Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent Research Articles

Everolimus-Eluting Xience V/Promus Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Resolute Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

This study sought to compare everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in terms of patient- or stent-related clinical outcomes in an "all-comer" group of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. DM significantly increases the risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention. The efficacy and safety of second-generation drug-eluting stents, in particular EES versus ZES, in patients with DM have not been extensively evaluated. Patients with DM (1,855 of 5,054 patients, 36.7%) from 2 prospective registries (the EXCELLENT [Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting] registry and RESOLUTE-Korea [Registry to Evaluate the Efficacy of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent]) who were treated with EES (n = 1,149) or ZES (n = 706) were compared. Stent-related outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), and patient-oriented composite events were a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization. Despite a higher risk patient profile in the ZES group, both TLF (43 of 1,149 [3.7%] vs. 25 of 706 [3.5%], p = 0.899) and patient-oriented composite events (104 of 1,149 [9.1%] vs. 72 of 706 [10.2%], p = 0.416) were similar between the EES and ZES in patients with DM at 1 year. In those without DM, EES and ZES also showed comparable incidence of TLF (39 of 1,882 [2.1%] vs. 33 of 1,292 [2.6%], p = 0.370) and patient-oriented composite events (119 of 1,882 [6.3%] vs. 81 of 1,292 [6.3%], p = 0.951), which were all significantly lower than in the DM patients. These results were corroborated by similar findings from the propensity score-matched cohort. Upon multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure was the most powerful predictor of TLF in DM patients (hazard ratio: 4.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.91 to 10.09, p < 0.001). After unrestricted use of second-generation drug-eluting stents in all-comers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention, both EES and ZES showed comparable clinical outcomes in the patients with DM up to 1 year of follow-up. DM compared with non-DM patients showed significantly worse patient- and stent-related outcomes. Nonetheless, overall incidences of TLF were low, even in the patients with DM, suggesting excellent safety and efficacy of both types of second-generation drug-eluting stents in this high-risk subgroup of patients.

Performance of the resolute zotarolimus‐eluting stent in small vessels

Drug eluting stents for the treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease have traditionally yielded inferior clinical outcomes compared to the use of DES in large vessels. The benefit of the second-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in small vessels was examined. Two-year clinical outcomes from five combined R-ZES studies were compared between patients with small (reference vessel diameter [RVD] ≤2.5 mm; n = 1,956) and large (RVD >2.5 mm; n = 3174) vessels. Despite a higher incidence of comorbidities in the small vessel group, there was no significant difference in target lesion failure (TLF) (10.1% vs. 8.7%; P = 0.54) at 2 years. When the subgroup of patients with diabetes was examined (n = 1,553) there was no significant difference in 2-year TLF in small compared to large vessels (11.2% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.17). Similarly, within the small vessel cohort, no significant difference was seen regarding TLF at 2 years between people with and without diabetes (11.2% vs 9.6%; P = 0.28). When used for the treatment of small vessels, the R-ZES appears to provide acceptable clinical results at 2 years when compared to its performance in large vessels.

Balancing ischaemia and bleeding with dual antiplatelet therapy: a resolute endeavour

This editorial refers to ‘Modifying effect of dual antiplatelet therapy on incidence of stent thrombosis according to implanted drug-eluting stent type’[†][1], by E. Camenzind et al. , on page 1932 and ‘Lack of association between dual antiplatelet therapy use and stent thrombosis between 1 and 12 months following Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation’[‡][2], by S. Silber et al. , on page 1949. The most devastating complication after stent implantation is sudden, thrombotic coronary occlusion, which results in myocardial infarction (MI) in 80–90% of patients and death in 20–30%. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and an ADP receptor antagonist is the foundation to prevent stent thrombosis (ST).1 Whereas drug-eluting stents (DES) are more effective than bare metal stents (BMS) in preventing restenosis and recurrent ischaemia, DES susceptibility to ST is increased by delayed endothelialization, polymer hypersensitivity, and other mechanisms,2 necessitating prolonged DAPT. Long-term DAPT may have additional benefits by preventing atherothrombotic events in patients with vascular disease.3 However, DAPT increases major bleeding, the occurrence of which is strongly associated with subsequent mortality.4 Striking the right balance between ischaemic and bleeding complications by fine-tuning the potency and duration of DAPT is essential to optimize DES outcomes. First-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) were approved based on the basis of double-blind randomized trials in which DAPT was used for 3–6 months. Thereafter, reports of late ST resulted in recommendations for DAPT for 1 year or longer, without randomized evidence to support this endorsement. These guidelines have been carried forward to newer generation DES, despite randomized trials demonstrating enhanced safety and effectiveness with these devices compared with their earlier … [1]: #fn-2 [2]: #fn-3

