2.0 mg E2 benzoate and received (PGF1) or not (PGF0) 0.5 mg cloprostenol sodium (PGF). On Day −2, the P4 insert was removed, all cows received 0.5 mg PGF, 300 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and 0.5 (EC0.5) or 1.0 mg estradiol cypionate (EC1.0). On Day 0, cows were treated (G1) with 8.4 μg buserelin acetate (GnRH) or not (G0), concurrently with TAI. The eight treatments were generated: 1) PGF0-EC0.5-G0 (n = 364), 2) PGF0-EC0.5-G1 (n = 363), 3) PGF1-EC0.5-G0 (n = 363), 4) PGF1-EC0.5-G1 (n = 360), 5) PGF0-EC-1.0-G0 (n = 360), 6) PGF0-EC1.0-G1 (n = 363), 7) PGF1-EC1.0-G0 (n = 361), and 8) PGF1-EC1.0-G1 (n = 363). Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was greater at first AI compared with resynchronization (58.9 [n = 2012] vs. 54.9% [n = 885]). Presence of CL on Day −9 resulted in more cows expressing estrus (81.3 [n = 680] vs. 67.1% [n = 2033]) and greater P/AI (66.0 [n = 692] vs. 54.9% [n = 2106]). There was no difference in P/AI between cows that received or not PGF on Day -9 (58.7 [n = 1447] vs. 56.6% [n = 1450]). In contrast, PGF tended to increase P/AI of cows with CL on Day −9 (with PGF = 69.1 [n = 375] vs. without PGF = 62.5% [n = 317]). Cows that received 1.0 mg EC expressed more estrus than those treated with 0.5 mg (73.8 [n = 1414] vs. 67.9% [n = 1398]) and had greater P/AI (60.2 [n = 1447] vs. 55.1% [n = 1450]). P/AI was greater in cows treated with GnRH at TAI (59.8 [n = 1449] vs. 55.5% [n = 1448]), particularly in cows that did not show estrus (52.7 [n = 393] vs. 38.1% [n = 420]). Moreover, GnRH on Day 0 increased P/AI in cows with BCS < 3.0 (57.1 [n = 723] vs. 48.6% [n = 698]), in primiparous (50.1 [n = 465] vs. 41.9% [n = 497]) and in cows that received 0.5 mg EC (58.9 [n = 723] vs. 51.3% [n = 727]). In conclusion, 1.0 mg of EC on Day −2 and GnRH at TAI improved P/AI, but the combination of a higher dose of EC and GnRH treatment at AI did not enhance this effect. Furthermore, GnRH improved P/AI especially in Bos indicus cows with lower expression of estrus, such as primiparous, thinner cows, and cows treated with 0.5 mg of EC.

The effectiveness of intravaginal progesterone insert in Ovsynch and resynchronization protocols in cyclic and non-cyclic Holstein heifers

In the present study, it was aimed to compare of resynchronization with used progesterone (P4) releasing intravaginal device (PRID), with modified ovulation synchronization in cyclic and non-cyclic Holstein heifers. Animals were randomly divided into two groups; Group I (GI, n=87) and Group II (GII, n=88). Fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) following modified Ovsynch protocol with PRID insertion, was performed to all animals. In GI, used PRID was reinserted to the same animals, 15 days after the first FTAI (day 25) for 12 days. Pregnancies were detected by ultrasound in all groups on day 37. For resynchronization, prostaglandin (PG) F2α was applied to non-pregnant animals on day 37. In GI, following 48 hours from PGF2α injection, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone was administrated, and after 18 hours the second FTAI was performed. No additional treatments were applied to the non-pregnant animals found in GII, and heifers were taken to the routine service program. In both groups, the second pregnancy diagnosis was performed 27 days after inseminations by transrectal ultrasonography. Pregnancy rates (PR) following the first and overall inseminations in cyclic and non-cyclic heifers (GI and GII) were detected as 66.4% and 52.3% (P&amp;gt;0.05); 76.3% and 59.1% (P&amp;gt;0.05), respectively. In conclusion, the usage of PRID in the Ovsynch and resynchronization protocol resulted in higher PRs of non-cyclic heifers than cyclic heifers. Moreover, this study reveals that the initial P4 levels of non-cyclic animals should be used as a determinant for pregnancy success in dairy heifers.

