This editorial refers to ‘Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention’, by A.D. Sloth et al . doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht369 Rapid restoration of coronary blood flow through primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI) remains the gold standard management of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). As the availability of primary interventional facilities has improved, door to balloon times have fallen and this has been rewarded with concomitant reductions in mortality and morbidity.1 The question remains, however, even with PPCI and the associated evolution of optimized medical therapy, of whether we doing absolutely everything to preserve the jeopardized myocardium. In the face of improved clinical outcomes, it may be difficult to envisage where any further improvement might come from. Rapid recanalization/reperfusion of an occluded epicardial artery is a paradoxical phenomenon due to its association with reperfusion-induced injury. Reperfusion is indispensable for reviving the myocardium at risk of necrosis, but the reintroduction of oxygen leads to the generation of damaging reactive oxygen species, whereas re-energization of the processes necessary to maintain cellular ion homeostasis leads to rapid intracellular alkalization, which, combined with intracellular and mitochondrial calcium overload, represent the ‘perfect storm’ for initiation of cell death signalling cascades.2 The extension of the myocardial infarct by reperfusion is not necessarily inevitable. An intervention known as ischaemic conditioning was recognized in animal models as early as 19863 and is capable of reducing infarct size in these models by up to 50%.4 Ischaemic conditioning, whereby brief, repetitive, non-injurious ischaemia, before (pre-conditioning), during …
Read full abstract