Complex patients treated with zotarolimus‐eluting resolute and everolimus‐eluting xience V stents in the randomized TWENTE trial: Comparison of 2‐year clinical outcome

To assess the differences in clinical outcome between complex patients treated with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) versus Xience V everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Nowadays, many complex patients with coronary disease are treated with percutaneous coronary interventions, using drug-eluting stents (DES). We analyzed 2-year outcome data of 1,033 complex patients of the TWENTE trial, treated with second-generation Resolute ZES or Xience V EES. Complex patients had at least one of the following characteristics: renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥ 140 µmol/l); ejection fraction < 30%; acute myocardial infarction (MI) within previous 72 hrs; >1 lesion/vessel; >2 vessels treated; lesion length > 27 mm; bifurcation; saphenous vein graft lesion; arterial bypass graft lesion; in-stent restenosis; unprotected left main lesion; lesion with thrombus; or lesion with total occlusion. Target vessel failure (TVF), the primary composite endpoint of the trial, was defined as cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, or target vessel revascularization. Among the 1,033 complex patients, 529 (51%) were treated with Resolute ZES and 504 (49%) with Xience V EES. Patient- and procedure-related characteristics were similar between DES groups. After 2-year follow-up, outcome was also similar between DES groups. TVF occurred in 12.1% of patients treated with Resolute ZES and 12.3% of patients treated with Xience V EES. In addition, DES groups did not differ significantly in cardiac death, MI, or target vessel revascularization-the individual components of TVF. Complex patients treated with Resolute ZES and Xience V EES showed similar safety and efficacy during 2-year follow-up. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

4-Year Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Repeat Revascularization in Patients Treated With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Report From the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)

The aim of the study was to investigate 4-year outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) and XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois) in the RESOLUTE (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) All-Comers trial. Data on long-term outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents are limited, and predictors of repeat revascularization due to restenosis and/or progression of disease are largely unknown. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with the R-ZES (n = 1,140) or the EES (n = 1,152). We assessed pre-specified safety and efficacy outcomes at 4 years including target lesion failure and stent thrombosis. Predictors of revascularization at 4 years were identified by Cox regression analysis. At 4 years, the rates of target lesion failure (15.2% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.68), cardiac death (5.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.44), and target vessel myocardial infarction (5.3% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.00), clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.62), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.23) were similar with the R-ZES and EES. Independent predictors of TLR were age, insulin-treated diabetes, SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, treatment of saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, and in-stent restenosis. Independent predictors of any revascularization were age, diabetes, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, absence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, smaller reference vessel diameter, SYNTAX score, and treatment of left anterior descending, right coronary artery, saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, or in-stent restenosis. R-ZES and EES demonstrated similar safety and efficacy throughout 4 years. TLR represented less than one-half of all repeat revascularization procedures. Patient- and lesion-related factors predicting the risk of TLR and any revascularization showed considerable overlap. (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084).