Timing of early resynchronization protocols affects subsequent pregnancy outcome in dairy cows

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an early resynchronization protocol (Resynch) initiated at different timepoints after timed artificial insemination (TAI) and with unknown pregnancy status. Holstein cows (n = 164) were submitted to the following TAI protocol: D0, insertion of an intravaginal progesterone (P4) device and 2 mg im estradiol benzoate (EB); D8, removal of P4 device and treatment with 0.5 mg im sodium cloprostenol (PGF); D9, 0.1 mg im Lecirelin (LEC); and D10, TAI1. Cows were then randomly assigned to Resynch protocols starting either on day 20 (Resynch20D, n = 82) or 25 after TAI1 (Resynch25D, n = 82) with the insertion of a new P4 device and EB treatment. In both groups, P4 device was removed on day 8 after the beginning of Resynch, the same day of pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography. In pregnant cows there was no further action. Non-pregnant cows were treated with 0.5 mg im PGF, had a blood sample collected for serum P4 analysis and we measured and recorded the size of the largest follicle and the presence or absence of a corpus luteum (CL). One day later, cows were treated with 0.1 mg im LEC and TAI2 occurred 12–14 h later. The diameter of the largest follicle and serum P4 were compared between groups by ANOVA for the main effects of treatment, presence of a CL, and their interaction, whereas pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) and the percentage of cows with a CL on the day of ultrasonography were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Follicle diameter on day 8 of Resynch was greater for cows in the Resynch20D group compared with Resynch25D (15.9 ± 3.9 vs 12.2 ± 2.5 mm, respectively; P = 0.046). The Resynch25D group had a greater percentage of cows with a CL (51.9 vs 18.9%, respectively; P = 0.0008) and higher serum P4 (2.8 ± 1.1 vs 1.7 ± 0.8 ng/mL; P = 0.041) at the end of the protocol compared with Resynch20D. P/AI at TAI1 was 35.4 and 36.6% (P > 0.10) for cows enrolled in Resynch20D and Resynch25D groups, respectively. P/AI to TAI2, after Resynch protocols, was greater in Resynch25D than Resynch20D (44.2 vs 22.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). In conclusion, starting an early resynchronization protocol 25 days after TAI increases P/AI compared with starting 20 days after TAI, and this was associated with a presumed greater proportion of cows with a functional CL at the moment of P4 device removal.

Fixed timed artificial insemination and early resynchronization of ovulation in different categories of ewes in grazing system: Response of multiparous, nulliparous, and lactating ewes during the breeding season

The aims of this study were to: 1) determine if the insertion of a second MAP sponge in ewes 12 days after the first FTAI affects the pregnancy rate; 2) compare the responses to resynchronization protocol in multiparous and nulliparous ewes; and 3) compare the responses to resynchronization protocol in multiparous and postpartum lactating ewes. Three trials were performed with 186 Corriedale ewes: 111 multiparous [(control – CON (n = 60) and synchronization – SYNC groups (n = 51)], forty-two 1.5 yr-old nulliparous (group NUL), and 33 lactating ewes with at least 28 postpartum (group PtP). All ewes were treated with a MAP sponge for 6 days. Twenty-four hours before the sponge withdrawal, all animals received 0.24 mg of cloprostenol sodium and 300 IU of eCG, and 0.05 mg of gonadorelin 36 h after sponge withdrawal and artificially inseminated (AI) 27-30 h after the GnRH administration (Day 0). A second intravaginal sponge was inserted to all groups (except for SYNC group), on Day 12. On Day 17, early pregnancy diagnosis was performed with doppler ultrasound in all ewes. Sponge withdrawal occurred on Day 18, and a new GnRH dose (0.05 mg) was administrated 36 h after it. Once again, AI 27-30 h after the GnRH administration. A final pregnancy diagnosis on Day 42 was performed in all ewes for confirmation of first diagnosis and the data were confirmed by parturition. Ewes in all groups presented estrus signs (SYNCH – 94.1%; CON – 71.7%; NUL – 83.3%; PtP – 39.4% at first AI and CON – 65.2%; NUL – 76.5%; PtP – 62.5% at the second). Pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss were not different between synchronized and resynchronized multiparous ewes (SYNCH – 56.9% vs. CON – 58.3% pregnant at D42 and SYNCH – 5.9% vs. CON – 7.1% fetal loss at D42). No differences were found between resynchronized multiparous and nulliparous ewes at the first FTAI, only fecundity was higher in multiparous ewes [CON – 0.88 vs. NUL – 0.62 (P = 0.04)]. Resynchronized multiparous ewes had higher reproductive performance than postpartum ewes that only presented pregnancy after the second FTAI [CON – 73.3% vs. PtP – 15.1% total pregnancy (P = 0.003)]. Overall, synchronization-resynchronization FTAI treatments may be included in reproductive programs in nulliparous ewes, but the treatments cannot superimpose to the limiting conditions imposed by postpartum lactating status. The resynchronization treatments allow to include practical managements with no deleterious effects in the results of the first FTAI.

