Response Rate Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Research Articles

Study on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TTC and FTC regimens for the treatment of breast cancer

Objective To investigate the efficacy of TTC and FTC regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods Collecting clinical data of 325 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TIC and FTC regimens from June 2004 to April 2008, among them 138 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TTC regimen in one group, and 187 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CTF regimen in the other group. The expression of Topo Ⅱ a in specimen of 325 patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were detected by immunohistochemical method. Results Among the 325 cases of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the overall response rate (RR) was 87.7 % in TIC arm and 67.4 % in FTC arm (P=0.000), but in the group of Topo Ⅱ a(+) Her-2(-), the overall response rate (RR) was 87.8 % in TTC arm and 79.4 % in FTC arm (P=0.266), and in the groups of Topo Ⅱ a(-), there was statistical significance; the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) was 13.7 % in TIC ann and 11.2 % in CTF ann (P=0.491). Conclusion TIC regimen is superior to FTC regimen in the response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but patients with negative expression of Topo Ⅱ a may get more benefits from 9eoadjuvant taxane and anthracycline chemotherapy. Key words: Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Topoisomerase Ⅱa; TIC; FTC; Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols

Clinicopathologic and prognostic features of triple-negative breast cancer analyzed in registration data of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, 11705 cases

e22122 Background: Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers which are negative for ER, PgR, and HER2 by immunohistochemistry are associated with a poor prognosis. To clarify the characteristics of TN tumors, the data of the registration committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society were analyzed with respect to clinicopathologic factors, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and prognosis. Methods: Of 14,748 cases that were registered in 2004, 11,705 cases (79.4%) were examined for ER, PgR, and HER2 status, which was based on local institute. In the 2,331 cases of all registered cases, the prognosis and details of the treatment were analyzed with 47.8 months as median follow-up period. In 184 cases (7.9%), NAC was mainly performed using anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy. Results: Luminal A type with positive for ER and/or PgR and negative for HER2 was most prevalent (53.8%), followed by TN type (15.5%). TN cancers were diagnosed at a slightly advanced stage and more of the cases had lymph node metastases compared to other types. Mucinous or tubular carcinoma was frequently seen in the Luminal A type. Squamous cell, spindle cell carcinoma, or metaplastic carcinoma with bone/cartilage metaplasia was found in only TN type. The HER2 type and TN type had statistically worse outcome compared to Luminal type in DFS and OS (P<.0001 and P<.0001, respectively). Pathological response rate of NAC, including grade 2 and 3, was higher in TN tumor as 51.5 % (22/53) than in Luminal A tumor as 16.7% (12/72). Responders in TN tumors have a better prognosis than non-responder (P=.0016), but this tendency was not recognized in non-TN tumors (P=.15). Conclusions: The ratio of the TN tumors in Japan was 15–6%. Central reviews of immunohistochemistry, such as ER, PgR, HER2, CK5/6, EGFR etc, will be confirmed in this cohort, for TN tumors are similar to basal-like tumors discriminated by gene- profiling. [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Adriamycin in Breast Cancer; Clincopathologic Factors Influencing to Response Rate

Purpose: The objective of this study was to test the efficacy and toxicity of adriamycin plus docetaxel as the primary chemotherapy for women with advanced breast carcinoma, and including those patients with inflammatory breast cancer. Our study also evaluated the clinicopathologic factors influencing the response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Twenty-eight patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2002 and 2004 were included for this study. The patients were treated with adriamycin (50 mg/m2 ; intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 ; 1-hr intravenous infusion) on the first day of each cycle for an average four cycles. We analysed the response rate to adjuvant chemotherapy by reviewing the post operative pathologic report. Additionally we compared the clincopathologic factors related to the response rate. Statistical analyses were performed with 2 -tests and using SPSS 11.0. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 48.9 yr old (range 29-63 yr). The tumoral response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was, 3 patients (10.7%) showed a complete response ( CR), 21 patients (75%) showed a partial response (PR). and which about lymph node were that 15 patients (75%) have shown responder, 5 patients (25%) have shown non-responder. The overall response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 85.7%. The preoperative serum-CEA level was influenced the response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was recorded in 81.9% of the patients (N=59/72). Grade 3 or 4 anemia was recorded in 2.8% of the patients. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with adriamycin plus docetaxel was effective treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. The preoperative serum CEA level colud be the important factor for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy response rate.