Lack of association between dual antiplatelet therapy use and stent thrombosis between 1 and 12 months following resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following the use of new generation drug-eluting stents is unknown. The association between DAPT interruption and the rates of stent thrombosis (ST) and cardiac death/target-vessel myocardial infarction (CD/TVMI) in patients receiving a Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) was analysed in 4896 patients from the pooled RESOLUTE clinical programme. Daily acetylsalicylate (ASA) and a thienopyridine for 6-12 months were prescribed. A DAPT interruption was defined as any interruption of ASA and/or a thienopyridine of >1 day; long interruptions were >14 days. Three groups were analysed: no interruption, interruption during the first month, and >1-12 months. There were 1069 (21.83%) patients with a DAPT interruption and 3827 patients with no interruption. Among the 166 patients in the 1-month interruption group, 6 definite/probable ST events occurred (3.61%; all long DAPT interruptions), and among the 903 patients in the >1-12 months (60% occurred between 6 and 12 months) interruption group, 1 ST event occurred (0.11%; 2-day DAPT interruption). Among patients with no DAPT interruption, 32 ST events occurred (0.84%). Rates of CD/TVMI were 6.84% in the 1-month long interruption group, 1.41% in the >1-12 months long interruption group, and 4.08% in patients on continuous DAPT. In a pooled population of patients receiving an R-ZES, DAPT interruptions within 1 month are associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy interruptions between 1 and 12 months were associated with low rates of ST and adverse cardiac outcomes. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine whether early temporary or permanent interruption of DAPT is truly safe. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00617084; NCT00726453; NCT00752128; NCT00927940.

CRT-170 Radial and Femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an International Registry: Post-Hoc Analysis of the Deliver Study

DELIVER was a prospective, multicenter, all-comers registry to assess the deliverability of the Resolute Integrity™ zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). In-hospital clinical outcomes and resource utilization following radial and femoral access implantations are compared in a post-hoc analysis.

Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents vs. durable-polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and Bayesian approach network meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biodegradable-polymer (BP) drug-eluting stents (DES), bare metal stents (BMS), and durable-polymer DES in patients undergoing coronary revascularization, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis using a Bayesian framework. Study stents included BMS, paclitaxel-eluting (PES), sirolimus-eluting (SES), endeavor zotarolimus-eluting (ZES-E), cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting (CoCr-EES), platinium-chromium everolimus-eluting (PtCr-EES), resolute zotarolimus-eluting (ZES-R), and BP biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES). After a systematic electronic search, 113 trials with 90 584 patients were selected. The principal endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) defined according to the Academic Research Consortium within 1 year. Biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents [OR, 0.56; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.33-0.90], SES (OR, 0.53; 95% CrI, 0.38-0.73), CoCr-EES (OR, 0.34; 95% CrI, 0.23-0.52), and PtCr-EES (OR, 0.31; 95% CrI, 0.10-0.90) were all superior to BMS in terms of definite or probable ST within 1 year. Cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents demonstrated the lowest risk of ST of all stents at all times after stent implantation. Biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents was associated with a higher risk of definite or probable ST than CoCr-EES (OR, 1.72; 95% CrI, 1.04-2.98). All DES reduced the need for repeat revascularization, and all but PES reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared with BMS. All DESs but PES and ZES-E were superior to BMS in terms of ST within 1 year. Cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents was safer than any DES even including BP-BES. Our results suggest that not only the biodegradability of polymer, but the optimal combination of stent alloy, design, strut thickness, polymer, and drug all combined determine the safety of DES.

Clinical and angiographic evaluation of the resolute zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent in Japanese patients – long-term outcome in the RESOLUTE Japan and RESOLUTE Japan small vessel study.

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the RESOLUTE(TM)zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES; Medtronic, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in Japanese patients for the treatment of de novo native coronary lesions. Both RESOLUTE Japan (R-Japan) and RESOLUTE Japan Small Vessel Study (R-Japan SVS) were prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational studies. R-Japan enrolled 100 patients (reference vessel diameter, 2.5-3.5 mm) and R-Japan SVS enrolled 65 patients (at least 1 lesion suitable for 2.25-mm stent) treated with R-ZES. In R-Japan, in-stent late lumen loss (LLL; the primary endpoint) at 8 months was 0.12 ± 0.22 mm and volume obstruction on intravascular ultrasound was 2.33 ± 3.51%. At 4 years, there were no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR); the target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven TLR) was 5.6% (5/90). In R-Japan SVS, in-stent LLL at 9 months was 0.27 ± 0.33 mm, TLF (primary endpoint) was 4.6% (3/65), without incidence of TLR. At 3 years, TLF was 7.9% (5/63) and clinically driven TLR, 3.2% (2/63). R-Japan and R-Japan SVS demonstrate substantial suppression of neointimal hyperplasia, low LLL, and excellent and sustained long-term clinical outcome with R-ZES in Japanese patients.

