BackgroundUrban development impacts on population health and wellbeing through multiple mechanisms. Many issues are considered in urban development decision-making, including amount and type of housing, greenspaces, transport, neighbourhood amenity, safety and community infrastructure. Costs and financial viability are important and public health may not be prioritised. This study seeks to understand how sharing locally-relevant health evidence at key decision points can influence creation of healthier environments. MethodsThe local government of a UK city was developing a spatial regeneration framework for a 15 ha area, changing from predominantly industrial to residential use, alongside community and employment spaces and parks. An embedded researcher worked with the framework's practitioner team (October, 2020 to February, 2024) to iteratively provide locally-relevant health evidence in different formats. Sources included routine and local data, and a new health economic model developed by academics to quantify health impacts of possible development scenarios. The embedded researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of practitioners involved in framework development (N=5, July, 2023 to September, 2023; average 46 min) to explore the evidence's influence on design decisions. Observational fieldnotes and meeting notes were also collected. Data were analysed using a framework approach and inductive thematic analysis. FindingsPractitioners used health evidence in three key ways: highlighting problems, e.g. noise and air pollution risks to future residents from busy roads; supporting good or aspirational designs, e.g. providing additional greenspaces; or considering competing issues, e.g. balancing housing, employment and climate resilience needs. The iterative and locally-relevant nature of the health evidence increased its value for practitioners, although health was not the main decision-making priority. InterpretationTailoring health evidence to fit local contexts, and working collaboratively to meet practitioners’ requirements for information at key decision points, can influence urban development plans to support health. This approach could be transferred to other local authorities. FundingThis work was funded as part of a multi-disciplinary research project called TRUUD (‘Tackling Root causes Upstream for Unhealthy Urban Development’). It was supported by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (award reference: MR/S037586/1), which is funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Natural Environment Research Council, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), The Health Foundation and Wellcome.
Read full abstract