The surfactant-assisted stabilization of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) in SWCNT/epoxy resin suspensions were investigated for different surfactant types, concentrations, and temperatures using molecular dynamics simulation. One cationic surfactant, i.e. cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), and three anionic surfactants, i.e. sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (NaDDBS), and sodium cholate (SC), as well as a 1:1 mixture of CTAB and SDS were used. Potentials of mean force (PMFs) were generated between two fixed-size (6,6) SWCNTs for all neat (no surfactant) and surfactant-loaded SWCNT/epoxy resin systems at three different surfactant concentrations (0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 wt%) at room (298 K) and elevated temperature (398 K, only for low-surfactant-concentration systems). Overall, two distinct mechanisms of SWCNT stabilization by the surfactants were identified: (1) an increase in the SWCNT aggregation energy barrier due to the wrapping of the SWCNTs by the surfactant molecules, and (2) a constantly positive free energy (repulsion) for all SWCNT separation distances due to the encapsulation of the two approaching SWCNTs. With the second mechanism, there is a delay for the epoxy molecules to be pushed out from the space between the two SWCNTs. With an increase in the surfactant concentration, the first mechanism becomes more prevalent. With an increase in temperature to 398 K, all surfactants migrate to the suspending medium, thereby the second mechanism of SWCNT stabilization dominates. A drop in the SWCNT-surfactant binding energy is observed around 360–370 K, signifying the surfactant migration to the suspending medium. More or less, all surfactants stabilize the SWCNTs in an epoxy resin at one or more surfactant concentrations. However, NaDDBS exhibits a higher SWCNT aggregation barrier at high concentrations and both temperatures (298 K and 398 K), thereby providing a better SWCNT stabilization in the epoxy resin compared to the other surfactants.
Read full abstract