One-Year Outcomes from an All-Comers Chinese Population of Patients Implanted With the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent

The RESOLUTE China Registry is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers, observational study of patients in China implanted with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). R-ZES was commercially available before the enrollment began. All patients suitable for R-ZES implantation according to applicable guidelines were candidates for enrollment at 30 centers and were treated per standard hospital practice. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was prescribed for a minimum of 6 months per current European Society of Cardiology guidelines and the device instructions for use. There were 1,800 patients enrolled with a mean age of 61.3 ± 10.9 years, 76% of patients were men, and 61% had complex disease. DAPT use was 94% at 1 year. Target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year was 3.5% (95% confidence interval 2.7% to 4.5%). The rate of cardiac death was 0.6%, target vessel myocardial infarction 2.3%, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization 0.9%. The 1-year rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.5% (8 of 1,750); 0.4% (7 of 1,750) occurred early (0 to 30 days) and 1 event occurred late (1 to 12 months). One stent thrombosis occurred in a patient who had an interruption of DAPT within the first month; all other stent thromboses occurred while on DAPT. Outcomes did not differ significantly between monitored and unmonitored patients (difference in target lesion failure, p = 0.264). In conclusion, the RESOLUTE China Registry confirms the safety and effectiveness of R-ZES in a large real-world Chinese population.

Angiographic and clinical comparison of novel Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents and Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents in all-comers with coronary artery disease (ORIENT trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent is a newly developed third-generation drug-eluting stent, featuring a unique dual-polymer mix. An active bioabsorbable polymer delivers the anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, via controlled release, while a passive biocompatible polymeric coating shields the metallic strut from surrounding tissue, preventing interaction. To date, the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent has excelled in terms of late lumen loss at 9 months in a first-in-man single-arm trial. However, the efficacy and safety data for Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents in a broader population of all-comers are limited. The present study offers an angiographic and clinical comparison of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent and the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.Methods/designThe ORIENT trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent relative to the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent. A total of 375 patients with a spectrum of coronary artery disease will undergo prospective, random assignment to a Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent or Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (2:1 ratio), for a primary endpoint of in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary 12-month clinical endpoints are death, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization and target vessel-related myocardial infarction).DiscussionThe ORIENT trial is the first study to date comparing the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent with the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent for efficacy and safety in a population of all-comers with coronary artery disease.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01826552

Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice: comprehensive network meta-analysis

Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of durable polymer drug eluting stents (DES) and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents (biolimus-ES).Design Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Data sources and study...

Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries III (PRISON III): a randomised comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions

We investigated whether sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) are superior to next-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in treating patients with total coronary occlusions (TCO). In a prospective, randomised trial we compared the SES with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor or Resolute) after successful recanalisation of TCO. During the first phase of the trial, 51 patients were assigned to receive the SES and 46 patients to receive the Endeavor ZES. In the second phase we randomised 103 patients to the SES group and 104 patients to the Resolute ZES group. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at eight-month follow-up. At eight months, patients in the SES group had less in-segment and in-stent late loss as compared to the Endeavor group: -0.13±0.3 mm vs. 0.27±0.6 mm (p=0.0002) and -0.13±0.5 mm vs. 0.54±0.5 mm (p<0.0001), respectively. In contrast, the SES and the Resolute ZES showed comparable amounts of in-segment (-0.03±0.7 mm vs. -0.10±0.7 mm, p=0.6) and in-stent (0.03±0.8 mm vs. 0.05±0.8 mm, p=0.9) late loss. In the treatment of TCOs, the SES was associated with superior angiographic outcomes compared to the Endeavor ZES. On the other hand, the SES and the Resolute ZES showed comparable angiographic outcomes.

