Establishing community organizations at newly resettled residential sites after a disaster is crucial because the management of the living environment and social communication are highly dependent on it, and are linked to social capital. However, depending on how people decide and choose to live, newly resettled residential sites influence the establishment of community organizations, namely, residents’ associations (RAs), in Japan. This study aims to understand these processes, including the successes and difficulties people have experienced before and after settling in their new homes. Interview surveys were conducted with residents and local government officials in charge of residential planning, community establishment, and the support division. Additionally, questionnaire surveys were conducted at three study sites. Consequently, some newly resettled sites were able to have a discussion when selecting the potential resettled sites; most people were essentially from the same original sites, were neighbors, and lived in the same temporary houses where they had already built up bonding social capital. These people established a core group and were able to coordinate with locally elected prefectural or city council members to reach out to city planners to participate in several decision-making processes for the newly resettled sites and houses, which link social capital. However, in some communities, people were gathered from different areas for many reasons, such as losing lottery selections at other sites, preferably selecting a location far away from the seashore, preferring to live with pets, and disadvantaged people who were not able to respond in a timely manner to lottery selection. In these areas, people had more difficulties establishing a new community organization because they had difficulty establishing bonds. Moreover, since this group of people is not able to participate in the decision-making stage of newly resettled sites, selection, and building-type planning, they are simply accepted as planned, which means that they lack both bonding and linking social capital. Each new settlement has different houses and residents, making it unique. Encouraging and recognizing community organization activities and the core group built up in the community must be involved from the very early stages of settlement planning. Both bonding and linking social capital are necessary for a smooth settlement plan. Since establishing RAs can help improve their living environment and plays an important role, consideration needs to be given when a new resettlement site is planned, involving a core group that knows each other to smooth the process.
Read full abstract