Reproductive performance of early- and late-calving dairy cows artificially inseminated after ovulation synchronization and estrous resynchronization or artificially inseminated after observed estrus

Within seasonal dairy systems, cows that calve late in the calving season are less likely to become pregnant and maintain a yearly calving interval. Very few studies have examined effective strategies for reproductive management of these late-calving cows. The objectives were to evaluate the reproductive performance of early- and late-calving dairy cows that were either inseminated after observed estrus (control) or enrolled in a timed AI and resynchronization protocol [progesterone (P4) Ovsynch Resynch)]. Early-calving cows calved during the first week of the calving season, whereas late-calving cows calved after 6 wk but were at least 10 d in milk at study commencement. Three dairy herds participated in the study with 391 cows total. Within each calving group, cows were randomly assigned to P4 Ovsynch Resynch or control (no treatment) in a 2 × 2 experimental design. Artificial insemination continued for 6 wk after mating start date (MSD) and was followed by 6 wk of natural service. The interval from MSD to AI was shorter (11.7 vs. 14.7 d) and the 3-wk pregnancy rate (49.5 vs. 21.2%) and the 6-wk pregnancy rate (60.8 vs. 42.4%) were greater in the early-calving compared with the late-calving control cows. By design, synchronized cows received timed AI on MSD and were not included in the statistical analysis of submission rate and interval from MSD to AI. The proportion of cows that received a second AI was not increased by the progesterone-based resynchronization strategy but was greater in early-calving compared with late-calving cows. The 12-wk pregnancy rate was greater (64.5 vs. 45.0%) in the early-calving synchronized cows compared with the late-calving synchronized cows. The interval from MSD to pregnancy was 6 and 12.6 d shorter for synchronized compared with control cows in the early- and late-calving groups, respectively. The results demonstrated reduced reproductive performance of late-calving cows compared with early-calving cows. Nonetheless, a major improvement to reproductive performance was achieved by targeting late-calving cows with a synchronization program, even when cows were only 20 to 50 DIM at first AI. Resynchronization of estrus with a progesterone device only, however, was not sufficient to increase the proportion of nonpregnant cows that received a second AI.

Early resynchronization protocols for goats: Progestogens can be used prior to an early pregnancy diagnosis without affecting corpus luteum functionality.

This study aimed to evaluate the exogenous progesterone (P4) effect on the luteal function from Day 16 to Day 21 of the oestrous cycle in inseminated goats with unknown pregnancy status. A total of 54 does passed through a short progestin-based synchronization protocol and, on Day 16 of the following oestrous cycle, 27 does received a new P4 device which was retained until Day 21. Blood samples were collected daily from all does during this period, as well as on Day 24. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on Day 30. Serum P4 values from 26 animals (GNPSP : Group of non-pregnant does with second sponge: n=8; GNPNSP : Group of non-pregnant does without second sponge: n=6; GPSP : Group of pregnant does with second sponge: n=5; GPNSP : Group of pregnant does without second sponge: n=7) were determined by radioimmunoassay commercial kits. No P4 differences were found between groups (GNPSP : 3.1±2.8; 1.7±1.8; 0.4±1.0; and 0.0±0.0 vs. GNPNSP : 4.4±1.8; 3.0±2.2; 0.8±0.8; and 0.0±0.0 or GPSP : 4.2±1.0; 3.4±0.6; 3.3±1.6; 3.2±0.9; 3.6±1.2; 3.5±1.3; 2.7±1.3 vs. GPNSP : 4.4±1.6; 3.6±1.5; 3.7±1.5; 3.8±1.4; 3.2±1.2; 3.1±1.2; 3.6±1.1; D16, D17, D18, D19, D20, D21, D24, respectively) or for the interaction of group and time. In conclusion, a second progestogen device had no effect on luteolysis or early pregnancy in the following oestrous cycle.