Nine‐Month Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Outcomes After Resolute Zotarolimus‐Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of In‐Stent Restenosis

We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implantation for in-stent restenosis (ISR). There has been a paucity of data regarding the effects of new-generation drug-eluting stent to treat ISR. From 2009 to 2010, a total of 98 patients with 98 ISR lesions were prospectively enrolled after R-ZES implantation for the treatment of ISR. Among 98 patients, 73 patients underwent follow-up angiography at 9 months. Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at both postprocedure and 9 months was evaluated in 55 patients. The overlapped segment of R-ZES was defined as the portion of R-ZES superimposed on previous stent. Late loss and binary restenosis rate were 0.3 ± 0.5 mm and 5.5% at 9 months. On IVUS, the percentage of neointimal volume and maximum percentage of neointimal area were 3.9 ± 6.3% and 17.3 ± 15.5%, respectively. There was no significant change of vessel volume index between postprocedure and 9 months (16.9 ± 4.7 mm³ /mm vs. 17.1 ± 4.6 mm³ /mm, P = 0.251). Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 5 (5/55, 9.1%) cases. Compared with nonoverlapped segments of R-ZES, the overlapped did not show larger neointimal volume index (0.3 ± 0.5 mm³ /mm vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 mm³ /mm, P = 0.187) on 9-month IVUS. During follow-up (median, 353 days), repeat target-lesion revascularization was performed in four cases, but there were no death or stent thrombosis. This study suggested that R-ZES implantation for the treatment of ISR was effective up to 9 months and showed favorable vascular responses on serial IVUS assessment.

First- versus second-generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary bifurcations

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease are associated with comparable, if not improved, clinical outcomes as compared to those of their first-generation counterparts. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes associated with first- versus second-generation DESs for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. This was a retrospective study of consecutive de novo bifurcation lesions, excluding those at the left main, treated with either second-generation DES (everolimus-eluting or resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents) between October 2006 and October 2011 (199 bifurcation lesions in 192 patients) or first-generation DES (sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents) between April 2002 and December 2005 (289 bifurcation lesions in 273 patients). Second-generation DES use in this setting was associated with less major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (23.1% vs. 14.4%, p=0.02) as well as lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates (15.5% vs. 8.3%, p=0.01) at 2-year follow-up. Target lesion revascularization, both per patient (12.6% vs. 7.4%, p=0.02) and per bifurcation (11.8% vs. 7.0%, p=0.03), was also improved with second-generation DES over the same follow-up period. Propensity-score adjusted analysis suggested that second-generation DES was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.85; p=0.01) and TVR (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.83; p=0.01). Our results suggest that the use of second-generation DES for the treatment of bifurcation lesions is associated with better clinical outcomes as compared to first-generation DES, largely due to a lower need for repeat revascularization.

TCT-471 Relation of Stent Thrombosis to Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent Implantation

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is utilized for varying durations following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with stable coronary artery disease, largely based on concerns of stent thrombosis (ST). A prior analysis of 5371 patients undergoing Resolute(tm) zotarolimus-eluting stent

TCT-210 Clinical Outcomes Following Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Patients Suitable for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: Insights From a Multicenter Italian Registry

Diabetes mellitus remains a significant predictor of adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes after 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in diabetics remains ill-defined. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the Resolute

Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Artery DisEase in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus from the ESSENCE-DIABETES II Trial