Phase III randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical hysterectomy (RH) versus RH for bulky stage I/II cervical cancer (JCOG 0102)

5013 Background: NAC may represent an alternative to conventional RH for locally advanced cervical cancer. We compared NAC followed by RH with RH for bulky stage I/II cervical cancer. Methods: Patients (pts) with stage IB2, IIA (> 4 cm), or IIB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were randomly assigned to receive either BOMP (bleomycin 7mg day 1–5, vincristine 0.7mg/m2 day 5, mitomycin 7mg/m2 day 5 and cisplatin 14 mg/m2 day 1–5,) q21 days, 2 to 4 cycles followed by radical hysterectomy (NAC arm) or undergo RH (RH arm). Pts with positive surgical margins, metastatic nodes, infiltration to parametrium, and/or deep myometrial invasion received postoperative irradiation. Eligibility included preserved organ function, aged 20–70, and Performance Status 0 or 1. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) to be compared by log-rank test. Assuming 100 eligible pts in each arm, the study had 80% power to detect a 15% increase in 5-year survival at 0.05 one-sided alpha. Results: 134 pts (67 NAC, 67 RH) were randomized between 12/01 and 08/05. The first planned interim analysis was performed in July 2005 using data from 108 pts registered as of 11/04. Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended to terminate the study because overall survival in NAC arm was inferior to that in RH arm (HR 2.11, multiplicity adjusted 99% CI 0.34 to 13.2) and the predictive probability of significant superiority using Spiegelhalter’s method of NAC arm was extremely low (6.4%). No increase of operability and no decrease of surgery-related morbidity were observed in NAC arm. Response Rate of NAC was 61% (33 of 54) using RECIST criteria. One-year progression-free survival and overall survival, updated as of 05/05, were 69.9% and 91.8% (95% CI 84.1–99.6) in NAC arm and 78.6% and 95.4% (95% CI 89.1–100) in RH arm respectively. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with BOMP regimen followed by radical hysterectomy did not demonstrate clinical benefit, and conventional radical hysterectomy still remains to be a standard treatment option for bulky stage I/II cervical cancer. [Table: see text]

A clinicopathologic study on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

To explore the clinicopathological changes of non-small cell lung cancer tissues after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MVP (MMC+VDS+DDP) regimen and its concordance with clinical evaluation, and to study the clinical value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 84 patients with NSCLC were randomized into combinated therapy group (42 cases) and surgical group (42 cases). The combinated therapy group were given MVP regimen for 2 cycles before operation and 2-4 cycles after operation, however, the surgical group only received surgical treatment. The efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy were determined by pathologic examination under light microscope and electron microscope and clinical evaluation. Combinated therapy group showed various degrees of degeneration and necrosis of tumor cells, which was not found in surgical group. The overall response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 59.5% (25/42) by both pathological and clinical evaluation. The coincidence ratio of the two evaluation methods was 71.4% (Kappa value=0.407,P < 0.01). Between the two groups, there was a significant difference in total survival rate (P=0.047). And further analysis showed that survival rate was remarkably different in patients with stage III between the two groups (P=0.037), but not in those with stage I and II (P > 0.05). Degeneration and necrosis with fibrosis are the main pathological phenotypes of the primary lesion after induction chemotherapy, which can be showed by clinical evaluation to chemotherapy efficacy. The preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may be benefical to patients with stage-III NSCLC.

Statistical analysis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma--multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and evaluation of therapeutic modalities

Ninety-one cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma initially treated at Keio University Hospital between July 1981 and June 1996 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 83 males and 8 females, aged from 29 to 83 years old, with an average age of 62.7. The primary lesion was located in the lateral wall in 52 patients (57.1%), the superior wall in 23 (25.3%), the anterior wall in 14 (15.4%) and the posterior wall in 2 (2.2%). Double cancer was detected in 21 patients (23.1%). The patients were divided into two groups according to the initial main treatment of the primary lesion without regard to chemotherapy: 72 patients (79.1%) who received curative radiotherapy with or without salvage surgery, and 14 patients (15.4%) who underwent curative surgery with or without preoperative and/or postoperative radiation. The remaining 5 patients were treated by chemotherapy alone. Prior to the above treatments 50 patients (54.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Survival distributions were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method as univariate analysis, and compared by the generalized Wilcoxon test. The overall five-year cumulative survival rate was 55.6%. The five-year survival rates according to stage (UICC classification, 1987) were as follows: stage I (11 cases), 70.7%; stage II (12 cases), 63. 6%; stage III (30 cases), 52.3%; and stage IV (38 cases), 52.5%. Significant clinicopathological variables that influenced survival were: (1) T stage (p = 0.0075); (2) age (p = 0.0274); and (3) location of primary lesion (p = 0.0400). The results of multivariate analysis by Cox's proportional hazards model identified T stage as a significant independent prognostic factor. Evaluation of the therapeutic modalities led to the following conclusions. (1) Differences in the initial treatments of the primary lesion were not reflected in the outcome. (2) Salvage surgery for residual or recurrent tumor contributed to improving the survival. The superior wall type, in particular, seemed to be a good indication for salvage surgery. (3) Although the limitations of radiotherapy are not defined clearly, we have to determine the indications for radical resection of tumors resistant to radiotherapy with reconstruction. (4) The response rate of NAC reached 85.4%, but there were no significant differences in survival between the group that underwent NAC and the other group in any other subset analyses. (5) Among the patients who underwent NAC, the responder (CR + PR) group showed a better five-year survival rate (61.3%) than the non-responder (NC + PD) group (42.9%), but the difference was not significant.