Effect of progesterone supplementation in a resynchronization protocol on follicular dynamics and pregnancy success

The objective of this study was to evaluate the necessity of a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) in a fixed-time AI resynchronization protocol as well as to compare a commercially available blood pregnancy test with transrectal ultrasonography for Day 28 pregnancy detection. Over a two-year period, beef cows and heifers from twelve herds were inseminated using the 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol. On Day 21 following the first insemination, the protocol was repeated, with animals receiving either a CIDR or no CIDR. Pregnancy status (AI1) was determined on Day 28 by both transrectal ultrasonography and the IDEXX Rapid Visual Pregnancy Test. Non-pregnant animals by both methods (CIDR: n = 190 cows, n = 228 heifers; no CIDR: n = 185 cows, n = 223 heifers) received an injection of Prostaglandin F2alpha and were inseminated at the appropriate time or bred following detection of estrus. Corpora lutea (CL) number and largest follicle diameter were recorded on a subset of non-pregnant animals (CIDR: n = 66 cows, n = 46 heifers; no CIDR: n = 76 cows, n = 41 heifers) at time of pregnancy diagnosis on Day 28. Final pregnancy status was determined a minimum of 31 days following the second AI (AI2). The GLIMMIX procedure of SAS was utilized for estrus and pregnancy data; while the MIXED procedure was utilized for analyses of CL number and largest follicle diameter. There was no effect (P ≥ 0.55) of treatment on AI1 pregnancy, AI2 pregnancy, or overall pregnancy rates. The presence of a CIDR during the resynchronization increased (P < 0.001) estrus expression prior to AI2. There was an effect of treatment by age on AI2 pregnancy (P < 0.01); heifers that received a CIDR had greater AI2 pregnancy rates than heifers that did not receive a CIDR (P = 0.04), but there was no difference between cows with and without a CIDR. Treatment had no effect (P > 0.10) on embryonic loss (between the first and second pregnancy diagnosis), CL number, or follicle diameter. Although, there was a tendency for the interaction of treatment by age on follicle size (P = 0.07), with cows having larger follicles than heifers in the no CIDR group but not the CIDR group. In conclusion, use of a CIDR in this resynchronization protocol increased estrus expression, increased AI2 pregnancy for heifers, but did not improve pregnancies in cows, and did not influence overall pregnancy or embryonic loss.

170 Embryonic loss and pregnancy rate in response to resynchronisation using oestradiol benzoate or injectable progesterone at 14 days after timed AI in Bos taurus×Bos indicus beef heifers