Angiographic and clinical outcomes remain relatively unfavorable for diabetic patients even after the use of drug-eluting stent. This prospective, multicenter, randomized study compared the relative efficacy and safety of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. The primary end point was noninferiority of angiographic in-segment late loss at 9 months. Clinical events were also monitored for at least 12 months. Patient recruitment was prematurely stopped after enrollment of 256 patients (127 in R-ZES group and 129 in SES) because of discontinuing production of SES. The R-ZES was noninferior to the SES for 9-month in-segment late loss (0.34 ± 0.30 vs 0.39 ± 0.43 mm; difference -0.048; 95% confidence interval -0.157 to 0.061; upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval 0.044; p <0.001 for noninferiority). In addition, in-stent late loss (0.22 ± 0.29 vs 0.21 ± 0.40 mm, p = 0.849) and the rates of in-segment (1.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.119) and in-stent (1.2% vs 3.3%, p = 0.621) binary restenoses were similar between the 2 groups. At 12 months, there were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of any clinical outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, and composite outcomes). In conclusion, despite having reduced power because of early study termination, our study suggests that the R-ZES has noninferior angiographic outcomes at 9 months to the SES in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Comparison of 9-month angiographic outcomes of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in a real world setting of coronary intervention in Korea

BackgroundClinical outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), Everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES), have been reported. However, angiographic follow-up data of new-generation DES are limited, especially in Asians. We investigated the angiographic and clinical outcomes of EES and R-ZES in a real-world setting of Korean patients.MethodsAngiographic and clinical outcomes of 679 patients (866 lesions) who had been treated with EES or R-ZES from Jun 2008 to May 2010 were evaluated. The primary analysis was to compare in-segment late loss at 9 months and the secondary analyses were to compare the clinical outcomes.ResultsIn-segment late loss at 9-month follow-up angiography was 0.23 ± 0.52 mm for EES and 0.29 ± 0.64 mm for R-ZES (p = 0.248). In addition, the rate of binary restenosis did not show between-group differences (5.8% vs. 6.8% for EES and R-ZES, respectively, p = 0.716). During a median follow-up of 33 months, there were no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier estimates of target lesion failure (TLF) (7.5% vs. 7.9% for EES and R-ZES, respectively, p = 0.578) and patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization, 22.8% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.888). The adjusted hazard ratios for TLF and POCO were 0.875 (95% CI 0.427 - 1.793; p = 0.715) and 1.029 (95% CI 0.642 - 1.650; p = 0.904), respectively, for EES over R-ZES in the propensity score matched group analysis.ConclusionsIn Korean patients undergoing new-generation DES implantation for coronary artery disease, EES and R-ZES showed similar angiographic outcomes at 9 months and comparable clinical outcomes during 2.8 years of median follow-up.

Clinical Outcomes of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: 2-Year Results From a Pooled Analysis

This study sought to assess the clinical safety and effectiveness of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) from 2 large trials. ISR treatment is associated with higher rates of subsequent cardiac events compared with treatment of de novo lesions. Although drug-eluting stents (DES) are an option, second-generation DES are largely untested in the treatment of ISR. A total of 3,489 patients were pooled from the RAC (RESOLUTE All Comers) trial and the RESOLUTE International (RINT) registry. Two-year clinical endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion failure (TLF), cardiac death (CD), target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), combined CD or TVMI (CD/TVMI), and Academic Research Consortium definite and probable stent thrombosis (ST). Overall, 281 patients (8.1%) received an R-ZES for ISR. Two-year TLR and TLF rates were significantly higher in ISR patients than in non-ISR patients (TLR: 12.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003; TLF: 17.4% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.007); however, the CD/TVMI rate was not (6.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.711). Seven ISR patients had ST. Two-year outcomes by ISR stent type were similar: bare-metal stent (BMS)-ISR TLR was 12.5% and TLF was 17.2%; DES-ISR TLR was 13.0% and TLF was 18.8%. CD/TVMI was 7.3% and 7.2% for BMS-ISR and DES-ISR, respectively. Using R-ZES to treat ISR appears equally safe in BMS-ISR and DES-ISR, with CD/TVMI rates comparable to 2-year outcomes in other clinical trials. Although revascularization rates are still higher in ISR lesions, the R-ZES offers an effective alternative for treatment of BMS-ISR and DES-ISR. (Randomized, Two-Arm, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Endeavor-Resolute Stent With Abbot Xience-V Stent [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084; and RESOLUTE International Registry: Evaluation of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent System in a 'Real-World' Patient Population [RINT]; NCT00752128).