The effect of the exposure of pregnant cattle to oestradiol benzoate (EB) or injectable long-acting progesterone (iP4), as well as their use for early resynchronisation of non-pregnant (NP) females within the second week after timed AI (TAI), is yet to be assessed. This study aimed to assess the pregnancy rate and embryonic loss of cross-bred Bos taurus×Bos indicus beef heifers in response to an EB- or iP4-based resynchronisation strategy implemented 14 days after the first TAI. A total of 677 cyclic heifers (Braford and Brangus; 24 months old) were subjected to an EB/P4 synchronisation protocol for the first TAI (Day 0=TAI). On Day 14, all heifers received a new P4 intravaginal device (1g, Sincrogest, Ourofino Saúde Animal) and were randomly assigned to two groups: EB (1mg intramuscularly, Sincrodiol; n=339) or iP4 (75 mg intramuscularly, Sincrogest Injetável; n=338). On Day 22, P4 devices were removed and heifers underwent colour Doppler ultrasonography evaluation. Non-pregnant females were identified by the assessment of structural regression of the corpus luteum, as previously reported by our group. On Day 22, NP heifers received 1mg of oestradiol cipionate (SincroCP), 250µg of sodium cloprostenol (Sincrocio), and 200IU of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (SincroeCG), and they were inseminated on Day 24. On Day 22, the diameter of the preovulatory follicle (POF) was also recorded. Pregnancy was diagnosed via B-mode ultrasonography on Days 35-40 and 54. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (ver. 9.2, SAS Institute Inc.). The MIXED procedure was used to evaluate the POF diameter, and the GLIMMIX procedure was used to develop a multivariate model including treatment, breed, age, farm (1-7), and possible interactions of treatment with farm, breed, and age to evaluate the binomial data (pregnancy rates and embryonic loss). In NP heifers, the diameter of the POF on Day 22 did not differ (P&amp;gt;0.05) between the EB (9.77±0.25mm) and iP4 (9.92±0.22 mm) groups. Exposure to EB or iP4 on Day 14 post-TAI did not influence pregnancy rates as assessed on Day 22 (56.3% (191/339) vs. 60.1% (203/338)) and on Days 35-40 (49.6% (168/339) vs. 53.3% (180/338)). In addition, embryonic loss between Days 22 and 35-40 was not different between the EB (12%, 23/191) and iP4 (11.3%, 23/203) groups. On the other hand, pregnancy rates in heifers submitted to the second TAI were greater (P=0.01) in the EB group (45.95%, 68/148) than in the iP4 group (31.85%, 43/135). In conclusion, improved pregnancy rates can be achieved using 1mg of EB associated with a P4 intravaginal device on Day 14 of the resynchronisation protocol without affecting the first TAI pregnancy rates and embryonic loss. However, further investigation is warranted to assess the lower pregnancy rates obtained in response to the association of iP4 and P4 device. This research was supported by FAPESP (2015/10606-9; 2019/15514-6), Graduate Studies Support Program (PAPG-UNIPAMPA), and Ourofino Saúde Animal.

Fertility response of lactating dairy cows subjected to three different breeding programs under subtropical conditions

BackgroundIt is comprehensively recognized that reduced reproductive efficiency represents a great economic loss to dairy producers. Ovarian cysts and anestrus syndromes are considered the greatest significant causes of low reproductive efficiency in dairy herds worldwide as they detrimentally affect the longevity and profitability of dairy herd. Pregnancy rate is the best available single deciding parameter used for assessment of the reproductive efficiency at the herd level which measures the probability that open cows become pregnant per unit of time. So, the current study was planned to evaluate the suitability of using Ovsynch plus CIDR and G6G resynchronization protocols as an efficient treatment regimen for cystic ovarian diseased cows and anestrus cows, respectively, through comparing pregnancy rates of cystic ovarian diseased cows that subjected to Ovsynch supplemented with controlled internal drug release device with the pregnancy rate of healthy cows that subjected to a Presynch-Ovsynch synchronization protocol, as well as through comparing pregnancy rates of anestrus cows that subjected to G6G treatment protocol with the pregnancy rate of healthy cows. Moreover, possible factors such as breed, parity, and season which may affect the treatment success were also evaluated.ResultsThe results of the current study revealed an overall mean pregnancy rate of 36.64%. Moreover, Simmental cows recorded a greater (p < 0.01) pregnancy rate (45.16%) than that recorded for Holstein cows (34.98%). A highly significant seasonal effect was observed, as a higher (p < 0.01) pregnancy rate was recorded for cows inseminated during cold months (39.54%) compared with that recorded for cows inseminated during hot months (29.18%).ConclusionsNo significant differences were detected in the pregnancy rates among the three breeding programs; thence, the application of the G6G synchronization protocol for anestrus cows and Ovsynch-CIDR synchronization protocol for cows with ovarian cysts could be used as effective treatment regimens as they resulted in nearly the same pregnancy rates that recorded for healthy cows. In addition, the treatment response was highly influenced by cow’s breed, parity, and season of breeding.